journal article·2025-07-15Open access

Deep Learning-Based Crack Detection on Cultural Heritage Surfaces

Wei-Che Huang, Yi-Shan Luo, Wen-Cheng Liu, Hong-Ming Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

This study employs a deep learning-based object detection model, GoogleNet, to identify cracks in cultural heritage images. Subsequently, a semantic segmentation model, SegNet, is utilized to determine the location and extent of the cracks. To establish a scale ratio between image pixels and real-world dimensions, a parallel laser-based measurement approach is applied, enabling precise crack length calculations. The results indicate that the percentage error between crack lengths estimated using deep learning and those measured with a caliper is approximately 3%, demonstrating the feasibility and reliability of the proposed method. Additionally, the study examines the impact of iteration count, image quantity, and image category on the performance of GoogleNet and SegNet. While increasing the number of iterations significantly improves the models’ learning performance in the early stages, excessive iterations lead to overfitting. The optimal performance for GoogleNet was achieved at 75 iterations, whereas SegNet reached its best performance after 45,000 iterations. Similarly, while expanding the training dataset enhances model generalization, an excessive number of images may also contribute to overfitting. GoogleNet exhibited optimal performance with a training set of 66 images, while SegNet achieved the best segmentation accuracy when trained with 300 images. Furthermore, the study investigates the effect of different crack image categories by classifying datasets into four groups: general cracks, plain wall cracks, mottled wall cracks, and brick wall cracks. The findings reveal that training GoogleNet and SegNet with general crack images yielded the highest model performance, whereas training with a single crack category substantially reduced generalization capability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering, National United University, Miaoli 360302, Taiwan

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Investigating diverse photogrammetric techniques in the hazard assessment of historical sites of the Museum of the Coal Basin Area in Będzin, Poland
2. Automatic crack detection and structural inspection of cultural heritage buildings using UAV photogrammetry and digital twin technology10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109952 ↗
3. Towards the contemporary conservation of cultural heritage: An overview of their conservation history10.3390/heritage7010009 ↗
4. Federal Highway Administration (1999). Study of LTPP Distress Data Variability, U.S. Department of Transportation.
5. Deep learning for concrete crack detection and measurement10.3390/metrology4010005 ↗
6. Peta, K., Stemp, W.J., Stocking, T., Chen, R., Love, G., Gleason, M.A., Houk, B.A., and Brown, C.A. (2025). Multiscale geometric characterization and discrimination of dermatoglyphs (fingerprints) and hardened clay—A novel archaeological application of Gelsight Max. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18132939 ↗
7. Zhang, H., Tan, J., Liu, L., Qiao, Q., Wu, J., Wang, Y., and Jie, L. (2017, January 20–22). Automatic crack inspection for concrete bridge bottom surfaces based on machine vision. Proceedings of the Chinese Automation Congress Conference (CAC), Jinan, China.10.1109/CAC.2017.8243654 ↗
8. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
9. Deep learning-based weathering type recognition in historical stone monuments10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.008 ↗
10. Luo, S., and Wang, H. (2024). Digital twin research on masonry-timber architectural heritage pathology cracks using 3D laser scanning and deep learning model. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14041129 ↗
11. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, H., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–8). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
12. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2014). Going deeper with convolutions. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
13. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
14. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks
15. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You Only Look Once: Unified, real-time object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
16. SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
17. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683 ↗
18. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation
19. Evaluation of deep learning computer version for water level measurements in rivers10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25989 ↗
20. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., and Girshick, R. (2017, January 22–29). Mask R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.322 ↗
21. Yang, G., Feng, W., Jin, J., Lei, Q., Li, X., Gui, G., and Wang, W. (2020, January 11–14). Face mask recognition system with YOLOv5 based on image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Computer and Communications, Chengdu, China.10.1109/ICCC51575.2020.9345042 ↗
22. Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.Y., and Liao, H.Y.M. (2020). YOLOv4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv.
23. Artificial intelligence-based automatic visual inspection system for built heritage10.1108/SASBE-09-2020-0139 ↗
24. Automated surface crack detection in historical constructions with various materials using deep learning-based YOLO network10.1080/15583058.2024.2376177 ↗
25. Li, Q., Zhang, G., and Yang, P. (2024). CL-YOLOv8: Crack detection algorithm for fair-faced walls based on deep learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14209421 ↗
26. Zhou, L., Jia, H., Jiang, S., Xu, F., Tang, H., Xiang, C., Wang, G., Zheng, H., and Chen, L. (2025). Multi-Scale crack detection and quantification of concrete bridges based on aerial photography and improved object detection network. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15071117 ↗
27. Lightweight bridge crack detection method based on SegNet and bottleneck deep-separable convolution with residuals10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3133712 ↗
28. Yu, G., Dong, J., Wang, Y., and Zhou, X. (2022). RUC-Net: A residual-Unet-based convolutional neural network for pixel-level pavement crack segmentation. Sensor, 23.10.3390/s23010053 ↗
29. Elhariri, E., El-Bendary, N., and Taie, S.A. (2022). Automated pixel-level deep crack segmentation on historical surfaces using U-Net models. Algorithms, 15.10.3390/a15080281 ↗
30. Investigation of crack segmentation and fast evaluation of crack propagation, based on deep learning10.1007/s11709-024-1040-z ↗
31. Shi, X., Song, W., and Sun, S. (2025, January 11–13). Multiscale feature fusion-based pavement crack detection using TransUNet. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environmental Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Technology, Zhengzhou, China.10.1117/12.3059437 ↗
32. Attard, L., Debono, C.J., Valentino, G., Castro, M.D., Masi, A., and Scibile, L. (2019, January 23–25). Automatic crack detection using Mask R-CNN. Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, Dubrovnik, Croatia.10.1109/ISPA.2019.8868619 ↗
33. Xu, X., Zhao, M., Shi, P., Ren, R., He, X., Wei, X., and Yang, H. (2022). Crack detection and comparison study based on Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22031215 ↗
34. Application of Mask R-CNN and YOLOv8 algorithms for concrete crack detection10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3469951 ↗
35. Surface crack detection based on imagine stitching and transfer learning with pretrained convolution neural network10.1002/stc.2766 ↗
36. GoogleNet transfer leaning with improved gorilla optimized kernel extreme learning machine for accurate detection of asphalt pavement cracks10.1177/14759217231215419 ↗
37. Automatic image-based brick segmentation and crack detection of masonry walls using machine learning10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104389 ↗
38. Golding, V.P., Gharineiat, Z., Munawar, H.S., and Ullah, F. (2022). Crack detection in concrete structures using deep learning. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14138117 ↗
39. Deep learning-based multi-scale crack image segmentation and improved skeletonization measurement method10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112727 ↗
40. Kompanets, A., Pai, G., Duits, R., Leonetti, D., and Snijder, B. (2024). Deep learning for segmentation of cracks in high-resolution images of steel bridges. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. arXiv.
41. Real-time high-resolution neural network with semantic guidance for crack segmentation10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105112 ↗
42. Real-time detection of cracks in tiled sidewalks using a YOLO-based method applied to unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104745 ↗
43. Lin, M., Chen, Q., and Yan, S. (2014, January 14–16). Network in network. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations Conference (ICLR), Banff, AB, Canada.
44. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2015, January 7–9). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations Conference (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA.
45. Zeiler, M.D., and Fergus, R. (2013). Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 ↗
46. Automated crack segmentation in close-range building façade inspection images using deep learning techniques10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102913 ↗
47. Measurement invariance investigation for performance of deep learning architectures10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3192468 ↗
48. Nurfarahin, A.A.S., Dziyauddin, R.A., and Norliza, M.N. (2023, January 5–7). Transfer learning with pre-trained CNNs for MRI brain tumor multi-classification: A comparative study of VGG, VGG19, and inception models. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 2nd National Biomedical Engineering Conference (NBEC), Melaka, Malaysia.
49. Gao, Q., Zhao, Y., and Tong, T. (2018, January 2–6). Image super-Resolution using knowledge distillation. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia.10.1007/978-3-030-20890-5_34 ↗
50. Concrete crack segmentation based on UAV-enabled edge computing10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.139 ↗
51. Wang, K., Zhuang, J., Li, G., Fang, C., Cheng, L., Lin, L., and Zhou, F. (2023, January 7–14). De-biased teacher: Rethinking IoU matching for semi-supervised object detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA.10.1609/aaai.v37i2.25355 ↗
52. Özgenel, Ç.F., and Gönenç Sorguç, A. (2018, January 20–25). Performance comparison of pretrained convolutional neural networks on crack detection in buildings. Proceedings of the ISARC 2018, Berlin, Germany.10.22260/ISARC2018/0094 ↗
53. DeepCrack: A deep hierarchical feature learning architecture for crack segmentation10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.036 ↗
54. Red blood cell classification using image processing and CNN10.1007/s42979-021-00458-2 ↗
55. Influence of X ray computed tomography (CT) exposure and reconstruction parameters on positron emission tomography (PET) quantitation10.1186/s40658-020-00331-w ↗
56. Impact of quality, type and volume of data used by deep learning models in the analysis of medical images10.1016/j.imu.2022.100911 ↗
57. MobileNetV3-BLS: A broad learning approach for automatic concrete surface crack detection10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131941 ↗
58. Tanveer, M., Kim, B., Hong, J., Sim, S.-H., and Cho, S. (2022). Comparative study of lightweight deep semantic segmentation models for concrete damage detection. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412786 ↗
59. Shojaei, D., Jafary, P., and Zhang, Z. (2024). Mixed reality-based concrete crack detection and skeleton extraction using deep learning and image processing. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13224426 ↗
60. Efficient pavement crack detection and classification using custom YOLOv7 model
61. Detecting cracks and spalling automatically in extreme events by end-to-end deep learning frameworks
62. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation
63. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks10.1111/mice.12263 ↗
64. Automatic recognition and analysis system of asphalt pavement cracks using interleaved low-rank group convolution hybrid deep network and SegNet fusing dense condition random field10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108693 ↗
65. A deep learning framework for real-time multi-task recognition and measurement of concrete cracks10.1016/j.aei.2025.103127 ↗
66. Pavement crack detection and recognition using the architecture of segNet