journal article·2010-10

Plasticity of quasicrystals and of bulk metallic glasses: An analogy

P. Guyot

Intermetallics· Volume 18· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Despite their antinomic atomic structures, long range ordered but non-periodically for quasicrystals (QC), or disordered for met-glasses (MG), both materials share surprisingly a similar mechanical behaviour: brittleness at low temperature, plasticity at high temperature. Such a-priori surprising results are considered and analysed, focussing on the high temperature ductility. Due to the aperiodic order of the QC atomic structure, the dislocation motion creates a topological and chemical disorder from which a friction stress results. Combining the friction stress–strain reduction with classical dynamic properties of dislocations allows to establish a constitutive equation of the deformation, which reproduces the essential characteristics of the experimental stress–strain and creep curves [7] . In MG, the diffusion of the free volume flow defects [9] is at the origin of the high temperature plastic strain. Their flow equation, where time and strain variations of the flow carriers density are introduced, leads to a satisfactory description of experimental observations: scaling of the glass viscosity with strain-rate and temperature, transient regimes occurring during specimen loading/unloading or strain-rate changes. Common features underlying the constitutive equation of the high temperature deformation of both materials are emphasized and discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties · Mineralogy and Gemology Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Johnson · Intermetallics · 2002 · 10 · 103910.1016/S0966-9795(02)00160-7 ↗
2. Lu · Acta Materialia · 2003 · 51 · 342910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00164-2 ↗
3. Giacometti · Mater Sc Eng A · 2001 · 429 · 319
4. Quasicrystal structure models related to crystalline structures10.1016/B978-0-12-040603-6.50006-4 ↗
5. Tilings and quasicrystals, lectures on quasicrystals
6. Miracle · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 431710.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.002 ↗
7. Guyot · Philos Mag A · 1999 · 79 · 281510.1080/01418619908212026 ↗
8. Fikar · Mat Res Soc Symp · 2001 · 643 · K7.3.1
9. Spaepen · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 407710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
10. de Hey · Acta Mater · 1997 · 46 · 587310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00234-1 ↗
11. Bletry · Intermetallics · 2004 · 12 · 105110.1016/j.intermet.2004.04.019 ↗
12. Monpiou · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 313310.1080/1478643031000155110 ↗
13. Feuerbacher M. Ph.D. Jülich, Aachen, Germany, 1996.
14. Mikulla R, Roth J, Trebin H.R. Proc; 5th. Int. Conf. Quasicrystals, 1995:298.
15. Bletry · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 633110.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.047 ↗
16. Feuerbacher · Philos Mag Lett · 2001 · 81 · 47310.1080/09500830110049983 ↗