journal article·2025-04-23Open access

Hybrid Neural Network-Based Maritime Carbon Dioxide Emission Prediction: Incorporating Dynamics for Enhanced Accuracy

Seunghun Lim, Jungmo Oh

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 9

Abstract

The rapid expansion of international maritime transportation has led to rising greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate change and environmental sustainability concerns. According to the International Maritime Organization, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from vessels are projected to increase by over 17% by 2050. Traditional emission estimation methods are prone to inaccuracies due to uncertainties in emission factors, and inconsistencies in fuel consumption data. This study proposes deep learning-based CO2 emission prediction models leveraging engine operation data. Unlike previous approaches that primarily relied on fuel consumption, this model incorporates multiple parameters capturing the relationship between combustion characteristics and emissions to enhance predictive accuracy. We developed and evaluated individual models—convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and temporal convolutional network (TCN)—as well as hybrid model (TCN–LSTM). The hybrid model achieved the highest predictive performance, with a coefficient of determination of 0.9726, outperforming other models across multiple quantitative metrics. These findings demonstrate the potential of deep learning for vessel emission assessment, providing a scientific basis for carbon management strategies and policy development in the international shipping industry. This study thus holds major academic and industrial value, advancing the field of deep learning-based emission prediction and extending its applicability to diverse operational scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Marine Engineering, Mokpo National Maritime University, Mokpo 58628, Republic of Korea

Division of Marine System Engineering, Mokpo National Maritime University, Mokpo 58628, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Education

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Spray characteristics of a urea solution injector and optimal mixer location to improve droplet uniformity and NOx conversion efficiency for selective catalytic reduction10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.032 ↗
2. International Energy Agency (2018, February 22). IEA Official Wesite. Available online: https://www.iea.org/.
3. Uniformity index measurement technology using thermocouples to improve performance in urea-selective catalytic reduction systems10.1007/s00231-018-2371-x ↗
4. A review on carbon emissions of global warming10.1007/s44312-023-00001-2 ↗
5. International Maritime Organization (2025, March 14). Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/Environment/Pages/Fourth-IMO-Greenhouse-Gas-Study-2020.aspx.
6. ISEMAR (2025, March 14). Global Sulphur Cap 2020 Etat des lieux [Summary Note ISEMAR No. 216]. Available online: https://www.isemar.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Note-de-Synthese-216-Global-sulphur-cap-2020-Etat-des-lieux.pdf.
7. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory data acquisition and analytics for low carbon cities10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130711 ↗
8. Particulate emission factors for mobile fossil fuel and biomass combustion sources10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.041 ↗
9. PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors for non-exhaust particles from road vehicles: Dependence upon vehicle mass and implications for battery electric vehicles10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117886 ↗
10. Analysis of passenger vehicle pollutant emission factor based on on-board measurement10.1016/j.apr.2022.101421 ↗
11. The activity-based methodology to assess ship emissions—A review10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.099 ↗
12. A sampling method for calculating regional ship emission inventories10.1016/j.trd.2020.102617 ↗
13. Estimating of shipping emissions in the Samsun Port from 2010 to 201510.1016/j.apr.2018.02.003 ↗
14. Methodologies for estimating shipping emissions and energy consumption: A comparative analysis of current methods10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.083 ↗
15. Shen, Q., Wang, G., Wang, Y., Zeng, B., Yu, X., and He, S. (2023). Prediction model for transient NOx emission of diesel engine based on CNN-LSTM network. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16145347 ↗
16. Prediction of harbour vessel emissions based on machine learning approach10.1016/j.trd.2024.104214 ↗
17. Tiered prediction models for port vessel emissions inventories10.1007/s10696-022-09468-5 ↗
18. Šilas, G., Rapalis, P., and Lebedevas, S. (2023). Particulate matter (PM1, 2.5, 10) concentration prediction in ship exhaust gas plume through an artificial neural network. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11010150 ↗
19. Attention is all you need
20. State-of-the-art augmented NLP transformer models for direct and single-step retrosynthesis10.1038/s41467-020-19266-y ↗
21. Transformer models for text-based emotion detection: A review of BERT-based approaches10.1007/s10462-021-09958-2 ↗
22. A tensorized transformer for language modeling
23. Multimodal transformer with multi-view visual representation for image captioning10.1109/TCSVT.2019.2947482 ↗
24. Contextual transformer networks for visual recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3164083 ↗
25. Self-adaptive neural module transformer for visual question answering10.1109/TMM.2020.2995278 ↗
26. A survey on vision transformer10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3152247 ↗
27. TSF-transformer: A time series forecasting model for exhaust gas emission using transformer10.1007/s10489-022-04326-1 ↗
28. Fast and accurate gas turbine emission prediction based on a light and enhanced Transformer model10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132750 ↗
29. A physics-informed neural network that considers monotonic relationships for predicting NOx emissions from coal-fired boilers10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131026 ↗
30. A test of goodness of fit10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232 ↗
31. Jiang, J. (2010). Large Sample Techniques for Statistics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-6827-2 ↗
32. A generalized Anderson-Darling test for the goodness-of-fit evaluation of the fracture strain distribution of acrylic glass10.1007/s40940-021-00149-7 ↗
33. Comparisons of various types of normality tests10.1080/00949655.2010.520163 ↗
34. Power comparisons of some selected normality tests
35. An analysis of variance test for normality10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗
36. A study of real-world micrograph data quality and machine learning model robustness10.1038/s41524-021-00616-3 ↗
37. Pal, K.K., and Sudeep, K.S. (2016, January 20–21). Preprocessing for image classification by convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore, India.10.1109/RTEICT.2016.7808140 ↗
38. Robustness of machine learning to color, size change, normalization, and image enhancement on micrograph datasets with large sample differences10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112086 ↗
39. Rosenblatt, F. (1961). Principles of neurodynamics. Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory Inc.10.21236/AD0256582 ↗
40. Huang, C.-J., and Kuo, P.-H. (2018). A deep CNN-LSTM model for particulate matter (PM2.5) forecasting in smart cities. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18072220 ↗
41. Tian, C., Ma, J., Zhang, C., and Zhan, P. (2018). A deep neural network model for short-term load forecast based on long short-term memory network and convolutional neural network. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11123493 ↗
42. Review on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.12.010 ↗
43. Using wavelet–feedforward neural networks to improve air pollution forecasting in urban environments10.1007/s10661-015-4697-x ↗
44. Lara-Benítez, P., Carranza-García, M., Luna-Romera, J.M., and Riquelme, J.C. (2020). Temporal convolutional networks applied to energy-related time series forecasting. Appl. Sci., 10.10.20944/preprints202003.0096.v1 ↗
45. Bai, S., Kolter, J.Z., and Koltun, V. (2018). An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv.
46. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
47. Pascanu, R. (2013). On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. arXiv.
48. A hybrid prediction method for realistic network traffic with temporal convolutional network and LSTM10.1109/TASE.2021.3077537 ↗
49. Liu, M., Sun, X., Wang, Q., and Deng, S. (2022). Short-term load forecasting using EMD with feature selection and TCN-based deep learning model. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15197170 ↗
50. Ferromagnetic cluster glass behavior and large magnetocaloric effect in Ho2 PtSi310.1016/j.ssc.2017.09.010 ↗
51. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206 ↗