Open-Pit Bench Blasting Fragmentation Prediction Based on Stacking Integrated Strategy
Source abstract
Abstract
The size distribution of rock fragments significantly influences subsequent operations in geotechnical and mining engineering projects. Thus, accurate prediction of this distribution according to the relevant blasting design parameters is essential. This study employs artificial intelligence methods to predict the fragmentation of open-pit bench blasting. The study employed a dataset comprising 97 blast fragment samples. Random forest and XGBoost models were utilized as base learners. A prediction model was developed using the stacking integrated strategy to enhance predictive performance. The model’s performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), the mean square error (MSE), the root mean square error (RMSE), and the mean absolute error (MAE). The results indicated that the model achieved the highest prediction accuracy, with an R2 of 0.943. In the training set, the model achieved MSE, RMSE, and MAE values of 0.00269, 0.05187, and 0.03320, while in the testing set, these values were 0.00197, 0.04435, and 0.03687, respectively. The model was validated using five sets of actual blasting block data from a northeastern mining area, which yielded more accurate prediction results. These findings demonstrate that the stacking strategy effectively enhances the prediction performance of a single model and offers innovative approaches to predicting blasting block size.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mineral Processing and Grinding · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Resource and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Division of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Optimized design of drilling and blasting operations in open pit mines under technical and economic uncertainties by system dynamic modelling10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.06.009 ↗
2. Kanchibotla, S.S., Valery, W., and Morrell, S. (1999, January 7–11). Modeling fines in blast fragmentation and its impact on crushing and grinding. Proceedings of the Explo’99: A Conference on Rock Breaking, Kalgoorlie, WA, Australia.
3. Predicting the average size of blasted rocks in aggregate quarries using artificial neural networks10.1007/s10064-018-1270-1 ↗
4. Prediction of blast fragmentation using multivariate analysis procedures10.1002/nag.957 ↗
5. Chandrahas, N.S., Choudhary, B.S., Teja, M.V., Venkataramayya, M.S., and Prasad, N.S.R.K. (2022). XGBoost Algorithm to Simultaneous Prediction of Rock Fragmentation and Induced Ground Vibration Using Unique Blast Data. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12105269 ↗
6. Determination of the parameters of the Rosin-Rammler and beta distributions from their mode and variance using equation-solving software10.1016/0032-5910(95)03073-5 ↗
7. The mean diameter of the fragments formed by blasting rock10.1007/BF02506177 ↗
8. Cunningham, C.V.B. (2005). The kuz-ram fragmentation model—20 years on. Brighton Conference Proceedings, European Federation of Explosives Engineer.
9. The Swebrec function: Linking fragmentation by blasting and crushing10.1179/037178405X44539 ↗
10. Evaluation of effect of rock mass properties on fragmentation using robust techniques10.1007/s00366-017-0537-7 ↗
11. Prediction and optimization of back-break and rock fragmentation using an artificial neural network and a bee colony algorithm10.1007/s10064-015-0720-2 ↗
12. Feasibility of PSO–ANFIS model to estimate rock fragmentation produced by mine blasting10.1007/s00521-016-2746-1 ↗
13. Rock Fragmentation Prediction through a New Hybrid Model Based on Imperial Competitive Algorithm and Neural Network
14. Research on Explosive-Rock Matching System based on XGBoost
15. Towards lightweight excavation: Machine learning exploration of rock size distribution prediction after tunnel blasting10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102266 ↗
16. A robust triaxial localization method of AE source using refraction path10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.03.004 ↗
17. Joint Inversion of AE/MS Sources and Velocity with Full Measurements and Residual Estimation10.1007/s00603-024-03917-3 ↗
18. Step-path failure mechanism and stability analysis of water-bearing rock slopes based on particle flow simulation10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104370 ↗
19. Mean particle size prediction in rock blast fragmentation using neural networks10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.05.008 ↗
20. Application of soft computing in predicting rock fragmentation to reduce environmental blasting side effects10.1007/s12517-012-0770-8 ↗
21. Philip, D., Abbaspour, H., Kansake, B.A., and Drebenstedt, C. (2019, January 27). Unraveling the Capability of Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Rock Fragmentation. Proceedings of the REAL TIME MINING—Conference on Innovation on Raw Material Extraction, Freiberg, Germany.
22. Application of PCA, SVR, and ANFIS for modeling of rock fragmentation10.1007/s12517-014-1677-3 ↗
23. Optimization of flyrock and rock fragmentation in the Tajareh limestone mine using metaheuristics method of firefly algorithm10.1007/s00366-017-0535-9 ↗
24. Prediction of Blasting Fragmentation Based on GWO-ELM
25. Prediction of the mean fragment size in mine blasting operations by deep learning and grey wolf optimization algorithm10.1007/s12145-024-01313-7 ↗
26. Prediction of blasting mean fragment size using support vector regression combined with five optimization algorithms10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.07.013 ↗
27. Ensemble machine learning models for prediction of flyrock due to quarry blasting10.1007/s13762-022-04096-w ↗
28. Khan, K., Ahmad, W., Amin, M.N., Ahmad, A., Nazar, S., Alabdullah, A.A., and Arab, A.M.A. (2022). Exploring the Use of Waste Marble Powder in Concrete and Predicting Its Strength with Different Advanced Algorithms. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15124108 ↗
29. Introducing stacking machine learning approaches for the prediction of rock deformation10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100756 ↗
30. Stacked Generalization for Improved Prediction of Ground Vibration from Blasting in Open-Pit Mine Operations
31. Prediction model for the compressive strength of rock based on stacking ensemble learning and shapley additive explanations10.1007/s10064-024-03896-3 ↗
32. Bagging Predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
33. Assemble learning: A survey of boosting algrithms
34. Stacked regressions10.1007/BF00117832 ↗
35. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
36. Random Forest and Bayesian Network Techniques for Probabilistic Prediction of Flyrock Induced by Blasting in Quarry Sites10.1007/s11053-019-09611-4 ↗
37. Optimization of postblast ore boundary determination using a novel sine cosine algorithm-based random forest technique and Monte Carlo simulation10.1080/0305215X.2020.1801668 ↗
38. Prediction of ground vibration induced by blasting operations through the use of the Bayesian Network and random forest models10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106390 ↗
39. Chen, T., He, T., and Benesty, M. (2016). XGBoost: Extreme Gradient Boosting. arXiv.
40. A Hybrid Model for Back-Break Prediction using XGBoost Machine learning and Metaheuristic Algorithms in Chadormalu Iron Mine
41. Performance evaluation of hybrid WOA-XGBoost, GWO-XGBoost and BO-XGBoost models to predict blast-induced ground vibration10.1007/s00366-021-01393-9 ↗
42. Yu, Q., Monjezi, M., Mohammed, A.S., Dehghani, H., Armaghani, D.J., and Ulrikh, D.V. (2021). Optimized Support Vector Machines Combined with Evolutionary Random Forest for Prediction of Back-Break Caused by Blasting Operation. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132212797 ↗
43. Application of various robust techniques to study and evaluate the role of effective parameters on rock fragmentation10.1007/s00366-021-01522-4 ↗
44. Developing a least squares support vector machine for estimating the blast-induced flyrock10.1007/s00366-017-0568-0 ↗
45. Support vector regression optimized by black widow optimization algorithm combining with feature selection by MARS for mining blast vibration prediction10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113106 ↗
46. Rock Fragmentation Prediction Using an Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Regression Hybrid Approach10.3390/mining2020013 ↗
47. Zhou, J., Chen, Y.X., Chen, H., Khandelwal, M., Monjezi, M., and Peng, K. (2023). Hybridizing five neural-metaheuristic paradigms to predict the pillar stress in bord and pillar method. Front. Public Health, 11.10.3389/fpubh.2023.1119580 ↗
48. A true triaxial strength criterion for rocks by gene expression programming10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.004 ↗
49. Determination of the in situ block size distribution in fractured rock, an approach for comparing in-situ rock with rock sieve analysis10.1007/s00603-004-0029-0 ↗
50. Energy control and block performance optimization of bench blasting10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105830 ↗
51. The influence of stemming practice on ground vibration and air blast10.17159/2411-9717/1204/2021 ↗
52. Zhao, J., Li, D., Zhou, J., Armaghani, D.J., and Zhou, A.H. (Deep. Undergr. Sci. Eng., 2024). Performance evaluation of rock fragmentation prediction based on RF-BOA, AdaBoost-BOA, GBoost-BOA, and ERT-BOA hybrid models, Deep. Undergr. Sci. Eng., early view.10.1002/dug2.12089 ↗
53. Developing GPR model for forecasting the rock fragmentation in surface mines10.1007/s00366-017-0544-8 ↗
54. Application of fuzzy inference system for prediction of rock fragmentation induced by blasting10.1007/s12517-015-1952-y ↗
55. Proposing a novel hybrid intelligent model for the simulation of particle size distribution resulting from blasting10.1007/s00366-018-0582-x ↗
56. Predicting rock size distribution in mine blasting using various novel soft computing models based on meta-heuristics and machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.gsf.2020.11.005 ↗