journal article·2025-06-06Open access

Evaluating Soil Bacteria for the Development of New Biopreparations with Agricultural Applications

Patrycja Rowińska, Marcin Sypka, Aneta M. Białkowska, Maria Stryjek, Adriana Nowak, Regina Janas, Beata Gutarowska, Justyna Szulc

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 12

Abstract

This study evaluates various strains of soil bacterial for use in the development of new biopreparations. Mesophilic spore-forming bacteria were isolated from cultivated soil and analysed for their enzymatic activity, ability to decompose crop residues, and antagonistic properties towards selected phytopathogens. Notably, this is the first cytotoxicity assessment of soil bacterial metabolites on Spodoptera frugiperda Sf-9 (fall armyworm). Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus velezensis, Paenibacillus amylolyticus, and Prestia megaterium demonstrated the highest hydrolytic potential for the degradation of post-harvest residues from maize, winter barley, and triticale. They exhibited antimicrobial activity against at least three of the tested phytopathogens and demonstrated the ability to solubilize phosphorus. Metabolites of B. licheniformis (IC50 = 8.3 mg/mL) and B. subtilis (IC50 = 144.9 mg/mL) were the most cytotoxic against Sf-9. We recommend the use of the tested strains in industrial practice as biocontrol agents, plant growth biostimulants, crop residue decomposition stimulants, and bioinsecticides. Future studies should focus on assessing the efficacy of using these strains under conditions simulating the target use, such as plant microcosms and greenhouses and the impact of these strains on the abundance and biodiversity of native soil microbiota. This research can serve as a model procedure for screening other strains of bacteria for agricultural purposes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enzyme Production and Characterization · Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology · Food Industry and Aquatic Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wólczańska 171/173, 90-530 Łódź, Poland

Interdisciplinary Doctoral School, Lodz University of Technology, Żeromskiego 116, 90-924 Łódź, Poland

Institute of Molecular and Industrial Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, B. Stefanowskiego 2/22, 90-537 Łódź, Poland

The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland

Funding

The Agency for Restructuring and Modernisation of Agriculture, Poland

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. European Commission (2024, July 14). European Commission COM(2019)640. Available online: https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vl4cnhyp1ort.
2. European Commission (2024, July 14). European Commission COM(2020)380. Available online: https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vl8tqb8jwtyy.
3. European Commission (2024, July 14). European Commission COM(2020)381. Available online: https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vl8tofp7dtuc.
4. Solid-state fermentation in an earthen vessel: Trichoderma viride spore-based biopesticide production using maize cobs10.1016/j.funbio.2023.06.007 ↗
5. Rowińska, P., Gutarowska, B., Janas, R., and Szulc, J. (2024). Biopreparations for the decomposition of crop residues. Microb. Biotechnol., 17.10.1111/1751-7915.14534 ↗
6. Review report on the role of bioproducts, biopreparations, biostimulants, and microbial inoculants in organic production of fruit10.1007/s11157-019-09500-5 ↗
7. Bacterial biopreparations-a ‘green revolution’ for agriculture
8. Marwal, A., Srivastava, A.K., and Gaur, R.K. (2022). Plant viruses as biopesticides. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-85577-8.00002-0 ↗
9. Steglińska, A., Bekhter, A., Wawrzyniak, P., Kunicka-Styczyńska, A., Jastrząbek, K., Fidler, M., Śmigielski, K., and Gutarowska, B. (2022). Antimicrobial activities of plant extracts against Solanum tuberosum L. phytopathogens. Molecules, 27.10.3390/molecules27051579 ↗
10. Chakraborty, N., Mitra, R., Pal, S., Ganguly, R., Acharya, K., Minkina, T., Sarkar, A., and Keswani, C. (2023). Biopesticide consumption in India: Insights into the current trends. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13030557 ↗
11. Response of biofertilizers and foliar application of zinc on yield and economics of lentil (Lens culinaris, Fabaceae)10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92325 ↗
12. Upadhyay, H., Banik, D., Aslam, M., and Singh, J. (2021). Beneficial microbiomes for sustainable agriculture: An ecofriendly approach. Current Trends in Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-6949-4_10 ↗
13. Influence of biofertilizers and nitrogen on yield and economics of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i173199 ↗
14. Anli, M., Ait-El-Mokhtar, M., Akensous, F.-Z., Boutasknit, A., Ben-Laouane, R., Fakhech, A., Ouhaddou, R., Raho, O., and Meddich, A. (2023). Biofertilizers in date palm cultivation. Date Palm, CABI.10.1079/9781800620209.0009 ↗
15. Nano-biofertilizers synthesis and applications in agroecosystems10.3390/agrochemicals2010009 ↗
16. Singh, M., Kumar, A., Singh, R., and Pandey, K.D. (2017). Endophytic bacteria: A new source of bioactive compounds. 3 Biotech, 7.10.1007/s13205-017-0942-z ↗
17. Kumar, S., Sindhu, S.S., and Kumar, R. (2022). Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Curr. Res. Microbiol., 3.10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094 ↗
18. Cirillo, A., De Luca, L., Graziani, G., Cepparulo, M., El-Nakhel, C., Giordano, M., Rouphael, Y., Ritieni, A., Romano, R., and Di Vaio, C. (2022). Biostimulants application on Olea europaea L. in Mediterranean conditions increases the production and bioactive compounds of drupes and oil. Agriculture, 12.10.3390/agriculture12122173 ↗
19. Effect of plant biostimulants on growth, yield, and some mineral composition of broccoli plants (Brassica oleracea var. italica)
20. Malécange, M., Sergheraert, R., Teulat, B., Mounier, E., Lothier, J., and Sakr, S. (2023). Biostimulant properties of protein hydrolysates: Recent advances and future challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24119714 ↗
21. Evaluation of biostimulants based on recovered protein hydrolysates from animal by-products as plant growth enhancers10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001104 ↗
22. Exploring microbes for their cellulolytic and lignolytic enzyme activity for manure preparation10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.438 ↗
23. Grzyb, A., Wolna-Maruwka, A., and Niewiadomska, A. (2020). Environmental factors affecting the mineralization of crop residues. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10121951 ↗
24. Suitability of vermicomposting for different varieties of organic waste: A systematic literature review (2012–2021)10.1007/s13165-022-00413-2 ↗
25. Significance of harvest residues in sustainable management of arable land I. Decomposition of harvest residues
26. Decomposition of Eucalyptus sp. and Pinus taeda harvest residues under controlled temperature and moisture conditions
27. Hellequin, E., Monard, C., Quaiser, A., Henriot, M., Klarzynski, O., and Binet, F. (2018). Specific recruitment of soil bacteria and fungi decomposers following a biostimulant application increased crop residues mineralization. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0209089 ↗
28. Setlow, P., and Christie, G. (2023). New thoughts on an old topic: Secrets of bacterial spore resistance slowly being revealed. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 87.10.1128/mmbr.00080-22 ↗
29. Szulc, J., Okrasa, M., Nowak, A., Ryngajłło, M., Nizioł, J., Kuźniar, A., Ruman, T., and Gutarowska, B. (2024). Uncontrolled Post-Industrial Land-Source of Metals, Potential Toxic Compounds, Dust, and Pathogens in Environment-A Case Study. Molecules, 29.10.3390/molecules29071496 ↗
30. Plant biomass as a source of low-temperature yeasts10.15376/biores.18.1.599-612 ↗
31. Comparison of methods for identification of microbial communities in book collections: Culture-dependent (sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS) and culture-independent (Illumina MiSeq)
32. Gerlicz, W., Sypka, M., Jodłowska, I., and Białkowska, A.M. (2024). Isolation, Selection, and Identification of Keratinolytic Bacteria for Green Management of Keratin Waste. Molecules, 29.10.3390/molecules29143380 ↗
33. Steglińska, A., Kołtuniak, A., Motyl, I., Berłowska, J., Czyżowska, A., Cieciura-Włoch, W., Okrasa, M., Kręgiel, D., and Gutarowska, B. (2022). Lactic acid bacteria as biocontrol agents against potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) pathogens. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157763 ↗
34. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species
35. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their efficiency on the growth of maize10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.06.005 ↗
36. Steglińska, A., Nowak, A., Janas, R., Grzesik, M., Śmigielski, K., Kręgiel, D., and Gutarowska, B. (2024). Chitosan as an antimicrobial, anti-insect, and growth-promoting agent for potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants. Molecules, 29.10.3390/molecules29143313 ↗
37. Microbiological and toxicological hazard assessment in a waste sorting plant and proper respiratory protection10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114257 ↗
38. Saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass using an enzymatic cocktail from marine bacteria10.1080/17597269.2024.2395166 ↗
39. Characterization of a GH8 β-1,4-Glucanase from Bacillus subtilis B111 and Its Saccharification Potential for Agricultural Straws10.4014/jmb.2105.05026 ↗
40. Woźniak, M., Ratajczak, I., Wojcieszak, D., Waśkiewicz, A., Szentner, K., Przybył, J., Borysiak, S., and Goliński, P. (2021). Chemical and Structural Characterization of Maize Stover Fractions in Aspect of Its Possible Applications. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14061527 ↗
41. Multienzyme production by Bacillus velezensis strains isolated from fruit residues in submerged fermentation using triticale and sugarcane bagasse in the cultivation media10.1016/j.procbio.2024.03.003 ↗
42. Fractionation of triticale, wheat, barley, oats, canola, and mustard straws for the production of carbohydrates and lignins10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.071 ↗
43. FDA (2025, May 30). Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/generally-recognized-safe-gras/gras-notice-inventory.
44. EFSA (2025, May 30). Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/qualified-presumption-safety-qps.
45. European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2000). Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work. Off. J. Eur. Communities, L262, 21–45.
46. Keeping up with the Bacillus cereus group: Taxonomy through the genomics era and beyond10.1080/10408398.2021.1916735 ↗
47. Manzulli, V., Rondinone, V., Buchicchio, A., Serrecchia, L., Cipolletta, D., Fasanella, A., Parisi, A., Difato, L., Iatarola, M., and Aceti, A. (2021). Discrimination of Bacillus cereus Group Members by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. Microorganisms, 9.10.3390/microorganisms9061202 ↗
48. The Bacillus cereus Group: Bacillus Species with Pathogenic Potential
49. A multiplex real-time PCR for identifying and differentiating B. anthracis virulent types10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.039 ↗
50. Diagnostic challenges within the Bacillus cereus-group: Finding the beast without teeth10.1016/j.nmni.2022.101040 ↗
51. Plant growth-promoting bacteria and exogenous phytohormones alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress in pigeon pea plants10.1007/s11104-023-06155-8 ↗
52. Enhancement of disease resistance, growth potential, and biochemical markers in maize plants by inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria under biotic stress10.1007/s42161-023-01338-9 ↗
53. Mondal, S., Santra, S., Rakshit, S., Kumar, S., Hossain, M., and Chandra Mondal, K. (2022). Saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass using an enzymatic cocktail of fungal origin and successive production of butanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Bioresour. Technol., 343.10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126093 ↗
54. Transporters of glucose and other carbohydrates in bacteria10.1007/s00424-020-02379-0 ↗
55. Wu, Y., Guo, H., Rahman, M.S., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., and Qin, W. (2021). Biological pretreatment of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis using Bacillus sp. P3. Bioresour. Bioprocess., 8.10.1186/s40643-021-00445-8 ↗
56. Influence of microbial inoculants on co-composting of lignocellulosic crop residues with farm animal manure: A review10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114088 ↗
57. The decomposition of various types of crop residues by strains Bacillus subtilis IMB B-7516 and B. licheniformis IMB B-751510.15407/microbiolj78.02.052 ↗
58. Biodegradation of organic waste using Bacillus species isolated from soil10.3126/ijasbt.v10i2.44303 ↗
59. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: An incredible role for plant supplements
60. Pang, F., Li, Q., Solanki, M.K., Wang, Z., Xing, Y.-X., and Dong, D.-F. (2024). Soil phosphorus transformation and plant uptake driven by phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms. Front. Microbiol., 15.10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383813 ↗
61. Bedine, M.A.B., Iacomi, B., Nguemezi Tchameni, S., Sameza, M.L., and Boyom Fekam, F. (2022). Harnessing the phosphate-solubilizing ability of Trichoderma strains to improve plant growth, phosphorus uptake, and photosynthetic pigment contents in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 45.10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102510 ↗
62. Ferreira, A.P., Oliveira, J.A.d.S., Polonio, J.C., Pamphile, J.A., and Azevedo, J.L. (2023). Recombinants of Alternaria alternata endophytes enhance inorganic phosphate solubilization and plant growth hormone production. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 51.10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102784 ↗
63. Phosphate solubilization by Bacillus isolates and its influence in a cyanobacterial co-culture
64. Mosela, M., Andrade, G., Massucato, L.R., Almeida, S.R.d.A., Nogueira, A.F., Lima Filho, R.B.d., Zeffa, D.M., Teixeira, G.M., Shimizu, G.D., and Gonçalves, L.S.A. (2022). Bacillus velezenis strain Ag75 as a new multifunctional agent for biocontrol, phosphate solubilization, and growth promotion in maize and soybean crops. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-19515-8 ↗
65. Identification and characterization of inorganic-phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from agricultural fields with a rapid isolation method10.1186/s13568-018-0575-6 ↗
66. In situ solubilization of phosphorus-bearing raw materials by Bacillus megaterium10.1002/elsc.201600191 ↗
67. Production of phosphorus biofertilizer based on the renewable materials in large laboratory scale10.1515/chem-2019-0057 ↗
68. Saeid, A., Prochownik, E., and Dobrowolska-Iwanek, J. (2018). Phosphorus solubilization by Bacillus species. Molecules, 23.10.3390/molecules23112897 ↗
69. Phosphate solubilization of Paenibacillus polymyxa and Paenibacillus macerans from mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal cucumber plants
70. Increasing the bioavailability of phosphate by using microorganisms10.1155/2022/4305501 ↗
71. Effect of temperature on the ability of Pseudomonas stutzeri bacteria isolated from different sources to fix nitrogen10.55544/jrasb.1.3.33 ↗
72. Haskett, T.L., and Poole, P.S. (2021). A Simple Assay for Quantification of Plant-Associative Bacterial Nitrogen Fixation, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.10.1101/2021.03.31.437999 ↗
73. An alternative approach to “Identification of Unknowns”: Designing a protocol to verify the identities of nitrogen-fixing bacteria10.1128/jmbe.v16i2.973 ↗
74. Javid, H., ul Qadir, R., Rashid, S., Rashid, K., Magray, J.A., Islam, T., Wani, B.A., Gulzar, S., and Nawchoo, I.A. (2022). Biological nitrogen fixation. Advances in Plant Nitrogen Metabolism, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003248361-10 ↗
75. Jain, S., Varma, A., and Choudhary, D.K. (2021). Perspectives on nitrogen-fixing Bacillus species. Advances in Plant Nitrogen Metabolism, CRC Press.10.1007/978-3-030-71206-8_18 ↗
76. Nitrogen fixing potential of various heterotrophic Bacillus strains from a tropical estuary and adjacent coastal regions10.1002/jobm.201700072 ↗
77. Effect of culture conditions on nitrogen-fixing activity of bacteria isolated from cassava cultivated soils of Vietnam10.15625/2615-9023/15820 ↗
78. Paenibacillus brasilensis sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing species isolated from the maize rhizosphere in Brazil10.1099/00207713-52-6-2147 ↗
79. Wang, L., Zhang, L., Liu, Z., Zhao, D., Liu, X., Zhang, B., Xie, J., Hong, Y., Li, P., and Chen, S. (2013). Correction: A minimal nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Paenibacillus sp. WLY78 enables expression of active nitrogenase in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet., 9.10.1371/annotation/1e9bcb70-265a-4383-abf4-3466d144d56e ↗
80. Hazarika, D.J., Goswami, G., Gautom, T., Parveen, A., Das, P., Barooah, M., and Boro, R.C. (2019). Lipopeptide mediated biocontrol activity of endophytic Bacillus subtilis against fungal phytopathogens. BMC Microbiol., 19.10.1186/s12866-019-1440-8 ↗
81. Evaluation of biocontrol Bacillus species on plant growth promotion and systemic-induced resistant potential against bacterial and fungal wilt-causing pathogens10.1007/s00203-020-01891-2 ↗
82. Genomic and chemical diversity of Bacillus subtilis secondary metabolites against plant pathogenic fungi10.1128/mSystems.00770-20 ↗
83. Isolation and identification of rhizosphere soil chitinolytic bacteria and their potential in antifungal biocontrol
84. Isolation of a chitinolytic Bacillus licheniformis S213 strain exerting a biological control against Phoma medicaginis infection10.1007/s12010-015-1520-7 ↗
85. Ling, L., Cheng, W., Jiang, K., Jiao, Z., Luo, H., Yang, C., Pang, M., and Lu, L. (2022). The antifungal activity of a serine protease and the enzyme production characteristics of Bacillus licheniformis TG116. Arch. Microbiol., 204.10.1007/s00203-022-03216-x ↗
86. Wang, S., Sun, L., Zhang, W., Chi, F., Hao, X., Bian, J., and Li, Y. (2020). Bacillus velezensis BM21, a potential and efficient biocontrol agent in control of maize stalk rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control, 30.10.1186/s41938-020-0209-6 ↗
87. Kim, J.-A., Song, J.-S., Kim, P.I., Kim, D.-H., and Kim, Y. (2022). Bacillus velezensis TSA32-1 as a promising agent for biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi. J. Fungi, 8.10.3390/jof8101053 ↗
88. Characterization of broad-spectrum biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus velezenis against Fusarium oxysporum in Triticum aestivum L.10.15835/nbha50112590 ↗
89. Profiling of Antimicrobial Metabolites Synthesized by the Endophytic and Genetically Amenable Biocontrol Strain Bacillus velezensis DMW110.1128/spectrum.00038-23 ↗
90. Genetic characteristics and enzymatic activities of Bacillus velezenis KS04AU as a stable biocontrol agent against phytopathogens10.3390/ijpb13030018 ↗
91. Ngalimat, M.S., Radin Shafierul, R.Y., Mohamad Malik Al-adil, B., Yaminudin, S.M., Karim, M., Ahmad, S.A., and Sabri, S. (2021). A review on the biotechnological applications of the operational group Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Microorganisms, 9.10.3390/microorganisms9030614 ↗
92. Antifungal Activity of Paenibacillus kribbensis Strain T-9 Isolated from Soils against Several Plant Pathogenic Fungi10.5423/PPJ.OA.05.2013.0052 ↗
93. Investigation of the antifungal activity of Bacillus megaterium against Fusarium species10.29133/yyutbd.1237451 ↗
94. Xie, Y., Qiuju, P., Ji, Y., Xie, A., Yang, L., Mu, S., Li, Z., He, T., Yang, X., and Zhao, J. (2021). Isolation and Identification of Antibacterial Bioactive Compounds from Bacillus megaterium L2. Front. Microbiol., 12.10.3389/fmicb.2021.645484 ↗
95. Cytotoxic potential of industrial strains of Bacillus sp.10.1006/rtph.2002.1574 ↗
96. Lichenysin is produced by most Bacillus licheniformis strains10.1111/jam.12299 ↗
97. Yeak, K.Y.C., Perko, M., Staring, G., Fernandez-Ciruelos, B.M., Wells, J.M., Abee, T., and Wells-Bennik, M.H.J. (2022). Lichenysin Production by Bacillus licheniformis Food Isolates and Toxicity to Human Cells. Front. Microbiol., 13.10.3389/fmicb.2022.831033 ↗
98. Iqbal, S., Begum, F., Rabaan, A.A., Aljeldah, M., Al Shammari, B.R., Alawfi, A., Alshengeti, A., Sulaiman, T., and Khan, A. (2023). Classification and multifaceted potential of secondary metabolites produced by Bacillus subtilis group: A comprehensive review. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28030927 ↗
99. Toxic lactonic lipopeptide from food poisoning isolates of Bacillus licheniformis10.1046/j.1432-1033.2000.01467.x ↗
100. Antitumor antibiotics: Bleomycin, enediynes, and mitomycin10.1021/cr030117g ↗