Soil Mercury Pollution in Nature-Based Solutions Across Various Land Uses: A Review of Trends, Treatment Outcomes, and Future Directions
Source abstract
Abstract
Mercury (Hg) contamination in soils poses significant environmental risks. In response, various nature-based solutions (NbSs) have been developed and studied in the past to treat mercury along with other heavy metals from both point and nonpoint sources. However, various land uses present uncertainties in mercury mobility and treatment efficiency, affecting the scalability of NbS systems. In this study, a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles addressing mercury pollution in NbS soils was conducted. Results revealed that lakeside environments and mining areas are key Hg accumulation zones due to hydrological connectivity and anthropogenic pressures. Constructed wetlands were the most studied NbSs, where those with Acorus calamus and Aquarius palifolius as the main vegetation achieved >90% Hg removal efficiencies. Although NbSs achieved high Hg removal, anaerobic conditions were found to promote MeHg formation, a critical drawback. Moreover, biochar demonstrated potential for immobilizing Hg and reducing bioavailability, though certain types increased MeHg formation under specific redox conditions. Overall, the study highlighted the need for site-specific design, long-term field evaluation, and multidisciplinary strategies to optimize NbS performance for mercury removal. Furthermore, future research on the scalability of mercury-treating NbSs across diverse land uses is recommended to address mercury risks and improve effectiveness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mercury impact and mitigation studies · Heavy metals in environment · Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Republic of Korea
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. Pochodyła-Ducka, E., Glińska-Lewczuk, K., and Jaszczak, A. (2023). Changes in Stormwater Quality and Heavy Metals Content along the Rainfall–Runoff Process in an Urban Catchment. Water, 15.10.3390/w15193505 ↗
2. Removal of Heavy Metals from Urban Stormwater Runoff Using Different Filter Materials10.1016/j.jece.2013.12.020 ↗
3. Elwaleed, A., Jeong, H.H., Abdelbagi, A.H., Quynh, N.T., Agusa, T., Ishibashi, Y., and Arizono, K. (2024). Human Health Risk Assessment from Mercury-Contaminated Soil and Water in Abu Hamad Mining Market, Sudan. Toxics, 12.10.3390/toxics12020112 ↗
4. The Human Health Risks Assessment of Mercury in Soils and Plantains from Farms in Selected Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Communities around Obuasi, Ghana10.1002/jat.4209 ↗
5. A Review on the Distribution of Hg in the Environment and Its Human Health Impacts10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.031 ↗
6. Anderson, V., and Gough, W.A. (2022). A Typology of Nature-Based Solutions for Sustainable Development: An Analysis of Form, Function, Nomenclature, and Associated Applications. Land, 11.10.3390/land11071072 ↗
7. Sun, C., Rao, Q., Chen, B., Liu, X., Ikram, R.M.A., Li, J., Wang, M., and Zhang, D. (2024). Mechanisms and Applications of Nature-Based Solutions for Stormwater Control in the Context of Climate Change: A Review. Atmosphere, 15.10.3390/atmos15040403 ↗
8. A Review of Green Remediation Strategies for Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil10.1111/sum.12717 ↗
9. Urban Stormwater Nutrient and Metal Removal in Small-Scale Green Infrastructure: Exploring Engineered Plant Biofilter Media Optimisation10.2166/wst.2021.353 ↗
10. A Global Perspective on the Nature and Fate of Heavy Metals Polluting Water Ecosystems, and Their Impact and Remediation10.1080/10643389.2024.2317112 ↗
11. Bioremediation of Mercury Contaminated Soil and Water: A Review10.1002/ldr.4989 ↗
12. Carbon and Mercury Burial in Mangrove Soils across an Anthropogenic Gradient10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109226 ↗
13. Mercury in Wetlands over 60 Years: Research Progress and Emerging Trends10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161862 ↗
14. Mercury Speciation, Transformation, and Transportation in Soils, Atmospheric Flux, and Implications for Risk Management: A Critical Review10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.019 ↗
15. Zong, J., Zhang, H., Li, X., Bai, X., Hu, Y., Cui, D., Wang, Z., and Zhang, G. (2024). Process of Mercury Accumulation in Urban Strip River Artificial Wetland Ecosystems: A Case Study of Changchun, a Typical Industrial City in Northeast China. Front. Plant Sci., 15.10.3389/fpls.2024.1392904 ↗
16. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 ↗
17. Breucker, P., Cointet, J., Hannud Abdo, A., Orsal, G., de Quatrebarbes, C., Duong, T., Martinez, C., Ospina Delgado, J., Medina Zuluaga, L., and Gómez Peña, D. (2025, April 26). CorTexT Manager. Available online: https://docs.cortext.net.
18. A Study of Heavy Metal Pollution in China: Current Status, Pollution-Control Policies and Countermeasures10.3390/su6095820 ↗
19. Forest Harvest Contribution to Boreal Freshwater Methyl Mercury Load10.1002/2015GB005316 ↗
20. Effects of Disturbance and Vegetation Type on Total and Methylmercury in Boreal Peatland and Forest Soils10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.029 ↗
21. Environmental and Biological Factors Are Joint Drivers of Mercury Biomagnification in Subarctic Lake Food Webs along a Climate and Productivity Gradient10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146261 ↗
22. Zhang, X., Lu, Z., Chen, F., Li, B., and Yang, C. (2024). Non-Lethal Sampling of Phalanges for Heavy Metal Bioaccumulation in Pelophylax Nigromaculatus from Historical Mercury Mining Areas in Southwestern China. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-81621-6 ↗
23. Distribution Pattern of Mercury in the Slovenian Soil: Geochemical Mapping Based on Multiple Geochemical Datasets10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.05.005 ↗
24. Mercury Pollution in the Lake Sediments and Catchment Soils of Anthropogenically-Disturbed Sites across England10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.012 ↗
25. Yang, X., Leng, M., Ge, X., Wu, X., Liu, H., Lin, G., Huang, Z., and Chen, Y. (2024). Characterization and Risk Assessment of Nutrient and Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Sediments of Representative Lakes in Yangxin County, China. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16062252 ↗
26. Spatial Distribution and Pollution Assessment of Mercury in Sediments of Lake Taihu, China10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60033-3 ↗
27. Characterization of Soils from an Industrial Complex Contaminated with Elemental Mercury10.1016/j.envres.2013.03.013 ↗
28. Mercury Emission from Industrially Contaminated Soils in Relation to Chemical, Microbial, and Meteorological Factors10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.093 ↗
29. Soil Aggregate–Associated Mercury (Hg) and Organic Carbon Distribution and Microbial Community Characteristics under Typical Farmland–Use Types10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129987 ↗
30. Factors and Mechanisms Driving Among-Lake Variability of Mercury Concentrations in a Benthivorous Fish in the Canadian Subarctic10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144078 ↗
31. Zhang, T., Hu, Y., Wu, J., Yin, S., Huang, J., Huang, W., Huang, H., and Zhang, G. (2024). Characteristics and Risk Assessments of Mercury Pollution in a County Region Undergoing Industrialization in Northeastern China: A Case Study in Gongzhuling. Front. Environ. Sci., 12.10.3389/fenvs.2024.1440426 ↗
32. Gilbreath, A., McKee, L., Shimabuku, I., Lin, D., Werbowski, L.M., Zhu, X., Grbic, J., and Rochman, C. (2019). Multiyear Water Quality Performance and Mass Accumulation of PCBs, Mercury, Methylmercury, Copper, and Microplastics in a Bioretention Rain Garden. J. Sustain. Water Built Environ., 5.10.1061/JSWBAY.0000883 ↗
33. Measurements of Nutrients and Mercury in Green Roof and Gravel Roof Runoff10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.030 ↗
34. Costs and Benefits of Constructed Wetlands for Meeting New Water Quality Standards from China’s Wastewater Treatment Plants10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107248 ↗
35. Mercury Pollution from Irrigation with Treated Sewage Water (TSW)10.2166/wh.2007.027 ↗
36. Mercury in Soils of Three Agricultural Experimental Stations with Long-Term Fertilization in China10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.052 ↗
37. Influence of Irrigation Water and Soil on Annual Mercury Dynamics in Sacramento Valley Rice Fields10.1002/jeq2.20557 ↗
38. Synergetic Effect of Pyrrhotite and Zero-Valent Iron on Hg(Ⅱ) Removal in Constructed Wetland: Mechanisms of Electron Transfer and Microbial Reaction10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136041 ↗
39. Ma, Y., Wang, G., Wang, Y., Dai, W., and Luan, Y. (2021). Mercury Uptake and Transport by Plants in Aquatic Environments: A Meta-Analysis. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11198829 ↗
40. Mercury Sequestration and Transformation in Chemically Enhanced Treatment Wetlands10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.144 ↗
41. Mercury Removal, Methylmercury Formation, and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Profiles in Wetland Mesocosms10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00135-7 ↗
42. Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Anoxic Estuarine Sediment10.1128/aem.50.2.498-502.1985 ↗
43. Methylmercury Concentrations and Production Rates across a Trophic Gradient in the Northern Everglades10.1023/A:1005972708616 ↗
44. Removal of Mercury from Gold Mine Effluents Using Limnocharis Flava in Constructed Wetlands10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.130 ↗
45. Mercury Removal by Aquarius Palifolius (Nees & Mart.) Christenh. & Byng: Isotherms Model, Superoxide Dismutase Activity, and Chlorophyll Content10.1016/j.wsee.2024.10.001 ↗
46. Mercury Removal from Mining Wastewater by Phytoaccumulation in Autochthonous Aquatic Plant Species10.3390/cleantechnol5030041 ↗
47. Effects of Dryout and Inflow Water Quality on Mercury Methylation in a Constructed Wetland10.1007/s11270-014-1929-6 ↗
48. Above- and Belowground Plant Mercury Dynamics in a Salt Marsh Estuary in Massachusetts, USA10.5194/bg-21-1461-2024 ↗
49. Removal of Mercury from Water by Phytoremediation Process with Salvinia natans(L.) All10.1007/s11356-023-27533-w ↗
50. Phytoremediation of Mercury from Water by Monocultures and Mixed Cultures Pleustophytes10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103529 ↗
51. Mercury Contents in Aquatic Macrophytes from Two Reservoirs in the Paraíba do Sul: Guandú River System, SE Brazil10.1590/S1519-69842006000100013 ↗
52. Frey, B., Rast, B.M., Qi, W., Stierli, B., and Brunner, I. (2022). Long-Term Mercury Contamination Does Not Affect the Microbial Gene Potential for C and N Cycling in Soils but Enhances Detoxification Gene Abundance. Front. Microbiol., 13.10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034138 ↗
53. Leclerc, M., Harrison, M.C., Storck, V., Planas, D., Amyot, M., and Walsh, D.A. (2021). Microbial Diversity and Mercury Methylation Activity in Periphytic Biofilms at a Run-of-River Hydroelectric Dam and Constructed Wetlands. mSphere, 6.10.1128/mSphere.00021-21 ↗
54. Evaluation of Small-Scale Constructed Wetland for Water Quality and Hg Transformation10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.077 ↗
55. Efficient Treatment of Mercury(Ⅱ)-Containing Wastewater in Aerated Constructed Wetland Microcosms Packed with Biochar10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133302 ↗
56. Du, J., Ren, Y., Li, J., Zhang, S., Huang, H., and Liu, J. (2023). The Study on the Effect of Mercury Pollution on Soil Microorganisms around Mercury Mining Area. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-48932-6 ↗
57. Management Strategies to Reduce Microbial Mercury Methylation in Constructed Wetlands: Potential Routes and Future Challenges10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138009 ↗
58. Field-Aged Rice Hull Biochar Stimulated the Methylation of Mercury and Altered the Microbial Community in a Paddy Soil under Controlled Redox Condition Changes10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134446 ↗
59. Evaluation of Engineered Sorbents for the Sorption of Mercury from Contaminated Bank Soils: A Column Study10.1007/s11356-020-12073-4 ↗
60. Use of Biochar to Reduce Mercury Accumulation in Oryza Sativa L: A Trial for Sustainable Management of Historically Polluted Farmlands10.1016/j.envint.2021.106527 ↗
61. Rice Hull Biochar Enhances the Mobilization and Methylation of Mercury in a Soil under Changing Redox Conditions: Implication for Hg Risks Management in Paddy Fields10.1016/j.envint.2022.107484 ↗
62. Control of Mercury and Methylmercury in Contaminated Sediments Using Biochars: A Long-Term Microcosm Study10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.02.004 ↗
63. Modified Biochar Enhances Soil Fertility and Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Rice in Mercury-Contaminated Soil10.1016/j.eti.2023.103435 ↗
64. Impact of Biochar on Mobilization, Methylation, and Ethylation of Mercury under Dynamic Redox Conditions in a Contaminated Floodplain Soil10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.040 ↗
65. Mercury Contaminated Sediment Sites-An Evaluation of Remedial Options10.1016/j.envres.2013.01.007 ↗
66. Remediation of Mercury Contaminated Soil, Water, and Air: A Review of Emerging Materials and Innovative Technologies10.1016/j.envint.2019.105281 ↗
67. Ganguly, M., Dib, S., and Ariya, P.A. (2018). Fast, Cost-Effective and Energy Efficient Mercury Removal-Recycling Technology. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-34172-6 ↗
68. Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of Bioretention on Stormwater in Response to Climate Change and Urbanization for Future Scenarios10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.019 ↗
69. Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of Specific LID Practice Designs in Response to Large Storm Events10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.011 ↗
70. Biochar-Based Water Treatment Systems as a Potential Low-Cost and Sustainable Technology for Clean Water Provision10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.087 ↗
71. The Costs and Benefits of Biochar Production and Use: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137138 ↗
72. Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Minamata Convention on Mercury: Principles and Recommendations for Next Steps10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.001 ↗
73. Maha, M.M., Matsuyama, A., Arima, T., and Sainoki, A. (2024). Assessment of Total Mercury Levels Emitted from ASGM into Soil and Groundwater in Chami Town, Mauritania. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16187992 ↗
74. Modelling Mercury Concentration in Ghanaian Soil10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135553 ↗
75. Mulenga, M., Ouma, K.O., Monde, C., and Syampungani, S. (2024). Aquatic Mercury Pollution from Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status, Impacts, and Interventions. Water, 16.10.3390/w16050756 ↗