journal article·2025-04-14Open access

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Chlamydia trachomatis: The Current State of Evidence and a Call for More National Surveillance Studies

Sunčanica Ljubin-Sternak, Tomislav Meštrović

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 8

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) remains the most common bacterial sexually transmitted agent worldwide. Although current treatment regimens are highly effective, sporadic reports of reduced antimicrobial susceptibility and treatment failure raises concerns, especially in the context of increasing global antibiotic consumption and the well-documented rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in other sexually transmitted pathogens. A key factor contributing to the continued efficacy of antimicrobials against C. trachomatis is the unique biology of this species, including its obligate intracellular life cycle, reduced genome, and capacity to enter a persistent state. However, this same biology poses significant challenges to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Different national surveillance studies have consistently demonstrated low rates of resistance, confirming that C. trachomatis remains largely susceptible to first-line therapies. Nonetheless, these efforts are scarce and have also revealed significant variability in testing protocols, limited geographic coverage, as well as a lack of continuous monitoring. Since antibiotic consumption patterns differ between regions, systematic surveillance will become indispensable to detect emerging resistance trends before they translate into widespread clinical failure. This narrative review synthesizes on a molecular basis the current evidence of C. trachomatis resistance and available AST methods, evaluates findings from different national surveillance studies, and underscores the need for standardized, well-funded surveillance strategies to preserve the long-term efficacy of treatment options for chlamydiosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reproductive tract infections research · Urinary Tract Infections Management · Reproductive Health and Contraception

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Clinical Microbiology Department, Teaching Institute of Public Health, “Dr Andrija Štampar”, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Medical Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

University Centre Varaždin, University North, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Department for Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2025, March 20). Chlamydia. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chlamydia.
2. Huai, P., Li, F., Chu, T., Liu, D., Liu, J., and Zhang, F. (2020). Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population: A meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis., 20.10.1186/s12879-020-05307-w ↗
3. Jian, H., Lu, W.J., Chen, Z.W., Liang, S.Q., Yue, X.L., Li, J., Zhang, J.H., and Gong, X.D. (2024). Prevalence and trends of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female sex workers and men who have sex with men in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 24.10.1186/s12889-024-18804-3 ↗
4. Current perspectives in the USA on the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease in adolescents
5. Chlamydia trachomatis and Genital Mycoplasmas: Pathogens with an Impact on Human Reproductive Health
6. Pregnancy and fertility-related adverse outcomes associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection: A global systematic review and meta-analysis10.1136/sextrans-2019-053999 ↗
7. Sexually transmitted infections (Chlamydia trachomatis, genital HSV, and HPV) and female fertility: A scoping review10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101067 ↗
8. Partial characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates resistant to multiple antibiotics10.1093/infdis/162.6.1309 ↗
9. Tetracycline-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis in Toulouse, France
10. Multiple drug-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis associated with clinical treatment failure10.1086/315372 ↗
11. Lack of mutation in macrolide resistance genes in Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.03.015 ↗
12. Antibiotics for treating urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and non-pregnant women
13. Clinical Updates in Sexually Transmitted Infections, 202410.1089/jwh.2024.0367 ↗
14. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30 ↗
15. Chlamydial metabolism revisited: Interspecies metabolic variability and developmental stage-specific physiologic activities10.1111/1574-6976.12059 ↗
16. Role of disulfide bonding in outer membrane structure and permeability in Chlamydia trachomatis10.1128/iai.44.2.479-485.1984 ↗
17. The chlamydial developmental cycle10.1016/j.femsre.2005.03.002 ↗
18. Christensen, S., Halili, M.A., Strange, N., Petit, G.A., Huston, W.M., Martin, J.L., and McMahon, R.M. (2019). Oxidoreductase disulfide bond proteins DsbA and DsbB form an active redox pair in Chlamydia trachomatis, a bacterium with disulfide dependent infection and development. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0222595 ↗
19. Global Stage-Specific Gene Regulation during the Developmental Cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis10.1128/JB.185.10.3179-3189.2003 ↗
20. Jury, B., Fleming, C., Huston, W.M., and Luu, L.D.W. (2023). Molecular pathogenesis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 13.10.3389/fcimb.2023.1281823 ↗
21. The role of peptidoglycan in chlamydial cell division: Towards resolving the chlamydial anomaly10.1093/femsre/fuv001 ↗
22. A new metabolic cell-wall labelling method reveals peptidoglycan in Chlamydia trachomatis10.1038/nature12892 ↗
23. Structural characterization of muropeptides from Chlamydia trachomatis peptidoglycan by mass spectrometry resolves “chlamydial anomaly”10.1073/pnas.1514026112 ↗
24. Chlamydia trachomatis Persistence In vitro: An Overview10.1086/652394 ↗
25. Kintner, J., Lajoie, D., Hall, J., Whittimore, J., and Schoborg, R.V. (2014). Commonly prescribed β-lactam antibiotics induce C. trachomatis persistence/stress in culture at physiologically relevant concentrations. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 4.10.3389/fcimb.2014.00044 ↗
26. Effect of tryptophan starvation on inclusion membrane composition and chlamydial-host interactions10.1128/iai.00532-24 ↗
27. Rodrigues, R., Marques, L., Vieira-Baptista, P., Sousa, C., and Vale, N. (2022). Therapeutic Options for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: Present and Future. Antibiotics, 11.10.3390/antibiotics11111634 ↗
28. Xue, Y., Zheng, H., Mai, Z., Qin, X., Chen, W., Huang, T., Chen, D., and Zheng, L. (2017). An in vitro model of azithromycin-induced persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 364.10.1093/femsle/fnx145 ↗
29. Evolution, phylogeny, and molecular epidemiology of Chlamydia10.1016/j.meegid.2014.01.029 ↗
30. Sigalova, O.M., Chaplin, A.V., Bochkareva, O.O., Shelyakin, P.V., Filaretov, V.A., Akkuratov, E.E., Burskaia, V., and Gelfand, M.S. (2019). Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction. BMC Genom., 20.10.1186/s12864-019-6059-5 ↗
31. Luu, L.D.W., Kasimov, V., Phillips, S., Myers, G.S.A., and Jelocnik, M. (2023). Genome organization and genomics in Chlamydia: Whole genome sequencing increases understanding of chlamydial virulence, evolution, and phylogeny. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 13.10.3389/fcimb.2023.1178736 ↗
32. Szabo, K.V., O’Neill, C.E., and Clarke, I.N. (2020). Diversity in chlamydial plasmids. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0233298 ↗
33. Plasmid deficiency in urogenital isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis reduces infectivity and virulence in a mouse model10.1111/2049-632X.12086 ↗
34. Jones, C.A., Hadfield, J., Thomson, N.R., Cleary, D.W., Marsh, P., Clarke, I.N., and O’Neill, C.E. (2020). The nature and extent of plasmid variation in Chlamydia trachomatis. Microorganisms, 8.10.3390/microorganisms8030373 ↗
35. Benamri, I., Azzouzi, M., Sanak, K., Moussa, A., and Radouani, F. (2021). An overview of genes and mutations associated with Chlamydiae species’ resistance to antibiotics. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob., 20.10.1186/s12941-021-00465-4 ↗
36. Molecular mechanisms of Chlamydia trachomatis resistance to antimicrobial drugs10.2741/4611 ↗
37. Mutations in a 23S rRNA gene of Chlamydia trachomatis associated with resistance to macrolides10.1128/AAC.48.4.1347-1349.2004 ↗
38. Tetracycline resistance in Chlamydia suis mediated by genomic islands inserted into the chlamydial inv-like gene10.1128/AAC.48.10.3989-3995.2004 ↗
39. Marti, H., Kim, H., Joseph, S.J., Dojiri, S., Read, T.D., and Dean, D. (2017). Tet(C) Gene Transfer between Chlamydia suis Strains Occurs by Homologous Recombination after Co-infection: Implications for Spread of Tetracycline-Resistance among Chlamydiaceae. Front. Microbiol., 8.10.3389/fmicb.2017.00156 ↗
40. Horizontal transfer of tetracycline resistance among Chlamydia spp. in vitro10.1128/AAC.00477-09 ↗
41. Frequency of development and associated physiological cost of azithromycin resistance in Chlamydia psittaci 6BC and C. trachomatis L210.1128/AAC.00962-07 ↗
42. Mutations in 23S rRNA and ribosomal protein L4 account for resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis strains selected in vitro by macrolide passage10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.01019.x ↗
43. Differences in 23S ribosomal RNA mutations between wild-type and mutant macrolide-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis isolates10.3892/etm.2015.2595 ↗
44. Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance is uncommon in clinical strains of Chlamydia trachomatis10.1016/j.jiac.2018.03.007 ↗
45. Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates identified as tetracycline resistant do not exhibit resistance in vitro: Whole-genome sequencing reveals a mutation in porB but no evidence for tetracycline resistance genes10.1099/mic.0.065391-0 ↗
46. Presence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma spp., but not Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Treponema pallidum, in women undergoing an infertility evaluation: High prevalence of tetracycline resistance gene tet(M)10.1186/s13568-017-0510-2 ↗
47. High treatment failure rate is better explained by resistance gene detection than by minimum inhibitory concentration in patients with urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.015 ↗
48. Sequencing of gyrase and topoisomerase IV quinolone-resistance-determining regions of Chlamydia trachomatis and characterization of quinolone-resistant mutants obtained in vitro10.1128/AAC.42.10.2474 ↗
49. Serial passage of Chlamydia spp. in sub-inhibitory fluoroquinolone concentrations10.1093/jac/dkf031 ↗
50. Uncommon occurrence of fluoroquinolone resistance-associated alterations in GyrA and ParC in clinical strains of Chlamydia trachomatis10.1007/s10156-004-0332-4 ↗
51. Analysis of point mutations in the ygeD, gyrA and parC genes in fluoroquinolones resistant clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis
52. Detection of nucleotide variability in rpoB in both rifampin-sensitive and rifampin-resistant strains of Chlamydia trachomatis10.1128/AAC.47.7.2316-2318.2003 ↗
53. Emergence of resistance to rifampin and rifalazil in Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis10.1128/AAC.49.3.903-907.2005 ↗
54. Rifampin resistant RNA polymerase mutants of Chlamydia trachomatis remain susceptible to the ansamycin rifalazil10.1128/AAC.49.3.1120-1126.2005 ↗
55. Variation in the mutation frequency determining quinolone resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis serovars L2 and D10.1093/jac/dkm447 ↗
56. Methodologies and cell lines used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia spp.10.1128/AAC.47.2.636-642.2003 ↗
57. Technical aspects of Chlamydia trachomatis antimicrobial susceptibility testing in cell culture system
58. Antimicrobial Resistance Screening in Chlamydia trachomatis by Optimized McCoy Cell Culture System and Direct qPCR-Based Monitoring of Chlamydial Growth10.1007/978-1-4939-9694-0_5 ↗
59. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates from patients with persistent or successfully treated infections10.1093/jac/dkx454 ↗
60. The Effect of Amoxicillin Pre-Exposure on Treatment Outcomes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Patients with Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection10.2147/IDR.S410410 ↗
61. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia trachomatis using a reverse transcriptase PCR-based method10.1128/AAC.43.9.2311 ↗
62. High dynamic range detection of Chlamydia trachomatis growth by direct quantitative PCR of the infected cells10.1016/j.mimet.2015.11.010 ↗
63. van Niekerk, J.M., van Loo, I.H.M., Lucchesi, M., Morré, S.A., Hoebe, C.J.P.A., Dukers-Muijrers, N.H.T.M., and Wolffs, P.F.G. (2022). Direct assessment of possible mutations in the 23S rRNA gene encoding macrolide resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0265229 ↗
64. Surveying genetic markers of antibiotic resistance and genomic background in Chlamydia trachomatis: Insights from a multiplex NGS-based approach in clinical strains from Portugal
65. Evaluating methods for genome sequencing of Chlamydia trachomatis and other sexually transmitted bacteria directly from clinical swabs
66. Antibiotic susceptibility testing for Chlamydia trachomatis using flow cytometry10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980101)31:1<37::AID-CYTO5>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
67. Antibiotic resistance in Chlamydiae10.2217/fmb.10.96 ↗
68. In vitro susceptibility of recent clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis to macrolides and tetracyclines10.1016/S0732-8893(01)00221-8 ↗
69. Nationwide surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis from male urethritis in Japan10.1016/j.jiac.2016.06.010 ↗
70. Nationwide surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis from male urethritis in Japan: Comparison with the first surveillance report10.1016/j.jiac.2021.09.012 ↗
71. In vitro susceptibility of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis strains in a country with high azithromycin consumption rate10.1007/s12223-012-0218-2 ↗
72. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Profile of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates from Croatia in McCoy Cell Culture System and Comparison with the Literature
73. Impact of mass distribution of azithromycin on the antibiotic susceptibilities of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis10.1128/AAC.49.11.4804-4806.2005 ↗
74. Is there evidence for resistance of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis to azithromycin after mass treatment for trachoma control?10.1093/infdis/jiu046 ↗
75. Chlamydia trachomatis antimicrobial susceptibility in colorectal and endocervical cells10.1093/jac/dkx392 ↗
76. Villa, L., Boga, J.A., Otero, L., Vazquez, F., Milagro, A., Salmerón, P., Vall-Mayans, M., Maciá, M.D., Bernal, S., and Piñeiro, L. (2023). Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Chlamydia trachomatis Isolates from Patients with Persistent or Clinical Treatment Failure in Spain. Antibiotics, 12.10.3390/antibiotics12060975 ↗
77. Outpatient Antibiotic Consumption for Urinary Infections in Croatia 2005–2014: What can be Learned from Utilization Trends
78. Estimating variations in the use of antibiotics in primary care: Insights from the Tuscany region, Italy10.1002/hpm.3388 ↗
79. Albiger, B., Revez, J., Leitmeyer, K.C., and Struelens, M.J. (2018). Networking of Public Health Microbiology Laboratories Bolsters Europe’s Defenses against Infectious Diseases. Front. Public Health, 6.10.3389/fpubh.2018.00046 ↗
80. The importance of microbiology reference laboratories and adequate funding for infectious disease surveillance10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00241-3 ↗
81. Dumm, R.E., Marlowe, E.M., Patterson, L., Larkin, P.M.K., She, R.C., and Filkins, L.M. (2024). The foundation for the microbiology laboratory’s essential role in diagnostic stewardship: An ASM Laboratory Practices Subcommittee report. J. Clin. Microbiol., 62.10.1128/jcm.00960-24 ↗
82. A challenging future in the sexually transmitted infection diagnostics landscape: Chlamydia trachomatis as model10.1016/j.eimc.2022.03.003 ↗
83. Multicomponent Internet continuing medical education to promote chlamydia screening10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.013 ↗
84. Kahlmeter, G., and Turnidge, J. (2023). Wild-type distributions of minimum inhibitory concentrations and epidemiological cut-off values-laboratory and clinical utility. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 36.10.1128/cmr.00100-22 ↗
85. Status check: Next-generation sequencing for infectious-disease diagnostics10.1172/JCI178003 ↗
86. Postiglione, U., Batisti Biffignandi, G., Corbella, M., Merla, C., Olivieri, E., Petazzoni, G., Feil, E.J., Bandi, C., Cambieri, P., and Gaiarsa, S. (2023). Combining Genome Surveillance and Metadata To Characterize the Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus Circulating in an Italian Hospital over a 9-Year Period. Microbiol. Spectr., 11.10.1128/spectrum.01010-23 ↗