Smart Routing for Sustainable Supply Chain Networks: An AI and Knowledge Graph Driven Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face growing challenges in optimizing their sustainable supply chains because of fragmented logistics data and changing regulatory requirements. In particular, globally operating manufacturing SMEs often lack suitable tools, resulting in manual data collection and making reliable accounting and benchmarking of transport emissions in lifecycle assessments (LCAs) time-consuming and difficult to scale. This paper introduces a novel hybrid AI-supported knowledge graph (KG) which combines large language models (LLMs) with graph-based optimization to automate industrial supply chain route enrichment, completion, and emissions analysis. The proposed solution automatically resolves transportation gaps through generative AI and programming interfaces to create optimal routes for cost, time, and emission determination. The application merges separate routes into a single multi-modal network which allows users to evaluate sustainability against operational performance. A case study shows the capabilities in simplifying data collection for emissions reporting, therefore reducing manual effort and empowering SMEs to align logistics decisions with Industry 5.0 sustainability goals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sustainable Manufacturing Lab, Industrial Engineering and Automation (IEA), Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Europastr. 9, 39031 Bruneck, Italy
Funding
Italian Ministry of Enterprises
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Future of Industry 5.0 in Society: Human-Centric Solutions, Challenges and Prospective Research Areas10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5 ↗
2. Toward a Technology Roadmapping Methodology to Enhance Sustainable and Digital Transition in Manufacturing
3. Goel, A., Masurkar, S., and Pathade, G.R. (2024). An Overview of Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: Threats, Opportunities, and Solutions. Sustainability, 16.10.20944/preprints202409.2340.v1 ↗
4. Understanding the Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Improving Environmental Sustainability10.1016/j.susoc.2022.01.008 ↗
5. Digital Twin-Based Sustainable Intelligent Manufacturing: A Review10.1007/s40436-020-00302-5 ↗
6. (2024, June 30). European Sustainability Reporting Standards. Available online: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-adopts-european-sustainability-reporting-standards-2023-07-31_en.
7. Reaching for Net Zero: The Impact of an Innovative University-led Business Support Programme on Carbon Management Strategy and Practices of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises10.1002/bse.3844 ↗
8. Exploration of Small and Medium Entities’ Actions on Sustainability Practices and Their Implications for a Greener Economy10.1108/JAAR-09-2022-0252 ↗
9. Embodied Carbon Emissions in the Supply Chains of Multinational Enterprises10.1038/s41558-020-0895-9 ↗
10. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040:2006).
11. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044:2006).
12. Life Cycle Assessment10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005 ↗
13. Hauschild, M.Z., Rosenbaum, R.K., and Olsen, S.I. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3 ↗
14. Market.us (2025, May 27). Logistics 2.0: Transportation Management Software Industry to Skyrocket to USD 77.0 Billion by 2033! Global Trade Magazine. Available online: https://www.globaltrademag.com/logistics-2-0-transportation-management-software-industry-to-skyrocket-to-usd-77-0-billion-by-2033/.
15. (2025, May 27). The Complexity of Quantifying Freight Emissions|Insights & Sustainability|Climatiq. Available online: https://www.climatiq.io/blog/complexity-of-quantifying-freight-emissions.
16. Kiemel, S., Rietdorf, C., Schutzbach, M., and Miehe, R. (2022). How to Simplify Life Cycle Assessment for Industrial Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142315704 ↗
17. Development of an ERP-Integrated Direct Routing and Way-Point Routing for Increasing Automation of LCAs in Supply Chains10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.327 ↗
18. Yurtay, Y. (2025). Carbon Footprint Management with Industry 4.0 Technologies and Erp Systems in Sustainable Manufacturing. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010480 ↗
19. Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Integrating Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) in an Industry 4.0 Environment10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125314 ↗
20. Leveraging Knowledge Graphs in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: Insights into Key Drivers of Drug Shortages10.1080/00207543.2025.2496671 ↗
21. Towards Trustworthy AI for Link Prediction in Supply Chain Knowledge Graph: A Neurosymbolic Reasoning Approach10.1080/00207543.2024.2399713 ↗
22. A Graph Database for Life Cycle Inventory Using Neo4j10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136344 ↗
23. CarbonKG: Industrial Carbon Emission Knowledge Graph-Based Modeling and Application for Carbon Traceability of Complex Manufacturing Process10.1115/1.4065166 ↗
24. Saidi, C., Hamani, N., Benaissa, M., Rolf, B., Reggelin, T., and Lang, S. (2025). Modeling Reconfigurable Supply Chains Using Knowledge Graphs: Towards Supply Chain 5.0. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel.10.1007/s11740-025-01342-1 ↗
25. Knowledge Graph-Based Mapping and Recommendation to Automate Life Cycle Assessment10.1016/j.aei.2024.102752 ↗
26. Chen, L., Silvennoinen, H., Wolf, C.D., Hall, D., Mele, T.V., and Block, P. (2024, January 26–30). Towards Automated Building Life Cycle Assessments: A Novel Approach Using Large Language Models and the COMPAS Framework. Proceedings of the IASS 2024 Symposium, Zürich, Switzerland.
27. CECA: An Intelligent Large-Language-Model-Enabled Method for Accounting Embodied Carbon in Buildings10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112694 ↗
28. Greif, L., Hauck, S., Kimmig, A., and Ovtcharova, J. (2024). A Knowledge Graph Framework to Support Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Decision-Making. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010175 ↗
29. Leveraging AI-Derived Data for Carbon Accounting: Information Extraction from Alternative Sources
30. Huang, Z., Shi, G., and Sukhatme, G.S. (2024). Can Large Language Models Solve Robot Routing?. arXiv.
31. Andersson, J., Joshi, S., Malmsköld, L., and Hanning, F. (2024). Availability and Need for Climate Footprint and Resilience Data from Suppliers in Automotive Supply Chains. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, IOS Press.10.3233/ATDE52 ↗
32. Building Sustainable and Resilient Supply Chains: A Framework and Empirical Evidence on Trade-Offs and Synergies in Implementation of Practices10.1080/09537287.2022.2053758 ↗
33. Daios, A., Kladovasilakis, N., Kelemis, A., and Kostavelis, I. (2025). AI Applications in Supply Chain Management: A Survey. Appl. Sci., 15.10.20944/preprints202502.0381.v1 ↗
34. Robinson, I., Webber, J., and Eifrem, E. (2015). Graph Databases: New Opportunities for Connected Data, O’Reilly. [2nd ed.].
35. Kotiranta, P., Junkkari, M., and Nummenmaa, J. (2022). Performance of Graph and Relational Databases in Complex Queries. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136490 ↗
36. (2025, May 28). Dijkstra Single-Source Shortest Path—Neo4j Graph Data Science. Available online: https://neo4j.com/docs/graph-data-science/2.18/algorithms/dijkstra-single-source/.
37. Bayramoğlu, K., Çelikoğlu, Ş., and Turan, İ. (2025). An Examination of the Emissions, Cost, and Time of Intermodal Transportation. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17062368 ↗
38. Brown, T.B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., and Askell, A. (2020). Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv.
39. (2025, May 28). API Reference—OpenAI API. Available online: https://platform.openai.com.
40. Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M., and Choi, Y. (2019). The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration. arXiv.
41. (2025, May 27). Introducing the Model Context Protocol. Available online: https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol.
42. Hou, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., and Wang, H. (2025). Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directions. arXiv.