journal article·2024-08-06Open access

Identification of Land Use Mix Using Point-Based Geospatial Data in Urban Areas

Mehmet Ali Akyol, Tuğba Taşkaya Temizel, Sebnem Duzgun, Nazife Baykal

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 16

Abstract

Identifying land use mix (LUM) in urban areas is challenging, often requiring extensive human intervention and fieldwork. Accurate classification of LUM is crucial for various disciplines, including urban planning, urban economics, and public health. This study addresses this need by employing Voronoi triangulation and an entropy-based LUM formula using point-based geospatial data collected from publicly available sources. The methodology was tested in two distinct urban settings: Ankara and Kadıköy. Ankara, the capital city, provides a large and diverse urban environment, while Kadıköy, a district in Istanbul known for its dynamic urban life, offers a contrasting scenario. Results were analyzed concerning local spatial autocorrelation and point of interest (POI) intensity. The comparative analysis demonstrated that the approach performs well across different urban contexts, with improved results observed in Kadıköy due to its higher density of mixed-use development. Specifically, we managed to identify mixed land use areas with an accuracy of up to 78% and an F1-score of 83% in urban regions. These findings highlight the robustness and applicability of our approach in diverse urban environments, providing valuable insights for city planners and policymakers in optimizing the allocation of urban resources and enhancing land use efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Impact of Light on Environment and Health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Informatics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey

Mining Engineering Department, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Random House.
2. Managing urban freight transport in an expanding city—Case study of Ahmedabad
3. Land use mix in the neighbourhood and childhood obesity10.1111/obr.13098 ↗
4. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6 ↗
5. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001 ↗
6. A fishnet-constrained land use mix index derived from remotely sensed data10.1080/19475683.2017.1382570 ↗
7. A land-use mix allocation model considering adjacency, intensity, and proximity10.1080/13658816.2019.1687899 ↗
8. Thanh Noi, P., and Kappas, M. (2018). Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18010018 ↗
9. Classifying urban land use by integrating remote sensing and social media data10.1080/13658816.2017.1324976 ↗
10. Spatial technology and social media in remote sensing: A survey10.1109/JPROC.2017.2729890 ↗
11. Aubrecht, C., Ungar, J., Aubrecht, D.O., Freire, S., and Steinnocher, K. (2018). Mapping Land Use Dynamics Using the Collective Power of the Crowd. Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-65633-5_10 ↗
12. Modeling location-based social network data with area attraction and neighborhood competition10.1007/s10618-018-0588-4 ↗
13. Social media: New perspectives to improve remote sensing for emergency response10.1109/JPROC.2017.2684460 ↗
14. Sensing spatial distribution of urban land use by integrating points-of-interest and Google Word2Vec model10.1080/13658816.2016.1244608 ↗
15. Sitthi, A., Nagai, M., Dailey, M., and Ninsawat, S. (2016). Exploring land use and land cover of geotagged social-sensing images using naive bayes classifier. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8090921 ↗
16. Spectral clustering for sensing urban land use using Twitter activity10.1016/j.engappai.2014.06.019 ↗
17. Land-use scene classification based on a CNN using a constrained extreme learning machine10.1080/01431161.2018.1458346 ↗
18. Beyond Word2vec: An approach for urban functional region extraction and identification by combining Place2vec and POIs10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.008 ↗
19. Impact of Jobs–Housing Balance on Average Jurisdiction Commuting Times: Virginia Macroscopic Analysis10.3141/2244-03 ↗
20. Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.02.003 ↗
21. Measurements of POI-based mixed use and their relationships with neighbourhood vibrancy10.1080/13658816.2016.1220561 ↗
22. Toward a spatial-temporal measure of land-use mix
23. Modelling urban mixed land-use prediction using influence parameters10.2478/geosc-2021-0006 ↗
24. Belen, R., Temizel, T.T., and Kaygısız, Ö. (2010, January 28–30). A data quality case study for Turkish highway accident data sets. Proceedings of the Road Safety on Four Continents: 15th International Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
25. Laplacian smoothing and Delaunay triangulations10.1002/cnm.1630040603 ↗
26. Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality10.1080/01944360608976725 ↗
27. Bailey, T.C., and Gatrell, A.C. (1995). Interactive Spatial Data Analysis, Longman Scientific & Technical Essex.
28. The effect of quadrat size on the estimation of the parameters of Neyman’s and Thomas’s distributions10.2307/2257075 ↗
29. Temporal land-use pattern analysis with the use of nearest neighbor and quadrat methods10.1111/j.1467-8306.1964.tb00497.x ↗
30. Quadrat analysis of urban dispersion: 1. Theoretical techniques10.1068/a010047 ↗
31. Quantifying the spatial heterogeneity of points10.1080/13658816.2019.1577432 ↗
32. A comparison of spatial autocorrelation indices and landscape metrics in measuring urban landscape fragmentation10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.002 ↗
33. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x ↗