Hybrid Electrocoagulation with Al Electrodes Assisted by Magnet and Zeolite: How Effective Is It for Compost Wastewater Treatment?
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates an innovative hybrid treatment for compost-derived wastewater, combining aluminum-based electrocoagulation (EC), zeolite addition, and magnet assistance. Key experimental variables—presence/absence of magnet, stirring speed (250 and 350 rpm), and contact time (10–30 min)—were systematically varied to analyze process efficiency, electrode dissolution and mass loss, solid–liquid separation dynamics, and quantify energy input and Faraday efficiency (FE). Magnet-assisted processes achieved higher COD reduction at longer treatment times of 30 min and lower mixing speeds of 250 rpm, with up to 89.87%. The highest turbidity reduction of 98.59% is achieved after 20 min at 350 rpm. The magnetic field does not significantly affect the dissolution of Al electrodes, but over time, it helps reduce localized electrode damage, thereby supporting both process efficiency and electrode longevity. Magnetic fields improved sludge settling in shorter treatments by promoting faster aggregation. However, the energy input was generally higher with magnetic assistance. FE in the range of 50.89–65.82% indicates that the actual electrode loss is lower than theoretical. For the experiments conducted according to the L8 Taguchi experimental design, given the significance and contribution of factors to the process, the optimal combination is the absence of a magnet, 350 rpm, and 20 min.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced oxidation water treatment · Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 35, 21000 Split, Croatia
Funding
institutional funds of the Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Croatia
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Srivastav, A.L., Madhav, S., Bhardwaj, A.K., and Valsami, J. (2022). Challenges of Water Contamination in Urban Areas (Chapter 9), Elsevier. Current Directions in Water Scarcity Research.
2. Revolutionizing wastewater treatment toward circular economy and carbon neutrality goals: Pioneering sustainable and efficient solutions for automation and advanced process control with smart and cutting-edge technologies10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105486 ↗
3. Innovative approaches to sustainable wastewater treatment: A comprehensive exploration of conventional an emerging technologies10.1039/D4VA00136B ↗
4. A state-of-the-art review of the electrocoagulation technology for wastewater treatment10.1016/j.watcyc.2023.01.001 ↗
5. Application of Electrocoagulation In Various Wastewater And Leachate Treatment-A Review10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012052 ↗
6. Landfill leachate treatment technology via electrocoagulation: A review of operating parameters, intensification, and modelling10.5004/dwt.2022.28456 ↗
7. Recent progress in highly effective electrocoagulation-coupled systems for advanced wastewater treatment10.1016/j.isci.2025.111965 ↗
8. Investigation on operating parameters and cost using an electrocoagulation process for wastewater treatment10.1007/s13201-021-01517-y ↗
9. Electrocoagulation process with Fe/Al electrodes to eliminate pollutants from real and synthetic wastewater10.1016/j.rinma.2024.100606 ↗
10. Mao, Y., Zhao, Y., and Cotterill, S. (2023). Examining Current and Future Applications of Electrocoagulation in Wastewater Treatment. Water, 15.10.3390/w15081455 ↗
11. Electrocoagulation processes: A general review about role of electro-generated flocs in pollutant removal10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.048 ↗
12. Combination of electrocoagulation and adsorption processes to remove methyl orange from aqueous solution10.1016/j.eti.2021.102018 ↗
13. Integration of electrocoagulation, adsorption and wetland technology for jewelry industry wastewater treatment10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119690 ↗
14. Overview of integrated electrocoagulation-adsorption strategies for the removal of heavy metal pollutants from wastewater10.1007/s43938-024-00053-w ↗
15. Combining natural zeolite and electrocoagulation with different electrode materials–electrode surface analysis and Taguchi optimization10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100330 ↗
16. Vukojević Medvidović, N., Vrsalović, L., Svilović, S., and Bobanović, A. (2022). Electrocoagulation vs. Integrate Electrocoagulation-Natural Zeolite for Treatment of Biowaste Compost Leachate—Whether the Optimum Is Truly Optimal. Minerals, 12.10.3390/min12040442 ↗
17. Vukojević Medvidović, N., Vrsalović, L., Svilović, S., Magaš, K., Jozić, D., and Čović, A. (2023). Electrocoagulation Combined with Synthetic Zeolite—Does the Size of Zeolite Particles Matter?. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13091141 ↗
18. The impact of a magnetic field on electrode fouling during electrocoagulation10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135207 ↗
19. Unconventional applications of the magnetohydrodynamic effect in electrochemical systems10.1016/j.coelec.2023.101220 ↗
20. Sibiya, N.P., Amo-Duodu, G., Tetteh, E.K., and Rathilal, S. (2023). Magnetic Field Effect on Coagulation Treatment of Wastewater Using Magnetite Rice Starch and Aluminium Sulfate. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15010010 ↗
21. Assessing the efficacy of magnetic water treatment: A concise review and experimental investigation10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100369 ↗
22. Experimental Design of Electrocoagulation and Magnetic Technology for Enhancing Suspended Solids Removal from Synthetic Wastewater
23. Effect of permanent magnetic field on scale inhibition property of circulating water10.2166/wst.2017.357 ↗
24. Existing scale deposits removal by magnetic water treatment: Theoretical study and experiment10.16966/2381-5299.143 ↗
25. Reducing formation of CaCO3 scales of groundwater by magnetic treatment reducing formation of CaCO3 scales of groundwater by magnetic treatment
26. Effect of magnetic treatment on surface tension and water evaporation
27. Effect of permanent magnetic field on the properties of static water and germination of cucumber seeds10.14741/ijmcr.v6i01.10916 ↗
28. Magnetized irrigation water treatment for resolving salinity stress
29. Karabegovic, I., Kovačević, A., and Mandzuka, S. (2024). Magnetically Assisted Electrocoagulation Combined with Zeolite: Opportunities and Challenges in Compost Wastewater Treatment. New Technologies, Development and Application VII.NT 2024, Springer. Lecture Notes in Networks and, Systems.
30. Vukojević Medvidović, N., Vrsalović, L., Svilović, S., Gudić, S., and Čule, I. (2024). Sono- and Zeolite-Assisted Electrocoagulation for Compost Wastewater Treatment: Does Ultrasound Power Make a Difference?. Minerals, 14.10.3390/min14121190 ↗
31. Eaton, A.D., Clesceri, L.S., Rice, E.W., Greenberg, A.E., and Franson, M.A.H. (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Water Environment Federation (WEF). [21st ed.].
32. Kordala, N., and Wyszkowski, M. (2024). Zeolite Properties, Methods of Synthesis, and Selected Applications. Molecules, 29.10.3390/molecules29051069 ↗
33. Ni’am, M., Othman, F., Sohaili, J., and Fauzia, Z. (2006, January 24–25). Combined Magnetic Field and Electrocoagulation Process for Suspended Solid Removal from Wastewater. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Natural Resources Engineering & Technology, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
34. Operating cost analysis and treatment of domestic wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminium electrodes
35. Comparison of conventional coagulation and electrocoagulation methods for dewatering of coal preparation plant10.1016/j.mineng.2018.03.035 ↗
36. The Combined Implementation of Electrocoagulation and Adsorption Processes for the Treatment of Wastewaters10.3390/cleantechnol4040063 ↗