journal article·2024-08-26Open access

Effectiveness of Three Turbulence Modeling Approaches in a Crosswind–Sedan–Dune Computational Fluid Dynamics Framework

Weichao Yang, Jian Wang, Yue Dong

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

The aerodynamic loads of a sedan experience significant fluctuations when passing by a sand dune at the roadside under crosswinds, which can easily cause yawing and overturning. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, based on different turbulence modeling approaches, yield different aerodynamic results for sedans. This study aims to investigate the effects of three prevailing turbulence modeling approaches (renormalization group (RNG) k-ε, large eddy simulation (LES), and improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES)) on the aerodynamic characteristics of a sedan passing by a sand dune under crosswinds. The CFD dynamic mesh models are constructed using the “mosaic” mesh technique to account for the dune–air–sedan interaction. The reliability of the CFD prediction method is verified by comparing it with field test results. The predictive capabilities of the three turbulence modeling approaches are compared in terms of aerodynamic loads and flow field characteristics. The simulation of sand particle movement is conducted through the discrete phase model, aiming to assess the impact of wind–sand flow on the aerodynamic properties of sedans. Corresponding results show that the aerodynamic loads predicted by the LES model closely match (within 4.4–7.5%) the corresponding data obtained from field tests. While the IDDES and LES models demonstrate similar abilities in characterizing the wind field details, and their results exhibit maximum differences of 8.3–15.7%. Meanwhile, the maximum difference between the results obtained by the RNG k-ε and LES models ranges from 14.8% to 18.4%, attributed to its inability to capture subtle changes in the vortex structure within the flow field. This work will provide a numerical modeling reference for studies on the wind–sand flow and the aerodynamic characteristics of sedans running through the desert, and it has implications for the safe driving of sedans under extreme conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Aeolian processes and effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

National Engineering Research Center of High-Speed Railway Construction Technology, Changsha 410075, China

National Rail Transit Electrification and Automation Engineering Technology Research Center (Hong Kong Branch), Hong Kong, China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

Funding

Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of China railway · Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of China railway group limited

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. The physics of wind erosion and its control10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60400-9 ↗
2. On the crescentic shape of barchan dunes10.1140/epjb/e2004-00087-y ↗
3. Long-time evolution of models of aeolian sand dune fields: Influence of dune formation and collision10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.010 ↗
4. Force distribution within a barchan dune10.1063/5.0033964 ↗
5. Transiting test method for galloping of iced conductor using wind generated by a moving vehicle
6. Investigation of effects of tire contour on aerodynamic characteristics and its optimization10.1177/09544070211058664 ↗
7. Tian, G., Jia, Y.S., Chen, Z.Q., Gao, Y., Wang, S.Q., Wei, Z.Y., Chen, Y.F., and Zhang, T.S. (2023). Evaluation on lateral stability of vehicle: Impacts of pavement rutting, road alignment, and adverse weather. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13053250 ↗
8. Zhang, Q.W., Su, C.Q., Zhou, Y., Zhang, C.C., Ding, J.Y., and Wang, Y.P. (2020). Numerical investigation on handling stability of a heavy tractor semi-trailer under crosswind. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10113672 ↗
9. High speed driving stability of passenger car under crosswind effects10.1007/s12239-014-0077-8 ↗
10. Aerodynamic drag reduction of an Ahmed body based on deflectors10.1016/j.jweia.2015.11.004 ↗
11. Wind tunnel tests for mean wind loads on road vehicles
12. Inclusion of the physical wind tunnel in vehicle CFD simulations for improved prediction quality10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104055 ↗
13. Crosswind effects on high-sided road vehicles with and without movement10.12989/was.2014.18.2.155 ↗
14. Automobile shape formation and simulation by a computer-aided systematic method10.1177/1063293X16660598 ↗
15. High-order large-eddy simulation of flow over the “Ahmed body” car model10.1063/1.2952595 ↗
16. Base wake dynamics and its influence on driving stability of passenger vehicles in crosswind10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105164 ↗
17. A simplified analysis of various types of wind-induced road vehicle accidents10.1016/0167-6105(86)90012-7 ↗
18. Transient aerodynamic characteristics of vans overtaking in crosswinds10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.014 ↗
19. Effect of crosswinds on the aerodynamics of two passenger cars crossing each other10.1007/s12239-019-0094-8 ↗
20. Automobile aerodynamics influenced by airfoil-shaped rear wing10.1007/s12239-016-0039-4 ↗
21. Dynamic coupling analysis of the aerodynamic performance of a sedan passing by the bridge pylon in a crosswind10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.003 ↗
22. Large eddy simulation on the unsteady aerodynamic response of a road vehicle in transient crosswinds10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.05.008 ↗
23. Investigating the aerodynamic drag and noise characteristics of a standard squareback vehicle with inclined side-view mirror configurations using a hybrid computational10.1063/5.0156111 ↗
24. The Role of Forebody Topology on Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustics Characteristics of Squareback Vehicles using Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA)10.1007/s10494-023-00523-1 ↗
25. Assessment of hybrid RANS-LES methods for accurate automotive aerodynamic simulations10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104301 ↗
26. Numerical analysis of unsteady flow features around a realistic Estate vehicle with hybrid RANS/LES methods10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105935 ↗
27. Assessment of hybrid RANS-LES formulations for flow simulation around the Ahmed body10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.01.005 ↗
28. Turbulence modeling effects on the CFD predictions of flow over a NASCAR Gen 6 racecar10.1016/j.jweia.2018.03.016 ↗
29. Assessment of LES, IDDES and RANS approaches for prediction of wakes behind notchback road vehicles10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104737 ↗
30. How do dunes along a desert urban motorway affect the driving safety of sedans? Evidences from long- and short-term monitoring and IDDES10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105595 ↗
31. Numerical predictions of indoor climate in large industrial premises.: A comparison between different k-ε models supported by field measurements10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.005 ↗
32. Numerical simulation of wind flow over hilly terrain10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00014-3 ↗
33. CFD simulation of bubble column flows: Investigations on turbulence models in RANS approach10.1016/j.ces.2009.07.009 ↗
34. Yang, W.C., Deng, E., Zhu, Z.H., Lei, M.F., Shi, C.H., and He, H. (2020). Sudden variation effect of aerodynamic loads and safety analysis of running trains when entering tunnel under crosswind. Appl. Sci., 10.10.20944/preprints202001.0289.v1 ↗
35. Risan, A., Lund, J.A., Chang, C.Y., and Saetran, L. (2018). Wind in Complex TerrainLidar Measurements for Evaluation of CFD Simulations. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10010059 ↗
36. Detached eddy simulation of turbulent flow fields over steep hilly terrain10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104906 ↗
37. Evaluation of RANS, SAS and IDDES models for the simulation of the flow around a high-speed train subjected to crosswind10.1016/j.jweia.2017.09.006 ↗
38. Comparison of aerodynamic performance of high-speed train driving on tunnel-bridge section under fluctuating winds based on three turbulence models10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105081 ↗