journal article·2025-04-10Open access

Dynamic Expected Threat (DxT) Model: Addressing the Deficit of Realism in Football Action Evaluation

Karim Hassani, Mohammed Ramdani, Marwane Lotfi

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 8

Abstract

Evaluating player actions in football is essential for understanding match dynamics and optimizing team strategies. Traditional models, such as the widely adopted Expected Threat (xT) model, assign static threat values to pitch zones without considering real-time player positioning, leading to a limited representation of the evolving tactical context. To address this limitation, we introduce the Dynamic Expected Threat (DxT) model, which adjusts threat values dynamically by integrating off-ball player positions. DxT refines the probability of shooting and ball movement using an Expected Goals (xG) model that incorporates off-ball player positioning. Built on event data from professional football matches, which encompasses over 335,000 actions, our results demonstrate that DxT significantly improves upon traditional xT models by offering a more accurate and dynamic evaluation of action threats. This framework enhances tactical analysis, providing valuable insights for coaches, analysts, and scouting professionals seeking a more realistic approach to performance evaluation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Analytics and Performance · Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Machine Intelligence Laboratory, Hassan II University, Casablanca 20360, Morocco

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Performance Assessment in Team Sports10.1123/jtpe.16.4.500 ↗
2. Analysis and Research on Technical and Tactical Action Recognition in Football Based on 3D Neural Network10.2478/amns.2023.1.00046 ↗
3. Rudd, S. (2011, January 24). A Framework for Tactical Analysis and Individual Offensive Production Assessment in Soccer Using Markov Chains. Proceedings of the New England Symposium on Statistics in Sports, Cambridge, MA, USA.
4. Singh, K. (2025, March 26). Introducing Expected Threat (xT): Modelling Team Behaviour in Possession to Gain a Deeper Understanding of Buildup Play. Available online: https://karun.in/blog/expected-threat.html.
5. Decroos, T., Bransen, L., Van Haaren, J., and Davis, J. (2019, January 4–8). Actions Speak Louder than Goals: Valuing Player Actions in Soccer. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330758 ↗
6. Deep Soccer Analytics: Learning an Action-Value Function for Evaluating Soccer Players10.1007/s10618-020-00705-9 ↗
7. Kurt, R., and Schulte, O. (2015, January 12–16). A Markov Game Model for Valuing Player Actions in Ice Hockey. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
8. Pulis, M., and Josef, B. (2022, January 20). Reinforcement Learning for Football Player Decision Making Analysis. Proceedings of the StatsBomb Conference 2022, London, UK.
9. Factors Associated with Goals and Goal Scoring Opportunities in Professional Soccer10.1080/24748668.2011.11868563 ↗
10. Effects of Game Location and Final Outcome on Game-Related Statistics in Each Zone of the Pitch in Professional Football10.1080/17461391.2011.566373 ↗
11. Link, D., Lang, S., and Seidenschwarz, P. (2016). Real Time Quantification of Dangerousity in Football Using Spatiotemporal Tracking Data. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0168768 ↗
12. Modelling Team Performance in Soccer Using Tactical Features Derived from Position Tracking Data
13. Evaluating Goal Threat in Football Using Player and Ball Locations
14. The Kos Angle, an Optimizing Parameter for Football Expected Goals (xG) Models10.2478/ijcss-2023-0010 ↗
15. Van Roy, M., Robberechts, P., Decroos, T., and Davis, J. (2020, January 7–8). Valuing On-the-Ball Actions in Soccer: A Critical Comparison of xT and VAEP. Proceedings of the AAAI-20 Workshop on Artifical Intelligence in Team Sports, New York, NY, USA.
16. A Multiresolution Stochastic Process Model for Predicting Basketball Possession Outcomes10.1080/01621459.2016.1141685 ↗
17. Lucey, P., Bialkowski, A., Monfort, M., Carr, P., and Matthews, I. (2015, January 27). “Quality vs Quantity”: Improved Shot Prediction in Soccer Using Strategic Features from Spatiotemporal Data. Proceedings of the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, Boston, MA, USA.
18. Bertin, M. (2025, March 24). Why Soccer’s Most Popular Advanced Stat Kind of Sucks. Available online: https://deadspin.com/why-soccers-most-popular-advanced-stat-kind-of-sucks-1685563075/.
19. Eggels, H., Van Elk, R., and Pechenizkiy, M. (2016, January 19). Explaining Soccer Match Outcomes with Goal Scoring Opportunities Predictive Analytics. Proceedings of the Workshop on Machine Learning and Data Mining for Sports Analytics 2016, Riva del Garda, Italy.
20. An Examination of Expected Goals and Shot Efficiency in Soccer10.14198/jhse.2017.12.Proc2.05 ↗
21. Herbinet, C. (2018). Predicting Football Results UsingMachine Learning Techniques. [Master’s Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine].
22. Tiippana, T. (2020). How Accurately Does the Expected Goals Model Reflect Goalscoring and Success in Football?. [Master’s Thesis, Aalto University School of Business].
23. Pardo, P.M. (2020). Creating a Model for Expected Goals in Football Using Qualitative Player Information. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya—BarcelonaTech].
24. Bransen, L., and Davis, J. (2021, January 21–23). Women’s Football Analyzed: Interpretable Expected Goals Models for Women. Proceedings of the AI for Sports Analytics (AISA) Workshop at IJCAI 2021, Montreal, QC, Canada.
25. Implementing the Expected Goal (xG) Model to pPredict Scores in Soccer Matches
26. Van Haaren, J. (2021). “Why Would I Trust Your Numbers?” On the Explainability of Expected Values in Soccer. arXiv.
27. A Framework for the Fine-Grained Evaluation of the Instantaneous Expected Value of Soccer Possessions10.1007/s10994-021-05989-6 ↗
28. Cavus, M., and Biecek, P. (2022, January 13–16). Explainable Expected Goal Models for Performance Analysis in Football Analytics. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 9th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Shenzhen, China.10.1109/DSAA54385.2022.10032440 ↗
29. Comparative Analysis of Expected Goals Models: Evaluating Predictive Accuracy and Feature Importance in European Soccer
30. Anzer, G., and Bauer, P. (2021). A Goal Scoring Probability Model for Shots Based on Synchronized Positional and Event Data in Football (Soccer). Front. Sports Act. Living, 3.10.3389/fspor.2021.624475 ↗
31. A New xG Model for Football Analytics10.1080/01605682.2024.2323669 ↗
32. Accuracy and Explainability of Statistical and Machine Learning xG Models in Football10.1080/02331888.2024.2445305 ↗
33. van Rossum, G., and Drake, F.L. (2010). The Python Language Reference, Python Software Foundation. Python documentation Manual.