Show source-provided references
3. Radiolysis of liquid water: An attempt to reconcile Monte-Carlo simulations with new experimental hydrated electron yield data at early times
10.1139/v02-173 ↗4. Plante, I. (2021). A review of simulation codes and approaches for radiation chemistry. Phys. Med. Biol., 66.
10.1088/1361-6560/abbd19 ↗5. Review of chemical models and applications in Geant4-DNA: Report from the ESA BioRad III Project
10.1002/mp.17256 ↗7. Chatzipapas, K.P., Papadimitroulas, P., Emfietzoglou, D., Kalospyros, S.A., Hada, M., Georgakilas, A.G., and Kagadis, G.C. (2020). Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: Quantifying the Radiobiological Damage Using Monte Carlo Simulations. Cancers, 12.
10.3390/cancers12040799 ↗8. Kyriakou, I., Sakata, D., Tran, H.N., Perrot, Y., Shin, W.G., Lampe, N., Zein, S., Bordage, M.C., Guatelli, S., and Villagrasa, C. (2022). Review of the Geant4-DNA simulation toolkit for radiobiological applications at the cellular and DNA level. Cancers, 14.
10.3390/cancers14010035 ↗9. The effect of model approximations on single-collision distributions of low-energy electrons in liquid water
10.1667/RR3281 ↗10. Comparisons of Calculations with PARTRAC and NOREC: Transport of Electrons in Liquid Water
10.1667/RR1099.1 ↗12. Monte Carlo electron track structure calculations in liquid water using a new model dielectric response function
10.1667/RR14705.1 ↗13. On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations
10.1118/1.4901555 ↗15. Comparison of GEANT4 very low energy cross section models with experimental data in water
10.1118/1.3476457 ↗16. Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit
10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.10.087 ↗17. Geant4-DNA example applications for track-structure simulations in liquid water. A report from the Geant4-DNA project
10.1002/mp.13048 ↗18. Influence of track structure and condensed history physics models of Geant4 to nanoscale electron transport in liquid water
10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.001 ↗20. Experimental platform for ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation of small animals using a clinical linear accelerator
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.018 ↗22. Wilson, J.D., Hammond, E.M., Higgins, G.S., and Petersson, K. (2020). Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool’s Gold?. Front. Oncol., 9.
10.3389/fonc.2019.01563 ↗24. El Naqa, I., Pater, P., and Seuntjens, J. (2012). Monte Carlo role in radiobiological modelling of radiotherapy outcomes. Phys. Med. Biol., 57.
10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/R75 ↗26. Friendland, W., Aschmidtt, E., Kundrat, P., Dingfelder, M., Baiocco, G., Barbieri, S., and Ottolenghi, A. (2017). Comprehensive track-structure based evaluation of DNA damage by light ions from radiotherapy-relevant energies down to stopping. Sci. Rep., 7.
10.1038/srep45161 ↗27. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy beams: Comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols
10.1118/1.1405841 ↗29. Overview of energetic partic;e hazards during prospective manned missions to Mars
32. Strigari, L., Strolin, S., Morganti, A.G., and Bartoloni, A. (2021). Dose-effects models for space radiobiology: An overview on dose-effects relationships. Front. Public Health, 9.
10.3389/fpubh.2021.733337 ↗33. Cuccinotta, F.A. (2022). Flying without a net: Space radiation cancer risk predictions without a gamma-ray basis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.
10.3390/ijms23084324 ↗35. Shuryak, I., Slaba, T.C., Plante, I., Poignant, F., Blattnig, S.R., and Brenner, D.J. (2022). A practical approach for conituous in situ characterization of radiation quality factors in space. Sci. Rep., 12.
10.1038/s41598-022-04937-1 ↗36. Space radiation qualiy factor for Galactic Cosmic Rays and typical space mission scenarios using a microdosimetric approach
10.1007/s00411-023-01023-6 ↗37. The general-purpose Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit and its Geant4-DNA extension to investigate mechanisms underlying the FLASH effect in radiotherapy: Current status and challenges
10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102601 ↗38. An integrated physico-chemical approach for explaining the differential impact of FLASH versus conventional dose rate irradiation on cancer and normal tissue responses
10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.028 ↗39. A Computer Modeling Study of Water Radiolysis at High Dose Rates. Relevance to FLASH Radiotherapy
40. An electron-impact cross section data set (10 eV–1 keV) of DNA constituents based on consistent experimental data: A requisite for Monte Carlo simulations
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.09.027 ↗42. Technical note: Improvements in Geant4 energy-loss model and the effect on low-energy electron transport in liquid water
10.1118/1.4921613 ↗43. The impact of new geant4-DNA cross section models on electron track structure simulations in liquid water
10.1063/1.4950808 ↗45. Nikjoo, H., Uehara, S., and Emfietzoglou, D. (2012). Interaction of Radiation with Matter, CRC Press Taylor & Francis.
46. Evaluation of calculated and measured electron inelastic mean free paths near solid surfaces
10.1063/1.556035 ↗49. Kyriakou, I., Emfietzoglou, D., and Incerti, S. (2022). Status and Extension of the Geant4-DNA Dielectric Models for Application to Electron Transport. Front. Phys., 9.
10.3389/fphy.2021.711317 ↗51. Inelastic scattering of electrons in water from first-principles: Cross sections and inelaqstic mean free path for use in Monte Carlo track-structure simulations of biological damage
10.1098/rsos.212011 ↗55. ICRU (1996). Secondary Electron Spectra from Charged Particle Interactions, International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements. Report 55.
57. Cross sections for electron interactions in condensed matter
58. ICRU (2016). Key Data for Ionizing Radiation Dosimetry: Measurement Standards and Applications, International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements. Report 90.