Mixing enthalpy of liquid phase calculated by miedema’s scheme and approximated with sub-regular solution model for assessing forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys has been assessed with mixing enthalpy (Δ H mix ) of a liquid phase based on Miedema’s scheme. The Δ H mix ’s were calculated as a function of composition in an alloy for possible 2628 binary systems from 73 elements, and were approximated with interaction parameter Ω in a sub-regular solution model with coefficients Ω i ( i = 0 to 3) for a cubic function of composition. The results revealed that 2627 systems were fitted by Ω ′s within errors denoted by statistical adjusted R-square ( R 2 ) ≥ 0.999, which includes R 2 = 1 for 2409 systems. The values of Ω i for 1378 systems from 53 elements were selected and tabulated for assessing the forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys. The analysis revealed that P and C in Fe–P and Fe–C binary alloys and simultaneous additions of Ni and Cu in La-, Zr- and Pd-based bulk metallic glasses exhibit a marked and peculiar composition dependence of Δ H mix . In a framework of Miedema’s scheme, the most accurate values of Δ H mix for a liquid phase have been provided as a function of composition in an alloy system, which makes it possible to consider the forming ability of amorphous and glassy alloys deeply.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 27910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
2. Klement · Nature · 1960 · 187 · 86910.1038/187869b0 ↗
3. 1988
4. Bakker · 1998 · vol. 1 · 1
5. Hidebrand · J Am Chem Soc · 1929 · 51 · 6610.1021/ja01376a009 ↗
6. Hardy · Acta Metall · 1953 · 1 · 20210.1016/0001-6160(53)90059-5 ↗
7. Abe · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 42110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.020 ↗
8. Takeuchi · Mater Trans JIM · 2000 · 41 · 137210.2320/matertrans1989.41.1372 ↗
9. Takeuchi · Mater Trans · 2005 · 46 · 281710.2320/matertrans.46.2817 ↗
10. Takeuchi · Intermetallics · 2009 · 17 · 69610.1016/j.intermet.2009.02.006 ↗
11. Inoue · Mater Trans JIM · 1997 · 38 · 17910.2320/matertrans1989.38.179 ↗
12. Johnson · Mater Sci Forum · 1996 · 225–227 · 3510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.225-227.35 ↗
13. Nishiyama · Mater Trans · 2005 · 46 · 280710.2320/matertrans.46.2807 ↗
14. Inoue · Mater Trans JIM · 1996 · 37 · 18510.2320/matertrans1989.37.185 ↗
15. Zheng · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 102 · 11351910.1063/1.2821755 ↗
16. Ma · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 87 · 18191510.1063/1.2126794 ↗
17. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng B · 2008 · 148 · 9210.1016/j.mseb.2007.09.064 ↗
18. He · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 186110.1063/1.117458 ↗
19. Guo · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 257510.1063/1.1614420 ↗
20. Li · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 371910.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.026 ↗
21. Jiang · J Alloys Comp · 2006 · 424 · 18310.1016/j.jallcom.2006.07.109 ↗
22. Xing · J Mater Sci Lett · 1991 · 16 · 127710.1023/A:1018574808365 ↗
23. Schroers · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 366610.1063/1.1738945 ↗
24. Amiya · Rev Adv Mater Sci · 2008 · 18 · 27
25. Park · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 68510.1557/jmr.2004.19.3.685 ↗
26. Busch · Mater Sci Forum · 1998 · 269–272 · 54710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.269-272.547 ↗
27. Kawazoe · 1997 · vol. 37 · 1
28. Takeuchi · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 130410.2320/matertrans.MF200604 ↗