A Review of Failures and Malfunctions in Hydraulic Sandblasting Perforation Guns
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydraulic sandblasting perforation guns play a critical role in well completion and productivity enhancement operations in oil and gas wells, as their performance and service life directly affect perforation efficiency, reservoir integrity, and downhole operational safety. Drawing on a comprehensive review of the existing literature, this paper systematically summarizes recent research progress on surface erosion, high-pressure leakage, and vibration-induced fatigue in perforation guns. Regarding erosion wear, we discuss the mechanisms and preventive strategies influenced by abrasive particle flow characteristics, material selection, and coating applications. In the field of high-pressure leakage, we analyze the key factors of seal failure, structural deformation, and material degradation that contribute to leakage formation, and we provide improvement measures involving seal structure optimization, enhanced material properties, and real-time monitoring technologies. Concerning vibration and fatigue, we elucidate the multi-factor coupling mechanisms of failure—encompassing fluid–solid interactions, cavitation impacts, and stress concentration—and outline mitigation strategies through structural redesign, material reinforcement, and fluid dynamic control. Furthermore, the paper anticipates the future trends of intelligent fault diagnosis and predictive maintenance, including multi-sensor data fusion, AI-driven predictive models, and digital twin technologies. Overall, the integrated application of precision design, dynamic optimization, and intelligent control across the entire service life of perforation guns is poised to guide forthcoming research and engineering practices, driving hydraulic sandblasting perforation technology toward greater efficiency, reliability, and intelligence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Petroleum Technology Special Project · the project “Research and Testing on Green Low-carbon Development Technology for Heavy Oil,”
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Dotson, T., Farr, J., and Findley, E. (2009, January 14–16). Advances in sand jet perforating. Proceedings of the SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, CO, USA.10.2118/123569-MS ↗
2. Water jet perforation techniques: Status and prospects
3. Efficiency of water-based sand jet perforation
4. Optimization of hydraulic jet perforation tools
5. Study of perforating guns and sand jet performance in oil and gas operations
6. Practice of hydraulic sandblasting perforation fracturing technology in well testing process
7. Hydraulic testing of ordnance components
8. Xu, Y., Li, Q.D., Li, B.X., and Guan, Z. (2022). Numerical simulation study of hydraulic fracturing nozzle erosion in deep well. Front. Phys., 10.10.3389/fphy.2022.947094 ↗
9. An experimental study on casing perforation erosion during sand fracturing10.1016/j.wear.2023.204980 ↗
10. Surjaatmadja, J.B., East, L.E., Luna, J.B., and Hernandez, J.O. (2005, January 5–6). An effective hydrajet-fracturing implementation using coiled tubing and annular stimulation fluid delivery. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA. SPE, 2005.10.2523/94098-MS ↗
11. Experimental and numerical study of erosion in a non-Newtonian hydraulic fracturing fluid10.1016/j.wear.2018.12.080 ↗
12. CFD analysis and field observation of tool erosion caused by abrasive waterjet fracturing10.1007/s12182-020-00425-1 ↗
13. Erosion characteristics and simulation charts of sand fracturing casing perforation10.1016/j.petsci.2023.06.001 ↗
14. Analysis on nozzle wear of hydraulic sandblast fracturing tools
15. Nakhwa, A.D., Loving, S.W., Ferguson, A., and Shah, S.N. (2007, January 20–21). Oriented perforating using abrasive fluids through coiled tubing. Proceedings of the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2523/107061-MS ↗
16. Numerical simulation on erosion and stress on a small-diameter hydrajet fracturing tool10.1021/acsomega.3c09102 ↗
17. New hydra-jet tool demonstrates improved life for perforating and fracturing applications
18. Hydro-abrasive erosion and cavitation-silt erosion characteristics of HVOF sprayed WC-Ni cermet coatings under different flow velocities and sand concentrations10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.282 ↗
19. Erosion wear performance of Ni-Cr-O and NiCrBSiFe-WC (Co) composite coatings deposited by HVOF technique10.1108/ILT-04-2018-0149 ↗
20. Jet characteristics and optimization of a cavitation nozzle for hydraulic fracturing applications10.32604/fdmp.2023.030499 ↗
21. Fryzowicz, R., Naughton-Rumbo, R., and Schrama, E. (2010, January 5–6). Application of CT-conveyed perforating with sand jetting technology on North Sea deep horizontal tight gas producer. Proceedings of the SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Galveston, TX, USA.10.2118/137642-MS ↗
22. Guo, Q., Qiang, H., Hu, J.T., Cheng, Y.F., Yang, J.J., Zhang, S.C., Ge, D.K., Han, Q.Q., Wen, Y., and She, D.Y. (2015). Sandblasting Perforator with Nozzle Anti-Detachment Device. (CN204627565U).
23. Yao, J.F., Lu, C.F., Ge, X., Li, J.B., Tong, Z.Y., Zhang, D.W., and Wang, X.B. (2014). High Reliability Hydraulic Jet Device. (CN103953317A).
24. Wang, D.J., Fei, C.J., Liu, J., Wu, W., Xia, X.B., and Ding, K. (2015). A Casing Well Sandblasting Perforator. (CN204283372U).
25. The effect of velocity on the solid particle erosion rate of alloys10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00085-X ↗
26. The erosion of guns
27. Anderson, M., Chiovelli, S., and Llewellyn, R. (2003). The use of tungsten carbide materials for oilsand wear applications. International Proceedings Conference Thermal Spray, ASM International.10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2003p0509 ↗
28. Thapa, B. (2025, March 05). Sand Erosion in Hydraulic Machinery. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/231204.
29. Fracture analysis of rubber sealing material for high pressure hydrogen vessel10.1299/jee.6.53 ↗
30. Fatigue crack propagation in thick-walled pressure vessels under hydraulic testing condition10.1088/1742-6596/2478/12/122052 ↗
31. Study of fatigue behavior of longitudinal welded pipes10.1088/1757-899X/145/2/022032 ↗
32. Sealing performance and fatigue life of the fracturing packer rubber of various materials10.1177/0954406219859917 ↗
33. Damage and fracture of gun barrel under wear-fatigue interaction10.1088/1742-6596/1507/10/102034 ↗
34. Karakouzian, M., Karami, M., Nazari-Sharabian, M., and Ahmad, S. (2019). Flow-induced stresses and displacements in jointed concrete pipes installed by pipe jacking method. Fluids, 4.10.20944/preprints201901.0160.v2 ↗
35. Fatigue crack propagation analysis of X60 pipeline steel pipelines with defects10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.284-286.1148 ↗
36. Failure of locally buckled pipelines10.1115/1.2716431 ↗
37. Takahashi, S., Xu, Q., Takamura, N., Morita, R., Uchiyama, Y., and Watanabe, S. (2016, January 26–30). Evaluation of jet impact region and fluid force generated from ruptured pipes: 2—Evaluation using CFD analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Charlotte, NC, USA.10.1115/ICONE24-60316 ↗
38. Zheng, J., Li, H.J., and Wu, B. (2021, January 19–21). Low cycle fatigue damage of gun barrel and its monitoring for prevention of fracture. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electron Device and Mechanical Engineering (ICEDME), Guangzhou, China.10.1109/ICEDME52809.2021.00068 ↗
39. Fatigue crack growth through residual stress fields—Theoretical and experimental studies on thick-walled cylinders10.1016/0167-8442(84)90046-6 ↗
40. Audino, M.J. (1993). Fatigue Life Assessment of 155-mm M284 Cannon Tubes, Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center Report. ARCCB-TR-93036.
41. Modelling fluid-structure interaction of water recirculating flow to predict damage and/or failure in a jet-pump assembly of a nuclear boiling water reactor10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110155 ↗
42. Finite element simulations on erosion and crack propagation in thermal barrier coatings10.1515/htmp-2014-0068 ↗
43. Erosion wear characteristics of HVOF sprayed WC-Co-Cr and CoNiCrAlY coatings on IS-2062 structural steel10.1088/2053-1591/aad85d ↗
44. CFD simulation of erosion by particle collision in U-bend and helical type pipes10.24874/jsscm.2020.14.02.01 ↗
45. Gan, L., Men, X., Tao, F., and Li, Y. (2019, January 4–8). Blow-by erosion model for the saddle-type degradation of high pressure gun bore. Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Ballistics, Hyderabad, India.10.12783/ballistics2019/33074 ↗
46. Influence of the “critical velocity” phenomenon on chromium-plated gun barrels10.1115/1.1593701 ↗
47. Experimental study on pore forming characteristics of simulated hydrate broken by high pressure water jet10.1088/1742-6596/2108/1/012094 ↗
48. Purwaningsih, H., Rochiem, R., Suchaimi, M., Jatimurti, W., Wibisono, A.T., and Kurniawan, B.A. (2018). A review of various nozzle range of wire arc spray on FeCrBMnSi metal coating. AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing.10.1063/1.5030275 ↗
49. Slurry erosion performance study of high velocity flame sprayed Ni–Al2O3 coating under hydro accelerated conditions10.1088/2053-1591/ab1927 ↗
50. Influence of environmental factors on erosion-corrosion resistance of stainless steels10.3323/jcorr1974.35.4_212 ↗
51. Semi-physical simulation model for leakage prediction of aviation pipeline10.1088/1742-6596/2437/1/012025 ↗
52. Morita, R., Watanabe, S., Takahashi, S., and Takamura, N. (2018, January 3). Numerical evaluation of affected region by flashing jet flow. Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Surabaya, Indonesia.
53. Investigation of hydrogen sulfide stress corrosion cracking of PH 13-8 Mo stainless steel10.1016/j.msea.2005.10.021 ↗
54. Effects of hydrogen on stress corrosion cracking behavior of ultra-high strength steel 23Co14Ni12Cr3Mo10.1016/S1452-3981(23)08208-1 ↗
55. Warke, W.R. (2002). Stress-corrosion cracking. Failure Analysis and Prevention, ASM International.10.31399/asm.hb.v11.a0003553 ↗
56. Design and performance of a novel dynamic rotary sealing device for roadheader with high-pressure water-jets assistance10.2174/2212797609666160907123817 ↗
57. Failure analysis of the multi-level series rotary seal device under high-pressure water10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4012 ↗
58. Baumann, C., Damm, D., Escudero, J., Smart, M., Yang, X.T., Liu, J.Y., and Wei, Z. (2019, January 26–28). New low-shock low-debris gun technology with reliable gunshock simulation and optimization. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China.10.2523/19376-MS ↗
59. The sealing performance of PTFE O-rings at low temperature10.1088/1742-6596/2842/1/012014 ↗
60. Sealing performances research on PTFE rotating seal under deep-sea environment10.2174/1874155X01509010475 ↗
61. The design of new water jet spray gun10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.667 ↗
62. Leak detection systems in oil and gas fields: Present trends and future prospects10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101772 ↗
63. (2005). Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries—Design and Operation of Subsea Production Systems—Part 7: Completion/Workover Riser Systems (Standard No. ISO 13628-7).
64. (2016). Specification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment (Standard No. API 6A).
65. Quan, L., Che, S., Guo, C., Gao, H., and Guo, M. (2020). Axial vibration characteristics of fluid-structure interaction of an aircraft hydraulic pipe based on modified friction coupling model. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10103548 ↗
66. Numerical-based studies on hydraulic vibration of pipe flow in hydropower systems10.1080/00221686.2021.2004256 ↗
67. Analytical method for fluid-solid coupling vibration analysis of hydraulic pipeline system with hinged ends10.1155/2021/8846869 ↗
68. Study on vibration characteristics of hydraulic pipes in case of internal pulsating fluid excitation10.1088/1742-6596/2449/1/012019 ↗
69. Fatigue simulation analysis of semi-open thick-walled cylinder under cyclic loading10.1088/1757-899X/631/3/032029 ↗
70. Dynamic simulation analysis of aircraft hydraulic pipeline system under different pressure10.1088/1742-6596/2280/1/012051 ↗
71. Jia, X., Liao, H., Hu, Q., He, Y., Wang, Y., and Niu, W. (2023). Optimization method of jet pump process parameters and experimental study on optimal parameter combinations. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11102841 ↗
72. Dynamic response analysis of the hydraulic pipe under jets of the aircraft tire burst10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.798-799.341 ↗
73. Eisinger, F.L. (1998). Piping Systems Providing Minimal Acoustically-Induced Structural Vibrations and Fatigue. (No. 5,711,350), U.S. Patent.10.1121/1.424172 ↗
74. The unsteady flow and forced response for a variable nozzle turbine10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.871.296 ↗
75. Vibration of a high-pressure piping system due to flow in a spherical elbow10.1006/jfls.2000.0374 ↗
76. Characteristics and suppression of vibration in cross-flow turbine with a cavity10.1088/1742-6596/2217/1/012063 ↗
77. Wachel, J.C., Morton, S.J., and Atkins, K.E. (, 1990). Piping vibration analysis. Proceedings of the 19th Turbomachinery Symposium, San Antonio, TX, USA. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/163563.
78. Fatigue analysis of the aircraft’s hydraulic pipes based on fluid–structure interaction10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.299-300.917 ↗
79. Acoustically induced structural fatigue of piping systems10.1115/1.2883727 ↗
80. Saunders, K.L., and Onorato, M. (2022, January 17–22). Piping snubber failure experience and mitigation. Proceedings of the Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1115/PVP2022-85167 ↗
81. Effect of nozzles’ characteristics on PV aeromechanical systems10.2495/AFM180231 ↗
82. Jet characteristics and optimal design of hydraulic perforating nozzles for natural gas hydrate reservoirs10.1177/16878132231197488 ↗
83. Study on nozzle structure of hydraulic jet fracturing10.1088/1742-6596/2594/1/012068 ↗
84. Study on the influence rule of high-pressure water jet nozzle parameters on the effect of hydraulic slotting10.1155/2022/4510194 ↗
85. Research on the structures and hydraulic performances of the typical direct jet nozzles for water jet technology10.1007/s40430-019-2075-2 ↗
86. Study on flow field characteristics of nozzle water jet in hydraulic cutting10.1088/1755-1315/81/1/012167 ↗
87. Flow field characteristic of water jet with air ring protective layer under submerged environment and the orthogonal optimization of nozzle structure10.1002/ese3.1325 ↗
88. Study of mixing enhancement in helium jet/shock interaction by laser pulses10.2514/1.J061399 ↗
89. Numerical investigation of plasma-controlled turbulent jets for mixing enhancement10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.02.008 ↗
90. Ho, C.C., Shen, K.Y., Chen, C.S., Chang, Y.J., Hsu, J.C., and Kuo, C.L. (2017). Swirling gas jet-assisted laser trepanning for a galvanometer-scanned CO2 laser. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7050502 ↗
91. Deshpande, K., Knoeller, M., and Patkar, V. (2019, January 23–26). Digital solutions to optimize jet pump technology for production enhancement. Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, San Jose, CA, USA.10.2118/195261-MS ↗
92. Design of a three-nozzle for air spraying based on jet interference effect and numerical study of spraying process10.1007/s42452-022-05046-4 ↗
93. Improved gas-jet based extreme ultraviolet, soft x-ray laser plasma source10.1364/OE.418075 ↗
94. Fault diagnosis and location of the aero-engine hydraulic pipeline based on Kalman filter10.1177/1687814017742811 ↗
95. Lu, Z., Cao, C., Ge, Y., He, J., Yu, Z., Chen, J., and Zheng, X. (2021). Research on improving the working efficiency of hydraulic jet submarine cable laying machine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9070745 ↗
96. Lou Toua, V. (2020). The Effect of Aircraft Manufacturing Riveting Tools on Hand-Arm Vibrations and Muscle Fatigue, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.
97. Yan, Z., Liu, N., Yang, K., and Hui, W. (2022, January 8–10). Visualization of hydraulic sandblasting perforation in horizontal Wells. Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Intelligent Control, Measurement and Signal Processing (ICMSP), Hangzhou, China.10.1109/ICMSP55950.2022.9859118 ↗
98. Monitoring system design for intelligent hydraulic safety based on the IoT10.1088/1755-1315/676/1/012071 ↗
99. Ramírez, M., Torres, F.J., López, F., Cervantes, F.A., Ramírez, C.A., and Núñez, D.A. (2022, January 9–11). A cloud remote monitoring system of hydraulic pressure by a minicomputer. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC), Ixtapa, Mexico.10.1109/ROPEC55836.2022.10018803 ↗
100. Water pipeline leakage detection and monitoring system using smart sensor with IoT10.1088/1742-6596/2267/1/012122 ↗