journal article·2024-09-28Open access

Evaluation of Hand Muscle Strength Using Manual Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study of the Activ5 Instrument

José Pino-Ortega, Rafael Carvajal-Espinoza, Boryi A. Becerra-Patiño

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

Manual dynamometry (HHD) allows for the assessment of musculature because its use has been supported as an indicator of health in different population groups. The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Activ5 dynamometer for assessing grip strength in a population of adults. A total of 106 individuals with an age of 20.38 ± 1.64, body mass of 71.52 ± 11.32 kg, and height of 1.70 ± 0.11 m were evaluated during two sessions. A cross-sectional agreement study was conducted on Sports Science students from a university community, and 106 individuals were evaluated during two sessions. Statistical analysis of reliability and validity was performed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Pearson correlations, and Lin’s coefficient. According to Lin’s coefficient, both instruments measure grip strength for both conditions, either for the right hand or the left hand. The correlation coefficient to determine the linear relationship between both instruments determined that between the Jamar right-hand dynamometer and the right-hand Activ5, a coefficient R2 = 0.580, p = 0.00, was obtained. In contrast, the correlation between the Jamar left-hand dynamometer and the left-hand Activ5 had a coefficient R2 = 0.543, p = 0.001. Both intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach’s alpha presented high values, indicating that both instruments have good reproducibility in their measurements. The Activ5 dynamometer cannot be used interchangeably with the Jamar dynamometer; however, the close values reported make it a reliable tool in grip strength assessment. The different characteristics of the Activ5 instrument, such as its ergonomics, weight, portability, wireless connection, dimensions, and applications, make it a promising daily- use tool for assessing, monitoring, and the prescription of physical activity and exercise.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Body Composition Measurement Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

BioVetMed & SportSci Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, 30720 San Javier, Spain

School of Physical Education and Sports, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica

Physical Activity and Sport Management and Pedagogy Group (GPAFD), Faculty of Physical Education, National Pedagogical University, Bogotá 480100, Colombia

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Invited Review: Aging and Sarcopenia10.1152/japplphysiol.00347.2003 ↗
2. Cigarán-Méndez, M., Úbeda-D’Ocasar, E., Arias-Buría, J.L., Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C., Gallego-Sendarrubias, G.M., and Valera-Calero, J.A. (2022). The Hand Grip Force Test as a Measure of Physical Function in Women with Fibromyalgia. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-07480-1 ↗
3. Sarcopenia: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Functional Consequences. Interdiscip
4. The association of Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Skeletal Muscle Strength and Muscle Power in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.arr.2021.101266 ↗
5. Association between Typologies of Sedentary Behavior and Muscle Strength, Gait Speed, and Balance in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
6. Strength Testing Using Hand-Held Dynamometry10.1179/108331905X55730 ↗
7. Development of a Position-Specific Index of Muscle Strength to be Used in Stroke Evaluation10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.261 ↗
8. Hand-held Dynamometry Correlation with the Gold Standard Isokinetic Dynamometry: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.025 ↗
9. Interdevice Reliability and Validity Assessment of the Nicholas Hand-Held Dynamometer10.2519/jospt.1994.20.6.302 ↗
10. Hand-Held Dynamometry: A Practicable Alternative for Obtaining Objective Measures of Muscle Strength10.3233/IES-2012-0476 ↗
11. Mentiplay, B.F., Perraton, L.G., Bower, K.J., Adair, B., Pua, Y.H., Williams, G.P., McGaw, R., and Clark, R.A. (2015). Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0140822 ↗
12. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease in Young Individuals10.1038/nrcardio.2017.154 ↗
13. Patiño-Villada, F.A., Estrada-Restrepo, A., and Aristizábal, J. (2023). Handgrip Strength in Older Adults from Antioquia-Colombia and Comparison of Cutoff Points for Dynapenia. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-28898-1 ↗
14. Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker For Older Adults10.2147/CIA.S194543 ↗
15. Benton, M.J., Spicher, J.M., and Silva-Smith, A.L. (2022). Validity and Reliability of Handgrip Dynamometry in Older Adults: A Comparison of Two Widely Used Dynamometers. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0270132 ↗
16. Hand Grip Strength Predicts Cardiovascular Risk10.1038/nrcardio.2015.84 ↗
17. Shim, J., and Yoo, H.J. (2020). Effects of Handgrip Strength on 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk among the Korean Middle-Aged Population: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2014. Healthcare, 8.10.3390/healthcare8040458 ↗
18. Muscular Strength as a Predictor of All-Cause Mortality in an Apparently Healthy Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Data from Approximately 2 Million Men and Women10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.008 ↗
19. Rivas-Campo, Y., Muñoz-Laverde, E.P., Aibar-Almazán, A., Jiménez-García, J.D., Martínez-Amat, A., García-Garro, P.A., Muñoz-Perete, J.M., Garcia-Sillero, M., and Castellote-Caballero, Y. (2022). Handgrip Strength-Related Factors in a Colombian Hypertensive Population: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19063726 ↗
20. Hand Grip Strength Determination for Healthy Males in Saudi Arabia: A Study of the Relationship with Age, Body Mass Index, Hand Length and Forearm Circumference Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer10.1177/0300060516688976 ↗
21. Reliability and Validity of the K-Force Grip Dynamometer in Healthy Subjects: Do We Need to Assess it Three Times?10.1177/17589983231152958 ↗
22. Effects of Three Trials on Grip and Pinch Strength Measurements10.1016/S0894-1130(12)80377-2 ↗
23. Huang, L., Liu, Y., Lin, T., Hou, L., Song, W., Ge, N., and Yue, J. (2020). Reliability and Validity of Two Hand Dynamometers when Used by Community-Dwelling Adults Aged over 50 Years. BMC Geriatr., 22.10.1186/s12877-022-03270-6 ↗
24. Sarcopenia: Revised European Consensus on Definition and Diagnosis10.1093/ageing/afy169 ↗
25. Global Variation in Grip Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Normative Data10.1093/ageing/afv192 ↗
26. Reference Values for Adult Grip Strength Measured with a Jamar Dynamometer: A Descriptive Meta-analysis10.1016/j.physio.2005.05.003 ↗
27. Average Grip Strength: A Meta-Analysis of Data obtained with a Jamar Dynamometer from Individuals 75 Years or more of Age10.1519/00139143-200704000-00006 ↗
28. A Review of the measurement of Grip Strength in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies: Towards a Standardised Approach10.1093/ageing/afr051 ↗
29. Sousa-Santos, A.R., and Amaral, T.F. (2017). Differences in Handgrip Strength Protocols to Identify Sarcopenia and Frailty—A Systematic Review. BMC Geriatr., 17.10.1186/s12877-017-0625-y ↗
30. Handgrip Strength measurement Protocols for all-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Outcomes in more than 3 million Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis
31. Optimal Jamar Dynamometer Handle Position to Assess Maximal Isometric Hand Grip Strength in Epidemiological Studies10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.014 ↗
32. Comparative Study ofVvalidity and Reliability of Two Handgrip Dynamometers: K-Force Grip and Jamar10.3390/biomechanics1010006 ↗
33. Validity, Reliability and Test-Retest Study of Grip Strength measurement in Two Positions with Two Dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip10.1016/j.hansur.2022.02.007 ↗
34. A primer on the Validity of Assessment Instruments10.4300/JGME-D-11-00075.1 ↗
35. Reliability and Validity of the DynEx Dynamometer10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.002 ↗
36. Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of Squegg™—Smart Dynamometer and Handgrip Trainer in Healthy Individuals10.1177/17589983231223868 ↗
37. Merry, K., Napier, C., Chung, V., Hannigan, B.C., MacPherson, M., Menon, C., and Scott, A. (2021). The Validity and Reliability of Two Commercially Available Load Sensors for Clinical Strength Assessment. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21248399 ↗
38. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002 ↗
39. World Medical Association (2014). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J. Am. Coll. Dent., 81, 14–18.10.1515/jwiet-2014-0117 ↗
40. Reliability and Validity ofGgrip and Pinch Strength Evaluations10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80146-X ↗
41. American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) (1992). Clinical Assessment Recommendations, American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT).
42. Coefficient of Accuracy and Concordance Correlation Coefficient: New Statistics for Methods Comparison
43. Vaz, S., Falkmer, T., Passmore, A.E., Parsons, R., and Andreou, P. (2013). The Case for Using the Repeatability Coefficient when Calculating Test-Retest Reliability. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0073990 ↗
44. Bland-Altman Methods for Comparing Methods of measurement and Response to Criticisms10.1016/j.gloepi.2020.100045 ↗
45. Rating the Methodological Quality in Systematic Reviews of Studies on measurement Properties: A Scoring System for the COSMIN Checklist10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1 ↗
46. Determination the Validity of the new Developed Sport Experts® Hand Grip Dynamometer, measuring Continuity of Force, and Comparison with Current Takei and Baseline® Dynamometers
47. Bittmann, F.N., Dech, S., Aehle, M., and Schaefer, L.V. (2020). Manual Muscle Testing-Force Profiles and Their Reproducibility. Diagnostics, 10.10.20944/preprints202011.0064.v1 ↗
48. Comparison of Three hand Dynamometers in Relation to the Accuracy and Precision of the measurements10.1590/S1413-35552012000300007 ↗
49. Concordance-Conformity Within Camry and Jamar Hand Dynamometer in Adults10.35454/rncm.v1n1.075 ↗
50. Grip Strength measured by High Precision Dynamometry in Healthy Subjects from 5 to 80 Years10.1186/s12891-015-0612-4 ↗
51. Mobile Devices and Apps for Health Care Professionals: Uses and Benefits
52. Advancements in Portable Instruments Based on Affinity-Capture-Migration and Affinity-Capture-Separation for Use in Clinical Testing and Life Science Applications10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464109 ↗
53. Majumder, S., and Deen, M.J. (2019). Smartphone Sensors for Health Monitoring and Diagnosis. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19092164 ↗
54. Mallo-López, A., Fernández-González, P., Sánchez-Herrera-Baeza, P., Cuesta-Gómez, A., Molina-Rueda, F., and Aguilera-Rubio, Á. (2022). The Use of Portable Devices for the Instrumental Assessment of Balance in Patients with Chronic Stroke: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph191710948 ↗
55. GripAble: An accurate, Sensitive and Robust Digital Device for measuring Grip Strength
56. Du, W., Cornett, K.M.D., Donlevy, G.A., Burns, J., and McKay, M.J. (2024). Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24061861 ↗
57. Nature, Reliability, and Predictive Value of Muscle Performance measures in Patients with Hemiparesis following Stroke