journal article·2022-04-28Open access

Numerical Investigation on a Liquid–Gas Ejector for Carbon Dioxide Removal Using Amine Solution: Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer Evaluation

Mohammad Mehdi Parivazh, Mohammad Rahmani, Mohammad Akrami

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

The present study investigates the hydrodynamics and mass transfer of the liquid–gas ejector using three-dimensional (air–water) and two-dimensional (CO2/air-MEA (Monoethanolamine) solution) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. For 3D simulation, validation of the CFD results of this ejector with experimental data (error less than 5%) showed high simulation accuracy. The effects of motive liquid flow rate and outlet pressure parameters on the air entrainment rate and air hold-up are also investigated. It was found that by increasing the outlet pressure by about 70% (from 3587 to 6127 Pag), the rate of gas entrainment and gas hold up decreased by about 37% and 20%, respectively. On the contrary, these parameters showed increasing behavior of about 74% and 15%, respectively, when the mass flow rate of liquid increased by about 21%. In addition, three-dimensional phenomena such as mixing shock and the location of its occurrence are examined, which is the reason for recirculation and vortex in the ejector. Next, by simulating a two-dimensional simulation and changing the inlet fluids to CO2/air-methanol amine, the ejector was designed to simultaneously increase the gas pressure and absorb carbon dioxide. A user-defined function code was used to express the mass transfer from the gas to the liquid phase. The results, in this case, showed that with increasing the outlet pressure of the ejector (from 0 to 2000 Pag), and enhancing the concentration of MEA solution (from 10% to 30%), the CO2 removal boosted from 83% to 95%. A similar behavior was shown when the L/G ratio increased from 3.5 to 5.5. This study serves as a showcase on how to do an exact design and analysis for liquid–gas ejectors in flare gas recovery systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies · Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies · Combustion and Detonation Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran P.O. Box 15875-4413, Iran

Department of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimization of liquid jet ejector geometry and its impact on flow fields10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117132 ↗
2. Technical characterization and economic evaluation of recovery of flare gas in various gas-processing plants10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.084 ↗
3. Derthick, M. (2005). Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy, Brookings Institution Press.10.1002/pam.20123 ↗
4. Environmental impacts of oil exploration and exploitation in the Niger Delta of Nigeria
5. Production of hydrogen from purge gases of ammonia plants in a catalytic hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.013 ↗
6. Hydraulic characteristics of liquid–gas ejector pump with a coherent liquid jet10.1016/j.cherd.2021.02.022 ↗
7. Influence of liquid volume fraction on ejector performance: A numerical study10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116845 ↗
8. Numerical study on mixing flow behavior in gas-liquid ejector10.1007/s42757-020-0069-z ↗
9. Current advances in ejector modeling, experimentation and applications for refrigeration and heat pumps. Part 1: Single-phase ejectors10.3390/inventions4010015 ↗
10. Review on the simulation models of the two-phase-ejector used in the transcritical carbon dioxide systems10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.04.029 ↗
11. Bauzvand, A., Tavousi, E., Noghrehabadi, A., and Behbahani-Nejad, M. Study of a novel inlet geometry for ejectors. Int. J. Refrig., 2022. in press.10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2022.04.011 ↗
12. Study of the configuration and performance of air-air ejectors based on cfd simulation10.21608/erjm.2015.66771 ↗
13. Hydrodynamic performance evaluation of a novel eductor liquid–liquid extractor using CFD modeling10.1016/j.cherd.2017.08.006 ↗
14. Numerical simulation of bubble coalescence and break-up in multinozzle jet ejector10.1155/2016/5238737 ↗
15. Development of a dual optical fiber probe for the hydrodynamic investigation of a horizontal annular drive gas/liquid ejector10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2017.07.005 ↗
16. Estimation of gas induction in jet loop reactors: Influence of nozzle designs10.1016/j.cherd.2017.06.027 ↗
17. CFD simulation of two-phase ejector performance influenced by different operation conditions10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.066 ↗
18. Effect of turbulent dispersion on hydrodynamic characteristics in a liquid jet ejector10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.171 ↗
19. Effect of a mixture of carbon dioxide and steam on ejector performance: An experimental parametric investigation10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.12.008 ↗
20. The hydrodynamics of two-phase flows in the injection part of a conventional ejector10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.10.007 ↗
21. An experimental investigation of the flow and mass transfer behavior in a vertical aeration process with orifice ejector10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.064 ↗
22. Experimental flow visualization and performance analysis of horizontal water-air ejector system
23. Characterization of gas-liquid parameters in a down-flow jet loop bubble column10.1590/S0104-66322010000200004 ↗
24. Numerical simulation of particulate flow by the Eulerian–Lagrangian and the Eulerian–Eulerian approach with application to a fluidized bed10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.09.002 ↗
25. Fluent, A. (2011). Fluent 14.0 User’s Guide, ANSYS FLUENT Inc.
26. Versteeg, H.K., and Malalasekera, W. (2007). An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, Pearson Education.
27. Validation of CFD models for mono-and polydisperse air–water two-phase flows in pipes10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.056 ↗
28. Shapes and velocities of single drops and bubbles moving freely through immiscible liquids
29. The lift force on a spherical body in a rotational flow10.1017/S002211208700260X ↗
30. The virtual mass and lift force on a sphere in rotating and straining inviscid flow10.1016/0301-9322(87)90011-5 ↗
31. Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00085-4 ↗
32. Shape of liquid drops moving in liquid media10.1002/aic.690120506 ↗
33. Burns, A.D., Frank, T., Hamill, I., and Shi, J.-M. (June, January 30). The Favre averaged drag model for turbulent dispersion in Eulerian multi-phase flows. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow (ICMF), Yokohama, Japan.
34. Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow10.1016/0301-9322(91)90029-3 ↗
35. Interactions between gas–liquid mass transfer and bubble behaviours10.1098/rsos.190136 ↗
36. Zhang, D., Deen, N., and Kuipers, J. (2007, January 9–13). Numerical modeling of hydrodynamics, mass transfer and chemical reaction in bubble Columns. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multiphase Flow (ICMF), Leipzig, Germany.
37. The Henry’s law constant of N2O and CO2 in aqueous binary and ternary amine solutions (MEA, DEA, DIPA, MDEA, and AMP)10.1016/j.fluid.2011.08.019 ↗
38. Physical solubility and diffusivity of N2O and CO2 into aqueous solutions of (2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol+ monoethanolamine) and (N-methyldiethanolamine+ monoethanolamine)10.1021/je049826x ↗
39. Effect of temperature on carbon dioxide absorption in monoethanolamine solutions10.1016/j.cej.2007.05.049 ↗
40. Particle/fluid transport processes
41. Spalding, B. (2000, January 17–20). Turbulence models for CFD in the 21st century. Proceedings of the ACFD 2000 Conferences, Beijing, China.
42. Mixing mechanism in a modified co-current downflow bubble column10.1016/j.cej.2005.06.006 ↗
43. Influence of the ejector configuration, scale and the gas density on the mass transfer characteristics of gas–liquid ejectors10.1016/S1385-8947(00)00363-6 ↗
44. Numerical and experimental investigations of gas–liquid dispersion in an ejector10.1016/j.ces.2007.08.020 ↗
45. Li, Z., Yuan, Y., Guo, B., Varsegov, V., and Yao, J. (2020). The recirculation zone characteristics of the circular transverse jet in crossflow. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13123224 ↗
46. Gas suction and mass transfer in gas-liquid up-flow ejector loop reactors. Effect of nozzle and ejector geometry10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.079 ↗