Assessing Energy Efficiency in Desktop-Size FFF 3D Printers
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the energy consumption characteristics of desktop-sized Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) 3D printers, focusing on variations in energy usage and operational efficiency across different models. The results demonstrate a correlation between machine parameters and energy efficiency during the processing of PLA material. Notably, machines capable of producing identical components in shorter durations tend to consume more electricity, despite utilizing a lower volume of thermoplastic material. Furthermore, the research underscores the substantial impact of specific technological factors, such as the use of rafts, on energy consumption assessments. Relying solely on estimated manufacturing time and material volume to determine manufacturing costs may yield imprecise results, especially amid rising electricity prices. This study emphasizes the need for standardized energy metrics to enable more informed comparisons for consumers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Green IT and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3 STR, 61-138 Poznan, Poland
Funding
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher. Education
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011 ↗
2. Fortune Business Insights (2024, November 26). 3D Printing Market Report. Available online: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/3d-printing-market-101902.
3. Walls, S., Corney, J., and Vasantha, G.A. (2014, January 9–11). Relative energy consumption of low-cost 3D printers. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, Southampton, UK.
4. International comparisons of energy efficiency—Methodologies for the manufacturing industry10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00063-3 ↗
5. Fuchs, H., Therkelsen, P., Miller, W.C., Siciliano, G., and Sheaffer, P. (2023). ISO 50001-Based Energy Management Systems as a Practical Path for Decarbonization: Initial Findings from a Survey of Technical Assistance Cohort Participants. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16145441 ↗
6. Towards energy and resource-efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.002 ↗
7. Energy mapping of additive manufacturing processes using Sankey diagrams10.1007/s00170-023-12140-3 ↗
8. Fidan, I., Naikwadi, V., Alkunte, S., Mishra, R., and Tantawi, K. (2024). Energy Efficiency in Additive Manufacturing: Condensed Review. Technologies, 12.10.3390/technologies12020021 ↗
9. Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002 ↗
10. Carbon Footprint (2024, November 26). Electricity Factors. Available online: https://www.carbonfootprint.com/docs/2018_8_electricity_factors_august_2018_-_online_sources.pdf.
11. Jovanović, M., Mateo Sanguino, T.d.J., Damjanović, M., Đukanović, M., and Thomopoulos, N. (2023). Driving Sustainability: Carbon Footprint, 3D Printing, and Legislation concerning Electric and Autonomous Vehicles. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23229104 ↗
12. Analysis of Energy Utilization in 3D Printing Processes10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.055 ↗
13. Harding, O.J., Griffiths, C.A., Rees, A., and Pletsas, D. (2023). Methods to Reduce Energy and Polymer Consumption for Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15081874 ↗
14. David, C., Sagris, D., Petousis, M., Nasikas, N.K., Moutsopoulou, A., Sfakiotakis, E., Mountakis, N., Charou, C., and Vidakis, N. (2023). Operational Performance and Energy Efficiency of MEX 3D Printing with Polyamide 6 (PA6): Multi-Objective Optimization of Seven Control Settings Supported by L27 Robust Design. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158819 ↗
15. Elkaseer, A., Schneider, S., and Scholz, S.G. (2020). Experiment-Based Process Modeling and Optimization for High-Quality and Resource-Efficient FFF 3D Printing. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10082899 ↗
16. Muth, J., Klunker, A., and Völlmecke, C. (2023). Putting 3D printing to good use—Additive Manufacturing and the Sustainable Development Goals. Front. Sustain., 4.10.3389/frsus.2023.1196228 ↗
17. 3D printed foods: A comprehensive review on technologies, nutritional value, safety, consumer attitude, regulatory framework, and economic and sustainability issues10.1080/87559129.2020.1762091 ↗
18. Ribeiro, I., Matos, F., Jacinto, C., Salman, H., Cardeal, G., Carvalho, H., and Peças, P. (2020). Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of additive manufacturing. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12030929 ↗