Multi-Label Classification for Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance on E. coli
Source abstract
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a pressing global health challenge with implications for developmental progress, as it increasingly manifests within pathogenic bacterial populations. This phenomenon leads to a substantial public health hazard, given its capacity to undermine the efficacy of medical interventions, thereby jeopardizing patient welfare. In recent years, an increasing number of machine learning methods have been employed to predict antimicrobial resistance. However, these methods still pose challenges in single-drug resistance prediction. This study proposed an effective model for predicting antimicrobial resistance to E. Coli by utilizing the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model (XGBoost), among ten other machine learning methods. The experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms other machine learning classification methods, particularly in terms of precision and hamming loss, with scores of 0.891 and 0.110, respectively. Our study explores the existing machine learning models for predicting antimicrobial resistance (AMR), thereby improving the diagnosis as well as treatment of infections in clinical settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Text and Document Classification Technologies · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Electronics Engineering, Sun Moon University, Asan 31460, Republic of Korea
Division of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Moon University, Asan 31460, Republic of Korea
Genome-based BioIT Convergence Institute, Sun Moon University, Asan 31460, Republic of Korea
Funding
MSIT (Ministry of Science, ICT), Korea
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. (2024, March 25). World Health Organization. WHO Outlines 40 Research Priorities on Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/22-06-2023-who-outlines-40-research-priorities-on-antimicrobial-resistance.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024, March 25). Antimicrobial Resistance, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/antimicrobial-resistance/.
3. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 ↗
4. Relationship between CT Severity Score and Capillary Blood Oxygen Saturation in Patients with COVID-19 Infection10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23752 ↗
5. Antibiotic resistance: The challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace10.1002/jcla.24655 ↗
6. Antimicrobial use in cattle and poultry production on occurrence of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli. A systematic review with focus on sub-Saharan Africa10.3389/fvets.2022.1000457 ↗
7. Ali, T., Ahmed, S., and Aslam, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction: Challenges and Opportunities towards Practical Implementation. Antibiotics, 12.10.3390/antibiotics12030523 ↗
8. Multi-label classification: An overview10.4018/jdwm.2007070101 ↗
9. A review of methods for imbalanced multi-label classification10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107965 ↗
10. Feucherolles, M., Nennig, M., Becker, S.L., Martiny, D., Losch, S., Penny, C., Cauchie, H.M., and Ragimbeau, C. (2021). Investigation of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for Assessing the Molecular Diversity of Campylobacter jejuni and Comparison with MLST and cgMLST: A Luxembourg One-Health Study. Diagnostics, 11.10.3390/diagnostics11111949 ↗
11. Machine Learning Prediction of Antimicrobial Peptides10.1007/978-1-0716-1855-4_1 ↗
12. Machine learning for classifying tuberculosis drug-resistance from DNA sequencing data10.1093/bioinformatics/btx801 ↗
13. Application of machine learning techniques to tuberculosis drug resistance analysis10.1093/bioinformatics/bty949 ↗
14. Söylemez, Ü.G., Yousef, M., Kesmen, Z., Büyükkiraz, M.E., and Bakir-Gungor, B. (2022). Prediction of Linear Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides Active against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria Based on Machine Learning Models. Appl. Sci., 12.10.20944/preprints202202.0175.v1 ↗
15. Ren, Y., Chakraborty, T., Doijad, S., Falgenhauer, L., Falgenhauer, J., Goesmann, A., Schwengers, O., and Heider, D. (2022). Deep Transfer Learning Enables Robust Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance for Novel Antibiotics. Antibiotics, 11.10.3390/antibiotics11111611 ↗
16. Multi-label classification for multi-drug resistance prediction of Escherichia coli10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.007 ↗
17. Tsapatsoulis, N., Panayides, A., Theocharides, T., Lanitis, A., Pattichis, C., and Vento, M. (2021). eGAN: Unsupervised approach to class imbalance using transfer learning. Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference, CAIP 2021, Virtual Event, 28–30 September 2021, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-89131-2 ↗
18. Minvielle, L., Atiq, M., Peignier, S., and Mougeot, M. (2019, January 4–6). Transfer Learning on Decision Tree with Class Imbalance. Proceedings of the IEEE 31st International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), Portland, OR, USA.10.1109/ICTAI.2019.00141 ↗
19. Author Correction: Deep transfer learning for reducing health care disparities arising from biomedical data inequality10.1038/s41467-020-20480-x ↗
20. Moradigaravand, D., Palm, M., Farewell, A., Mustonen, V., Warringer, J., and Parts, L. (2018). Prediction of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from large-scale pan-genome data. PLOS Comput. Biol., 14.10.1101/338194 ↗
21. Prediction of antimicrobial resistance based on whole-genome sequencing and machine learning10.1093/bioinformatics/btab681 ↗
22. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools10.1093/gigascience/giab008 ↗
23. The variant call format and VCFtools10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 ↗
24. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. (2017). Classification and Regression Trees, Routledge.10.1201/9781315139470 ↗
25. Logistic Regression, AdaBoost and Bregman Distances10.1023/A:1013912006537 ↗
26. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., and Vapnik, V.N. (1992, January 27–29). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.1145/130385.130401 ↗
27. A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition10.1023/A:1009715923555 ↗
28. Lagrangian support vector machines
29. Support Vector Machines Trained with Evolutionary Algorithms Employing Kernel Adatron for Large Scale Classification of Protein Structures
30. Multi-label Lagrangian support vector machine with random block coordinate descent method10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.023 ↗
31. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118548387 ↗
32. Introduction to Genetic Association Studies10.1101/pdb.top068163 ↗
33. Death Risk in Hemodialysis Patients: The Predictive Value of Commonly Measured Variables and an Evaluation of Death Rate Differences Between Facilities10.1016/S0272-6386(12)70364-5 ↗
34. Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI: Logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
35. Rennie, J.D., Shih, L., Teevan, J., and Karger, D.R. (2003, January 23–24). Tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
36. Maxwell, A., Li, R., Yang, B., Weng, H., Ou, A., Hong, H., Zhou, Z., Gong, P., and Zhang, C. (2017). Deep learning architectures for multi-label classification of intelligent health risk prediction. BMC Bioinform., 18.10.1186/s12859-017-1898-z ↗
37. Powers, D.M. (2020). Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv.
38. BoosTexter: A Boosting-based System for Text Categorization10.1023/A:1007649029923 ↗
39. Nsubuga, M., Galiwango, R., Jjingo, D., and Mboowa, G. (2024). Generalizability of machine learning in predicting antimicrobial resistance in E. coli: A multi-country case study in Africa. BMC Genom., 25.10.1186/s12864-024-10214-4 ↗
40. Amjad, M., Ahmad, I., Ahmad, M., Wróblewski, P., Kamiński, P., and Amjad, U. (2022). Prediction of Pile Bearing Capacity Using XGBoost Algorithm: Modeling and Performance Evaluation. Appl. Sci, 12.10.3390/app12042126 ↗
41. Can, R., Kocaman, S., and Gokceoglu, C.A. (2021). Comprehensive Assessment of XGBoost Algorithm for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Upper Basin of Ataturk Dam, Turkey. Appl. Sci, 11.10.3390/app11114993 ↗
42. Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm10.1080/10494820.2021.1928235 ↗