Tracing Microplastic Pollution Through Animals: A Narrative Review of Bioindicator Approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Monitoring microplastic pollution relies increasingly on bioindicators that integrate environmental exposure across habitats. This review presents animals explicitly proposed as microplastic bioindicators in recent literature and qualitatively evaluates their appropriateness using established biomonitoring criteria encompassing ecological, physiological, and methodological dimensions. In aquatic systems, bivalves (clams and mussels) demonstrate high suitability due to wide distribution, habitat-specific feeding, effective microplastic retention, and well-established analytical protocols. Fish exhibit intermediate suitability, as ecological representativeness and retention vary among species, and standardized methods often require multi-species approaches. Sessile organisms, including barnacles and sea anemones, align strongly with all three dimensions through spatial fidelity, effective retention, and methodological ease. Crustaceans and sponges also exhibit robust ecological relevance and high retention, with sponges uniquely integrating fine particles over time. Terrestrial and aerial indicators, such as carabid beetles and insectivorous birds, provide complementary coverage with moderate physiological integration and feasible ethical sampling. Sea turtles demonstrate exceptional physiological integration and methodological robustness at regional scales, despite non-sedentary behavior. Overall, taxa combining sedentary or spatially faithful ecology, effective microplastic retention, and standardized laboratory applicability, particularly bivalves, sponges, barnacles, sea anemones, and sediment-associated crustaceans, emerge as the most suitable bioindicators. Future research should prioritize harmonized, multi-taxa frameworks to improve standardization, cross-ecosystem comparability, and long-term microplastic monitoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
References (98)
Show source-provided references
1. Microplastics in and Near Landlocked Countries of Central and East Asia: A Review of Occurrence and Characteristics10.53623/tasp.v3i2.262 ↗
2. Plastic occurrence, sources, and impacts in Antarctic environment and biota10.1016/j.watbs.2022.100034 ↗
3. Journey to the deep: Plastic pollution in the hadal of deep-sea trenches10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122078 ↗
4. Twenty years of microplastic pollution research—What have we learned?10.1126/science.adl2746 ↗
5. Tang, K.H. (2025). Counteracting the Harms of Microplastics on Humans: An Overview from the Perspective of Exposure. Microplastics, 4.10.3390/microplastics4030047 ↗
6. Tang, K.H. (2025). Combined Toxicity of Microplastics and Antimicrobials on Animals: A Review. Antibiotics, 14.10.3390/antibiotics14090896 ↗
7. Tang, K.H. (2025). Effects of Microplastics on Bioavailability, Persistence and Toxicity of Plant Pesticides: An Agricultural Perspective. Agriculture, 15.10.3390/agriculture15040356 ↗
8. Interactions and associated resistance development mechanisms between microplastics, antibiotics and heavy metals in the aquaculture environment10.1111/raq.12639 ↗
9. Tang, K.H. (2025). Toxic Effects of Nanoplastics on Animals: Comparative Insights into Microplastic Toxicity. Environments, 12.10.3390/environments12110429 ↗
10. A review of the toxic effects of microplastics based on studies on mammals and mammalian cell lines10.1039/D4VA00227J ↗
11. Bioindicators selection in the strategies for monitoring microplastic pollution10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112337 ↗
12. Microplastic occurrence in the gastrointestinal tract and gill of bioindicator fish species in the northeastern Mediterranean10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113556 ↗
13. Wang, Z., Wang, X., Hu, C., Ge, T., Wang, L., Xing, J., He, X., and Zhao, Y. (2024). Comparative Evaluation of Analytical Techniques for Quantifying and Characterizing Polyethylene Microplastics in Farmland Soil Samples. Agriculture, 14.10.3390/agriculture14040554 ↗
14. FTIR and Raman imaging for microplastics analysis: State of the art, challenges and prospects10.1016/j.trac.2019.115629 ↗
15. Sequential combination of micro-FTIR imaging spectroscopy and pyrolysis-GC/MS for microplastic quantification. Application to river sediments10.1039/D5AY00237K ↗
16. Daoutakou, M., and Kintzios, S. (2025). Biosensors for Micro- and Nanoplastics Detection: A Review. Chemosensors, 13.10.3390/chemosensors13040143 ↗
17. A rapid-screening approach to detect and quantify microplastics based on fluorescent tagging with Nile Red10.1038/srep44501 ↗
18. Exploratory analysis of hyperspectral FTIR data obtained from environmental microplastics samples10.1039/C9AY02483B ↗
19. Khanam, M.M., Uddin, M.K., and Kazi, J.U. (2025). Advances in machine learning for the detection and characterization of microplastics in the environment. Front. Environ. Sci., 13.10.3389/fenvs.2025.1573579 ↗
20. Microplastic biomonitoring studies in aquatic species: A review & quality assessment framework10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177541 ↗
21. Can natural history collection specimens be used as aquatic microplastic pollution bioindicators?10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111894 ↗
22. Nationwide monitoring of microplastics in bivalves from the coastal environment of Korea10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116175 ↗
23. Towards a North Pacific Ocean long-term monitoring program for plastic pollution: A review and recommendations for plastic ingestion bioindicators10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119861 ↗
24. Bioindicators for monitoring marine litter ingestion and its impacts on Mediterranean biodiversity10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.019 ↗
25. Toxic effects on enzymatic activity, gene expression and histopathological biomarkers in organisms exposed to microplastics and nanoplastics: A review10.1186/s12302-022-00652-w ↗
26. A meta-analysis of potential biomarkers associated with microplastic ingestion in marine fish10.1016/j.etap.2024.104414 ↗
27. From the Seafloor to the Surface: A Global Review of Gastropods as Bioindicators of Marine Microplastics10.1007/s11270-023-06823-6 ↗
28. Carrasco, L., Jiménez-Mora, E., Utrilla, M.J., Pizarro, I.T., Reglero, M.M., Rico-San Román, L., and Martin-Maldonado, B. (2025). Birds as Bioindicators: Revealing the Widespread Impact of Microplastics. Birds, 6.10.3390/birds6010010 ↗
29. Using mussel as a global bioindicator of coastal microplastic pollution10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.032 ↗
30. Monitoring plastic pollution using bioindicators: A global review and recommendations for marine environments10.1039/D4VA00174E ↗
31. Castillo, N.A., Swam-Jaramillo, L.M., Rider, M.M., Apeti, D.A., and Pisarski, E.C. (2025). A 2021 Assessment of Contaminants of Emerging Concern on the Mid-Atlantic Coast, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 361.
32. Larsen, M., and Hjermann, D. (2022). Status and Trend for Heavy Metals (Mercury, Cadmium and Lead) in Fish, Shellfish and Sediment. OSPAR, 2023: The 2023 Quality Status Report for the Northeast Atlantic, OSPAR Commission.
33. New tools to evaluate plastic ingestion by northern fulmars applied to North Sea monitoring data 2002–201810.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112246 ↗
34. Hit the target: A new experimental method to select bioindicators of microplastic ingestion by marine fish10.1016/j.envres.2025.120940 ↗
35. French, M.A., and Lipizer, M. (2023). Improving data reliability to support marine pollution assessment according to MSFD Descriptor 8 in the European Seas: The contribution of EMODnet Chemistry. Front. Mar. Sci., 10.10.3389/fmars.2023.1275097 ↗
36. UNEP (2025, December 28). Agenda item 7: Implementation of Decision IG 22/7 on IMAP and Articles 7 and 8 of the LBS Protocol. Available online: https://mcc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Decision_IG.22-7_IMAP_FINAL.pdf.
37. Monitoring microplastic pollution: The potential and limitations of Nephrops norvegicus10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110441 ↗
38. What type of plastic do sea turtles in Korean waters mainly ingest? Quantity, shape, color, size, polymer composition, and original usage10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118849 ↗
39. DNA barcoding of intertidal barnacles as potential bioindicators of microplastic pollution in Seribu Islands and Jakarta Bay, Indonesia
40. De Witte, B., Catarino, A.I., Vandecasteele, L., Dekimpe, M., Meyers, N., Deloof, D., Pint, S., Hostens, K., Everaert, G., and Torreele, E. (2022). Feasibility Study on Biomonitoring of Microplastics in Fish Gastrointestinal Tracts. Front. Mar. Sci., 8.10.3389/fmars.2021.794636 ↗
41. Khyalia, P., and Yadav, S. (2025). Potential Bioindicators of Microplastics for Monitoring Microplastic Pollution. Microplastic Pollution in India and Its Environmental Impacts: Assessment of Ecosystems and Aquatic Environments, Impacts on Human Health, Management and Mitigation, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-92530-6 ↗
42. Sentinel species selection for monitoring microplastic pollution: A review on one health approach10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109587 ↗
43. Microplastics in four bivalve species and basis for using bivalves as bioindicators of microplastic pollution10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146830 ↗
44. Assessing the relationship between the abundance and properties of microplastics in water and in mussels10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.284 ↗
45. Using the Asian clam as an indicator of microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.075 ↗
46. Microplastic fiber uptake, ingestion, and egestion rates in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis)10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.061 ↗
47. Selective Ingestion and Egestion of Plastic Particles by the Blue Mussel (Mytilus edulis) and Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica): Implications for Using Bivalves as Bioindicators of Microplastic Pollution10.1021/acs.est.9b02073 ↗
48. Pastorino, P., Prearo, M., Anselmi, S., Menconi, V., Bertoli, M., Dondo, A., Pizzul, E., and Renzi, M. (2021). Use of the Zebra Mussel Dreissena polymorpha (Mollusca, Bivalvia) as a Bioindicator of Microplastics Pollution in Freshwater Ecosystems: A Case Study from Lake Iseo (North Italy). Water, 13.10.3390/w13040434 ↗
49. The relationship of microplastic pollution between seawater and oyster: A holistic perspective for bioindicator selection10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.108052 ↗
50. From Spat to Adult: Investigating Microplastic Accumulation in Crassostrea hongkongensis of Varying Sizes10.1021/acs.est.5c07676 ↗
51. In-situ microplastic egestion efficiency of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113653 ↗
52. Modelling mussel (Mytilus spp.) microplastic accumulation10.5194/os-16-927-2020 ↗
53. Exploring microplastic pollution in a Mediterranean river: The role of introduced species as bioindicators10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15069 ↗
54. Accumulation of metals relevant for agricultural contamination in gills of European chub (Squalius cephalus)10.1007/s11356-016-6830-y ↗
55. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls in fresh water fish from Campania Region, southern Italy10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.039 ↗
56. Anthropogenic particles ingestion in fish species from two areas of the western Mediterranean Sea10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.04.064 ↗
57. An overview on properties and applications of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)–PBAT based composites10.1002/pen.24770 ↗
58. Microplastics in mussels along the coastal waters of China10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.012 ↗
59. Lanternfish as bioindicator of microplastics in the deep sea: A spatiotemporal analysis using museum specimens10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137125 ↗
60. Elder fish means more microplastics? Alaska pollock microplastic story in the Bering Sea10.1126/sciadv.adf5897 ↗
61. Barnacles as potential bioindicator of microplastic pollution in Hong Kong10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111081 ↗
62. The role of organisms’ size in microplastic pollution monitoring: Insights from Mytilaster lineatus and Amphibalanus improvisus10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106863 ↗
63. Temporal variability of microplastics contaminant ingested by striped barnacles Amphibalanus amphitrite in tidal flat of the Tsurumi River estuary, Tokyo Bay Area, Japan
64. Beadlet anemone: A novel bio-indicator of microplastic pollution in the marine environment10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119538 ↗
65. The sea anemone Bunodosoma cangicum as a potential biomonitor for microplastics contamination on the Brazilian Amazon coast10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114817 ↗
66. Uptake of microplastics by the snakelocks anemone (Anemonia viridis) is commonplace across environmental conditions10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155144 ↗
67. Are we underestimating microplastic abundance in the marine environment? A comparison of microplastic capture with nets of different mesh-size10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114721 ↗
68. Fiddler crabs (Tubuca arcuata) as bioindicators of microplastic pollution in mangrove sediments10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143112 ↗
69. The invasive red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) as a bioindicator of microplastic pollution: Insights from Lake Candia (northwestern Italy)10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110200 ↗
70. Plastics, prawns, and patterns: Microplastic loadings in Nephrops norvegicus and surrounding habitat in the North East Atlantic10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154036 ↗
71. Microplastic abundance in urban vs. peri-urban mangroves: The feasibility of using invertebrates as biomonitors of microplastic pollution in two mangrove dominated estuaries of southern Africa10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115657 ↗
72. Sponges as bioindicators for microparticulate pollutants?10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115851 ↗
73. Microplastic distribution in urban vs pristine mangroves: Using marine sponges as bioindicators of environmental pollution10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117391 ↗
74. Surrounded by microplastic, since when? Testing the feasibility of exploring past levels of plastic microfibre pollution using natural history museum collections10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110846 ↗
75. Assessment of microplastics in discharged treated wastewater and the utility of Chrysaora pentastoma medusae as bioindicators of microplastics10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148076 ↗
76. Evidence of microplastics from benthic jellyfish (Cassiopea xamachana) in Florida estuaries10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111521 ↗
77. Gastrointestinal transit times in juvenile green turtles: An approach for assessing digestive motility disorders10.1016/j.jembe.2021.151616 ↗
78. The feeding habit of sea turtles influences their reaction to artificial marine debris10.1038/srep28015 ↗
79. Quantities of Marine Debris Ingested by Sea Turtles: Global Meta-Analysis Highlights Need for Standardized Data Reporting Methods and Reveals Relative Risk10.1021/acs.est.8b02848 ↗
80. A pilot study to assess carabids (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as potential bioindicators of microplastics contamination in soils
81. Kosewska, A., Kędzior, R., Nietupski, M., and Borkowski, J. (2023). Epigeic Carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as Bioindicators in Different Variants of Scots Pine Regeneration: Implication for Forest Landscape Management. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151813322 ↗
82. The potential use of birds as bioindicators of suspended atmospheric microplastics and artificial fibers10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116744 ↗
83. Do loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) gut contents reflect the types, colors and sources of plastic pollution in the Southwest Indian Ocean?10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115343 ↗
84. Bendell, L.I., LeCadre, E., and Zhou, W. (2020). Use of sediment dwelling bivalves to biomonitor plastic particle pollution in intertidal regions; A review and study. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0232879 ↗
85. Particle characteristics of microplastics contaminating the mussel Mytilus edulis and their surrounding environments10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.05.041 ↗
86. Factors affecting distribution and abundance of jellyfish medusae in a temperate estuary: A multi-decadal study10.1007/s10530-017-1518-x ↗
87. Amberstripe scad Decapterus muroadsi (Carangidae) fish ingest blue microplastics resembling their copepod prey along the coast of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) in the South Pacific subtropical gyre10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.175 ↗
88. Uptake routes of microplastics in fishes: Practical and theoretical approaches to test existing theories10.1038/s41598-020-60630-1 ↗
89. Xu, X., Fang, J.K.-H., Wong, C.-Y., and Cheung, S.-G. (2023). Experimental accumulation of microplastics in acorn barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite and its use in estimating microplastic concentration in coastal waters. Front. Mar. Sci., 9.10.3389/fmars.2022.1081329 ↗
90. Janßen, A., Wizemann, A., Klicpera, A., Satari, D.Y., Westphal, H., and Mann, T. (2017). Sediment Composition and Facies of Coral Reef Islands in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Front. Mar. Sci., 4.10.3389/fmars.2017.00144 ↗
91. Pilcher, N.J., Rezaie-Atagholipour, M., Ghavasi, M., Dakhteh, S.M., Shokri, M.R., Javidkar, M., and Jensen, M. (2025). Population structure of green sea turtles at a foraging ground in the southeastern Persian Gulf. Front. Mar. Sci., 12.10.3389/fmars.2025.1572931 ↗
92. Plastic ingestion by seabirds in the circumpolar Arctic: A review10.1139/er-2020-0029 ↗
93. Plastic ingestion by Arctic fauna: A review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147462 ↗
94. Elevated levels of ingested plastic in a high Arctic seabird, the northern fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis)10.1007/s00300-015-1657-4 ↗
95. Implications of Regurgitative Feeding on Plastic Loads in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Study from Svalbard10.1021/acs.est.2c05617 ↗
96. Life starts with plastic: High occurrence of plastic pieces in fledglings of northern fulmars10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116365 ↗
97. Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.07.024 ↗
98. Development of a multi-spectroscopy method coupling μ-FTIR and μ-Raman analysis for one-stop detection of microplastics in environmental and biological samples10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170396 ↗