Bioconversion of Apple Pomace to Meyerozyma guilliermondii and Scheffersomyces stipitis Biomass
Source abstract
Abstract
Poland is one of the leading apple-producing countries, both in Europe and around the world. One of the main byproducts of apple processing is pomace, which can account for 20–35% of the harvested apples. Pomace is a potential source of many valuable bioactive components and can also serve as a food ingredient, either directly or indirectly (after bioconversion with fodder yeast). This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of converting polysaccharides contained in apple pomace to yeast biomass. Meyerozyma guilliermondii and Scheffersomyces stipitis yeasts were grown in a medium prepared by pretreatment of the raw material with water or 2% sulphuric acid at 120 °C. Subsequently, enzymatic hydrolysis was performed using a Cellic CTec2 preparation at 30 °C or 50 °C. The resulting hydrolysates were enriched with ammonium salts, and shaken yeast cultures were incubated at 30 °C for 72 h. Based on the results, it can be concluded that acid pretreatment of apple pomace is more effective than water pretreatment under the same time and temperature conditions. The Meyerozyma guilliermondii strain grows in apple pomace hydrolysates more efficiently (16.29 g/L) than Scheffersomyces stipitis cells do (14.63 g/L).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biofuel production and bioconversion · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls · Fungal and yeast genetics research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 171/173, 90-530 Lodz, Poland
References (90)
Show source-provided references
1. (2024, May 18). FAOSTAT. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
2. Apple Pomace as a Potential Valuable Resource for Full-Components Utilization: A Review10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129676 ↗
3. Egbuna, C., Sawicka, B., and Khan, J. (2022). Apple Pomace as a Source of Nutraceuticals. Food and Agricultural Byproducts as Important Source of Valuable Nutraceuticals, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-98760-2 ↗
4. Apple Pomace as a Potential Source of Nutraceutical Products
5. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Composition, Health Benefits, and Safety of Apple Pomace
6. Apple Pomace as Potential Source of Natural Active Compounds10.1055/s-0043-111898 ↗
7. Apple Pomace, a Bioresource of Functional and Nutritional Components with Potential of Utilization in Different Food Formulations: A Review10.1016/j.focha.2023.100598 ↗
8. Gołębiewska, E., Kalinowska, M., and Yildiz, G. (2022). Sustainable Use of Apple Pomace (AP) in Different Industrial Sectors. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15051788 ↗
9. Valorization of Apple Pomace By-Products from the Juice Processing Industry Using Pressurized Liquid Technology10.1016/j.jece.2023.110907 ↗
10. Apple Pomace Biorefinery: Integrated Approaches for the Production of Bioenergy, Biochemicals, and Value-Added Products—An Updated Review10.1016/j.jece.2022.108358 ↗
11. Putra, N.R., Rizkiyah, D.N., Abdul Aziz, A.H., Che Yunus, M.A., Veza, I., Harny, I., and Tirta, A. (2023). Waste to Wealth of Apple Pomace Valorization by Past and Current Extraction Processes: A Review. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010830 ↗
12. Apple Pomace Biorefinery for Ethanol, Mycoprotein, and Value-Added Biochemicals Production by Mucor Indicus10.1016/j.energy.2021.122469 ↗
13. Martău, G.A., Teleky, B.-E., Ranga, F., Pop, I.D., and Vodnar, D.C. (2021). Apple Pomace as a Sustainable Substrate in Sourdough Fermentation. Front. Microbiol., 12.10.3389/fmicb.2021.742020 ↗
14. Gustafsson, J., and Landberg, M. (2018). Production of Bio-Plastic Materials from Apple Pomace- a New Application for the Waste Material. Univ. Boras., Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1327184/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
15. Świątkiewicz, S. (2020). Chów i Hodowla Zwierząt Gospodarskich na Przestrzeni 70 Lat: Problemy i Wyzwania, Instytut Zootechniki, Państwowy Instytut Badawczy. Zakład Żywienia Zwierząt i Paszoznawstwa Instytutu Zootechniki PIB: Monografia.
16. Apple Industry: Wastes and Possibilities
17. Lyu, F., Luiz, S.F., Azeredo, D.R.P., Cruz, A.G., Ajlouni, S., and Ranadheera, C.S. (2020). Apple Pomace as a Functional and Healthy Ingredient in Food Products: A Review. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8030319 ↗
18. Utilization of Pomace from Apple Processing Industries: A Review10.1007/s13197-010-0061-x ↗
19. Utilisation of Apple Pomace as Livetock Feed: A Review10.5958/0973-9718.2015.00054.9 ↗
20. Upgrading Pectin Production from Apple Pomace by Acetic Acid Extraction10.1007/s12010-018-2893-1 ↗
21. Piwowarek, K., Lipińska, E., Hać-Szymańczuk, E., and Pobiega, K. (2021). Propionic Acid Production from Apple Pomace in Bioreactor Using Propionibacterium Freudenreichii: An Economic Analysis of the Process. 3 Biotech, 11.10.1007/s13205-020-02582-x ↗
22. Genomics of Cellulosic Biofuels10.1038/nature07190 ↗
23. Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Materials for Ethanol Production: A Review10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00212-7 ↗
24. Sun, L., Wu, B., Zhang, Z., Yan, J., Liu, P., Song, C., Shabbir, S., Zhu, Q., Yang, S., and Peng, N. (2021). Cellulosic Ethanol Production by Consortia of Scheffersomyces Stipitis and Engineered Zymomonas Mobilis. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 14.10.1186/s13068-021-02069-8 ↗
25. Ojo, A. (2023). An Overview of Lignocellulose and Its Biotechnological Importance in High-Value Product Production. Fermentation, 9.10.3390/fermentation9110990 ↗
26. Green and Sustainable Pretreatment Methods for Cellulose Extraction from Lignocellulosic Biomass and Its Applications: A Review
27. Lonnie, M., Hooker, E., Brunstrom, J., Corfe, B., Green, M., Watson, A., Williams, E., Stevenson, E., Penson, S., and Johnstone, A. (2018). Protein for Life: Review of Optimal Protein Intake, Sustainable Dietary Sources and the Effect on Appetite in Ageing Adults. Nutrients, 10.10.3390/nu10030360 ↗
28. Pomeroy, J., Jose, D., Tyler, A., Bloxham, P., and Culling, J. (2024, May 20). The Future of Food. Can We Meet the Needs of 9bn People?. Available online: https://www.research.hsbc.com/C/1/1/320/WgCK7Wv.
29. Galanakis, C.M. (2024). The Future of Food. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13040506 ↗
30. Robins, S., Iley, R., Michell, L., Smith, S., Gilbert, G., McCarthy, M., Stein, U., Wells, P., Lawton, J., and Landridge, A. (2024, June 13). The Future of Food: Are Food Businesses on Track to Deliver a Sustainable Protein System by 2040?. Available online: https://www.forumforthefuture.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=f2a9339c-8a62-4462-a886-f7de0e3fd729.
31. Smith, K., Watson, A.W., Lonnie, M., Peeters, W.M., Oonincx, D., Tsoutsoura, N., Simon-Miquel, G., Szepe, K., Cochetel, N., and Pearson, A.G. (2024). Meeting the Global Protein Supply Requirements of a Growing and Ageing Population. Eur. J. Nutr.10.1007/s00394-024-03358-2 ↗
32. Editorial: An Introduction to Traditional and Novel Alternative Proteins for Low- and Middle-Income Countries
33. Can Agroecology Help in Meeting Our 2050 Protein Requirements?10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104822 ↗
34. Jach, M.E., Serefko, A., Ziaja, M., and Kieliszek, M. (2022). Yeast Protein as an Easily Accessible Food Source. Metabolites, 12.10.3390/metabo12010063 ↗
35. Bratosin, B.C., Darjan, S., and Vodnar, D.C. (2021). Single Cell Protein: A Potential Substitute in Human and Animal Nutrition. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13169284 ↗
36. Šovljanski, O., Saveljić, A., Tomić, A., Šeregelj, V., Lončar, B., Cvetković, D., Ranitović, A., Pezo, L., Ćetković, G., and Markov, S. (2022). Carotenoid-Producing Yeasts: Selection of the Best-Performing Strain and the Total Carotenoid Extraction Procedure. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10091699 ↗
37. Chreptowicz, K., Mierzejewska, J., Tkáčová, J., Młynek, M., and Čertik, M. (2019). Carotenoid-Producing Yeasts: Identification and Characteristics of Environmental Isolates with a Valuable Extracellular Enzymatic Activity. Microorganisms, 7.10.3390/microorganisms7120653 ↗
38. Patel, A., Rova, U., Christakopoulos, P., and Matsakas, L. (2022). From Yeast to Biotechnology. Bioengineering, 9.10.3390/bioengineering9120751 ↗
39. Fernandes, N.D.A.T., Simões, L.A., and Dias, D.R. (2023). Biosurfactants Produced by Yeasts: Fermentation, Screening, Recovery, Purification, Characterization, and Applications. Fermentation, 9.10.3390/fermentation9030207 ↗
40. Jia, L.L., Brough, L., and Weber, J.L. (2021). Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Yeast-Based Supplementation as a Galactagogue in Breastfeeding Women? A Review of Evidence from Animal and Human Studies. Nutrients, 13.10.3390/nu13030727 ↗
41. Tullio, V. (2022). Yeast Genomics and Its Applications in Biotechnological Processes: What Is Our Present and Near Future?. J. Fungi, 8.10.3390/jof8070752 ↗
42. Thiviya, P., Gamage, A., Kapilan, R., Merah, O., and Madhujith, T. (2022). Single Cell Protein Production Using Different Fruit Waste: A Review. Separations, 9.10.3390/separations9070178 ↗
43. Walker, G., and Stewart, G. (2016). Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in the Production of Fermented Beverages. Beverages, 2.10.3390/beverages2040030 ↗
44. Stewart, G. (2016). Saccharomyces Species in the Production of Beer. Beverages, 2.10.3390/beverages2040034 ↗
45. Pauley, M., and Maskell, D. (2017). Mini-Review: The Role of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in the Production of Gin and Vodka. Beverages, 3.10.3390/beverages3010013 ↗
46. Raffak, A., Chafai, Y., Hamouda, A., Ouazzani Touhami, A., and Mounir, M. (2023). Assessment of the Fermentative Performance of Traditional Fresh Moroccan Sourdoughs and Their Freeze-Dried Forms Using Online Monitoring Device: Panigraph. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132212453 ↗
47. Reed, G., and Nagodawithana, T.W. (1990). Yeast Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-9771-7 ↗
48. Dygas, D., Kręgiel, D., and Berłowska, J. (2023). Sugar Beet Pulp as a Biorefinery Substrate for Designing Feed. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28052064 ↗
49. Dygas, D., Liszkowska, W., Steglińska, A., Sulyok, M., Kręgiel, D., and Berłowska, J. (2023). Rapeseed Meal Waste Biomass as a Single-Cell Protein Substrate for Nutritionally-Enhanced Feed Components. Processes, 11.10.20944/preprints202305.0279.v1 ↗
50. Patelski, P., Berłowska, J., Balcerek, M., Dziekońska-Kubczak, U., Pielech-Przybylska, K., Dygas, D., and Jędrasik, J. (2020). Conversion of Potato Industry Waste into Fodder Yeast Biomass. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8040453 ↗
51. Henriques, T., Pereira, S., Serafim, L., and Xavier, A. (2018). Two-Stage Aeration Fermentation Strategy to Improve Bioethanol Production by Scheffersomyces Stipitis. Fermentation, 4.10.3390/fermentation4040097 ↗
52. Salazar-Cerezo, S., De Vries, R.P., and Garrigues, S. (2023). Strategies for the Development of Industrial Fungal Producing Strains. J. Fungi, 9.10.3390/jof9080834 ↗
53. Bajić, B., Vučurović, D., Vasić, Đ., Jevtić-Mučibabić, R., and Dodić, S. (2022). Biotechnological Production of Sustainable Microbial Proteins from Agro-Industrial Residues and By-Products. Foods, 12.10.3390/foods12010107 ↗
54. Amara, A.A., and El-Baky, N.A. (2023). Fungi as a Source of Edible Proteins and Animal Feed. J. Fungi, 9.10.3390/jof9010073 ↗
55. Mycota of Distillery Yeast Sludge as Source of Single Cell Protein10.5943/mycosphere/6/3/1 ↗
56. Second Generation Bioethanol Production from Hemicellulolytic Hydrolyzate of Apple Pomace by Pichia stipitis
57. (2024, July 06). Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1104 of 1 July 2022 Amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of Feed Materials. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R1104.
58. Utilisation of Sugar Beet Bagasse for the Biosynthesis of Yeast SCP10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.03.031 ↗
59. Conversion of Sugar Beet Leaf Polysaccharides into Single Cell Protein10.1039/C4RA15930F ↗
60. Scheffersomyces Stipitis: A Comparative Systems Biology Study with the Crabtree Positive Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae10.1186/1475-2859-11-136 ↗
61. Yan, W., Gao, H., Qian, X., Jiang, Y., Zhou, J., Dong, W., Xin, F., Zhang, W., and Jiang, M. (2021). Biotechnological Applications of the Non-Conventional Yeast Meyerozyma Guilliermondii. Biotechnol. Adv., 46.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107674 ↗
62. Aspects of the Cell Growth of Candida Guilliermondii in Sugar Cane Bagasse Hydrolysate10.1515/znc-1996-5-619 ↗
63. Effect of Inoculum Level on Xylitol Production from Rice Straw Hemicellulose Hydrolysate byCandida Guilliermondii10.1007/BF01570113 ↗
64. Improvement of Biotechnological Xylitol Production by Glucose during Cultive of Candida Guilliermondii in Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysate10.1590/S1516-89132007000200005 ↗
65. Martini, C., Tauk-Tornisielo, S.M., Codato, C.B., Bastos, R.G., and Ceccato-Antonini, S.R. (2016). A Strain of Meyerozyma Guilliermondii Isolated from Sugarcane Juice Is Able to Grow and Ferment Pentoses in Synthetic and Bagasse Hydrolysate Media. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 32.10.1007/s11274-016-2036-1 ↗
66. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass
67. Co-Preparation of Pectin and Cellulose from Apple Pomace by a Sequential Process10.1007/s13197-019-03877-5 ↗
68. Biobutanol Production from Apple Pomace: The Importance of Pretreatment Methods on the Fermentability of Lignocellulosic Agro-Food Wastes10.1007/s00253-017-8522-z ↗
69. Optimisation of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Apple Pomace for Production of Biofuel and Biorefinery Chemicals Using Commercial Enzymes10.1007/s13205-015-0312-7 ↗
70. Processing of Apple Pomace for Bioactive Molecules10.1080/07388550802368895 ↗
71. Dietary Fibre Fractions from Fruit and Vegetable Processing Waste10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.10.005 ↗
72. Influence of pH and Cellic® CTec2 Enzymes Dose on the Glucose Yield after Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose at 50 °C
73. Conversion of Apple Pomace Waste to Ethanol at Industrial Relevant Conditions10.1007/s00253-016-7665-7 ↗
74. Vaez, S., Karimi, K., Denayer, J.F.M., and Kumar, R. (2023). Evaluation of Apple Pomace Biochemical Transformation to Biofuels and Pectin through a Sustainable Biorefinery. Biomass Bioenergy, 172.10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106757 ↗
75. Sustainable Extraction of Bioactive Compound from Apple Pomace through Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Fermentation10.1038/s41598-023-46584-0 ↗
76. Exploring the Production of Bio-Succinic Acid from Apple Pomace Using an Environmental Approach10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.052 ↗
77. The Profile of Organic Acids and Polyphenols in Apple Wines Fermented with Different Yeast Strains10.1007/s13197-018-3514-2 ↗
78. Mahgoub, S.A., Kedra, E.G.A., Abdelfattah, H.I., Abdelbasit, H.M., Alamoudi, S.A., Al-Quwaie, D.A., Selim, S., Alsharari, S.S., Saber, W.I.A., and El-Mekkawy, R.M. (2022). Bioconversion of Some Agro-Residues into Organic Acids by Cellulolytic Rock-Phosphate-Solubilizing Aspergillus Japonicus. Fermentation, 8.10.3390/fermentation8090437 ↗
79. Pretreatment of Lignocellulose: Formation of Inhibitory by-Products and Strategies for Minimizing Their Effects10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.009 ↗
80. Jönsson, L.J., Alriksson, B., and Nilvebrant, N.-O. (2013). Bioconversion of Lignocellulose: Inhibitors and Detoxification. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 6.10.1186/1754-6834-6-16 ↗
81. Fermentation of Lignocellulosic Hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and Mechanisms of Inhibition10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00161-3 ↗
82. Vanmarcke, G., Demeke, M.M., Foulquié-Moreno, M.R., and Thevelein, J.M. (2021). Identification of the Major Fermentation Inhibitors of Recombinant 2G Yeasts in Diverse Lignocellulose Hydrolysates. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 14.10.1186/s13068-021-01935-9 ↗
83. Contribution of Acetic Acid to the Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass under Abiotic Conditions10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.016 ↗
84. Świątek, K., Gaag, S., Klier, A., Kruse, A., Sauer, J., and Steinbach, D. (2020). Acid Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Sugars and Furfurals Formation. Catalysts, 10.10.3390/catal10040437 ↗
85. Dziekońska-Kubczak, U., Berłowska, J., Dziugan, P., Patelski, P., Balcerek, M., Pielech-Przybylska, K., and Robak, K. (2019). Two-Stage Pretreatment to Improve Saccharification of Oat Straw and Jerusalem Artichoke Biomass. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12091715 ↗
86. Dziekońska-Kubczak, U., Berłowska, J., Dziugan, P., Patelski, P., Pielech-Przybylska, K., and Balcerek, M. (2018). Nitric Acid Pretreatment of Jerusalem Artichoke Stalks for Enzymatic Saccharification and Bioethanol Production. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11082153 ↗
87. Kurtzman, C.P., and Fell, J.W. (1998). The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study, Elsevier. [4th ed.].
88. “Isolation, Taxonomic Identification and Investigation of the Biotechnological Potential of Wild-Type Meyerozyma Guilliermondii Associated with Amazonian Termites Able to Ferment D-Xylose
89. Yeast Biomass Production in Brewery’s Spent Grains Hemicellulosic Hydrolyzate10.1007/s12010-007-8046-6 ↗
90. Apple Pomace Utilization for the Production of Baker’s Yeast: Effect of Substrate Concentrations and Growth Stimulators