Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA) Analysis of an Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) System
Source abstract
Abstract
To ensure security and stable quality, deeper cybersecurity evaluations are essential for the development of safety features and functionalities in vehicles. Among these, the AEB system is the most relevant. This research presents a comprehensive TARA of the AEB system, emphasizing the identification, validation, and mitigation of major cybersecurity threats and risks. We systematically examine potential attack vectors by utilizing the STRIDE threat model. This approach enables a detailed analysis of each security threat associated with AEB systems, providing insights into how malicious actors could use the attack paths. The assessment aligns with ISO/SAE 21434, which offers a robust framework for risk management in automotive cybersecurity and IT security, ensuring a thorough evaluation of a system’s architecture. By assessing the AEB system’s architecture against these standards, we identify key components and communication pathways that may be particularly prone to cyberattacks. The results of this analysis highlight critical flaws within the AEB framework and propose corrective measures to enhance cybersecurity resilience. This article provides a structured methodology for assessing and mitigating automotive cybersecurity risks in compliance with industry standards, aiming to facilitate the safe implementation of AEB technology and ultimately improve overall vehicle security and safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
Department of Business Informatics, MND, THM, 61169 Friedberg, Germany
Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informational Technologies, Politehnica University of Timișoara, 300006 Timișoara, Romania
Funding
European Commission as part of the Erasmus+ Blended Intensive Program (BIP)
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Meléndez-Useros, M., Jiménez-Salas, M., Viadero-Monasterio, F., and Boada, B.L. (2023). Tire Slip H Control for Optimal Braking Depending on Road Condition. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23031417 ↗
2. Robust Adaptive Heterogeneous Vehicle Platoon Control Based on Disturbances Estimation and Compensation10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3428341 ↗
3. Gao, J., Tian, J., Gong, L., and Zhang, Y. (2024). An Innovative Cooperative Driving Strategy for Signal-Free Intersection Navigation with CAV Platoons. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14083498 ↗
4. (2021). Road Vehicles—Cybersecurity Engineering (Standard No. ISO/SAE 21434:2021). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/70918.html.
5. (2023). Road Vehicles—Software Update Engineering (Standard No. ISO/SAE 24089:2023). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/77796.html.
6. Ye, Y., Zhao, J., Wu, J., Zhu, B., Deng, W., and Chen, X. (2018). Real-Time Automatic Test of AEB with Brake System in the Loop, SAE International. Technical report SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2018-01-1450 ↗
7. AEB Simulation Method Based on Vehicle Test Data for Accident Analysis of ADAS Vehicles10.1007/s12239-024-00019-5 ↗
8. Tang, B., Chien, S., Huang, Z., and Chen, Y. (2016, January 1–4). Pedestrian protection using the integration of V2V and the Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking System. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795913 ↗
9. Agirre, I., Calderon A., J., Yarza, I., Mugarza, I., Garcia, D., Borracci, L., Uven, P., and Jover, A. (2023, January 6–8). UP2DATE software updating framework compliance with safety and security regulations and standards. Proceedings of the 2023 26th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), Golem, Albania.10.1109/DSD60849.2023.00062 ↗
10. (2022). Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection—Information Security Management Systems-Requirements (Standard No. ISO/IEC 27001:2022). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/27001.
11. Lu, K.-L., and Chen, Y.-Y. (2019, January 4–8). ISO 26262 ASIL-Oriented Hardware Design Framework for Safety-Critical Automotive Systems. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Graz, Austria.10.1109/ICCVE45908.2019.8965235 ↗
12. Ariyanto, M., Haryadi, G.D., Munadi, M., Ismail, R., and Hendra, Z. (2018, January 30–31). Development of Low-Cost Autonomous Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for an Electric Car. Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT), Surakarta, Indonesia.10.1109/ICEVT.2018.8628442 ↗
13. (2018). Road Vehicles—Functional Safety (Standard No. ISO 26262-1:2018). Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:68383:en.
14. Making Transport Safer: V2V-Based Automated Emergency Braking System10.3846/16484142.2011.622359 ↗
15. Ferenc, G., Timotijević, D., Tanasijević, I., and Simić, D. (2024). Towards Enhanced Autonomous Driving Takeovers: Fuzzy Logic Perspective for Predicting Situational Awareness. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14135697 ↗
16. Dewa, A.N.D., Wahyunggoro, O., and Nugroho, P. (2019, January 20–22). Prototype of Automatic Braking System on Car Model Using Fuzzy Logic. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Creative Computing (ICSECC), Bandung, Indonesia.10.1109/ICSECC.2019.8907011 ↗
17. Alsuwian, T., Saeed, R.B., and Amin, A.A. (2022). Autonomous Vehicle with Emergency Braking Algorithm Based on Multi-Sensor Fusion and Super Twisting Speed Controller. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178458 ↗
18. Kopetz, H., and Poledna, S. (2013, January 24–27). Autonomous Emergency Braking: A System-of-Systems perspective. Proceedings of the 2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/DSNW.2013.6615526 ↗
19. Research on subjective evaluation method of automatic emergency braking (AEB) for passenger car10.1051/e3sconf/202126801037 ↗
20. Concept of Using the MBSE Approach to Integrate Security Patterns in Safety-Related Projects for the Automotive Industry10.1109/TITS.2024.3444048 ↗
21. Pethö, Z., Kazár, T.M., Kraudy, R., Szalay, Z., and Török, A. (2022, January 12–13). Considering PKI safety impact on network performance during V2X-based AD/ADAS function development processes. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 1st International Conference on Cognitive Mobility (CogMob), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/CogMob55547.2022.10118227 ↗
22. Tany, N.S., Suresh, S., Sinha, D.N., Shinde, C., Stolojescu-Crisan, C., and Khondoker, R. (2022). Cybersecurity Comparison of Brain-Based Automotive Electrical and Electronic Architectures. Information, 13.10.3390/info13110518 ↗
23. Strengthening Automotive Cybersecurity: A Comparative Analysis of ISO/SAE 21434-Compliant Automatic Collision Notification (ACN) Systems10.3390/vehicles5040096 ↗