How e-Learning Platforms Are Addressing Project-Based Learning: An Assessment of Digital Learning Tools in Primary Education
Source abstract
Abstract
The integration of project-based learning (PBL) in primary education has proven effective in fostering students’ critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and problem-solving abilities. When implemented through eLearning platforms, PBL can be enhanced by digital environments that combine pedagogical and technological characteristics supporting interactive learning, personalization, and continuous formative assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the pedagogical-technological characteristics of e-learning platforms relevant to the implementation of PBL in Lithuanian primary education. A multi-stage Delphi study was conducted involving 22 primary school teachers experienced in applying educational technologies and project-based learning. In the initial stages, the research team developed and validated a PBL-oriented evaluation instrument, followed by an expert-based selection and in-depth assessment of eight e-learning platforms available for Lithuanian educational practice. The findings revealed substantial differences in how platforms support the main phases of the PBL process. The highest evaluations were given to LearnLab and SMART Lumio, which demonstrate a balanced integration of pedagogical and technological characteristics aligned with PBL logic, whereas content-oriented platforms such as Moodle showed limited adaptability. The final Delphi round generated expert-informed recommendations for enhancing platform design and pedagogical functionality. The study contributes to the understanding of how e-learning platforms can operationalize project-based learning principles and provides an empirically grounded framework for improving technology-enhanced PBL in primary education.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Problem and Project Based Learning · E-Learning and COVID-19 · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Marine Technologies and Natural Sciences, Klaipeda University, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Klaipeda University, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania
Funding
Research Council of Lithuania
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Cavus, N., Sani, A.S., Haruna, Y., and Lawan, A.A. (2021). Efficacy of social networking sites for sustainable education in the era of COVID-19: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020808 ↗
2. Rupšienė, L., Škėrienė, S., Girdzijauskienė, R., and Pranckūnienė, E. (2021). Dirbtinio Intelekto ir Mokymosi Analitikos Plėtra Mokyklose: Scenarijai ir Rekomendacijos, Klaipėdos Universiteto Leidykla.
3. Tackle implementation challenges in project-based learning: A survey study of PBL e-learning platforms10.1007/s11423-023-10202-7 ↗
4. E-learning environments and problem-based learning
5. Pranckūnienė, E., Girdzijauskienė, R., Bubnys, R., and Rupšienė, L. (2021, January 11–12). Discoveries through challenges: Collective autoethnographic study of teacher educators in the COVID-19 situation. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Human, Technologies and Quality of Education 2021, Riga, Latvia.
6. Pranckūnienė, E., and Girdzijauskienė, R. (2023, January 6–8). Personalised and deeper learning opportunities using learning experience platforms. Proceedings of the 17th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2023), Valencia, Spain.
7. UNESCO (2025, October 06). Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? Global Education Monitoring Report, Available online: https://www.unesco.org/reports.
8. Thomas, J.W. (2000). A review of Research on Project-Based Learning, Autodesk Foundation.
9. How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0 ↗
10. The implementation of project-based learning in K–12 education: Teacher qualities and students’ achievements10.21810/sfuer.v14i1.2376 ↗
11. Education for the future: Applying concepts from the new materialist discourse to UNESCO and OECD publications10.1080/00958964.2023.2188576 ↗
12. An evaluation of implementing problem-based learning scenarios in an immersive virtual world10.5116/ijme.4e92.b22f ↗
13. Targamadzė, V., and Gražienė, V. (2012). Projektinio ir Probleminio Mokymosi (si) Taikymo Edukologijos Studijų Baigiamuosiuose Darbuose Rekomendacijos, Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla.
14. Barrett, T. (2005). Who said learning couldn’t be enjoyable, playful and fun?. PBL in Context—Bridging Work and Education, Aalborg University Press.
15. Condliffe, B. (2017). Project-Based Learning: A Literature Review, MDRC. Working Paper.
16. McTighe, J., and Silver, H.F. (2020). Teaching for Deeper Learning: Tools to Engage Students in Meaning Making, ASCD.
17. Promoting deep learning through project-based learning: A design problem10.1186/s43031-019-0009-6 ↗
18. Darling-Hammond, L., and Oakes, J. (2021). Preparing Teachers for Deeper Learning, Harvard Education Press.
19. Project-based learning: A review of the literature10.1177/1365480216659733 ↗
20. The difference of students learning outcomes using the project-based learning and problem-based learning model in terms of self-efficacy10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012082 ↗
21. Pengaruh penerapan problem based learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada subtema lingkungan dan manfaatnya di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Bojong Kabupaten Bogor tahun pembelajaran 2022/2023
22. How to enhance interdisciplinary competence—Interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning
23. Effiyanti, T., Adriani, D., and Rahmadana, M.F. (2016, January 19). Project-based learning: To improve student learning independence. Proceedings of the First Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership, Medan, Indonesia.
24. Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: A systematic review10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573 ↗
25. The impact of project-based learning and direct instruction on the motivation and engagement of middle school students
26. Collaborative project-based learning: An integrative science and technological education project10.1080/02635143.2016.1274723 ↗
27. Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills?
28. “We’re doing things that are meaningful”: Student perspectives of project-based learning across the disciplines
29. Soft skills through the prism of primary school teachers10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2303 ↗
30. Sukmana, A.I.W.I.Y., and Sudarma, I.K. (2021, January 10–11). Optimizing student photography skills through development of project-based e-learning in photography courses. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020), Surabaya, Indonesia.10.2991/assehr.k.210407.238 ↗
31. The implementation of genre-based approach through project-based learning in teaching writing
32. Development of physics e-module based on integrated project-based learning model with ethno-STEM approach on smartphones for senior high school students10.21067/mpej.v6i1.6316 ↗
33. Development of practice module on domestic electricity installation based project on electrical engineering students10.24036/jptk.v3i3.12323 ↗
34. The effect of e-portfolio in project-based learning toward learner autonomy and writing competency
35. The hybrid project-based learning–flipped classroom: A design project module redesigned to foster learning and engagement10.1177/0306419019838335 ↗
36. Verslype, S., Thati, V.B., Peuteman, J., Gericota, M., Pissoort, D., and Boydens, J. (2021, January 23–25). Satisfaction questionnaire for students, teachers and trainees to assess the quality of an e-engineering program. Proceedings of the 2021 International e-Engineering Education Services Conference (e-Engineering), Porto, Portugal.10.1109/e-Engineering47629.2021.9470651 ↗
37. The impact of achievement motivation on project-based autonomous learning: An empirical study on the 2017 NBEPC10.5539/elt.v11n11p31 ↗
38. Assessing team learning practices in project/design based learning approach10.3991/ijep.v6i3.5448 ↗
39. The role of m-learning in project-based learning models in elementary schools
40. Exploring students’ perspectives on using live streaming on Facebook as project-based learning in Indonesian EFL classes10.23971/jefl.v13i1.4571 ↗
41. Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513 ↗
42. Yukawa, T., Takahashi, H., Fukumura, Y., Yamazaki, M., Miyazaki, T., Yano, S., Takeuchi, A., Miura, H., and Hasegawa, N. (December, January 30). Online collaboration support tools for project-based learning of embedded software design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2009), Hong Kong. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, 5712 LNAI, Part 2.10.1007/978-3-642-04592-9_66 ↗
43. Identification of learning styles and automatic assignment of projects in an adaptive e-learning environment using project based learning
44. Nedyalkova, A., Bakardjieva, T., and Lyutov, N. (2007, January 4–5). Application of an open source e-learning platform—Experiences and suggestions. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL 2007), Copenhagen, Denmark.
45. A conceptual approach for project-based pedagogical processes embedded in an existing e-learning platform10.1109/URKE.2011.6007872 ↗
46. Daineko, L., Davy, Y., Larionova, V., and Yurasova, I. (2019, January 7–8). Experience of using project-based learning in the URFU hypermethod e-learning system. Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL 2019), Copenhagen, Denmark.
47. Construct validation of educational technology for patients through the application of the Delphi technique10.1590/S0103-21002012000600026 ↗
48. Socialinių pedagogų bendradarbiavimas su paauglių tėvais, vykdant mokyklos nelankymo prevenciją
49. Sillat, L.H., Sillat, P.J., Vares, M., and Tammets, K. (2022, January 21–23). Providing meaningful digital competence assessment feedback for supporting teachers’ professional development. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Web-Based Learning (ICWL 2022), Tenerife, Spain.
50. Chang, Y.H.I., and Yearwood, D. (2020, January 22–26). An innovative project-based learning approach to teach project management. Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Online.
51. Strategic utilization of digital learning platforms in the era of independent curriculum
52. Digital transformation in education to foster personalized learning10.54371/jiip.v7i11.6198 ↗
53. Bell, S. (2023). Reimagining Learning: Project-Based Strategies for 21st-Century Classrooms, Routledge.
54. Yadav, S. (2025). Leveraging AI to enhance teaching and learning in education: The role of artificial intelligence in modernizing classroom practices. Optimizing Research Techniques and Learning Strategies with Digital Technologies, IGI Global Scientific Publishing.10.4018/979-8-3693-7863-2.ch008 ↗
55. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., and Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning, Center for Curriculum Redesign.10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068 ↗
56. Gupta, A.K., Aggarwal, V., Sharma, V., and Naved, M. (2024). Education 4.0 and Web 3.0 technologies application for enhancement of distance learning management systems in the post–COVID-19 era. The Role of Sustainability and Artificial Intelligence in Education Improvement, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781003425779-4 ↗
57. IoT-enhanced learning in primary education: Opportunities and design challenges
58. IoT in education: Connecting learning with context
59. Collaborative learning tools in digital PBL environments: An affordance-based study
60. Exploring student engagement and project success in digital PBL environments
61. A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st-century competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies
62. Designing multimedia-based project learning environments: A framework for engagement
63. Multimedia tools and student motivation in project-based learning
64. Curriculum alignment and digital platform integration: A cross-national analysis
65. Empowering teachers for digital transformation: A framework for sustained professional learning
66. OECD (2023). Teachers and Technology: Balancing Digital Innovation and Teacher Development, OECD Publishing. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/12/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2023_c827b81a/c74f03de-en.pdf.
67. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., and Osher, D. (2022). Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development, National Commission on Social, Emotional, and Academic Development.