journal article·2010-09

Mixing enthalpy of liquid phase calculated by miedema’s scheme and approximated with sub-regular solution model for assessing forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys

A. Takeuchi, A. Inoue

Intermetallics· Volume 18· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys has been assessed with mixing enthalpy (Δ H mix ) of a liquid phase based on Miedema’s scheme. The Δ H mix ’s were calculated as a function of composition in an alloy for possible 2628 binary systems from 73 elements, and were approximated with interaction parameter Ω in a sub-regular solution model with coefficients Ω i ( i = 0 to 3) for a cubic function of composition. The results revealed that 2627 systems were fitted by Ω ′s within errors denoted by statistical adjusted R-square ( R 2 ) ≥ 0.999, which includes R 2 = 1 for 2409 systems. The values of Ω i for 1378 systems from 53 elements were selected and tabulated for assessing the forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys. The analysis revealed that P and C in Fe–P and Fe–C binary alloys and simultaneous additions of Ni and Cu in La-, Zr- and Pd-based bulk metallic glasses exhibit a marked and peculiar composition dependence of Δ H mix . In a framework of Miedema’s scheme, the most accurate values of Δ H mix for a liquid phase have been provided as a function of composition in an alloy system, which makes it possible to consider the forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys deeply.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 27910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
2. Klement · Nature · 1960 · 187 · 86910.1038/187869b0 ↗
3. 1988
4. Bakker · 1998 · vol. 1 · 1
5. Hidebrand · J Am Chem Soc · 1929 · 51 · 6610.1021/ja01376a009 ↗
6. Hardy · Acta Metall · 1953 · 1 · 20210.1016/0001-6160(53)90059-5 ↗
7. Abe · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 42110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.020 ↗
8. Takeuchi · Mater Trans JIM · 2000 · 41 · 137210.2320/matertrans1989.41.1372 ↗
9. Takeuchi · Mater Trans · 2005 · 46 · 281710.2320/matertrans.46.2817 ↗
10. Takeuchi · Intermetallics · 2009 · 17 · 69610.1016/j.intermet.2009.02.006 ↗
11. Inoue · Mater Trans JIM · 1997 · 38 · 17910.2320/matertrans1989.38.179 ↗
12. Johnson · Mater Sci Forum · 1996 · 225–227 · 3510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.225-227.35 ↗
13. Nishiyama · Mater Trans · 2005 · 46 · 280710.2320/matertrans.46.2807 ↗
14. Inoue · Mater Trans JIM · 1996 · 37 · 18510.2320/matertrans1989.37.185 ↗
15. Zheng · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 102 · 11351910.1063/1.2821755 ↗
16. Ma · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 87 · 18191510.1063/1.2126794 ↗
17. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng B · 2008 · 148 · 9210.1016/j.mseb.2007.09.064 ↗
18. He · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 186110.1063/1.117458 ↗
19. Guo · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 257510.1063/1.1614420 ↗
20. Li · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 371910.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.026 ↗
21. Jiang · J Alloys Comp · 2006 · 424 · 18310.1016/j.jallcom.2006.07.109 ↗
22. Xing · J Mater Sci Lett · 1991 · 16 · 127710.1023/A:1018574808365 ↗
23. Schroers · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 366610.1063/1.1738945 ↗
24. Amiya · Rev Adv Mater Sci · 2008 · 18 · 27
25. Park · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 68510.1557/jmr.2004.19.3.685 ↗
26. Busch · Mater Sci Forum · 1998 · 269–272 · 54710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.269-272.547 ↗
27. Kawazoe · 1997 · vol. 37 · 1
28. Takeuchi · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 130410.2320/matertrans.MF200604 ↗