Classifying and Characterizing Fandom Activities: A Focus on Superfans’ Posting and Commenting Behaviors in a Digital Fandom Community
Source abstract
Abstract
As digital fandom communities expand and diversify, user engagement patterns increasingly shape the social and emotional fabric of online platforms. In the era of Industry 4.0, data-driven approaches are transforming how online communities understand and optimize user engagement. In this study, we examine how different forms of activity, specifically posting and commenting, characterize fandom engagement on Weverse, a global fan community platform. By applying a clustering approach to large-scale user data, we identify distinct subsets of heavy users, separating those who focus on creating posts (post-heavy users) from those who concentrate on leaving comments (comment-heavy users). A subsequent linguistic analysis using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) tool revealed that post-heavy users typically employ a structured, goal-oriented style with collective pronouns and formal tones, whereas comment-heavy users exhibit more spontaneous, emotionally rich expressions enhanced by personalized fandom-specific slang and extensive emoji use. Building on these findings, we propose design implications such as pinning community-driven content, offering contextual translations for fandom-specific slang, and introducing reaction matrices that address the unique needs of each group. Taken together, our results underscore the value of distinguishing multiple dimensions of engagement in digital fandoms, providing a foundation for more nuanced platform features that can enhance positive user experience, social cohesion, and sustained community growth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Social Media and Politics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Service Design Engineering, Sungshin Women’s University, Seoul 02844, Republic of Korea
Department of Software Convergence, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Republic of Korea
Funding
Sungshin Women’s University
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang, Y., and Lu, Z. (2023, January 23–28). Making Sense of Post-match Fan Behaviors in the Online Football Communities. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, Hamburg, Germany.10.1145/3544548.3581310 ↗
2. A Social-Ecological Approach to Modeling Sense of Virtual Community (SOVC) in Livestreaming Communities10.1145/3555081 ↗
3. Discord as a Fandom Platform: Locating a New Playground
4. “We will not be lectured”: Understanding political fandom on TikTok10.1080/22041451.2024.2355818 ↗
5. Moving Across Lands: Online Platform Migration in Fandom Communities10.1145/3392847 ↗
6. A Virtual Ethnography Study: Fandom and Social Impact in Digital Era10.31947/etnosia.v5i2.10898 ↗
7. Ringland, K.E., Bhattacharya, A., Weatherwax, K., Eagle, T., and Wolf, C.T. (May, January 29). ARMY’s Magic Shop: Understanding the Collaborative Construction of Playful Places in Online Communities. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’22, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1145/3491102.3517442 ↗
8. Park, S.Y., Santero, N.K., Kaneshiro, B., and Lee, J.H. (2021, January 8–13). Armed in ARMY: A Case Study of How BTS Fans Successfully Collaborated to #MatchAMillion for Black Lives Matter. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’21, Yokohama, Japan.10.1145/3411764.3445353 ↗
9. Kang, J., Lee, M., Park, E., Ko, M., Lee, M., and Han, J. Alliance for My Idol: Analyzing the K-pop Fandom Collaboration Network. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’19, Glasgow, UK, 4–9 May 2019.10.1145/3290607.3312906 ↗
10. “Ju. T’aime” My Idol, My Streamer: A Case Study on Fandom Experience as Audiences and Creators of VTuber Concert10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3252563 ↗
11. Keep the Fire Burning: Exploring the Hierarchies of Music Fandom and the Motivations of Superfans10.17645/mac.v9i3.4013 ↗
12. Extreme celebrity worship, fantasy proneness and dissociation: Developing the measurement and understanding of celebrity worship within a clinical personality context10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.004 ↗
13. An exploratory investigation of the theorized levels of consumer fanaticism10.1108/13522751111120675 ↗
14. Fiske, J. (1992). The Adoring Audience, The Cultural Economy of Fandom, Routledge.
15. Duffett, M. (2013). Understanding Fandom: An Introduction to the Study of Media Fan Culture, Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781501388354 ↗
16. Abercrombie, N., and Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination, SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781446222331 ↗
17. Sandvoss, C. (2005). Fans: The Mirror of Consumption, Polity.
18. From “carefree casuals” to “professional wanderers”: Segmentation possibilities for football supporters10.1108/03090560210445164 ↗
19. Positive moods derived from leisure and their relationship to happiness and personality10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00082-8 ↗
20. Localness of location-based knowledge sharing: A study of Naver KiN “Here”10.1145/2983645 ↗
21. Knowledge behavior model of e-government social media users
22. Huang, Y.T., and Su, S.F. (2018). Motives for Instagram Use and Topics of Interest among Young Adults. Future Internet, 10.10.3390/fi10080077 ↗
23. Behaviors and Perceptions of Human-Chatbot Interactions Based on Top Active Users of a Commercial Social Chatbot
24. Aldous, K.K., An, J., and Jansen, B.J. (2019, January 11–14). View, Like, Comment, Post: Analyzing User Engagement by Topic at 4 Levels across 5 Social Media Platforms for 53 News Organizations. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Münich, Germany.10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3208 ↗
25. FlumeRide: Interactive Space Where Artists and Fans Meet-and-Greet Using Video Calls10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3249460 ↗
26. Guazzini, A., Guidi, E., Cecchini, C., Milani, M., Vilone, D., and Meringolo, P. (2016). Self-presentation and emotional contagion on Facebook: New experimental measures of profiles’ emotional coherence. arXiv.
27. The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations on Social Media Engagement and Customer Likelihood to Share Content on Facebook
28. Wang, Y.C., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Kraut, R.E., and Halevy, A. (2023, January 10–13). Using Comments for Predicting the Affective Response to Social Media Posts. Proceedings of the 2023 11th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), Cambridge, MA, USA.10.1109/ACII59096.2023.10388133 ↗
29. Analysis of Cyber Interactive Behaviors Using Artificial Community and Computational Experiments10.1109/TSMC.2016.2615130 ↗
30. Yum, K., and Kim, J. (2024). The Influence of Perceived Value, Customer Satisfaction, and Trust on Loyalty in Entertainment Platforms. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14135763 ↗
31. Kim, M.S., Wang, S., and Kim, S. (2023). Effects of Online Fan Community Interactions on Well-Being and Sense of Virtual Community. Behav. Sci., 13.10.3390/bs13110897 ↗
32. Choi, H.j. (2024). Do K-Pop Consumers’ Fandom Activities Affect Their Happiness, Listening Intention, and Loyalty?. Behav. Sci., 14.10.3390/bs14121136 ↗
33. Panciera, K., Halfaker, A., and Terveen, L. (2009, January 10–13). Wikipedians are born, not made: A study of power editors on Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL, USA. GROUP ’09.10.1145/1531674.1531682 ↗
34. Quattrone, G., Capra, L., and De Meo, P. (2015, January 14–18). There’s No Such Thing as the Perfect Map: Quantifying Bias in Spatial Crowd-sourcing Datasets. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada. CSCW ’15.10.1145/2675133.2675235 ↗
35. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods10.1177/0261927X09351676 ↗
36. Boyd, R.L., Ashokkumar, A., Seraj, S., and Pennebaker, J.W. (2022). The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC-22, University of Texas at Austin.
37. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 ↗
38. Saha, K., and Sharma, A. (2020, January 8–11). Causal Factors of Effective Psychosocial Outcomes in Online Mental Health Communities. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Online.10.1101/2020.08.15.20175836 ↗
39. Linguistic Signals under Misinformation and Fact-Checking: Evidence from User Comments on Social Media
40. Kline, R.B. (2008). Becoming a Behavioral Science Researcher: A Guide to Producing Research That Matters, Guilford Press.
41. Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Frazee, J., Lavergne, G.M., and Beaver, D.I. (2014). When Small Words Foretell Academic Success: The Case of College Admissions Essays. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0115844 ↗
42. Did Shakespeare Write Double Falsehood? Identifying Individuals by Creating Psychological Signatures With Text Analysis10.1177/0956797614566658 ↗
43. Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions10.1073/pnas.1811987116 ↗
44. Olympians on Twitter: A Linguistic Perspective of the Role of Authenticity, Clout, and Expertise in Social Media Advertising10.1080/10641734.2020.1763521 ↗
45. Linguistic analysis of chat transcripts from child predator undercover sex stings10.1080/14789949.2017.1291707 ↗
46. Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies10.1177/0261927X13502654 ↗
47. Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles10.1177/0146167203029005010 ↗
48. Authentic First Impressions Relate to Interpersonal, Social, and Entrepreneurial Success10.1177/19485506221086138 ↗
49. Emotional Tone, Analytical Thinking, and Somatosensory Processes of a Sample of Italian Tweets During the First Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study10.2196/29820 ↗
50. Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 200110.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00741.x ↗
51. Suh, B., Convertino, G., Chi, E.H., and Pirolli, P. (2009, January 25–27). The singularity is not near: Slowing growth of Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, WikiSym ’09, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1145/1641309.1641322 ↗
52. Wang, G., Gill, K., Mohanlal, M., Zheng, H., and Zhao, B.Y. (2013, January 13–17). Wisdom in the social crowd: An analysis of quora. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’13, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1145/2488388.2488506 ↗
53. Ferrara, E. (2022). Twitter spam and false accounts prevalence, detection, and characterization: A survey. First Monday, 27.10.5210/fm.v27i12.12872 ↗
54. Qayyum, H., Zi Hao Zhao, B., Wood, I., Ikram, M., Kourtellis, N., and Ali Kaafar, M. (May, January 30). A longitudinal study of the top 1% toxic Twitter profiles. Proceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 2023, WebSci ’23, Austin, TX, USA.10.1145/3578503.3583619 ↗
55. Restriction Algorithm for Duplicate Posts on Online Social Networks: Facebook10.3329/gubjse.v6i1.52048 ↗
56. Detecting Automation of Twitter Accounts: Are You a Human, Bot, or Cyborg?10.1109/TDSC.2012.75 ↗
57. Fandom, Social Media, and Identity Work: The Emergence of Virtual Community through the Pronoun “We”10.1037/ppm0000259 ↗
58. Phan, T.T., Michoud, C., Volpato, L., Carral, M.D.R., and Gatica-Perez, D. (2022, January 27–30). Health Talk: Understanding Practices of Popular Professional YouTubers. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM ’22, Lisbon, Portugal.10.1145/3568444.3568453 ↗
59. Wang, Y., and Lv, Q. (2023, January 21–24). Jump off the Bandwagon? Characterizing Bandwagon Fans’ Future Loyalty in Online NBA Fan Communities. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing & Communications, Social Computing & Networking (ISPA/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom), Wuhan, China.10.1109/ISPA-BDCloud-SocialCom-SustainCom59178.2023.00158 ↗
60. From parasocial to parakin: Co-creating idols on social media10.1177/1461444820933313 ↗
61. Body like an idol: K-pop fitspiration on Tumblr—An analysis of texts and images
62. Patterns of linguistic simplification on social media platforms over time10.1073/pnas.2412105121 ↗
63. Zappavigna, M., and Logi, L. (2024). How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: A social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments. Soc. Semiot., 1–21.10.1080/10350330.2024.2389520 ↗
64. Chmiel, A., Sienkiewicz, J., Thelwall, M., Paltoglou, G., Buckley, K., Kappas, A., and Hołyst, J.A. (2011). Collective Emotions Online and Their Influence on Community Life. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0022207 ↗
65. The one-and-a-half sided parasocial relationship: The curious case of live streaming10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100150 ↗
66. To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter10.1177/1354856510394539 ↗
67. Sense of community: A definition and theory10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
68. The experienced “sense” of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes10.1145/968464.968470 ↗
69. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.019 ↗
70. Culturally-Embedded Visual Literacy: A Study of Impression Management via Emoticon, Emoji, Sticker, and Meme on Social Media in China
71. Why I Choose This Sticker When Chatting with You: Exploring Design Considerations for Sticker Recommendation Services in Mobile Instant Messengers10.1145/3687063 ↗
72. Complex and Ambiguous: Understanding Sticker Misinterpretations in Instant Messaging10.1145/3274299 ↗
73. Bae, J.e., Lim, Y.k., Bang, J.b., and Kim, M.s. (2014, January 21–25). Ripening room: Designing social media for self-reflection in self-expression. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS ’14, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1145/2598510.2598567 ↗
74. Sonification of Emotion in Social Media: Affect and Accessibility in Facebook Reactions10.1145/3512966 ↗
75. Erickson, J., and Yan, B. (2024, January 11–16). Affective Design: The Influence of Facebook Reactions on the Emotional Expression of the 114th US Congress. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’24, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3613904.3641935 ↗
76. Reviewing the Definitions of “Lurkers” and Some Implications for Online Research10.1089/cyber.2012.0362 ↗
77. Takahashi, M., Fujimoto, M., and Yamasaki, N. (2003, January 9–12). The active lurker: Influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP ’03, Sanibel Island, FL, USA.10.1145/958161.958162 ↗