Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production
Source abstract
Abstract
The amount of waste generated by society is constantly increasing. Consequently, there is a need to develop new and better methods of treating it. A significant part of municipal waste is biowaste, which can be treated as a source of valuable resources such as nutrients, organic matter, and energy. The present work aims to determine the properties of the tested household biowaste and the possibility of using it as feedstock in slow pyrolysis to obtain biochar. The slow pyrolysis process of the biowaste was carried out in an electrically heated Horizontal Tube Furnace (HTF) at temperatures of 400 °C, 500 °C, and 600 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere. The analysis showed that depending on the type and composition of the biowaste, its properties are different. All the biowaste tested has a high moisture content (between 63.51% and 81.53%), which means that the biowaste needs to be dried before the slow pyrolysis process. The characteristics of kitchen biowaste are similar to those of food waste studied by other researchers in different regions of the world. In addition, the properties of kitchen biowaste are similar to those of the typical biomasses used to produce biochar via slow pyrolysis, such as wood, almond shells, and rice husks. Both kinds of garden biowaste tested may have been contaminated (soil, rocks) during collection, which affected the high ash content of spring (17.75%) and autumn (43.83%) biowaste. This, in turn, affected all the properties of the garden biowaste, which differed significantly from both the literature data of other garden wastes and from the properties of typical biomass feedstocks used to produce biochar in slow pyrolysis. For all biowaste tested, it was shown that as the pyrolysis temperature increases, the yield of biochar decreases. The maximum mass yield of biochar for kitchen, spring garden, and autumn garden biowaste was 36.64%, 66.53%, and 66.99%, respectively. Comparing the characteristics of biowaste before slow pyrolysis, biochar obtained from kitchen biowaste had a high carbon content, fixed carbon, and a higher HHV. In contrast, biochar obtained from garden biowaste had a lower carbon content and a lower HHV.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 40-100 Gliwice, Poland
Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
IDMEC, Mechanical Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
INIAV, Instituto de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
Funding
the research subsidy
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. European Commission, Directorate General for Environment, Dubois, M., Sims, E., Moerman, T., Watson, D., Bauer, B., Bel, J.B., and Mehlhart, G. (2022, November 20). Guidance for Separate Collection of Municipal Waste. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/691513.
2. European Parliament and Council (2022, November 20). Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02008L0098-20180705&from=EN.
3. European Union, European Regional Development Fund, and Policy Learning Platform on Environment and Resource Efficiency (2021). The Biowaste Management Challenge: A Policy Brief, Interreg Europe.
4. Pavlas, M., Dvořáček, J., Pitschke, T., and Peche, R. (2020). Biowaste Treatment and Waste to Energy Environmental Benefits. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13081994 ↗
5. European Commission (2008). Green Paper on the Management of Bio Waste in the European Union, COM(2008) 811 Final.
6. Environmental impacts of food waste in Europe10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.038 ↗
7. Bhakta Sharma, H., Panigrahi, S., and Dubey, B.K. (2021). Food waste hydrothermal carbonization: Study on the effects of reaction severities, pelletization and framework development using approaches of the circular economy. Bioresour. Technol., 333.10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125187 ↗
8. European Environment Agency (2020). Bio Waste in Europe Turning Challenges into Opportunities, No. 04/2020, European Environment Agency.
9. Amer, M., and Elwardany, A. (2020). Biomass Carbonization, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.90480 ↗
10. Sustainable valorisation of kitchen waste through greenhouse solar drying and microwave pyrolysis—Technology readiness level for the production of biochar10.1007/s40201-024-00909-x ↗
11. Techno-economics and life-cycle assessment of biological and thermochemical treatment of bio-waste10.1016/j.rser.2021.110837 ↗
12. Chandraratne, M.R., and Daful, A.G. (2022). Recent Advances in Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass. Recent Perspectives in Pyrolysis Research, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.100060 ↗
13. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185 ↗
14. A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.071 ↗
15. Suero, S.R., Libra, J., Berge, N., Sabio, E., Ro, K., Li, L., Ledesma, B., Álvarez, A., and Bae, S. (2018). Hydrothermal carbonization: Modeling, final properties design and applications—A review. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11010216 ↗
16. Basu, P. (2013). Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction: Practical Design and Theory, Academic Press. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-396488-5.00007-1 ↗
17. Treatment technologies for urban solid biowaste to create value products: A review with focus on low- and middle-income settings10.1007/s11157-017-9422-5 ↗
18. Effects of temperature and particle size on the compositions, energy conversions and structural characteristics of pyrolysis products from different crop residues10.1016/j.energy.2019.116413 ↗
19. A review on operating parameters for optimum liquid oil yield in biomass pyrolysis10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.033 ↗
20. Slow pyrolysis of pistachio shell10.1016/j.fuel.2006.11.041 ↗
21. The effect of heating rate, particle size and gas flow on the yield of charcoal during the pyrolysis of radiata pine wood10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.036 ↗
22. Biomass pyrolysis: A review of the process development and challenges from initial researches up to the commercialisation stage10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.024 ↗
23. Slow pyrolysis of chemically treated walnut shell for valuable products: Effect of process parameters and in-depth product analysis10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.214 ↗
24. Biochar physicochemical properties: Pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3 ↗
25. An overview on biochar production, its implications, and mechanisms of biochar-induced amelioration of soil and plant characteristics10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60094-7 ↗
26. Comprehensive review on production and utilization of biochar10.1007/s42452-019-0172-6 ↗
27. Process simulation of preparing biochar by biomass pyrolysis via Aspen Plus and its economic evaluation10.1007/s12649-021-01671-z ↗
28. A complete review on biochar: Production, property, multifaceted applications, interaction mechanism and computational approach10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120243 ↗
29. A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.035 ↗
30. A techno-economic analysis of energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW) by an integrated intermediate pyrolysis and combined heat and power (CHP) plant10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.033 ↗
31. Pyrolysis of mixed municipal solid waste: Characterisation, interaction effect and kinetic modelling using the thermogravimetric approach10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.048 ↗
32. Characterization of solid char produced from pyrolysis of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste, high volatile coal and their blends10.1016/j.energy.2019.116562 ↗
33. Potentials of pyrolysis processes in the waste management sector10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.275 ↗
34. Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: Influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions10.1111/gcbb.12018 ↗
35. Characterization of banana peels wastes as potential slow pyrolysis feedstock10.5539/jsd.v11n2p14 ↗
36. Slow pyrolysis of walnut shells in nitrogen and carbon dioxide10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.094 ↗
37. (2023). Biopaliwa Stałe: Oznaczanie Zawartości Wilgoci: Część 1: Metoda Referencyjna (Standard No. PN-EN ISO 18134-1:2023-02).
38. (2018). Solid Biofuels: Determination of the Content of Volatile Matter (Standard No. PN-EN ISO 18123:2016-01). (In Polish).
39. (1993). Odpady Komunalne Stałe: Badania Właściwości Paliwowych: Oznaczanie Zawartości Części Palnych i Niepalnych (Standard No. PN-Z-15008-03:1993).
40. Speight, J.G. (2005). Handbook of Coal Analysis: Chemical Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471718513 ↗
41. (1996). Solid Mineral Fuels—Determination of Carbon and Hydrogen—High Temperature Combustion Method (Standard No. ISO 609:1996).
42. (1992). Paliwa Stałe: Oznaczanie Zawartości Azotu Metodą Kjeldahla (Standard No. PN-G-04523:1992).
43. (1999). Paliwa stałe—Oznaczanie Zawartości Siarki—Metodą Spalania w Wysokiej Temperaturze (Standard No. PN-ISO 351:1999).
44. (2000). Paliwa Stałe: Oznaczanie Zawartości Chloru z Zastosowaniem Mieszaniny Eschki (Standard No. PN-ISO 587:2000).
45. Kotlicki, T. (2022, December 12). Oznaczanie Ciepła Spalania Węgla za Pomocą Kalorymetru—Instrukcja do Ćwiczenia Laboratoryjnego, Available online: http://www.i15.p.lodz.pl/strony/elektrownie/spalanie_wegla.pdf.
46. (2020). Paliwa Stałe: Oznaczanie Ciepła Spalania Metodą Spalania w Bombie Kalorymetrycznej i Obliczanie Wartości Opałowej (Standard No. PN-ISO 1928:2020-05).
47. Biegańska, J. (2008). Metody Analizy w Gospodarce Odpadami: Zbiór Instrukcji do Ćwiczeń Laboratoryjnych, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej. (In Polish).
48. Zhou, W., and Wang, Z.L. (2006). Fundamentals of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Scanning Microscopy for Nanotechnology, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-39620-0 ↗
49. Assessing the potential of biofuel (biochar) production from food wastes through thermal treatment10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.108 ↗
50. Safarian, S., Unnthorsson, R., and Richter, C. (2020). Simulation and Performance Analysis of Integrated Gasification-Syngas Fermentation Plant for Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production. Fermentation, 6.10.3390/fermentation6030068 ↗
51. Energy Recovery from Biomass by Fast Pyrolysis10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.791 ↗
52. Chemical, Energetic, and Structural Characteristics of Hydrothermal Carbonization Solid Products for Lawn Grass10.15376/biores.10.3.4613-4625 ↗
53. Chemical Properties of Solid Biofuels—Significance and Impact10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.06.011 ↗
54. Oštarić, F., Kalit, S., Curik, I., and Mikulec, N. (2023). Influence of Sodium and Potassium Chloride on Rennet Coagulation and Curd Firmness in Bovine Milk. Foods, 12.10.3390/foods12122293 ↗
55. Quantification and Determination of Household Food Waste and Its Relation to Sociodemographic Characteristics in Croatia10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.042 ↗
56. Effects of Binders on the Properties of Bio-Char Pellets10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.019 ↗
57. Investigation of (Co)-Combustion Kinetics of Biomass, Coal and Municipal Solid Wastes10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.033 ↗
58. Co-Pyrolysis of Biomass and Plastic: Circularity of Wastes and Comprehensive Review of Synergistic Mechanism10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100989 ↗
59. Techno-Economic Assessment of Co-Pyrolyzed Kitchen Waste and Rice Straw for Co-Generation of Heat and Power10.1016/j.spc.2023.06.015 ↗
60. Environmental Assessment of a Waste-to-Energy Practice: The Pyrolysis of Agro-Industrial Biomass Residues10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.015 ↗
61. Petrova, T., Naydenova, I., Ribau, J., and Ferreira, A. (2023). Biochar from Agro-Forest Residue: Application Perspective Based on Decision Support Analysis. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13053240 ↗
62. Saksiwi, N., Rijo, B., Zăvoianu, R., Pavel, O.D., Ferreira, O., Galhano dos Santos, R., Soares Dias, A.P., and Pereira, M. (2023). Biofuels from Pyrolysis of Third-Generation Biomass from Household and Garden Waste Composting Bin: Kinetics Analysis. Reactions, 4.10.3390/reactions4020018 ↗
63. Eulerian CFD Simulation of Biomass Thermal Conversion in an Indirect Slow Pyrolysis Rotary Kiln Unit to Produce Biochar from Recycled Waste Wood10.1016/j.energy.2023.129895 ↗
64. CFD-Based Coupled Multiphase Modeling of Biochar Production Using a Large-Scale Pyrolysis Plant10.1016/j.energy.2020.119325 ↗
65. Aspen Plus Simulation of Bio-Char Production from a Biomass-Based Slow Pyrolysis Process10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.797.336 ↗
66. Safarian, S., Rydén, M., and Janssen, M. (2022). Development and Comparison of Thermodynamic Equilibrium and Kinetic Approaches for Biomass Pyrolysis Modeling. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15113999 ↗
67. Thermal Degradation of Dry Kitchen Waste: Kinetics and Pyrolysis Products10.1007/s13399-021-01309-z ↗
68. Kinetic Studies in Pyrolysis of Garden Waste in the Context of Downdraft Gasification: Experiments and Modeling10.1016/j.energy.2020.118427 ↗