Privacy-Preserving Poisoning-Resistant Blockchain-Based Federated Learning for Data Sharing in the Internet of Medical Things
Source abstract
Abstract
The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) creates interconnected networks of smart medical devices, utilizing extensive medical data collection to improve patient outcomes, streamline resource management, and guarantee comprehensive life-cycle security. However, the private nature of medical data, coupled with strict compliance requirements, has resulted in the separation of information repositories in the IoMT network, severely hindering protected inter-domain data cooperation. Although current blockchain-based federated learning (BFL) approaches aim to resolve these issues, two persistent security weaknesses remain: privacy leakage and poisoning attacks. This study proposes a privacy-preserving poisoning-resistant blockchain-based federated learning (PPBFL) scheme for secure IoMT data sharing. Specifically, we design an active protection framework that uses a lightweight (t,n)-threshold secret sharing scheme to protect devices’ privacy and prevent coordination edge nodes from colluding. Then, we design a privacy-guaranteed cosine similarity verification protocol integrated with secure multi-party computation techniques to identify and neutralize malicious gradients uploaded by malicious devices. Furthermore, we deploy an intelligent aggregation system through blockchain smart contracts, removing centralized coordination dependencies while guaranteeing auditable computational validity. Our formal security analysis confirms the PPBFL scheme’s theoretical robustness. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple datasets validate the framework’s operational efficiency and defensive capabilities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information and Control Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
School of Cyber Engineering, Xidan University, Xi’an 710126, China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Internet of Medical Things: A review of recent contributions dealing with cyber-physical systems in medicine10.1109/JIOT.2018.2849014 ↗
2. Internet of Things for in-home health monitoring systems: Current advances, challenges and future directions10.1109/JSAC.2020.3042421 ↗
3. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions
4. A survey on security and privacy of federated learning10.1016/j.future.2020.10.007 ↗
5. Nakamoto, S. (2025, May 02). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available online: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
6. A blockchain-empowered federated learning in healthcare-based cyber physical systems10.1109/TNSE.2022.3168025 ↗
7. Federated learning meets blockchain in edge computing: Opportunities and challenges10.1109/JIOT.2021.3072611 ↗
8. Hou, D., Zhang, J., Man, K.L., Ma, J., and Peng, Z. (2021, January 7–9). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based federated learning: Architectures, applications and issues. Proceedings of the 2021 2nd Information Communication Technologies Conference (ICTC), Nanjing, China.10.1109/ICTC51749.2021.9441499 ↗
9. Li, C., Yuan, Y., and Wang, F.-Y. (August, January 15). Blockchain-enabled federated learning: A survey. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI), Beijing, China.10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540163 ↗
10. Swarm learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3 ↗
11. Biscotti: A blockchain system for private and secure federated learning10.1109/TPDS.2020.3044223 ↗
12. Privacy-preserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption10.1109/TIFS.2017.2787987 ↗
13. Jayaraman, B., and Evans, D. (2019, January 14–16). Evaluating differentially private machine learning in practice. Proceedings of the 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), Santa Clara, CA, USA.
14. How to share a secret10.1145/359168.359176 ↗
15. Chen, L., Fu, S., Lin, L., Luo, Y., and Zhao, W. (2022). Privacy-preserving swarm learning based on homomorphic encryption. Algorithms Architectures Parallel Process, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.10.1007/978-3-030-95391-1_32 ↗
16. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H.B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., and Seth, K. (November, January 30). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1145/3133956.3133982 ↗
17. Blanchard, P., ElMhamdi, E.M., Guerraoui, R., and Stainer, J. (2017, January 4–9). Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine tolerant gradient descent. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
18. Chen, Y., Su, L., and Xu, J. (2017, January 1). Distributed statistical machine learning in adversarial settings: Byzantine gradient descent. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3154503 ↗
19. Yin, D., Chen, Y., Ramchandran, K., and Bartlett, P. (2018, January 5). Byzantine-robust distributed learning: Towards optimal statistical rates. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden.
20. Feldman, P. (1987, January 12–14). A practical scheme for non-interactive verifiable secret sharing. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/SFCS.1987.4 ↗
21. Toward responsible AI: An overview of federated learning for user-centered privacy-preserving computing
22. Ramanan, P., and Nakayama, K. (2020, January 2–6). BAFFLE: Blockchain based aggregator free federated learning. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), Rhodes, Greece.10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00017 ↗
23. Blockchained on-device federated learning10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2921755 ↗
24. A blockchain-based decentralized federated learning framework with committee consensus10.1109/MNET.011.2000263 ↗
25. Chen, X., Luo, J., Liao, C.W., and Li, P. (2018, January 10–13). When machine learning meets blockchain: A decentralized, privacy-preserving and secure design. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/BigData.2018.8622598 ↗
26. Blockchain assisted decentralized federated learning (BLADE-FL): Performance analysis and resource allocation10.1109/TPDS.2021.3138848 ↗
27. Privacy-Preserving Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning via Blockchain Systems10.1109/TIFS.2022.3196274 ↗
28. Mohassel, P., and Zhang, Y. (2017, January 22–26). Secureml: A system for scalable privacy- preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Jose, CA, USA.10.1109/SP.2017.12 ↗
29. Falcon: Honest-majority maliciously secure framework for private deep learning
30. Ozdayi, M.S., Kantarcioglu, M., and Gel, Y.R. (2021, January 2–9). Defending against back-doors in federated learning with robust learning rate. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-21), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
31. Cao, X., Fang, M., Liu, J., and Gong, N.Z. (2021, January 21–25). Fltrust: Byzantine-robust federated learning via trust bootstrapping. Proceedings of the ISOC Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), Virtually.10.14722/ndss.2021.24434 ↗
32. Privacy-enhanced federated learning against poisoning adversaries10.1109/TIFS.2021.3108434 ↗
33. Bift: A blockchain-based federated learning system for connected and autonomous vehicles10.1109/JIOT.2021.3135342 ↗
34. Schoenmakers, B., and Veeningen, M. (2015, January 2–5). Universally verifiable multiparty computation from threshold homomorphic crypto-systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security, New York, NY, USA.10.1007/978-3-319-28166-7_1 ↗
35. Verifynet: Secure and verifiable federated learning10.1109/TIFS.2019.2929409 ↗
36. Predicting survival from colorectal cancer histology slides using deep learning: A retrospective multicenter study10.1371/journal.pmed.1002730 ↗
37. Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.010 ↗