journal article·2024-12-16Open access

Development and Implementation of a Deep Learning Algorithm to Evaluate the Powder Distribution Process During 3D Printing Using the LPBF Method

Marcin Korzeniowski, Aleksandra Maria Małachowska, Maciej Szymański

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 24

Abstract

This article presents research work on an intelligent system that was developed to monitor and continuously evaluate the quality of metal powder distribution in the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 3D printing process. The 3D printer that was used to carry out the work was equipped with an industrial vision system to capture images immediately after spreading powder on the work field. The powder distribution tests showed that the most common defects were identified as an insufficiently thick layer of powder applied to the working field (super elevation), unevenly distributed powder as a result of recoater vibration (so called recoater hopping), and its wear (so called recoater streaking). In the first stage of research, a set of training data (images) was collected. Then, the implementation of the machine learning process was prepared in the Roboflow environment. After that, the learning, validation, and prediction process was carried out several times using the selected machine learning model (YOLO model implemented in a Python environment) in order to select the most effective parameters. The study showed that deep machine learning can be effectively used to identify defects in powder distribution during the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Engineering Technology and Methodologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

Funding

NCBiR (The National Center for Research and Development, Warsaw Poland)

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 3D printing: Making an innovative technology widely accessible through makerspaces and outsourced services10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.074 ↗
2. Development of SLM quality system for gas turbines engines parts production10.1088/1757-899X/441/1/012024 ↗
3. Kantaros, A., Petrescu, F.I.T., Abdoli, H., Diegel, O., Chan, S., Iliescu, M., Ganetsos, T., Munteanu, I.S., and Ungureanu, L.M. (2024). Additive Manufacturing for Surgical Planning and Education: A Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14062550 ↗
4. Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., and Petrescu, F.I.T. (2023). Three-Dimensional Printing and 3D Scanning: Emerging Technologies Exhibiting High Potential in the Field of Cultural Heritage. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084777 ↗
5. Kantaros, A., and Ganetsos, T. (2023). From Static to Dynamic: Smart Materials Pioneering Additive Manufacturing in Regenerative Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms242115748 ↗
6. Gao, B., Zhao, H., Peng, L., and Sun, Z. (2022). A Review of Research Progress in Selective Laser Melting (SLM). Micromachines, 14.10.3390/mi14010057 ↗
7. Review on volumetric energy density: Influence on morphology and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V manufactured via laser powder bed fusion10.1007/s40964-022-00328-0 ↗
8. Smart recoating: A digital twin framework for optimisation and control of powder spreading in metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.04.062 ↗
9. Experimental analysis of powder layer quality as a function of feedstock and recoating strategies
10. A review of powder deposition in additive manufacturing by powder bed fusion10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.021 ↗
11. Influences of powder morphology and spreading parameters on the powder bed topography uniformity in powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing
12. Powder spreading in laser-powder bed fusion process10.1007/s10035-021-01162-x ↗
13. Effects of spreader geometry on powder spreading process in powder bed additive manufacturing10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.022 ↗
14. Vakifahmetoglu, C., Hasdemir, B., and Biasetto, L. (2021). Spreadability of Metal Powders for Laser-Powder Bed Fusion via Simple Image Processing Steps. Materials, 15.10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-spjw4 ↗
15. Dynamic investigation on the powder spreading during selective laser melting additive manufacturing
16. Layer-wise anomaly detection and classification for powder bed additive manufacturing processes: A machine-agnostic algorithm for real-time pixel-wise semantic segmentation
17. Part defects identification in selective laser melting via digital image processing of powder bed anomalies10.1007/s11740-022-01112-3 ↗
18. Prediction of microstructural defects in additive manufacturing from powder bed quality using digital image correlation10.1016/j.msea.2020.140002 ↗
19. Craeghs, T., Clijsters, S., Yasa, E., and Kruth, J. (2011, January 8–10). Online quality control of selective laser melting. Proceedings of the 20th Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium, Austin, TX, USA.
20. Experimental Investigation on an Algorithm for Testing the Quality of Powder Distribution During 3D Printing Process10.12913/22998624/171809 ↗
21. Research on Feature Extraction of Local Binary Pattern of SLM Powder Bed Gray Image10.1088/1742-6596/1885/3/032007 ↗
22. Anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed additive manufacturing process using a trained computer vision algorithm
23. A review of machine learning techniques for process and performance optimization in laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1007/s10845-022-02012-0 ↗
24. Towards intelligent monitoring system in wire arc additive manufacturing: A surface anomaly detector on a small dataset10.1007/s00170-022-09076-5 ↗
25. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (July, January 26). You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
26. YOLOWeeds: A novel benchmark of YOLO object detectors for multi-class weed detection in cotton production systems10.1016/j.compag.2023.107655 ↗
27. Weak surface defect detection for production-line plastic bottles with multi-view imaging system and LFF YOLO10.1016/j.optlaseng.2024.108369 ↗
28. Tan, L., Huangfu, T., Wu, L., and Chen, W. (2021). Comparison of RetinaNet, SSD, and YOLO v3 for real-time pill identification. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 21.10.1186/s12911-021-01691-8 ↗
29. Understanding of Object Detection Based on CNN Family and YOLO10.1088/1742-6596/1004/1/012029 ↗
30. Enhancing additive manufacturing with computer vision: A comprehensive review10.1007/s00170-024-13689-3 ↗
31. Object and defect detection in additive manufacturing using deep learning algorithms10.1007/s11740-024-01278-y ↗
32. (2024, September 01). Brief Summary of YOLOv8 Model Structure. Available online: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/issues/189.
33. (2024, September 01). What Is YOLOv8? A Complete Guide. Available online: https://blog.roboflow.com/what-is-yolov8/.