journal article·2025-11-16Open access

Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Optimization for Improved Risk Assessment Using Multicollinearity Analysis and Machine Learning Technique

Buddhi Raj Joshi, Netra Prakash Bhandary, Indra Prasad Acharya, Niraj KC, Chakra Bhandari

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

This study integrates geospatial modeling with multi-criteria decision analysis for an improved approach to landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). This approach addresses key challenges in LSM through sophisticated multicollinearity analysis and machine learning strategies. We compared three machine learning models for weighting, and of them the Permutation-Weighted model yielded the best prediction results, with an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 95%, an accuracy of 69%, and a recall of 66%. To resolve perfect multicollinearity (r = 1) between land use land cover (LULC) and geological factors, we implemented Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The selected factors demonstrated strong predictive power, with the PCA-derived features exhibiting the best performance, having a Variation Inflation Factor (VIF) of 1.004. Slope appeared as the most influential factor (51.7% contribution), while the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) was less dominant with only 6.6%. Multiple landslide susceptibility mapping methods yielded consistent results, with 29.8–30.1% of the study area showing moderate susceptibility and 35.2–36.9% in the high to very high susceptibility class. The model also incorporated vulnerability parameters weighted by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) indicators, including farmland, buildings, bare land, water bodies, roads, and amenities to generate hazard, vulnerability, and risk maps. The results were verified through visual comparison with high-resolution Google Earth imagery. The Permutation-Weighted model performed better than others, categorizing 12.4% at high-risk, while Random Forest (RF) categorized 7.2% at high risk. This study makes three key contributions: (1) It establishes the effectiveness of PCA/VIF for variable selection, (2) it provides a comparison of machine learning weighting techniques, and (3) it validates a workflow applicable to data-scarce regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Pokhara University, Kaski 33700, Nepal

Faculty of Collaborative Regional Innovation, Ehime University, Matsuyama City 790-8577, Japan

Department of Civil Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal

Department of Geomatics Engineering, Pashchimanchal Campus, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Kaski 33700, Nepal

Madan Bhandari College of Engineering, Madan Bhandari Memorial Academy Nepal, Urlabari 56604, Nepal

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Global Patterns of Loss of Life from Landslides10.1130/G33217.1 ↗
2. Global Fatal Landslide Occurrence from 2004 to 201610.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018 ↗
3. Geomorphic and Geologic Controls of Geohazards Induced by Nepal’s 2015 Gorkha Earthquake10.1126/science.aac8353 ↗
4. Preliminary Assessment of September 2024 Extreme Rainfall–Induced Landslides in Central Nepal10.1007/s10346-025-02577-w ↗
5. Landslides in a Changing Climate10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.011 ↗
6. Fatal Landslides in Europe10.1007/s10346-016-0689-3 ↗
7. Deuba, T. (2025, October 08). More than 250 Families Displaced by Landslides in Doti. The Himalayan Times. Available online: https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/more-than-250-families-displaced-by-landslides-in-doti/.
8. Deuba, T. (2025, October 10). Haliya Settlement at Risk in Doti. The Himalayan Times. Available online: https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/haliya-settlement-at-risk-in-doti.
9. RSS (2025, October 10). Landslide Displaces Eight Families in Doti. Ratopati. Available online: https://english.ratopati.com/story/13941.
10. Deuba, T. (2025, October 10). Landslide Obstructs Bhimdutta Highway in Sudurpaschim. The Himalayan Times. Available online: https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/landslide-obstructs-bhimdutta-highway-in-sudurpaschim.
11. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of Kaligandaki Hydro-Catchment of Syangja, Nepal
12. Application of Frequency Ratio, Statistical Index, and Weights-of-Evidence Models and Their Comparison in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z ↗
13. Comparison and Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Maps Obtained from Weight of Evidence, Logistic Regression, and Artificial Neural Network Models10.1007/s11069-018-3299-7 ↗
14. Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Using Reduced Error Pruning Trees and Different Ensemble Techniques: Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018 ↗
15. Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Studies: A Comparative Overview of Algorithm Performance10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103225 ↗
16. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Maximum Entropy and Support Vector Machine Models along the Highway Corridor, Garhwal Himalaya10.1080/10106049.2018.1510038 ↗
17. GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Zonation (LSZ) Mapping of Darjeeling Himalaya, India Using Weights of Evidence (WoE) Model10.1007/s12517-023-11523-w ↗
18. Aboutaib, F., Krimissa, S., Pradhan, B., Elaloui, A., Ismaili, M., Abdelrahman, K., and Namous, M. (2023). Evaluating the Effectiveness and Robustness of Machine Learning Models with Varied Geo-Environmental Factors for Determining Vulnerability to Water Flow-Induced Gully Erosion. Front. Environ. Sci., 11.10.3389/fenvs.2023.1207027 ↗
19. GIS-Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Comparing Three Methods for the Urmia Lake Basin, Iran10.1007/s11069-012-0463-3 ↗
20. Landslide Susceptibility Modeling in a Landslide Prone Area in Mazandarn Province, North of Iran: A Comparison between GLM, GAM, MARS, and M-AHP Methods10.1007/s00704-016-1919-2 ↗
21. Assessing Physical Vulnerability for Multi-Hazards Using an Indicator-Based Methodology10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002 ↗
22. Vulnerability Assessment in Landslide Risk Analysis
23. Spatiotemporal Landslide Detection for the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake Region10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.07.026 ↗
24. Comparison of Hybrid Data-Driven and Physical Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping at Regional Scales10.1007/s11440-023-01841-4 ↗
25. The Influence of Systematically Incomplete Shallow Landslide Inventories on Statistical Susceptibility Models and Suggestions for Improvements10.1007/s10346-017-0820-0 ↗
26. Application of Deep Learning Algorithms in Geotechnical Engineering: A Short Critical Review10.1007/s10462-021-09967-1 ↗
27. Wang, Y., Wang, L., Liu, S., Han, L., Zhang, W., Hong, L., and Zhu, X. Region Similarity Assessment for Empowering Physics-Informed Transfer Learning-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 2025. in press.10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.06.030 ↗
28. A Hybrid Data-Driven Approach for Rainfall-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Physically Based Probabilistic Model with Convolutional Neural Network10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.08.005 ↗
29. A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Solution for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Three-Dimensional Slope Stability Evaluation10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3 ↗
30. A Comparative Study of Regional Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Multiple Machine Learning Models10.1002/gj.4902 ↗
31. Improving ML-Based Landslide Susceptibility Using Ensemble Method for Sample Selection: A Case Study of Kangra District in Himachal Pradesh, India
32. Singh, A., Dhiman, N., Niraj, K.C., and Shukla, D.P. (2024). Ensembled Transfer Learning Approach for Error Reduction in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of the Data Scare Region. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-76541-4 ↗
33. National-Scale Rainfall-Triggered Landslide Susceptibility and Exposure in Nepal10.1029/2023EF004102 ↗
34. Effect of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) on GIS-Enabled Bivariate and Multivariate Statistical Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping10.1007/s12524-023-01738-5 ↗
35. Geological Reconnaissance around Silgarhi-Doti, West Central Nepal
36. Tiwari, R.K., and Paudyal, H. (2023). Spatial Mapping of b-Value and Fractal Dimension Prior to November 8, 2022, Doti Earthquake, Nepal. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0289673 ↗
37. Trends in Seasonal Precipitation and Temperature–A Review in Doti and Surkhet Districts of Nepal10.3126/ije.v2i1.9227 ↗
38. Agricultural Perspectives of Climate Change Induced Disasters in Doti, Nepal10.3126/aej.v14i0.19795 ↗
39. Wagle, N., Acharya, T.D., Kolluru, V., Huang, H., and Lee, D.H. (2020). Multi-Temporal Land Cover Change Mapping Using Google Earth Engine and Ensemble Learning Methods. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228083 ↗
40. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of the Wanzhou District: Merging Landslide Susceptibility Modelling (LSM) with InSAR-Derived Ground Deformation Map
41. Characterization of Large-Scale Landslides and Their Susceptibility Evaluation in Central Nepal Himalaya10.3126/jngs.v63i01.50846 ↗
42. Zighmi, K., Zahri, F., Faqeih, K., Al Amri, A., Riheb, H., Alamri, S.M., and Alamery, E. (2025). AHP Multi Criteria Analysis for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Tellian Atlas Chain. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-10819-z ↗
43. Data Normalization and Standardization: A Technical Report
44. The Correlation Coefficient: An Overview10.1080/10408340500526766 ↗
45. Collinearity: A Review of Methods to Deal with It and a Simulation Study Evaluating Their Performance10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x ↗
46. Evaluation and Improvement of Energy Consumption Prediction Models Using Principal Component Analysis Based Feature Reduction10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123866 ↗
47. Assessment of Advanced Random Forest and Decision Tree Algorithms for Modeling Rainfall-Induced Landslide Susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221 ↗
48. Xia, D., Tang, H., Sun, S., Tang, C., and Zhang, B. (2022). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on the Germinal Center Optimization Algorithm and Support Vector Classification. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14112707 ↗
49. Wang, H., Yang, F., and Luo, Z. (2016). An Experimental Study of the Intrinsic Stability of Random Forest Variable Importance Measures. BMC Bioinform., 17.10.1186/s12859-016-0900-5 ↗
50. Permutation Importance: A Corrected Feature Importance Measure10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 ↗
51. Efficiency of Weighted Average Derivative Estimators and Index Models10.2307/2951498 ↗
52. An Introduction to ROC Analysis10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
53. Comparisons of Heuristic, General Statistical and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction and Mapping10.1016/j.catena.2020.104580 ↗
54. Combining Hazard, Exposure, and Social Vulnerability to Provide Lessons for Flood Risk Management10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013 ↗
55. Abdiweli, A.J. (2023). Simulation Study on the Performance of Robust Outlier Labelling Methods. [Ph.D. Thesis, Kampala International University]. Available online: https://irbackend.kiu.ac.ug/server/api/core/bitstreams/86d8fd79-e3c5-408a-98f1-48de5057c608/content.
56. Ma, S., Shao, X., and Xu, C. (2024). Delineating Non-Susceptible Landslide Areas in China Based on Topographic Index and Quantile Non-Linear Model. Forests, 15.10.3390/f15040678 ↗
57. Sassa, K., Mikos, M., and Yin, Y. (2017). United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)—UNISDR’s Contribution to Science and Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Role of the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL). Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides: Volume 1 ISDR-ICL Sendai Partnerships 2015–2025, Springer.
58. The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and Its Indicators—Where Does Health Fit In?10.1007/s13753-017-0120-2 ↗
59. Landslide Vulnerability Mapping (LVM) Using Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) Model through Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques10.1007/s40808-016-0141-7 ↗
60. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Certainty Factor, Index of Entropy and Logistic Regression Models in GIS and Their Comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat Road Section in Nepal Himalaya10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6 ↗
61. Stability and Hazard Assessment of the Progressive Zero Landslide in the Kalimpong Region of Darjeeling Himalaya, India10.1007/s10706-023-02641-z ↗
62. Assessing Landslide Susceptibility of Türkiye at Drainage Basin Scale: A Semi-Quantitative Approach10.1007/s11069-025-07615-3 ↗
63. Determining the Spatial Distribution of Soil Properties Using the Environmental Covariates and Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Case Study in Semi-Arid Regions of Iran10.1007/s40333-019-0059-9 ↗
64. Landslide Spatial Modeling: Introducing New Ensembles of ANN, MaxEnt, and SVM Machine Learning Techniques10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.06.020 ↗
65. Landslide Identification Using Machine Learning10.1016/j.gsf.2020.02.012 ↗
66. A Review of Statistically-Based Landslide Susceptibility Models10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 ↗
67. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using J48 Decision Tree with AdaBoost, Bagging and Rotation Forest Ensembles in the Guangchang Area (China)10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.005 ↗
68. Techniques for Evaluating the Performance of Landslide Susceptibility Models10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.004 ↗
69. Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Based on a Semi-Supervised Multiple-Layer Perceptron Model10.1007/s10346-020-01473-9 ↗