Dynamic Stall Mechanisms of Pitching Airfoil: IDDES Study Across Different Mach Numbers
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates dynamic stall mechanisms of a pitching NACA 0012 airfoil through high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) method based on a sliding mesh system is constructed and validated against experimental airload measurements. The results demonstrate a good agreement and the capability to capture three-dimensional flow structures. Comparative analyses at two Mach numbers of 0.283 and 0.5 reveal distinct stall physics. At the Mach number of 0.283, a notable 9.7° delay is observed between the static and dynamic stall. The airfoil experiences a leading-edge stall dominated by a strong adverse pressure gradient and generates rapid airload variations. In addition, trailing-edge vortex (TEV) and secondary leading-edge vortices (LEVs) induce distinct airload fluctuations. After the shedding of primary vortices, secondary vortices develop. In contrast, the airfoil at the Mach number of 0.5 presents a reduced stall delay of 6.4° and a shock-induced dynamic stall characterized by dispersed, smaller vortices, which results in mild airload variations during stall. Aerodynamic damping analysis identifies stall delay as a primary contributor to negative damping. Enhanced pitching stability at the higher Mach number correlates with reduced stall delay and different LEV development characteristics. Results across varying reduced frequencies show that increasing reduced frequency delays the aerodynamic response and stall onset. At Ma = 0.283, this increasement promotes a divergent tendency in pitching motion, whereas at Ma = 0.5, it induces greater oscillatory stability attributed to distinct stall characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Key Laboratory of Helicopter Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · riority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Johnson, W. (2012). Helicopter Theory, Princeton University Press.
2. McCroskey, W.J., McAlister, K.W., Carr, L.W., and Pucci, S.L. (1982). An Experimental Study of Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Sections Volume 1. Summary of the Experiment, NASA. NASA-TM-84245.
3. McAlister, K.W., Pucci, S.L., McCroskey, W.J., and Carr, L.W. (1982). An Experimental Study of Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Sections Volume 2. Pressure and Force Data, NASA. NASA-TM-84245.
4. Carr, L.W., McCroskey, W.J., McAlister, K.W., Pucci, S.L., and Lambert, O. (1982). An Experimental Study of Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Sections Volume 3. Hot-Wire and Hot-Film Measurements, NASA. NASA-TM-84245.10.4050/JAHS.26.3.40 ↗
5. Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Sections10.4050/JAHS.26.3.40 ↗
6. McCroskey, W.J. (1981). The Phenomenon of Dynamic Stall, NASA. NASA TM-81264.
7. The Onset of Dynamic Stall Revisited10.1007/s00348-011-1118-y ↗
8. Dynamic Stall Development10.1007/s00348-013-1469-7 ↗
9. Compressibility Effects on Dynamic Stall10.1016/0376-0421(95)00009-7 ↗
10. Effects of Compressibility on Dynamic Stall10.2514/3.10578 ↗
11. Interferometric Investigations of Compressible Dynamic Stall over a Transiently Pitching Airfoil10.2514/3.12025 ↗
12. Competing Mechanisms of Compressible Dynamic Stall10.2514/2.375 ↗
13. Matalanis, C.G., Bowles, P.O., Jee, S., Min, B.-Y., Kuczek, A.E., Croteau, P.F., Wake, B.E., Crittenden, T., Glezer, A., and Lorber, P.F. (2016). Dynamic Stall Suppression Using Combustion-Powered Actuation (COMPACT). NASA. NASA/CR-2016-219336.
14. High-Speed Experiments on Combustion-Powered Actuation for Dynamic Stall Suppression10.2514/1.J055700 ↗
15. An Experimental Analysis of Dynamic Stall on an Oscillating Airfoil10.4050/JAHS.19.26 ↗
16. The Onset of Dynamic Stall at a High, Transitional Reynolds Number10.1017/jfm.2018.939 ↗
17. Zhu, W., Bons, J.P., and Gregory, J.W. (2019, January 7–11). Reynolds Scaling Effects on Dynamic Stall of VR-7 and VR-12 Airfoils. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2019-0304 ↗
18. Airfoil dynamic stall at constant pitch rate and high Reynolds number10.2514/3.45621 ↗
19. Experimental Investigation of Dynamic Stall Performance for the EDI-M109 and EDI-M112 Airfoils10.4050/JAHS.58.032001 ↗
20. Spalart, P.R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., and Allmaras, S.R. (1999, January 7–9). Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach. Proceedings of the Advances in DNS/LES, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
21. A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0 ↗
22. A Hybrid RANS-LES Approach with Delayed-DES and Wall-Modelled LES Capabilities10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001 ↗
23. Numerical Investigation of Compressibility Effect on Dynamic Stall10.1016/j.ast.2020.105918 ↗
24. On Computational Simulations of Dynamic Stall and Its Three-Dimensional Nature10.1063/5.0170251 ↗
25. Khalifa, N.M., Rezaei, A.S., and Taha, H.E. (19–21, January 11–15). Comparing the Performance of Different Turbulence Models in Predicting Dynamic Stall. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, Virtual Event.10.2514/6.2021-1651 ↗
26. Numerical Investigation of Deep Dynamic Stall of a Plunging Airfoil10.2514/1.J050892 ↗
27. High-Fidelity Simulation of Transitional Flows past a Plunging Airfoil10.2514/1.43038 ↗
28. High-Fidelity Simulations of Moving and Flexible Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers10.1007/s00348-009-0635-4 ↗
29. Visbal, M.R. (2014, January 13–17). Analysis of the Onset of Dynamic Stall Using High-Fidelity Large-Eddy Simulations. Proceedings of the 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, National Harbor, MA, USA.10.2514/6.2014-0591 ↗
30. Analysis of Dynamic Stall on a Pitching Airfoil Using High-Fidelity Large-Eddy Simulations10.2514/1.J056108 ↗
31. Effects of Compressibility on Dynamic-Stall Onset Using Large-Eddy Simulation10.2514/1.J058681 ↗
32. Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Airfoil Thickness on Onset of Dynamic Stall10.1017/jfm.2019.235 ↗
33. Effects of Leading-Edge Geometry on the Onset of Dynamic Stall10.2514/1.J057277 ↗
34. Development of DDES and IDDES Formulations for the k-ω Shear Stress Transport Model10.1007/s10494-011-9378-4 ↗
35. Robust Navier-Stokes Method for Predicting Unsteady Flowfield and Aerodynamic Characteristics of Helicopter Rotor10.1016/j.cja.2017.10.005 ↗
36. Combining passive control method for dynamic stall control10.2514/1.17957 ↗
37. Jee, S., Bowles, P., Matalanis, C., Min, B.-Y., Wake, B., Crittenden, T., and Glezer, A. (2016, January 17–19). Computations of combustion-powered actuation for dynamic stall suppression. Proceedings of the AHS 72nd Annual Forum, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.
38. An Analysis of the Stall Flutter Instability of Helicopter Rotor Blades10.4050/JAHS.12.4.1 ↗
39. Improved Understanding of Aerodynamic Damping Through the Hilbert Transform10.2514/1.J052630 ↗