Show source-provided references
3. Segil, J.L., Roldan, L.M., and Graczyk, E.L. (2022). Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices. Front. Neurorobot., 16.
10.3389/fnbot.2022.902162 ↗4. Engdahl, S.M., Meehan, S.K., and Gates, D.H. (2020). Differential experiences of embodiment between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users. Sci. Rep., 10.
10.1038/s41598-020-72470-0 ↗5. Unilateral lower-limb loss: Prosthetic device use and functional outcomes in servicemembers from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts
10.1682/JRRD.2009.04.0039 ↗7. The aesthetic appeal of prosthetic limbs and the uncanny valley: The role of personal characteristics in attraction
11. Comparison of the demographic and clinical characteristics, functional status and quality of life of lower extremity amputees to identify the reason for undergoing amputation
10.3233/BMR-181148 ↗14. Bekrater-Bodmann, R. (2021). Factors associated with prosthesis embodiment and its importance for prosthetic satisfaction in lower limb amputees. Front. Neurorobot., 14.
10.3389/fnbot.2020.604376 ↗16. Bekrater-Bodmann, R. (2020). Perceptual correlates of successful body–prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: Psychometric characterisation and development of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale. Sci. Rep., 10.
10.1038/s41598-020-70828-y ↗18. Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires
19. The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force
10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 ↗20. Agonist-antagonist myoneural interface amputation preserves proprioceptive sensorimotor neurophysiology in lower limbs
10.1126/scitranslmed.abc5926 ↗21. The Ewing amputation: The first human implementation of the agonist-antagonist myoneural interface
23. My prosthesis as a part of me: A qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb
10.1177/0309364611409795 ↗26. Shell, C.E., Christie, B.P., Marasco, P.D., Charkhkar, H., and Triolo, R.J. (2021). Lower-limb amputees adjust quiet stance in response to manipulations of plantar sensation. Front. Neurosci., 15.
10.3389/fnins.2021.611926 ↗29. Providing time-discrete gait information by wearable feedback apparatus for lower-limb amputees: Usability and functional validation
10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2365548 ↗30. Charkhkar, H., Christie, B.P., and Triolo, R.J. (2020). Sensory neuroprosthesis improves postural stability during Sensory Organization Test in lower-limb amputees. Sci. Rep., 10.
10.1038/s41598-020-63936-2 ↗32. Di Pino, G., Romano, D., Spaccasassi, C., Mioli, A., D’Alonzo, M., Sacchetti, R., Guglielmelli, E., Zollo, L., Di Lazzaro, V., and Denaro, V. (2020). Sensory-and action-oriented embodiment of neurally-interfaced robotic hand prostheses. Front. Neurosci., 14.
10.3389/fnins.2020.00389 ↗33. Tieri, G., Tidoni, E., Pavone, E.F., and Aglioti, S.M. (2015). Body visual discontinuity affects feeling of ownership and skin conductance responses. Sci. Rep., 5.
10.1038/srep17139 ↗37. Kilteni, K., Maselli, A., Kording, K.P., and Slater, M. (2015). Over my fake body: Body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9.
10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141 ↗38. Braun, N., Debener, S., Spychala, N., Bongartz, E., Sörös, P., Müller, H.H., and Philipsen, A. (2018). The senses of agency and ownership: A review. Front. Psychol., 9.
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535 ↗39. Schettler, A., Raja, V., and Anderson, M.L. (2019). The embodiment of objects: Review, analysis, and future directions. Front. Neurosci., 13.
10.3389/fnins.2019.01332 ↗42. A non-invasive wearable sensory leg neuroprosthesis: Mechanical, electrical and functional validation
10.1088/1741-2552/ac43f8 ↗43. High-density peripheral nerve cuffs restore natural sensation to individuals with lower-limb amputations
10.1088/1741-2552/aac964 ↗44. Inducing any virtual two-dimensional movement in humans by applying muscle tendon vibration
10.1152/jn.91075.2008 ↗45. Chen, B., Feng, Y., and Wang, Q. (2016). Combining vibrotactile feedback with volitional myoelectric control for robotic transtibial prostheses. Front. Neurorobotics, 10.
10.3389/fnbot.2016.00008 ↗47. Shehata, A.W., Keri, M.I., Gomez, M., Marasco, P.D., Vette, A.H., and Hebert, J.S. (2019, January 24–28). Skin stretch enhances illusory movement in persons with lower-limb amputation. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Toronto, ON, Canada.
10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779477 ↗48. Bark, K., Wheeler, J.W., Premakumar, S., and Cutkosky, M.R. (2008, January 13–14). Comparison of skin stretch and vibrotactile stimulation for feedback of proprioceptive information. Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Reno, NV, USA.
10.1109/HAPTICS.2008.4479916 ↗49. Rokhmanova, N., and Rombokas, E. (2019, January 24–28). Vibrotactile feedback improves foot placement perception on stairs for lower-limb prosthesis users. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Toronto, ON, Canada.
10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779518 ↗50. Neural interfacing architecture enables enhanced motor control and residual limb functionality postamputation
10.1073/pnas.2019555118 ↗51. Agonist-antagonist muscle strain in the residual limb preserves motor control and perception after amputation
10.1038/s43856-022-00162-z ↗54. Structure of long-range direct and indirect spinocerebellar pathways as well as local spinal circuits mediating proprioception
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2157-20.2021 ↗56. Restoration of bilateral motor coordination from preserved agonist-antagonist coupling in amputation musculature
57. Srinivasan, S.S., Diaz, M., Carty, M., and Herr, H.M. (2019). Towards functional restoration for persons with limb amputation: A dual-stage implementation of regenerative agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces. Sci. Rep., 9.
10.1038/s41598-018-38096-z ↗58. Comparative analysis of transverse intrafascicular multichannel, longitudinal intrafascicular and multipolar cuff electrodes for the selective stimulation of nerve fascicles
63. Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: A comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses
10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.020 ↗64. Two-stage osseointegrated reconstruction of post-traumatic unilateral transfemoral amputees
10.1093/milmed/usx185 ↗65. Clinical outcome of osseointegrated prostheses for lower extremity amputations: A systematic review of the literature
10.1097/BCO.0000000000000248 ↗66. National Library of Medicine (2024, August 04). A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness Transdermal Compress Device in Participants with Transfemoral Amputations, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06134167.
68. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs
70. Systematic review of the safety and efficacy of osseointegration prosthesis after limb amputation
10.1002/bjs.11005 ↗71. Safety of osseointegrated implants for transfemoral amputees: A two-center prospective cohort study
10.2106/JBJS.15.00808 ↗73. Fifteen years of experience with Integral-Leg-Prosthesis: Cohort study of artificial limb attachment system
10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0280 ↗74. What are the risk factors for mechanical failure and loosening of a transfemoral osseointegrated implant system in patients with a lower-limb amputation?
10.1097/CORR.0000000000002074 ↗75. Lower limb prostheses: Measurement instruments, comparison of component effects by subgroups, and long-term outcomes