journal article·2025-01-08Open access

The Impact of Advanced Footwear Technology on the Performance and Running Biomechanics of Mountain Runners

Pedro Corbí-Santamaría, Marina Gil-Calvo, Alba Herrero-Molleda, Juan García-López, Daniel Boullosa, José Vicente García-Tormo

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

In recent years, advanced footwear technology (AFT) has been shown to improve performance in long-distance road running by altering biomechanics and perceived comfort. This type of footwear is now being marketed for mountain running, although its effects in such races remain unevaluated. This study aimed to examine the impact of AFT on performance, biomechanics, and perceived comfort during a simulated mountain running event. Twelve trained mountain runners participated in a 3-day experiment, with a 7-day recovery between sessions. On the first day, a maximal aerobic speed test assessed the runners’ performance levels. On the second day, participants familiarized themselves with a 5.19 km mountain circuit and comfort scale. On the third day, they completed two time trials on the same circuit, separated by 30 min of passive recovery, using conventional and AFT shoes in a randomized order. Physiological and biomechanical variables were recorded, including body mass, blood lactate, running biomechanics, vertical stiffness, shoe comfort, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The findings indicate that AFT does not improve performance or physiological responses during a simulated mountain race, regardless of segment (uphill, downhill, or mixed). However, AFT significantly alters running biomechanics, reducing step frequency and increasing the vertical oscillation of the center of gravity, especially in uphill and downhill sections. While overall comfort remained unchanged, specific differences were observed with AFT. Coaches and practitioners should consider these findings when using AFT in mountain running training or competition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain

Funding

MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 · ESF Investing in your future · European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Ogueta-Alday, A., Morante, J.C., Gómez-Molina, J., and García-López, J. (2018). Similarities and differences among half-marathon runners according to their performance level. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0191688 ↗
2. Energetics and biomechanics of running footwear with increased longitudinal bending stiffness: A narrative review10.1007/s40279-020-01406-5 ↗
3. Recent improvements in marathon run times are likely technological10.1007/s40279-020-01420-7 ↗
4. Effects of running shoe construction on performance in long distance running10.1080/19424280.2020.1778799 ↗
5. Teeter-totter effect: A new mechanism to understand shoe-related improvements in long-distance running10.1136/bjsports-2020-102550 ↗
6. Can we quantify the benefits of “super spikes” in track running?10.1007/s40279-022-01657-4 ↗
7. (2024, September 10). World Athletics: Athletic Shoe Regulations. Available online: https://worldathletics.org/news/press-releases/new-athletic-shoe-regulations-approved-2022.
8. A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2 ↗
9. Influence of different midsole foam in advanced footwear technology use on running economy and biomechanics in trained runners10.1111/sms.14526 ↗
10. (2024, September 10). World Athletics: Book of Rules. Available online: https://worldathletics.org/about-iaaf/documents/book-of-rules.
11. A randomized crossover study investigating the running economy of highly-trained male and female distance runners in marathon racing shoes versus track spikes10.1007/s40279-018-1012-3 ↗
12. Bermon, S., Garrandes, F., Szabo, A., Berkovics, I., and Adami, P.E. (2021). Effect of advanced shoe technology on the evolution of road race times in male and female elite runners. Front. Sports Act. Living, 3.10.3389/fspor.2021.653173 ↗
13. Energetics and biomechanics of uphill, downhill and level running in highly-cushioned carbon fiber midsole plated shoes10.52082/jssm.2022.127 ↗
14. Metabolic cost of level, uphill, and downhill running in highly cushioned shoes with carbon-fiber plates10.1016/j.jshs.2021.10.004 ↗
15. Does an increase in energy return and/or longitudinal bending stiffness shoe features reduce the energetic cost of running?10.1007/s00421-018-4038-1 ↗
16. Increasing shoe longitudinal bending stiffness is not beneficial to reduce energy cost during graded running10.1123/ijspp.2022-0163 ↗
17. Impact of advanced footwear technology on elite men’s in the evolution of road race performance10.1080/02640414.2023.2183103 ↗
18. The effect of advanced footwear technology on elite male marathon race speed10.1007/s00421-023-05341-x ↗
19. Highly cushioned shoes improve running performance in both the absence and presence of muscle damage10.1249/MSS.0000000000002832 ↗
20. Effects of the Nike ZoomX Vaporfly Next%2 shoe on long-interval training performance, kinematics, neuromuscular parameters, running power and fatigue10.1080/17461391.2023.2171907 ↗
21. Improved footwear comfort reduces oxygen consumption during running10.1080/19424280902993001 ↗
22. Increased footwear comfort is associated with improved running economy—A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1080/17461391.2021.1998642 ↗
23. Bone stress injuries in runners using carbon fiber plate footwear
24. Biomechanics and physiology of uphill and downhill running10.1007/s40279-016-0605-y ↗
25. El trail running (carreras de o por montaña) en España. Inicios, evolución y (actual) estado de la situación
26. Corbí-Santamaría, P., Herrero-Molleda, A., García-López, J., Boullosa, D., and García-Tormo, V. (2023). Variable pacing is associated with performance during the OCC® Ultra-Trail du Mont-Blanc® (2017–2021). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20043297 ↗
27. Defining off-road running: A position statement from the Ultra Sports Science Foundation10.1055/a-1096-0980 ↗
28. Moreno, H. (2010). La Pendiente del Terreno, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
29. Spontaneous pacing during overground hill running10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181af21e2 ↗
30. Análisis biomecánico del efecto de las zapatillas de clavos en el rendimiento del esprint en hombres velocistas10.5232/ricyde2018.05305 ↗
31. Rodrigo-Carranza, V., González-Mohíno, F., Santos-Concejero, J., and González-Ravé, J.M. (2020). Influence of shoe mass on performance and running economy in trained runners. Front. Physiol., 11.10.3389/fphys.2020.573660 ↗
32. A new short track test to estimate the VO2max and maximal aerobic speed in well-trained runners10.1519/JSC.0000000000003121 ↗
33. Determination of blood lactate training zone boundaries with rating of perceived exertion in runners10.1519/JSC.0000000000000639 ↗
34. Coppalle, S., Ravé, G., Moran, J., Salhi, I., Abderrahman, A.B., Zouita, S., Granacher, U., and Zouhal, H. (2021). Internal and external training load in under-19 versus professional soccer players during the in-season period. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18020558 ↗
35. A simple method for field measurements of leg stiffness in hopping10.1055/s-2003-45252 ↗
36. Influence of running shoe longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and performance in trained and national level runners10.1249/MSS.0000000000003254 ↗
37. Jaén-Carrillo, D., Roche-Seruendo, L.E., Cartón-Llorente, A., Ramírez-Campillo, R., and García-Pinillos, F. (2020). Mechanical power in endurance running: A scoping review on sensors for power output estimation during running. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20226482 ↗
38. Prediction of power output at different running velocities through the two-point method with the Stryd™ power meter10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.037 ↗
39. Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus10.1007/s00421-010-1379-9 ↗
40. Reliability and accuracy of six hand-held blood lactate analysers
41. The running shoe comfort assessment tool (RUN-CAT): Development and evaluation of a new multi-item assessment tool for evaluating the comfort of running footwear10.1080/02640414.2020.1773613 ↗
42. Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00197-7 ↗
43. Identifying clinically meaningful tools for measuring comfort perception of footwear10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181dbacc8 ↗
44. The effects of footwear midsole longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and ground contact biomechanics: A systematic review and meta-analysis
45. Technological advances in elite marathon performance10.1152/japplphysiol.00002.2021 ↗
46. The influence of footwear longitudinal bending stiffness on running economy and biomechanics in older runners10.1080/02701367.2022.2114589 ↗
47. Rearfoot striking runners are more economical than midfoot strikers10.1249/MSS.0000000000000139 ↗
48. Kinematics of recreational male runners in “super”, minimalist and habitual shoes10.1080/02640414.2022.2081767 ↗
49. Lower step rate is associated with a higher risk of bone stress injury: A prospective study of collegiate cross country runners10.1136/bjsports-2020-103833 ↗
50. Running biomechanical alterations during a 40-km mountain race
51. Jaén-Carrillo, D., Roche-Seruendo, L.E., Molina-Molina, A., Cardiel-Sánchez, S., Cartón-Llorente, A., and García-Pinillos, F. (2022). Influence of the shod condition on running power output: An analysis in recreationally active endurance runners. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22134828 ↗
52. Evolution of perceived footwear comfort over a prolonged running session10.1016/j.foot.2015.08.003 ↗
53. Advanced footwear technology and its impacts on running mechanics, running economy and perception of male and female recreational runners10.1080/19424280.2024.2378702 ↗