journal article·2024-10-08Open access

Derivation of Analytical Equations for the Fundamental Period of Framed Structures Using Machine Learning and SHAP Values

Ioannis Karampinis, Konstantinos Morfidis, Lazaros Iliadis

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

The fundamental period is one of the most important parameters for the design of new structures as well as for estimating the capacity of existing ones. Thus, to estimate it, various design codes and researchers have adopted several approximate analytical equations based on a number of key structural parameters. To this end, the present study introduces a novel methodology for deriving the analytical equations for the fundamental period of reinforced concrete structures. The methodology is based on machine learning explainability techniques, specifically the so-called SHapley Additive exPlanations values. These values are commonly employed as an explainability tool. However, in the proposed novel approach they are employed as a basis to fit analytical curves, which allows the resulting equations to be constructed sequentially and in an informed manner while controlling the balance between accuracy and complexity. An extended dataset consisting of 4026 data points is employed, on which a Gradient Boosting Machine model is fitted. The model achieves excellent accuracy, with a coefficient of determination R2≈0.99, while the equations derived from the proposed formulation achieve an R2≈0.95 and Mean Absolute Error ≈0.12. This demonstrates the potential applicability of the proposed methodology in a wide array of similar engineering challenges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fault Detection and Control Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lab of Mathematics and Informatics (ISCE), Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece

Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization (EPPO-ITSAK), Dasylliou 24-26, 55535 Thessaloniki, Greece

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Penelis, G., and Kappos, A. (1997). Earthquake-Rresistant Concrete Structures, E and FN Spon.
2. Elnashai, A.S., and Di Sarno, L. (2008). Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering: From Source to Fragility, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470024867 ↗
3. The Cephalonia, Greece, January 26 (M6. 1) and February 3, 2014 (M6. 0) earthquakes: Near-fault ground motion and effects on soil and structures10.1007/s10518-015-9807-1 ↗
4. Eleftheriadou, A., Karabinis, A., and Baltzopoulou, A. (2012, January 24–28). Fundamental Period versus Seismic Damage for Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2012 (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal.
5. Bathe, K.J. (2006). Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall.
6. Bhatt, P. (2002). Programming the Dynamic Analysis of Structures, Spon Press.10.1201/9781482267044 ↗
7. (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1:2005).
8. (2006). The Design of Concrete Structures (Standard No. NZS3101). Technical Report.
9. (2002). Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures-Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings (Standard No. IS 1893-1). Technical Report.
10. (2012). Egyptian Code for Computation of Loads and Forces in Structural and Building Works (Standard No. ECP-201). Technical Report.
11. AFPS (1990). Recommendations for the Redaction of Rules Relative to the Structures and Installation Built in Regions Prone to Earthquakes, France Association of Earthquake Engineering. Technical Report.
12. National Research Council (1995). The National Building Code (NBC), Technical Report.
13. (1994). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Technical Report.
14. (1997). Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials. Technical Report.
15. (1978). Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings, Applied Technology Council. Technical Report.
16. (2010). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers. Technical Report.
17. (2016). Building Standard Law of Japan, Building Center of Japan. Technical Report.
18. (1999). Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, Structural Engineers Association of California. Technical Report.
19. Determination of the natural periods of buildings10.1785/BSSA05406A1743 ↗
20. Bertero, V.V. (1988). Fundamental Period of Reinforced Concrete Moment-Resisting Frame Structures, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center. Number 87.
21. Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1454) ↗
22. Period formulas for concrete shear wall buildings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:4(426) ↗
23. Estimation of fundamental periods of shear-wall dominant building structures10.1002/eqe.258 ↗
24. Empirical formula for fundamental vibration periods of reinforced concrete buildings in Taiwan10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200003)29:3<327::AID-EQE907>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
25. Elastic period of sub-standard reinforced concrete moment resisting frame buildings10.1007/s10518-010-9176-8 ↗
26. Chiauzzi, L., Masi, A., Mucciarelli, M., Cassidy, J., Kutyn, K., Traber, J., Ventura, C., and Yao, F. (2012, January 24–28). Estimate of fundamental period of reinforced concrete buildings: Code provisions vs. experimental measures in Victoria and Vancouver (BC, Canada). Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
27. Estimation of period of vibration for concrete moment-resisting frame buildings10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.01.006 ↗
28. Comparison of fundamental periods of reinforced shear wall dominant building models with empirical expressions10.17559/TV-20140228124615 ↗
29. Estimation of period of vibration for concrete shear wall buildings10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.08.001 ↗
30. Fundamental period of vibration for seismic design of concrete shear wall buildings
31. An investigation of the fundamental period of vibration for moment resisting concrete frames10.28991/cej-2019-03091438 ↗
32. Estimation of fundamental natural period of vibration for reinforced concrete shear walls systems
33. Estimating vibration period of reinforced concrete moment resisting frame buildings
34. Dominguez Morales, M. (2000). Fundamental Period of Vibration for Reinforced Concrete Buildings, University of Ottawa.
35. A rationale for determining the natural period of RC building frames having infill10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.004 ↗
36. Evaluation of building period formulas for seismic design10.1002/eqe.998 ↗
37. Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis10.1002/eqe.949 ↗
38. Analytical investigation of elastic period of infilled RC MRF buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.009 ↗
39. On the fundamental period of infilled RC frame buildings10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1175 ↗
40. Parameters affecting the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.999 ↗
41. Evaluation of the infill influence on the elastic period of existing RC frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.050 ↗
42. Fundamental period of infilled reinforced concrete frame structures10.1080/15732479.2016.1227341 ↗
43. Investigations of elastic vibration periods of reinforced concrete moment-resisting frame systems with various infill walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.016 ↗
44. A new approach to predict the fundamental period of vibration for newly-designed reinforced concrete buildings10.1080/13632469.2021.1961929 ↗
45. A review on application of soft computing techniques for the rapid visual safety evaluation and damage classification of existing buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102536 ↗
46. The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1177/8755293020919419 ↗
47. Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816 ↗
48. Machine learning algorithms in civil structural health monitoring: A systematic review10.1007/s11831-020-09471-9 ↗
49. Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., and Kiranyaz, S. (2022). Structural Damage Detection in Civil Engineering with Machine Learning: Current State of the Art. Proceedings of the Sensors and Instrumentation, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting & Dynamic Environments Testing, Volume 7: Proceedings of the 39th IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2021, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-75988-9_17 ↗
50. Haykin, S. (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines, Prentice Hall. [3rd ed.].
51. Deka, P.C. (2019). A Primer on Machine Learning Applications in Civil Engineering, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429451423 ↗
52. Chatterjee, P., Yazdani, M., Fernández-Navarro, F., and Pérez-Rodríguez, J. (2023). Machine Learning Algorithms and Applications in Engineering, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003104858 ↗
53. Bishop, C. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.
54. Koutroumbas, K., and Theodoridis, S. (2008). Pattern Recognition, Elsevier. [4th ed.].
55. Parameters affecting the fundamental period of RC buildings with infill walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.017 ↗
56. The FP4026 Research Database on the fundamental period of RC infilled frame structures10.1016/j.dib.2016.10.002 ↗
57. Prediction of the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures using artificial neural networks10.1155/2016/5104907 ↗
58. Artificial bee colony-based neural network for the prediction of the fundamental period of infilled frame structures10.1007/s00521-018-03965-1 ↗
59. Machine learning and nonlinear models for the estimation of fundamental period of vibration of masonry infilled RC frame structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110765 ↗
60. Time period estimation of masonry infilled RC frames using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.088 ↗
61. Computational intelligence-based models for estimating the fundamental period of infilled reinforced concrete frames10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103456 ↗
62. ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system10.1109/21.256541 ↗
63. Machine learning techniques to predict the fundamental period of infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.052 ↗
64. A novel explainable AI-based approach to estimate the natural period of vibration of masonry infill reinforced concrete frame structures using different machine learning techniques10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101388 ↗
65. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 ↗
66. Seismosoft (2013). SeismoStruct—A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures, Seismosoft.
67. Proposed macro-model for the analysis of infilled frame structures
68. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
69. Natekin, A., and Knoll, A. (2013). Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Front. Neurorobot., 7.10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
70. Lundberg, S.M., Erion, G.G., and Lee, S.I. (2018). Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv.
71. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
72. Shapley, L.S. (1951). Notes on the n-Person Game-II: The Value of an n-Person Game, RAND Corporation.
73. Peeking inside the black box: Visualizing statistical learning with plots of individual conditional expectation10.1080/10618600.2014.907095 ↗