Vulnerability Assessment Framework for Physical Protection Systems Integrating Complex Networks and Fuzzy Petri Nets
Source abstract
Abstract
Modern physical protection systems (PPSs) play a pivotal role in safeguarding critical infrastructure and maintaining public safety. Yet increasingly complex system architectures and evolving threat landscapes pose significant vulnerability challenges to PPSs. Conventional vulnerability assessment methods predominantly rely on expert knowledge or single-path analysis, which inadequately captures complex inter-component relationships and the impact of uncertainties on PPS vulnerabilities. To bridge this gap, this paper introduces a hybrid analytical framework synergizing complex network theory with fuzzy Petri net (FPN). The proposed method operates through two integrated phases: (1) constructing topological models of PPS using complex network theory to characterize component interrelationships, and (2) incorporating FPN to establish vulnerability propagation models that simulate cascading effects and quantify overall system vulnerability. Compared with conventional methods, the proposed approach demonstrates superior effectiveness in identifying critical vulnerability points within the system, providing a scientifically grounded foundation for enhancing PPS security and implementing risk control measures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Information and Cyber Security
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Information and Cyber Security, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China
National Engineering Research Center of Classified Protection and Safeguard Technology for Cybersecurity, The Third Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security Shanghai, Shanghai 200030, China
Funding
Security Engineering Double First-Class Special Project of People’s Public Security University of China · Theoretical and Practical Research on Virtual Reality Technology in Public Safety Education and Training
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Using 3D model and simulation to support the force-on-force test of physical protection system10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074942 ↗
2. Effectiveness assessment of improvement measures in physical protection system monitoring center10.1515/KERN-2020-0026 ↗
3. Garcia, M.L. (2005). Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems, Elsevier.
4. Garcia, M.L. (2007). Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-055428-0.50005-1 ↗
5. Vintr, Z., Vintr, M., and Malach, J. (2012, January 15–18). Evaluation of physical protection system effectiveness. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST), Newton, MA, USA.10.1109/CCST.2012.6393532 ↗
6. A model-driven approach for vulnerability evaluation of modern physical protection systems10.1007/s10270-016-0572-7 ↗
7. Optimizing physical protection system using domain experienced exploration method
8. Physical protection system vulnerability assessment of a small nuclear research reactor due to TNT-shaped charge impact on its reinforced concrete wall10.1016/j.net.2021.12.009 ↗
9. Gregoire, O. (2023, January 4–7). The application of defence in depth in nuclear security. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual CNS Conference and 47th CNS/CNA Student Conference: Shifting the Paradigm of Thought, Saint John, NB, Canada.
10. Kapusta, J., Bauer, W., and Baranowski, J. (2023, January 22–25). Evaluation of the Effectiveness Of Physical Protection Systems with Consideration of its Cyber-Resilience. Proceedings of the 2023 27th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Międzyzdroje, Poland.10.1109/MMAR58394.2023.10242420 ↗
11. Yaseen, A.T., and Jarry, A.M. (2024, January 15–19). Designing a Physical Protection System for a Nuclear or Radiological Site or Facility (Threat Analysis and Evaluation). Proceedings of the 16th Arab Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Amman, Jordan.
12. The SAVI vulnerability assessment model
13. Snell, M.K. (2017). Multipath Very-Simplified Estimate of Adversary Sequence Interruption v. 2.1, 005477IBMPC00.
14. O’Connor, S.L., Whitehead, D.W., and Potter, C.S. (2007). Nuclear Power Plant Security Assessment Technical Manual, No. SAND2007-5591.10.2172/921722 ↗
15. Physical protection system effectiveness calculation in nuclear reactor facility using EASI code: Case study sabotage scenario10.1088/1742-6596/2072/1/012010 ↗
16. Evaluation of vulnerable path: Using heuristic path-finding algorithm in physical protection system of nuclear power plant10.1016/j.ijcip.2018.08.006 ↗
17. An adaptive probabilistic mapping matrix search algorithm for vulnerability analysis of PPS10.1016/j.anucene.2019.04.013 ↗
18. Optimization of communication probability in effectiveness evaluation of physical protection system10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046037 ↗
19. A detection and defense security system design for nuclear waste storage against stealth terrorists attack10.1515/kern-2024-0014 ↗
20. Risk analysis and protection in case of intrusion of nuclear facilities10.1515/kern-2024-0142 ↗
21. A 3D most vulnerable path search method for physical protection systems based on the EASI model10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3545264 ↗
22. Robustness and resilience of complex networks10.1038/s42254-023-00676-y ↗
23. A review of graph and complex network theory in water distribution networks: Mathematical foundation, application and prospects10.1016/j.watres.2024.121238 ↗
24. Conflicting evidence fusion using a correlation coefficient-based approach in complex network10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114087 ↗
25. Networked knowledge and complex networks: An engineering view10.1109/JAS.2022.105737 ↗
26. Complex network topology of transportation systems10.1080/01441647.2013.848955 ↗
27. Porta, S., Latora, V., and Crucitti, P. (2012). The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning, SAGE Publications Ltd.
28. Li, J.J. (2023). Research on Construction Method and Application of Complex Public Transport Network Model. [Master’s Thesis, Dalian Maritime University].
29. Network science10.1002/aris.2007.1440410119 ↗
30. Vulnerability analysis method for complex networks based on node importance
31. Applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in safety, reliability, and risk assessments: A review10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.009 ↗
32. Comprehensive risk evaluation of long-distance oil and gas transportation pipelines using a fuzzy Petri net model10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.052 ↗
33. A weighted fuzzy Petri-net based approach for security risk assessment in the chemical industry10.1016/j.ces.2017.09.002 ↗
34. A synergy-effect-incorporated fuzzy Petri net modeling paradigm with application in risk assessment10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117037 ↗
35. Comprehensive evaluation of intrinsic safety of railway facilities and equipment based on improved cloud model-fuzzy Petri net
36. Airspace Safety Assessment and Risk Estimation based on the Fuzzy Petri Net Model with Multi-Risk Factor Analysis10.1177/03611981241283460 ↗
37. Knowledge acquisition and representation using fuzzy evidential reasoning and dynamic adaptive fuzzy Petri nets10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2223671 ↗
38. Modeling, reasoning, and application of fuzzy Petri net model: A survey10.1007/s10462-022-10161-0 ↗
39. Xu, X.G., Shi, H., Xu, D.H., and Liu, H.C. (2019). Picture fuzzy Petri nets for knowledge representation and acquisition in considering conflicting opinions. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9050983 ↗
40. (2018). Technical Standard for Security Engineering (Standard No. GB 50348-2018).
41. (2012). Guide for Inspection of Physical Protection of Military Nuclear Materials (Standard No. GJB 7674-2012).
42. (2007). Guide for Access Control of Physical Protection System of Military Nuclear Material (Standard No. GJB 6118-2007).
43. (2013). Technical Requirements for Face Recognition System For Access Control (Standard No. GAT 1093-2013).
44. (2017). Video and Image Analysis System for Public Security—Part 1: General Technical Requirements (Standard No. GAT 1399.1-2017).
45. (2017). Video and Image Analysis System for Public Security—Part 2: Technical Specifications for Analysis and Description of Video and Image Content (Standard No. GAT 1399.2-2017).
46. (2012). Technical Requirements for Access Control Devices in Parking Lots (Standard No. GAT 992-2012).