journal article·2024-10-04Open access

A Multimodal Recurrent Model for Driver Distraction Detection

Marcel Ciesla, Gerald Ostermayer

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

Distracted driving is a significant threat to road safety, causing numerous accidents every year. Driver distraction detection systems offer a promising solution by alerting the driver to refocus on the primary driving task. Even with increasing vehicle automation, human drivers must remain alert, especially in partially automated vehicles where they may need to take control in critical situations. In this work, an AI-based distraction detection model is developed that focuses on improving classification performance using a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Unlike traditional approaches that evaluate individual frames independently, the LSTM network captures temporal dependencies across multiple time steps. In addition, this study investigated the integration of vehicle sensor data and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to further improve detection accuracy. The results show that the recurrent LSTM network significantly improved the average F1 score from 71.3% to 87.0% compared to a traditional vision-based approach using a single image convolutional neural network (CNN). Incorporating sensor data further increased the score to 90.1%. These results highlight the benefits of integrating temporal dependencies and multimodal inputs and demonstrate the potential for more effective driver distraction detection systems that can improve road safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Safety Warnings and Signage · IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Group Networks and Mobility, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Softwarepark 11, 4232 Hagenberg, Austria

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Regan, M.A., Lee, J.D., and Young, K. (2008). Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420007497 ↗
2. European Road Safety Observatory (2022). Road Safety Thematic Report—Driver Distraction, Technical Report.
3. Kinnear, N., and Stevens, A. (2015). The Battle for Attention: Driver Distraction—A Review of Recent Research and Knowledge, Institute of Advanced Motorists. Report.
4. World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018.
5. TRL, TNO, and Rapp Trans (2015). Study on Good Practices for Reducing Road Safety Risks Caused by Road User Distractions, Technical Report.
6. Driver distraction detection methods: A literature review and framework10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073599 ↗
7. Distracted driver detection by combining in-vehicle and image data using deep learning10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106657 ↗
8. State Farm Distracted Driver Detection Competition (2024, September 16). Online Resource. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/c/state-farm-distracted-driver-detection.
9. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
10. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
11. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2015). Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
12. Mafeni Mase, J., Chapman, P., Figueredo, G.P., and Torres Torres, M. (2020, January 19–23). Benchmarking deep learning models for driver distraction detection. Proceedings of the Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science: 6th International Conference, LOD 2020, Siena, Italy. Part II 6.10.1007/978-3-030-64580-9_9 ↗
13. Towards Computationally Efficient and Realtime Distracted Driver Detection with MobileVGG Network10.1109/TIV.2020.2995555 ↗
14. Distracted Driver Detection Based on a CNN with Decreasing Filter Size10.1109/TITS.2021.3063521 ↗
15. Driver distraction detection based on vehicle dynamics using naturalistic driving data10.1016/j.trc.2022.103561 ↗
16. Streiffer, C., Raghavendra, R., Benson, T., and Srivatsa, M. (2017, January 11–15). Darnet: A deep learning solution for distracted driving detection. Proceedings of the 18th acm/ifip/usenix Middleware Conference: Industrial Track, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1145/3154448.3154452 ↗
17. Zheng, A., and Casari, A. (2018). Feature Engineering for Machine Learning: Principles and Techniques for Data Scientists, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
18. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
19. Performance comparison of deep cnn models for detecting driver’s distraction
20. Landup, D. (2024, September 16). Don’t Use Flatten()—Global Pooling for CNNs with TensorFlow and Keras. Online Resource. Available online: https://stackabuse.com/dont-use-flatten-global-pooling-for-cnns-with-tensorflow-and-keras/.
21. Géron, A. (2022). Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, O’Reilly Media, Inc.