Hysteresis Compensation and Trajectory Tracking Control Model for Pneumatic Artificial Muscles
Source abstract
Abstract
The optimum performance position control of pneumatic artificial muscles (PAM) is restricted by their in-built hysteresis and nonlinearity. The hysteresis is usually depicted by a phenomenological model, while the model mentioned above always only describes the hysteresis phenomenon under certain conditions. Thus, the universality of the compensator is due to its weakness in handling disparate outside conditions. Our research employs the FN–QUPI (feedforward neural network–quadratic unparallel Prandtl–Ishlinskii) model to depict the phenomenon of pressure-displacement hysteresis in PAMs. This model has high-precision expression and generalization ability for the PAM hysteresis phenomenon. According to this, an inverse model of the QUPI operator is established as a feedforward control while combining with the feedback control of incremental PID-type iterative learning. The results show that due to the hysteresis of PAM, the compound control of feedforward control and iterative learning has better tracking performance than the ordinary PID compound control in terms of convergence rate and stability. According to the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the tracking process, it can be seen that the control model can achieve accurate nonlinear compensation, and the control system shows excellent robustness to different input signals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Soft Robotics and Applications · Robotic Locomotion and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Mi, J., Huang, G., and Yu, J. (2023). Characterization and Joint Control Study of Pneumatic Artificial Muscles. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13021075 ↗
2. Qin, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, X., and Han, J. (2022). Active model-based hysteresis compensation and tracking control of pneumatic artificial muscle. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22010364 ↗
3. Pietrala, D.S., and Laski, P.A. (2022). Design and Control of a Pneumatic Muscle Servo Drive Containing Its Own Pneumatic Muscles. J. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122111024 ↗
4. Experimental characterization and static modeling of McKibben actuators10.1115/1.3158982 ↗
5. Colbrunn, R.W., Nelson, G.M., and Quinn, R.D. (November, January 29). Modeling of braided pneumatic actuators for robotic control. Proceedings of the Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the Next Millennium (Cat. No. 01CH37180), Maui, HI, USA.
6. Minh, T.V., Tjahjowidodo, T., Ramon, H., and Van Brussel, H. (2009, January 14–17). Control of a pneumatic artificial muscle (PAM) with model-based hysteresis compensation. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Singapore.
7. Hysteresis modeling and tracking control for a dual pneumatic artificial muscle system using Prandtl–Ishlinskii model10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.03.006 ↗
8. Direct inverse hysteresis compensation of piezoelectric actuators using adaptive Kalman filter10.1109/TIE.2021.3114741 ↗
9. An efficient identification method for dynamic systems with coupled hysteresis and linear dynamics: Application to piezoelectric-actuated nanopositioning stages10.1109/TMECH.2019.2891777 ↗
10. Model reference adaptive control for a piezo-positioning system10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.03.006 ↗
11. Bouc–Wen hysteresis model identification using modified firefly algorithm10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.080 ↗
12. Non-symmetrical Bouc–Wen model for piezoelectric ceramic actuators10.1016/j.sna.2012.03.048 ↗
13. Control of pneumatic artificial muscle system through experimental modelling10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.09.010 ↗
14. Control of McKibben pneumatic muscles for a power-assist, lower-limb orthosis10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.07.004 ↗
15. Balasubramanian, K., and Rattan, K.S. (2003, January 25–28). Feedforward control of a non-linear pneumatic muscle system using fuzzy logic. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ’03, St. Louis, MO, USA.
16. Amato, F., Colacino, D., Cosentino, C., and Merola, A. (March, January 27). Robust and optimal tracking control for manipulator arm driven by pneumatic muscle actuators. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM), Vicenza, Italy.10.1109/ICMECH.2013.6519148 ↗
17. Schindele, D., and Aschemann, H. Sliding mode control applied to a novel linear axis actuated by pneumatic muscles. In Sliding Mode Control; InTech, Rostock, Germany, 2011.10.5772/15701 ↗
18. Development of the rate-dependent Prandtl–Ishlinskii model for smart actuators10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035026 ↗
19. Inverse feedforward controller for complex hysteretic nonlinearities in smart-material systems
20. A novel hysteresis modelling method with improved generalization capability for pneumatic artificial muscles10.1088/1361-665X/ab3770 ↗
21. Ma, G., Jia, H., Xiao, J., and Hao, L. (2023). A method for precise tracking control of pneumatic artificial-muscle-driven exoskeletal robot. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132112038 ↗
22. Modeling and inverse compensation of hysteresis in supercoiled polymer artificial muscles10.1109/LRA.2017.2651401 ↗
23. Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Qin, Y., and Han, J. (2021, January 15–19). Closed-loop control of a pneumatic artificial muscle actuated 2-DOF delta mechanism with adaptive hysteresis compensation. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR), Xining, China.10.1109/RCAR52367.2021.9517578 ↗