Development of Multimodal Physical and Virtual Traffic Reality Simulation System
Source abstract
Abstract
As urban traffic complexity increases, realistic multimodal simulation environments are essential for evaluating transportation safety and human behavior. This study introduces a novel multimodal, multi-participant co-simulation framework designed to comprehensively model interactions between drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The framework integrates CARLA, a high-fidelity driving simulator, with PTV Vissim, a widely used microscopic traffic simulation tool. This integration was achieved through the development of custom scripts in Python and C++ that enable real-time data exchange and synchronization between the platforms. Additionally, physiological sensors, including heart rate monitors, electrodermal activity sensors, and EEG devices, were integrated using Lab Streaming Layer to capture physiological responses under different traffic conditions. Three experimental case studies validate the system’s capabilities. In the first, cyclists showed a significant rightward lane shift (from 0.94 m to 1.14 m, p<0.00001) and elevated heart rates (69.45 to 72.75 bpm, p<0.00001) in response to overtaking vehicles. In the second, pedestrians exhibited more conservative gap acceptance behavior at 50 mph vs. 30 mph (gap acceptance time: 3.70 vs. 3.18 s, p<0.00001), with corresponding increases in HR (3.54 bpm vs. 1.91 bpm post-event). In the third case study, mean vehicle speeds recorded during simulated driving were compared with real-world field data along urban corridors, demonstrating strong alignment and validating the system’s ability to reproduce realistic traffic conditions. These findings demonstrate the system’s effectiveness in capturing dynamic, real-time human responses and provide a foundation for advancing human-centered, multimodal traffic research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Transportation Systems and Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Planung Transport Verkehr (PTV) AG (2021). PTV Vissim 2022 User Manual, Planung Transport Verkehr (PTV) AG.
2. Lopez, P.A., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Flötteröd, Y.P., Hilbrich, R., Lücken, L., Rummel, J., Wagner, P., and Wießner, E. (2018, January 4–7). Microscopic Traffic Simulation using SUMO. Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569938 ↗
3. Aimsun (2024). Aimsun Next 24 User’s Manual, Aimsun. Available online: https://docs.aimsun.com/next/24.0.0.
4. Combining survey-based and neuroscience measurements in customer acceptance of self-driving technology10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.016 ↗
5. Exploring behavioral validity of driving simulator under time pressure driving conditions of professional drivers10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.004 ↗
6. Systematic review of driving simulator validation studies10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.004 ↗
7. Validation of a bicycle simulator for road safety research10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.002 ↗
8. Studying bicyclists’ perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943 ↗
9. A Pedestrian Simulator for Urban Crossing Scenarios10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.531 ↗
10. Integration of Driving and Traffic Simulation: Issues and First Solutions10.1109/TITS.2010.2095846 ↗
11. Effect of emotion on galvanic skin response and vehicle control data during simulated driving10.1016/j.trf.2022.12.010 ↗
12. Driver’s mental workload classification using physiological, traffic flow and environmental factors10.1016/j.trf.2023.02.004 ↗
13. Relationship between braking intensity and driver heart rate as a function of the size of the measurement window and its position10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.013 ↗
14. From Driver to Supervisor: Comparing Cognitive Load and EEG-Based Attentional Resource Allocation Across Automation Levels10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103169 ↗
15. Jin, M., and Lam, S.H. (2003, January 3–5). A virtual-reality based integrated driving-traffic simulation system to study the impacts of intelligent transportation system (ITS). Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Cyberworlds, Singapore.
16. An integrated framework combining a traffic simulator and a driving simulator10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.072 ↗
17. SUMO Roundabout Simulation with Human in the Loop10.52825/scp.v4i.211 ↗
18. Wen, Z., Zhao, J., Xu, Y., and Tsourdos, A. (2024, January 2–9). A Co-simulation Digital Twin with SUMO and AirSim for Testing Lane-based UTM System Concept. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10521156 ↗
19. Hong, Y., Lv, B., Wang, S., Wang, R., Tan, H., and Lau, F.C. (2024). FedCars: An Efficient Scheduling Framework for In-Vehicle Federated Learning Integrated With CARLA-Cosimulation. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 1–14.10.1109/TVT.2024.3524002 ↗
20. Route and Speed Co-optimization for Improving Energy Consumption of Connected Vehicles10.1109/TMECH.2024.3399019 ↗
21. Lehsing, C., Kracke, A., and Bengler, K. (2015, January 15–18). Urban perception—A cross-correlation approach to quantify the social interaction in a multiple simulator setting. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Gran Canaria, Spain.10.1109/ITSC.2015.169 ↗
22. An Experimental Space for Conducting Controlled Driving Behavior Studies based on a Multiuser Networked 3D Virtual Environment and the Scenario Markup Language10.1109/TSMC.2013.2265876 ↗
23. Behavioural accident avoidance science: Understanding response in collision incipient conditions10.1080/0014013031000136386 ↗
24. Benefits and challenges of multi-driver simulator studies10.1049/iet-its.2014.0210 ↗
25. Maag, C., Mühlbacher, D., Mark, C., and Krüger, H.P. (2011, January 5–9). Studying effects of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) on individual and group level using multi-driver simulation. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany. ISSN 1931-0587.10.1109/IVS.2011.5940419 ↗
26. Evaluating the impact of real-time coaching programs on drivers overtaking cyclists10.1016/j.trf.2021.01.014 ↗
27. Drivers’ behaviour when overtaking cyclists on rural roads: Driving simulator validation using naturalistic data10.1016/j.trf.2023.05.011 ↗
28. Look right! The influence of bicycle crossing design on drivers’ approaching behavior10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.017 ↗
29. Advancing VR simulators for autonomous vehicle–pedestrian interactions: A focus on multi-entity scenarios10.1016/j.trf.2024.10.006 ↗
30. Driving simulator study on the influence of digital illuminated billboards near pedestrian crossings10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.013 ↗
31. Stress induction techniques in a driving simulator and reactions from newly licensed drivers10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.019 ↗
32. The effects of simulated acuity and contrast sensitivity impairments on detection of pedestrian hazards in a driving simulator10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.003 ↗
33. Naturalistic study of vehicle-bicycle lateral passing distance on high-speed rural two-lane roadways with paved shoulders10.1016/j.trf.2024.03.006 ↗
34. Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., and Koltun, V. (2017, January 13–15). CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, PMLR, Mountain View, CA, USA. ISSN 2640-3498.
35. MathWorks (2025, March 19). MATLAB RoadRunner. MathWorks. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/products/roadrunner.html.
36. Kaths, H., Keler, A., and Bogenberger, K. (2021). Calibrating the Wiedemann 99 Car-Following Model for Bicycle Traffic. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13063487 ↗
37. Bicyclists’ behavioral and physiological responses to varying roadway conditions and bicycle infrastructure10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.004 ↗
38. Psycho-physiological measures on a bicycle simulator in immersive virtual environments: How protected/curbside bike lanes may improve perceived safety10.1016/j.trf.2022.11.015 ↗
39. Models for pedestrian gap acceptance behaviour analysis at unprotected mid-block crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.006 ↗
40. Modelling the effects of stress on gap-acceptance decisions combining data from driving simulator and physiological sensors10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.019 ↗
41. Ardalan, T., Sarazhinsky, D., Dobrota, N., and Stevanovic, A. (2024). Investigation of Analyzable Solutions for Left-Turn-Centered Congestion Problems in Urban Grid Networks. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16114777 ↗