Prediction of Electrophysiological Severity and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument Changes After Carpal Tunnel Release Using Machine Learning Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is evaluated by electrophysiological examination as well as a patient-oriented questionnaire. We hypothesized that machine learning could predict postoperative electrophysiological severity as well as the scores of patient-oriented questionnaires. In this study, we developed machine learning models to predict postoperative changes in electrophysiological severity and changes in the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument (CTSI). Materials and Methods: Data from four hundred and twenty hands of individuals who had been diagnosed with CTS and undergone carpal tunnel release were used. The features used for the machine learning model were preoperative age, gender, distal motor latency (DML) value, sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) value, preoperative electrophysiological severity stage, CTSI-SS value, and CTSI-FS value. Logistic Regression (LR), ElesticNet (EN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and LightGBM (LGBM) were used as machine learning algorithms. A machine learning model was created to binary classify the electrophysiologic severity at one year postoperatively. In the second experiment, regression models were created to predict the change in CTSI-SS and CTSI-FS at one year postoperatively. Results: In the electrophysiological severity classification model, LGBM showed the highest score (AUC = 0.802). Preoperative DML, age, and preoperative electrophysiological severity were important factors for model prediction. RF model showed the best performance. In the regression model predicting the change in CTSI-SS or CTSI-FS (RMSE: 0.418, 0.333, respectively), preoperative age and CTSI-SS or CTSI-FS scores were important factors for model prediction. Conclusions: The machine learning model can predict postoperative electrophysiological severity and CTSI score with high accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Peripheral Nerve Disorders · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe Rosai Hospital, Kobe 651-0053, Japan
Locarno Hand Center, 6600 Locarno, Switzerland
Surgical Department, Hand Unit EOC, Locarno’s Regional Hospital, 6600 Locarno, Switzerland
Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Carpal tunnel syndrome10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.003 ↗
2. Incidence of carpal tunnel release: Trends and implications within the United States ambulatory care setting10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.035 ↗
3. The carpal-tunnel syndrome. Clinical evaluation of 598 hands10.1097/00003086-197203000-00007 ↗
4. Utility of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-6 for Predicting the Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Release10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.06.017 ↗
5. Pimentel, B.F.R., Faloppa, F., Tamaoki, M.J.S., and Belloti, J.C. (2018). Effectiveness of ultrasonography and nerve conduction studies in the diagnosing of carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical trial on accuracy. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 19.10.1186/s12891-018-2036-4 ↗
6. Do nerve conduction studies predict the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression?10.1002/mus.1091 ↗
7. Electrophysiological assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome in elderly patients: One-year follow-up study10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.011 ↗
8. Identifying High Gleason Score Prostate Cancer by Prostate Fluid Metabolic Fingerprint-Based Multi-Modal Recognition10.1002/smtd.202301684 ↗
9. Development and validation of a machine learning-based model of ischemic stroke risk in the Chinese elderly hypertensive population10.1002/VIW.20240059 ↗
10. Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic A, the Impairment Evaluation Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the H. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument10.1007/s00776-006-1087-9 ↗
11. Evaluation of carpal tunnel release outcomes by the Japanese version of the carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire compared to an electrophysiological severity grade10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.007 ↗
12. Park, D., Kim, B.H., Lee, S.E., Kim, D.Y., Kim, M., Kwon, H.D., Kim, M.C., Kim, A.R., Kim, H.S., and Lee, J.W. (2021). Machine learning-based approach for disease severity classification of carpal tunnel syndrome. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-97043-7 ↗
13. Tsamis, K.I., Kontogiannis, P., Gourgiotis, I., Ntabos, S., Sarmas, I., and Manis, G. (2021). Automatic Electrodiagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Machine Learning. Bioengineering, 8.10.3390/bioengineering8110181 ↗
14. Using deep learning for ultrasound images to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome with high accuracy10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.05.030 ↗
15. Elseddik, M., Alnowaiser, K., Mostafa, R.R., Elashry, A., El-Rashidy, N., Elgamal, S., Aboelfetouh, A., and El-Bakry, H. (2023). Deep Learning-Based Approaches for Enhanced Diagnosis and Comprehensive Understanding of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13203211 ↗
16. Developing Machine Learning Algorithms to Support Patient-centered, Value-based Carpal Tunnel Decompression Surgery10.1097/GOX.0000000000004279 ↗
17. Electrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome10.1007/s00776-008-1290-y ↗
18. The minimal clinically important difference of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.012 ↗
19. Minimal clinically important differences in the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release10.1177/1753193412442137 ↗
20. Minimal clinically important difference of carpal tunnel release in diabetic and nondiabetic patients10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd6ec ↗
21. Minimal clinically important difference for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire: New insights and review of literature10.1177/1753193418812616 ↗