Optimal Arrangement Strategy of IoT Sensors in Urban Drainage Networks: A Review
Source abstract
Abstract
The Urban Drainage Network (UDN) is a type of underground municipal infrastructure responsible for transporting sewage and rainwater. To keep abreast of the hydraulic and water quality conditions of the pipes and to detect problems such as pipe clogging, pollution and leakage, real-time monitoring sensors have been widely adopted, accomplished with the development of IoT technologies. However, the intricate topology and numerous nodes of drainage pipes complicate IoT sensor placement strategies, especially in the selection of sensors and the location of monitoring points. This review examines application cases of IoT sensors in UDNs and some other hydraulic networks, evaluating the characteristics and applicability of various optimal placement methods and theories. A general framework was proposed applicable to the optimal placement of IoT sensors in the UDN, including object classification–method selection–quantitative evaluation. Currently, the quantitative evaluation of monitoring schemes lacks a systematic process, and existing layout methods may not be optimal. Future research can explore dynamic optimization strategies through phased deployment and feedback iteration, which can enhance the accuracy and objectivity of sensor layout design and evaluation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring Technologies · Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks · Water Systems and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China · Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (96)
Show source-provided references
1. Temporal Variability of the Optimal Monitoring Setup Assessed Using Information Theory10.1002/2015WR017137 ↗
2. Sikorski, A., Solano Donado, F., and Kozdrowski, S. (2022). Cost-Efficient Coverage of Wastewater Networks by IoT Monitoring Devices. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22186854 ↗
3. Optimal Placement of Water Quality Monitoring Stations in Sewer Systems: An Information Theory Approach10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.956 ↗
4. Buras, M.P., and Solano Donado, F. (2021). Identifying and Estimating the Location of Sources of Industrial Pollution in the Sewage Network. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21103426 ↗
5. Sensor Placement Methods for Contamination Detection in Water Distribution Networks: A Review10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.175 ↗
6. Optimal and Objective Placement of Sensors in Water Distribution Systems Using Information Theory10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.050 ↗
7. Urban Areas Management in Developing Countries: Analysis of the Urban Areas Crossed with Risk of Storm Water Drains, Aswan-Egypt
8. Monitoring Blockage and Overflow Events in Small-Sized Sewer Network Using Contactless Flow Sensors in Hong Kong: Problems, Causes, and Proposed Solution10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3305275 ↗
9. Sensor Placement for Combined Sewer System Monitoring in the Besòs River Basin
10. He, J. (2014). The Design of Urban Waterlogging Online Monitoring and Information Services Digital System and Optimization of Monitoring Points of Urban Waterlogging. [Master’s Thesis, South China University of Technology].
11. Observability-Based Sensor Placement Improves Contaminant Tracing in River Networks10.1029/2020WR029551 ↗
12. Optimal Allocation and Operation of Sewer Monitoring Sites for Wastewater-Based Disease Surveillance: A Methodological Proposal10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115806 ↗
13. Larson, R.C., Berman, O., and Nourinejad, M. (2020). Sampling Manholes to Home in on SARS-CoV-2 Infections. PLoS ONE, 15.10.2139/ssrn.3631095 ↗
14. A Low-Cost IoT-Based Wireless Sensor System for Bridge Displacement Monitoring10.1088/1361-665X/ab2a31 ↗
15. Smith, C., McCain, J., Downey, A.R.J., and Imran, J. (November, January 30). An Open-Source IoT Remote Monitoring System for High-Hazard Dams. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Sensors, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/SENSORS52175.2022.9967232 ↗
16. Metal Oxide Nanofibers Based Chemiresistive H2S Gas Sensors10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214752 ↗
17. Risk Based Analysis for Contamination Event Selection and Optimal Sensor Placement for Intermittent Water Distribution Network Security10.1007/s11269-016-1309-7 ↗
18. Burst Detection in District Metering Areas Using a Data Driven Clustering Algorithm10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.016 ↗
19. Robust Leak Detection and Its Localization Using Interval Estimation for Water Distribution Network10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.04.027 ↗
20. Ji, C. (2023). Optimizing Drainage Network Monitoring and Pollution Tracing Using Machine Learning and Markov Chain Monte Carlo. [Master’s Thesis, Shandong University].
21. Site Prioritization and Performance Assessment of Groundwater Monitoring Network by Using Information-Based Methodology10.1016/j.envres.2022.113181 ↗
22. Exploring the Potential of Utilizing Unsupervised Machine Learning for Urban Drainage Sensor Placement under Future Rainfall Uncertainty10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113191 ↗
23. Nourinejad, M., Berman, O., and Larson, R.C. (2021). Placing Sensors in Sewer Networks: A System to Pinpoint New Cases of Coronavirus. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0248893 ↗
24. The Use of Long-Term on-Line Turbidity Measurements for the Calculation of Urban Stormwater Pollutant Concentrations, Loads, Pollutographs and Intra-Event Fluxes10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.030 ↗
25. Mishra, A.K., and Coulibaly, P. (2009). Developments in Hydrometric Network Design: A Review. Rev. Geophys., 47.10.1029/2007RG000243 ↗
26. Alfonso, L., Lobbrecht, A., and Price, R. (2010). Information Theory–Based Approach for Location of Monitoring Water Level Gauges in Polders. Water Resour. Res., 46.10.1029/2009WR008101 ↗
27. Information Theory-Based Decision Support System for Integrated Design of Multivariable Hydrometric Networks10.1002/2016WR019981 ↗
28. Coupling Hydrodynamic Models and Value of Information for Designing Stage Monitoring Networks10.1029/2012WR012040 ↗
29. Keum, J., Kornelsen, K.C., Leach, J.M., and Coulibaly, P. (2017). Entropy Applications to Water Monitoring Network Design: A Review. Entropy, 19.10.3390/e19110613 ↗
30. Automatic Setting of Urban Drainage Pipe Monitoring Points Based on Scenario Simulation and Fuzzy Clustering10.1080/1573062X.2018.1539504 ↗
31. Optimal Sensor Placement for the Routine Monitoring of Urban Drainage Systems: A Re-Clustering Method10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117579 ↗
32. Optimal Water Quality Sensor Positioning in Urban Drainage Systems for Illicit Intrusion Identification10.2166/hydro.2019.036 ↗
33. Evaluation of Different Formulations to Optimally Locate Sensors in Sewer Systems10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000778 ↗
34. Research on the method of monitoring points distribution of urban drainage network
35. Impact Coefficient Evaluation for Sensor Location in Sewer Systems10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6093 ↗
36. Sewer Networks Monitoring through a Topological Backtracking10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119015 ↗
37. Banik, B., Alfonso, L., Di Cristo, C., and Leopardi, A. (2017). Greedy Algorithms for Sensor Location in Sewer Systems. Water, 9.10.3390/w9110856 ↗
38. Monitoring Planning for Urban Drainage Networks10.1088/1755-1315/1136/1/012008 ↗
39. Chachuła, K., Nowak, R., and Solano, F. (2021). Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21030826 ↗
40. A Bayesian-SWMM Coupled Stochastic Model Developed to Reconstruct the Complete Profile of an Unknown Discharging Incidence in Sewer Networks10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113211 ↗
41. Application and Analysis of Monitoring Technology in Operation and Management of Urban Drainage Network
42. Optimal Sensors Placement for Flood Forecasting Modelling10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.971 ↗
43. Technique for Calibrating Network Models10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1983)109:4(360) ↗
44. Clemens, F. (2012, January 8–13). Evaluation of a Method for the Design of Monitoring Networks in Urban Drainage. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Urban Drainage (9ICUD), Portland, OR, USA.
45. Andò, B., Baldini, F., Di Natale, C., Marrazza, G., and Siciliano, P. (2018). A Distributed Sensor Network for Waste Water Management Plant Protection, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-55077-0 ↗
46. He, M., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., and Zhao, Q. (2024). Intelligent Optimal Layout of Drainage Pipe Network Monitoring Points Based on Information Entropy Theory. Front. Environ. Sci., 12.10.3389/fenvs.2024.1401942 ↗
47. Brosky, H., Prasek, S.M., Innes, G.K., Pepper, I.L., Miranda, J., Brierley, P.E., Slinski, S.L., Polashenski, L., Betancourt, W.Q., and Gronbach, K. (2024). A Framework for Integrating Wastewater-Based Epidemiology and Public Health. Front. Public Health, 12.10.3389/fpubh.2024.1418681 ↗
48. Making Waves: Plausible Lead Time for Wastewater Based Epidemiology as an Early Warning System for COVID-1910.1016/j.watres.2021.117438 ↗
49. Wastewater-Based Epidemiology as an Input to National Statistics on Recreational Drug Use: A Canadian Pilot Study
50. Wastewater-Based Epidemiology for Illicit Drugs: A Critical Review on Global Data10.1016/j.watres.2021.117789 ↗
51. Measurement of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater Tracks Community Infection Dynamics10.1038/s41587-020-0684-z ↗
52. Effectiveness of Building-Level Sewage Surveillance during Both Community-Spread and Sporadic-Infection Phases of SARS-CoV-2 in a University Campus Population10.1093/femsmc/xtac024 ↗
53. Tshehla, K.S., Hamam, Y., and Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. (2017, January 24–26). State Estimation in Water Distribution Network: A Review. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Emden, Germany.10.1109/INDIN.2017.8104953 ↗
54. Data from the Drain: A Sensor Framework That Captures Multiple Drivers of Chronic Coastal Floods10.1029/2022WR032392 ↗
55. Use Long Short-Term Memory to Enhance Internet of Things for Combined Sewer Overflow Monitoring10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.018 ↗
56. Cost-Effective Sensor Placement Optimization for Large-Scale Urban Sewage Surveillance10.1016/j.scs.2024.105250 ↗
57. Vonach, T., Tscheikner-Gratl, F., Rauch, W., and Kleidorfer, M. (2018). A Heuristic Method for Measurement Site Selection in Sewer Systems. Water, 10.10.3390/w10020122 ↗
58. Sambito, M., and Freni, G. (2021). Strategies for Improving Optimal Positioning of Quality Sensors in Urban Drainage Systems for Non-Conservative Contaminants. Water, 13.10.3390/w13070934 ↗
59. A Pre-Screening Procedure for Pollution Source Identification in Sewer Systems10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.896 ↗
60. Designing Contamination Warning Systems for Municipal Water Networks Using Imperfect Sensors10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:4(253) ↗
61. Evaluating the Robustness of Water Quality Sensor Placement Strategies of Water Distribution Systems Considering Possible Sensor Failures and System Changes10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001596 ↗
62. Berry, J.W., Hart, W.E., Phillips, C.A., Uber, J.G., and Walski, T.M. (2012). Water Quality Sensor Placement in Water Networks with Budget Constraints. Impacts of Global Climate Change, American Society of Civil Engineers.
63. Bai, H. (2016). Research on the Optimization Design Method of Separated Urban Drainage System under Uncertainty. [Ph.D. Thesis, Tsinghua University].
64. Use of Online Water Quality Monitoring for Assessing the Effects of WWTP Overflows in Rivers10.1039/c3em00449j ↗
65. Development and Evaluation of a Decision-Supporting Model for Identifying the Source Location of Microbial Intrusions in Real Gravity Sewer Systems10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.018 ↗
66. Quantification of On-line Monitoring Layout in Urban Drainage Network
67. Optimal Placement of Water-Level Sensors to Facilitate Data-Driven Management of Hydrological Infrastructure Assets in Coastal Mega-Cities of Developing Nations10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.019 ↗
68. A Mathematical Theory of Communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
69. Entropy-Based Assessment of Water Quality Monitoring Networks10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:1(90) ↗
70. Kwon, T., Lim, J., Yoon, S., and Yoon, S. (2020). Comparison of Entropy Methods for an Optimal Rain Gauge Network: A Case Study of Daegu and Gyeongbuk Area in South Korea. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10165620 ↗
71. Yeh, H.-C., Chen, Y.-C., Chang, C.-H., Ho, C.-H., and Wei, C. (2017). Rainfall Network Optimization Using Radar and Entropy. Entropy, 19.10.3390/e19100553 ↗
72. A Fuzzy Entropy Approach for Design of Hydrometric Monitoring Networks10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124797 ↗
73. Joo, H., Jun, H., Lee, J., and Kim, H.S. (2019). Assessment of a Stream Gauge Network Using Upstream and Downstream Runoff Characteristics and Entropy. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21070673 ↗
74. A Novel Bayesian Maximum Entropy-Based Approach for Optimal Design of Water Quality Monitoring Networks in Rivers10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126822 ↗
75. Optimal Redesign of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Networks: A Case Study10.1007/s10661-008-0742-3 ↗
76. Entropy Theory-Based Criterion for Hydrometric Network Evaluation and Design: Maximum Information Minimum Redundancy10.1029/2011WR011251 ↗
77. Near-Optimal Sensor Placements in Gaussian Processes: Theory, Efficient Algorithms and Empirical Studies
78. A Novel Framework for Optimization and Evaluation of Sensors Network in Urban Drainage System10.1016/j.watres.2024.122833 ↗
79. Water Quality Monitoring Network Design for Urban Drainage Systems, an Entropy Method10.1080/1573062X.2018.1424215 ↗
80. Efficient K-Means Clustering and Greedy Selection-Based Reduction of Nodal Search Space for Optimization of Sensor Placement in the Water Distribution Networks10.1016/j.watres.2022.118666 ↗
81. A K-Sensor Correlation-Based Evolutionary Optimization Algorithm to Cluster Contamination Events and Place Sensors in Water Distribution Systems10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128763 ↗
82. Peng, S., Cheng, J., Wu, X., Fang, X., and Wu, Q. (2022). Pressure Sensor Placement in Water Supply Network Based on Graph Neural Network Clustering Method. Water, 14.10.3390/w14020150 ↗
83. Optimal Placement of Pressure Sensors in Water Distribution System Based on Clustering Analysis of Pressure Sensitive Matrix10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.242 ↗
84. Optimization of Monitoring Points in Drainage Pipe Network Based on Improved K-means Algorithm
85. Simone, A., Cesaro, A., Del Giudice, G., Di Cristo, C., Esposito, G., and Fecarotta, O. (2022). The Spread of Contaminants in Urban Drainage Networks Based on a Topological Analysis. Environ. Sci. Proc., 21.10.3390/environsciproc2022021020 ↗
86. Observability of Complex Systems10.1073/pnas.1215508110 ↗
87. A Network Observability Framework for Sensor Placement in Flood Control Networks to Improve Flood Situational Awareness and Risk Management10.1016/j.ress.2022.108366 ↗
88. Pressure Sampling Design for Estimating Nodal Water Demand in Water Distribution Systems10.1007/s11269-024-03736-9 ↗
89. Revisiting the Water Quality Sensor Placement Problem: Optimizing Network Observability and State Estimation Metrics10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001374 ↗
90. Sensor Network Design for Contaminant Detection and Identification in Water Distribution Networks10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.12.022 ↗
91. Determination of Optimal Water Quality Monitoring Points in Sewer Systems Using Entropy Theory10.3390/e15093419 ↗
92. The application of cluster analysis in monitoring point optimal of sewer system
93. Yuan, J. (2010). Research on Hydraulic Modeling and Optimization of Monitoring Points of Urban Drainage System. [Master’s Thesis, Hunan University].
94. Enhancing Inflow and Infiltration Detection in Urban Sewer Networks with a New Deterministic Sensor Placement Method10.1016/j.watres.2024.122591 ↗
95. Mariacrocetta, S., Piazza, S., and Freni, G. (2022, January 19–24). Bayesian Identification of Brackish Water Infiltration by Lagrangian Sensors. Proceedings of the 39th IAHR World Congress, Granada, Spain.10.3850/IAHR-39WC252171192022432 ↗
96. Sensor Placement Optimization in Sewer Networks: Machine Learning–Based Source Identification Approach10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6430 ↗