journal article·2024-11-08Open access

User Perception-Based Optimal Route Selection for Vehicles of Disabled Persons in Urban Centers of Saudi Arabia

Fawaz Alharbi, Abdulmajeed Alshammari, Meshal Almoshaogeh, Arshad Jamal, Husnain Haider

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 22

Abstract

People with disabilities (PWD), in their routine commutes, confront hindrances associated with road infrastructure in busy urban centers. The present study developed a user perception-based methodology to evaluate optimal routes for PWD in urban settlements in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). A survey captured the preferences for 105 PWD, consisting of 37 powered wheelchair users, 62 manual wheelchair users, and 6 artificial limb users. The multi-criteria decision analysis evaluated the accessibility index for PWD based on four criteria: length, number of junctions, absence of footpath, and slope. This study revealed that manual wheelchair users prefer the length criterion, powered wheelchair users emphasized the absence of footpaths, and artificial limb users were concerned about slope. The result showed that only two routes out of ten showed medium, while those remaining exhibited low accessibility. Most routes were relatively long for people with disabilities, focusing on the need for public transportation with special arrangements in most small and medium-sized cities, like the study area of Hail and Qassim province of the KSA, to reduce the distance and travel time. The proposed framework provides valuable insights to route evaluation for persons with special needs in the KSA and elsewhere.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Transportation Planning and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia

Funding

King Salman Center for Disability Research

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2022, November 22). World Report on Disability. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability.
2. Disability in Saudi Arabia
3. Bindawas, S.M., and Vennu, V. (2018). The National and Regional Prevalence Rates of Disability, Type, of Disability and Severity in Saudi Arabia—Analysis of 2016 Demographic Survey Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.10.3390/ijerph15030419 ↗
4. Authority for the Care of Persons with Disabilities (2022, January 12). APD Statistics, Available online: https://www.apd.gov.sa/en/reports.
5. Development and content validation of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: A mixed-methods study. Disability and Rehabilitation
6. A Confidence-Based Approach for the Assessment of Accessibility of Pedestrian Network for Manual Wheelchair Users
7. Travel behaviour and mobility challenges of disabled elderly in selected cities of Ogun State, Nigeria10.2478/logi-2020-0003 ↗
8. An exploration of the navigational behaviors of people who use wheeled mobility devices in unfamiliar pedestrian environments10.1016/j.jth.2020.100975 ↗
9. Accessibility barriers of wheelchair users in public spaces10.30574/msarr.2023.8.1.0077 ↗
10. Analyzing Accessibility Barriers Using Cost-Benefit Analysis to Design Reliable Navigation Services for Wheelchair Users
11. Tannert, B., and Schöning, J. (2018, January 3–6). Disabled, but at what cost? An examination of wheelchair routing algorithms. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile, Barcelona, Spain.10.1145/3229434.3229458 ↗
12. Simulating and visualizing sidewalk accessibility for wayfinding of people with disabilities10.1080/23729333.2015.1055646 ↗
13. Collaborative personalized multi-criteria wayfinding for wheelchair users in outdoors10.1111/tgis.12230 ↗
14. Modelling Access with GIS in Urban Systems (MAGUS): Capturing the experiences of wheelchair users10.1111/1475-4762.00108 ↗
15. Mapping for wheelchair users: Route navigation in urban spaces10.1179/000870406X93517 ↗
16. Personalised Routing for Wheelchair Navigation10.1080/17489720902837936 ↗
17. Modified ACO evacuation model based on evacuation entropy
18. Understanding route choices for wheelchair navigation10.3109/17483107.2014.898160 ↗
19. Gharebaghi, A., Mostafavi, M.A., Edwards, G., and Fougeyrollas, P. (2021). User-Specific Route Planning for People with Motor Disabilities: A Fuzzy Approach. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10.10.3390/ijgi10020065 ↗
20. A New Approach for Accessibility Assessment of Sidewalks for Wheelchair Users Considering the Sidewalk Traffic
21. Enhancing transportation service experience in developing countries: A post pandemic perspective10.1007/978-981-33-4126-5_9 ↗
22. Nicolas, A., Kuperman, M., Ibañez, S., Bouzat, S., and AppertRolland, C. (2019). Mechanical response of dense pedestrian crowds to the crossing of intruders. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-018-36711-7 ↗
23. Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives10.1068/a291175 ↗
25. Yoon, K.P., and Hwang, C.-L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412985161 ↗
26. Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions10.15388/Informatica.2006.158 ↗
27. Squeaky wheels: Missing data, disability, and power in the smart city10.1177/20539517211047735 ↗
28. Graph-theoretic approach to resolving the accessibility and site selection issues in planning and development
29. KErtugay, S.H. (2016). Duzgun, understanding accessibility: Accessibility modeling with Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Ch. 9. Using Decision Support Systems for Transportation Planning Efficiency, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-8648-9.ch009 ↗
30. GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.001 ↗
31. Mora, H., Gilart-Iglesias, V., Pérez-Del Hoyo, R., and Andújar-Montoya, M.D. (2017). A comprehensive system for monitoring urban accessibility in smart cities. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17081834 ↗
32. Gharebaghi, A., Mostafavi, M.A., Chavoshi, S., Edwards, G., and Fougeyrollas, P. (2018). The Role of Social Factors in the Accessibility of Urban Areas for People with Motor Disabilities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 7.10.3390/ijgi7040131 ↗
33. Adaptive personalized routing for vulnerable road users10.1049/itr2.12191 ↗
34. Personalized accessibility map (PAM): A novel assisted wayfinding approach for people with disabilities10.1080/19475683.2014.904438 ↗
35. Ding, D., Parmanto, B., Karimi, H.A., Roongpiboonsopit, D., Pramana, G., Conahan, T., and Kasemsuppakorn, P. (2007, January 22–26). Design Considerations for a Personalized Wheelchair Navigation System. Proceedings of the 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France.10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353411 ↗
36. Wheelchair accessibility of mosques in Riyadh10.3233/WOR-182758 ↗
37. Assessment of Accessibility Preparation for People with Special Needs at Al Ahsa Mosques10.52403/ijhsr.20211107 ↗
38. Catanoso, D., Kempf, F., Schilling, K., and D’Amico, S. (2019, January 16–19). Networked model predictive control for satellite formation flying. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop of Satellites Constellations and Formation Flying, Glasgow, UK.
39. Personalized accessible wayfinding for people with disabilities through standards and open geospatial platforms in smart cities10.1186/s40965-020-00075-5 ↗
40. Geospatial assistive technologies: Potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users10.1080/17483107.2019.1620351 ↗
41. The extension ranks ordering criteria weighting methods in fuzzy environment
42. Trolese, M., De Fabiis, F., and Coppola, P. (2023). A Walkability Index including Pedestrians’ Perception of Built Environment: The Case Study of Milano Rogoredo Station. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152115389 ↗
43. Manzolli, J.A., Oliveira, A., and De Castro Neto, M. (2021). Evaluating walkability through a Multi criteria Decision Analysis Approach: A Lisbon Case Study. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031450 ↗
44. Disabled Pedestrian Level of Service Method for evaluating and promoting inclusive walking facilities on urban streets10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000492 ↗
45. Multiple-Stakeholder perspectives on accessibility data and the use of Socio-Technical tools to improve sidewalk accessibility10.3390/disabilities3040040 ↗
46. Grand challenges in accessible maps10.1145/3301657 ↗
47. Automated Sidewalk Assessment Method for Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Using Three Dimensional Mobile Lidar10.3141/2542-04 ↗
48. Obstacles and risks in the traffic environment for users of powered wheelchairs in Sweden10.1016/j.aap.2021.106259 ↗
49. An Optimal Route for People with Ambulant Disabilities Using Mathematical Risk Modeling and Analytic Hierarchy Process10.1007/978-981-16-4016-2_12 ↗
50. Wieczorek, B., Warguła, Ł., and Rybarczyk, D. (2020). Impact of a Hybrid Assisted Wheelchair Propulsion System on Motion Kinematics during Climbing up a Slope. Appl. Sci., 10.10.20944/preprints202001.0287.v1 ↗
51. Alajizah, S.M., and Altuwaijri, H.A. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Urban Expansion on the Urban Environment in Riyadh City (2000–2022) Using Geospatial Techniques. Sustainability, 16.10.20944/preprints202404.1912.v1 ↗
52. Abd El Karim, A., and Awawdeh, M.M. (2020). Integrating GIS Accessibility and Location-Allocation Models with Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating Quality of Life in Buraidah City, KSA. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12041412 ↗
53. General Authority of Statistics (2022, May 02). Real Estate Price Index, Fourth Quarter 2021. Saudi Unified National Platform, Available online: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/6833.
54. Alnaim, M.M., and Noaime, E. (2022). Typological Transformation of Individual Housing in Hail City, Saudi Arabia: Between Functional Needs, Socio-Cultural, and Build Polices Concerns. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14116704 ↗
55. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 ↗
56. Ahmed, F., and Kilic, K. (2016). Comparison of fuzzy extent analysis technique and its extensions with original Eigen vector approach. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, SciTePress.10.5220/0005868401740179 ↗
57. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 ↗
58. Koca, D. (2017). Engelliler Için Mekan Düzenlemelerinde Kapsayıcı Tasarım, Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi.
59. Daff, M. (2024, June 16). Footpaths Should Be Improved for Motorised Chairs. SciSpace—Paper. Available online: https://typeset.io/papers/footpaths-should-be-improved-for-motorised-chairs-10eax6x301.
60. A pilot study of functional access to public buildings and facilities for persons with impairments10.1080/09638280310001649543 ↗
61. Basiri, A. (2024, June 14). Open Area Path Finding to Improve Wheelchair Navigation. SciSpace—Paper. Available online: https://typeset.io/papers/open-area-path-finding-to-improve-wheelchair-navigation-1fllonnb6g.
62. Banister, D. (2005). Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century, Routledge.10.4324/9780203003886 ↗
63. The role of accessibility to public transport and quality of walking environment on urban equity: The case of Santiago de Chile10.1177/0361198118782036 ↗
64. Differences in perceived neighborhood environmental supports and barriers for walking between US adults with and without a disability10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106065 ↗
65. National Council on Disability (2023, October 02). The Impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Assessing the Progress Toward Achieving the Goals of the A.D.A, Available online: https://www.ncd.gov/report/the-impact-of-the-americans-with-disabilities-act-assessing-the-progress-toward-achieving-the-goals-of-the-americans-with-disabilities-act/.