Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices and Cone Beam Tomography in Orthodontics—Current Application and New Directions of Development
Source abstract
Abstract
Continuous progress in dentistry and orthodontics is crucial to ensuring high-quality diagnosis and treatment of patients, especially since malocclusions occur in up to half of the population. In addition to limiting the physiological functions of the masticatory system, they are often an aesthetic defect that may directly affect the well-being and even self-esteem of patients, especially in their teenage years and early adulthood. A holistic model of perceiving and treating orthodontic diseases, such as the Biocreative Orthodontic Strategy, focusing not only on the correction of the defect itself but also taking into account the least possible interference in the physiology of the masticatory system, limiting the use of appliances to a minimum, and taking into account the patient’s preferences, is a special alternative to conventional therapeutic models. In this review, we are presenting the current knowledge regarding the applications of temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSAD) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in orthodontics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Dental Radiography and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Photomedicine and Physical Chemistry, Medical College of the University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
Students English Division Science Club, Medical College of the University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
Department of Biochemistry and General Chemistry, Medical College of the University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Objective and subjective assessment of the quality and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment10.17116/stomat202110005182 ↗
2. Petrescu, S.M., Țuculină, M.J., Popa, D.L., Duță, A., Sălan, A.I., Voinea Georgescu, R., Diaconu, O.A., Turcu, A.A., Mocanu, H., and Nicola, A.G. (2022). Modeling and Simulating an Orthodontic System Using Virtual Methods. Diagnostics, 12.10.3390/diagnostics12051296 ↗
3. Epidemiology of Facial Profiles, Occlusal Features, and Orthodontic Treatment Need among Adolescence: A Cross-sectional Study10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3258 ↗
4. Safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew insertion in the infrazygomatic crest area in different facial types: A tomographic study10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.044 ↗
5. Alam, M.K., Abutayyem, H., Kanwal, B., and AL Shayeb, M. (2023). Future of Orthodontics-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Emerging Trends in This Field. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12020532 ↗
6. Modern Anchorage Systems in Orthodontics
7. Ghodasra, R., and Brizuela, M. (2023). Orthodontics, Malocclusion. StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing.
8. Zohud, O., Lone, I.M., Midlej, K., Obaida, A., Masarwa, S., Schröder, A., Küchler, E.C., Nashef, A., Kassem, F., and Reiser, V. (2023). Towards Genetic Dissection of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Review of Genetic Variations Underlying the Phenotype in Humans and Future Directions. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12093212 ↗
9. De Ridder, L., Aleksieva, A., Willems, G., Declerck, D., and Cadenas de Llano-Pérula, M. (2022). Prevalence of Orthodontic Malocclusions in Healthy Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19127446 ↗
10. Gershater, E., Li, C., Ha, P., Chung, C.H., Tanna, N., Zou, M., and Zheng, Z. (2021). Genes and Pathways Associated with Skeletal Sagittal Malocclusions: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms222313037 ↗
11. Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of En masse Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.4103/ccd.ccd_661_18 ↗
12. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: A randomized controlled trial10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.025 ↗
13. Accelerated Tooth Movement and Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices (TSADs)10.1155/2014/384380 ↗
14. Tooth extractions in Orthodontics: First or second premolars?10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.088-098.bbo ↗
15. Palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs): What to know and how to do?10.1111/ocr.12451 ↗
16. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.027 ↗
17. Critical issues concerning biocreative strategy in contemporary temporary skeletal anchorage device orthodontics: A narrative review10.1111/ocr.12444 ↗
18. The biocreative strategy: Part 1 foundations
19. Chung, K.R., Kim, S.H., Kim, M.J., and Seo, K.W. (2019). Ch 1. Tweemac prescription. BOS Mania, Kyungsung Media Co.
20. The C-orthodontic micro-implant
21. Orthodontic mini plate with tube as an efficient tool for borderline cases10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.041 ↗
22. Finite element study of controlling factors of anterior intrusion and torque during Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Device (TSAD) dependent en masse retraction without posterior appliances: Biocreative hybrid retractor (CH-retractor)10.2319/050619-315.1 ↗
23. 3D Technology Used for Precision in Orthodontics
24. Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review10.4103/1305-7456.126269 ↗
25. Li, C., Teixeira, H., Tanna, N., Chen, S.H.Y., Zou, M., and Chung, C.H. (2021). The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study. Diagnostics, 11.10.3390/diagnostics11122292 ↗
26. Leonardi, R.M. (2022). 3D Imaging Advancements and New Technologies in Clinical and Scientific Dental and Orthodontic Fields. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11082200 ↗
27. Dental cone beam CT: An updated review10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.007 ↗
28. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: Physical principles10.3174/ajnr.A1653 ↗
29. Zastosowanie tomografii komputerowej wiązki stożkowej (CBCT) w laryngologii i chirurgii rekonstrukcyjnej głowy i szyi—Przegląd literatury i doświadczenia własne
30. Use of artificial intelligence in computed tomography dose optimisation10.1177/0146645320940827 ↗
31. Kurt Bayrakdar, S., Orhan, K., Bayrakdar, I.S., Bilgir, E., Ezhov, M., Gusarev, M., and Shumilov, E. (2021). A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images. BMC Med. Imaging, 21.10.1186/s12880-021-00618-z ↗
32. Hung, K., Yeung, A.W.K., Tanaka, R., and Bornstein, M.M. (2020). Current Applications, Opportunities, and Limitations of AI for 3D Imaging in Dental Research and Practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17124424 ↗
33. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100845 ↗
34. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery: A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles10.1186/s13005-023-00383-0 ↗
35. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: A scoping review10.1186/s40510-021-00361-9 ↗
36. Subramanian, A.K., Chen, Y., Almalki, A., Sivamurthy, G., and Kafle, D. (2022). Cephalometric Analysis in Orthodontics Using Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review. Biomed. Res. Int., 2022.10.1155/2022/1880113 ↗
37. Liu, J., Zhang, C., and Shan, Z. (2023). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Current State and Future Perspectives. Healthcare, 11.10.3390/healthcare11202760 ↗
38. Performance of artificial intelligence using oral and maxillofacial CBCT images: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.4103/njcp.njcp_394_22 ↗
39. Kazimierczak, N., Kazimierczak, W., Serafin, Z., Nowicki, P., Nożewski, J., and Janiszewska-Olszowska, J. (2024). AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13020344 ↗
40. Artificial Intelligence and Its Application in Endodontics: A Review10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3593 ↗
41. Artificial Intelligence for Fast and Accurate 3-Dimensional Tooth Segmentation on Cone-beam Computed Tomography10.1016/j.joen.2020.12.020 ↗
42. Fuglsig, J.M.C.E.S., Reis, I.N.R.D., Yeung, A.W.K., Bornstein, M.M., and Spin-Neto, R. (2023). The current role and future potential of digital diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry: A scoping review. Clin. Oral Implant. Res.10.1111/clr.14212 ↗
43. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: Traits and orthodontic correction
44. En masse retraction versus two-step retraction of anterior teeth in extraction treatment of bimaxillary protrusion10.4103/2278-0203.110330 ↗
45. Xu, T.M., Zhang, X., Oh, H.S., Boyd, R.L., Korn, E.L., and Baumrind, S. (2010). Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 138.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.027 ↗
46. Testing force systems and biomechanics--measured tooth movements from differential moment closing loops
47. Comparison of skeletal and conventional anchorage methods in conjunction with pre-operative decompensation of a skeletal class III malocclusion10.1007/s00056-009-9909-y ↗
48. Analysis of lingual en masse retraction combining a C- lingual retractor and a palatal plate10.2319/100110-574.1 ↗
49. Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: Factors affecting clinical success10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.036 ↗
50. Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate10.1186/s13005-017-0147-z ↗
51. Kim, K., Lim, C.Y., Shin, J., Chung, M.J., and Jung, Y.G. (2023). Enhanced artificial intelligence-based diagnosis using CBCT with internal denoising: Clinical validation for discrimination of fungal ball, sinusitis, and normal cases in the maxillary sinus. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 240.10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107708 ↗
52. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: A preliminary study10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.023 ↗
53. Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.029 ↗
54. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: Biocreative therapy type II technique10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.023 ↗
55. Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated mini-implants: Biocreative therapy type I technique
56. Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated mini-implants: Biocreative therapy type II technique
57. The biocreative strategy. Part 5: Labial and lingual space closure in extraction treatment
58. Severe bidentoalveolar protrusion treated with orthodontic microimplant-dependent en-masse retraction10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.035 ↗
59. Primozic, J., Hren, M., Mezeg, U., and Legat, A. (2022). Tribocorrosion Susceptibility and Mechanical Characteristics of As-Received and Long-Term In-Vivo Aged Nickel-Titanium and Stainless-Steel Archwires. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15041427 ↗
60. En-masse retraction with a preformed nickel-titanium and stainless steel archwire assembly and temporary skeletal anchorage devices without posterior bonding10.4041/kjod.2014.44.5.236 ↗
61. Three dimensional (3D) imaging techniques in orthodontics-An update10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_64_20 ↗
62. Francisco, I., Ribeiro, M.P., Marques, F., Travassos, R., Nunes, C., Pereira, F., Caramelo, F., Paula, A.B., and Vale, F. (2022). Application of Three-Dimensional Digital Technology in Orthodontics: The State of the Art. Biomimetics, 7.10.3390/biomimetics7010023 ↗
63. Frąckiewicz, W., Jankowska, A., and Machoy, M.E. (Adv. Clin. Exp. Med., 2024). CBCT and modern intraoral scanners as tools for developing comprehensive, interdisciplinary treatment plans, Adv. Clin. Exp. Med., in press.
64. Deep learning-enabled 3D multimodal fusion of cone-beam CT and intraoral mesh scans for clinically applicable tooth-bone reconstruction10.1016/j.patter.2023.100825 ↗
65. Verykokou, S., Ioannidis, C., and Angelopoulos, C. (2022). Evaluation of 3D Modeling Workflows Using Dental CBCT Data for Periodontal Regenerative Treatment. J. Pers. Med., 12.10.3390/jpm12091355 ↗
66. Multiclass CBCT Image Segmentation for Orthodontics with Deep Learning10.1177/00220345211005338 ↗
67. Friedlander-Barenboim, S., Hamed, W., Zini, A., Yarom, N., Abramovitz, I., Chweidan, H., Finkelstein, T., and Almoznino, G. (2021). Patterns of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Utilization by Various Dental Specialties: A 4-Year Retrospective Analysis from a Dental and Maxillofacial Specialty Center. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9081042 ↗
68. Kim, S.H., Kim, K.B., and Choo, H. (2022). New Frontier in Advanced Dentistry: CBCT, Intraoral Scanner, Sensors, and Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22082942 ↗
69. CBCT in orthodontics: Assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use10.1259/dmfr.20140282 ↗
70. Cone beam CT in orthodontics: The current picture
71. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01662.x ↗
72. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.12.011 ↗
73. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics10.1259/dmfr/12615645 ↗
74. Cone-beam computed tomography and digital model analysis of maxillary buccal alveolar bone thickness for vertical temporary skeletal anchorage device placement10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.013 ↗
75. Low-dose cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of alveolar clefts, a randomized controlled trial in image quality. Low-dose cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of alveolar clefts, a randomized controlled trial in image quality10.1097/PRS.0000000000010588 ↗
76. Do different cone beam computed tomography exposure protocols influence subjective image quality prior to and after root canal treatment?10.1007/s00784-020-03524-w ↗
77. Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric Cone Beam CT [published correction appears in Sci Rep 2020, 10, 2474]10.1038/s41598-019-41949-w ↗
78. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: A review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities10.1007/s00784-019-02907-y ↗
79. Fountoulaki, G., and Thurzo, A. (2022). Change in the Constricted Airway in Patients after Clear Aligner Treatment: A Retrospective Study. Diagnostics, 12.10.20944/preprints202207.0454.v1 ↗
80. CBCT of Swedish children and adolescents at an oral and maxillofacial radiology department. A survey of requests and indications10.1080/00016357.2019.1645879 ↗
81. Head motion and perception of discomfort by young children during simulated CBCT examinations10.1259/dmfr.20200445 ↗
82. Patient movement characteristics and the impact on CBCT image quality and interpretability10.1259/dmfr.20170216 ↗
83. CBCT in orthodontics: A systematic review on justification of CBCT in a paediatric population prior to orthodontic treatment10.1093/ejo/cjy066 ↗
84. Reliability of different radiographic methods for the localization of displaced maxillary canines10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.026 ↗
85. Impact of Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Treatment Planning for External Cervical Resorption and a Novel Axial Slice-based Classification System10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.001 ↗
86. Effects of cleft lip and palate on the development of permanent upper central incisors: A cone-beam computed tomography study10.1093/ejo/cju082 ↗
87. A retrospective comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography versus rendered panoramic images in identifying the presence, types, and characteristics of dens invaginatus in a Turkish population10.1016/j.joen.2014.12.001 ↗
88. Evaluation of mandibular condyles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite
89. Jiang, Y., Shang, F., Peng, J., Liang, J., Fan, Y., Yang, Z., Qi, Y., Yang, Y., Xu, T., and Jiang, R. (2022). Automatic Masseter Muscle Accurate Segmentation from CBCT Using Deep Learning-Based Model. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12010055 ↗
90. Kazimierczak, N., Abbasi, M.S., Zuberi, F., Qamar, W., Halim, M.S.B., Maqsood, A., and Alam, M.K. (2024). AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13020344 ↗
91. Ahmed, N., Abbasi, M.S., Zuberi, F., Qamar, W., Halim, M.S.B., Maqsood, A., and Alam, M.K. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Techniques: Analysis, Application, and Outcome in Dentistry-A Systematic Review. BioMed Res. Int., 2021.10.1155/2021/9751564 ↗
92. Diagnosis: A Systematic Review10.1148/ryai.210064 ↗
93. Machine learning in orthodontics: Challenges and perspectives10.17219/acem/138702 ↗
94. A fully automatic AI system for tooth and alveolar bone segmentation from cone-beam CT images10.1038/s41467-022-29637-2 ↗
95. Fan, W., Zhang, J., Wang, N., Li, J., and Hu, L. (2023). The Application of Deep Learning on CBCT in Dentistry. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13122056 ↗
96. Bao, H., Zhang, K., Yu, C., Li, H., Cao, D., Shu, H., Liu, L., and Yan, B. (2023). Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-02881-8 ↗
97. Tsolakis, I.A., Kolokitha, O.E., Papadopoulou, E., Tsolakis, A.I., Kilipiris, E.G., and Palomo, J.M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence as an Aid in CBCT Airway Analysis: A Systematic Review. Life, 12.10.3390/life12111894 ↗
98. AI-based automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial anatomy from CBCT scans for automatic detection of pharyngeal airway evaluations in OSA patients10.1038/s41598-022-15920-1 ↗
99. Artificial intelligence to predict outcomes of head and neck radiotherapy
100. Evaluating AI-generated CBCT-based synthetic CT images for target delineation in palliative treatments of pelvic bone metastasis at conventional C-arm linacs10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110110 ↗