10 Years of Convergent Neck Implants: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes, Initial Original Concepts, and Changes in Surgical and Prosthetic Protocols

The study reviewed the state of the art of the clinical use of a convergent-neck-designed Prama implant. This implant was introduced approximately 10 years ago and was characterized by a specific and unique convergent neck with a microtextured surface (UTM surface) and Zirconium Titanium (ZirTi) implant body surface. The neck design was developed to adopt the biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT). A critical analysis of the published clinical studies and an evaluation of the adopted clinical protocols were performed. A total of forty-six articles were eligible to be reviewed. Only sixteen clinical studies reported clinical outcomes on Prama implants, and nine of these were selected having the longest follow-up from different research groups. The clinical follow-up/duration of the studies ranged from 12 months to 6 years. The initially proposed protocols explored neck supracrestal–transmucosal placement and gained interest due to its minimally invasive concept and the ability to proceed without a pre-prosthesis second surgery. The following investigations dedicated attention to the subcrestal or equicrestal implant placement with the conventional flap approach. The clinical studies characterized by the transmucosal exposed neck approach reported high survival rates with a stable bone morphology and reduced bone loss during the follow-up. Further recent implementations included the introduction of different convergent neck heights that need to be evaluated. The use of intraoral scanner technologies and digital workflow resulted in a simpler methodology with control of the marginal crown morphology. The studies support the concept that the hard tissue parameters (such as marginal bone level, MBL) and soft tissue parameters (such as pink esthetic score, PES) were stable or improved during the follow-up. Definitive crowns, designed with low invasiveness for soft tissues, were possible thanks to the morphology of the neck. The clinical studies support the use of the Prama implant with the different neck positions, demonstrating hard tissue preservation and optimal esthetic results in the first years following insertion. However, the current body of evidence is not robust enough to draw definitive conclusions, especially in the long term, and further high-quality research (long-term randomized trials) is required to consolidate these early observations.