MLPER: A Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Building Earthquake Response Using Ambient Vibration Measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have gained prominence in addressing regression problems, offering versatile architectural designs that cater to various applications. In the field of earthquake engineering, seismic response prediction is a critical area of study. Simplified models such as single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) and multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems have traditionally provided valuable insights into structural behavior, known for their computational efficiency facilitating faster simulations. However, these models have notable limitations in capturing the nuanced nonlinear behavior of structures and the spatial variability of ground motions. This study focuses on leveraging ambient vibration (AV) measurements of buildings, combined with earthquake (EQ) time-history data, to create a predictive model using a neural network (NN) in image format. The primary objective is to predict a specific building’s earthquake response accurately. The training dataset consists of 1197 MDOF 2D shear models, generating a total of 32,319 training samples. To evaluate the performance of the proposed model, termed MLPER (machine learning-based prediction of building structures’ earthquake response), several metrics are employed. These include the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and the mean deviation angle (MDA) for comparisons in the time domain. Additionally, we assess magnitude-squared coherence values and phase differences (Δφ) for comparisons in the frequency domain. This study underscores the potential of the MLPER as a reliable tool for predicting building earthquake responses, addressing the limitations of simplified models. By integrating AV measurements and EQ time-history data into a neural network framework, the MLPER offers a promising avenue for enhancing our understanding of structural behavior during seismic events, ultimately contributing to improved earthquake resilience in building design and engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece
Funding
Advanced Information Modelling for SAFER structures against manmade hazards
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion
2. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
3. Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 ↗
4. LeCun, Y., and Bengio, Y. (1995). The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, MIT Press.
5. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
6. LeCun, Y., Kavukcuoglu, K., and Farabet, C. Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Proceedings of 2010 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Paris, France, 13–18 June 2010, IEEE.
7. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 ↗
8. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
9. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
10. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
11. Machine-learning based vulnerability analysis of existing buildings10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103936 ↗
12. Physical interpretation of machine learning-based recognition of defects for the risk management of existing bridge heritage10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107237 ↗
13. OASP (2023, March 06). First Level Pre-Quake Rapid Visual Inspection (RVI). Available online: https://oasp.gr/proseismikos-eleghos/proseismikos-eleghos-ktirion-dimosias-kai-koinofeloys-hrisis.
14. Applied Technology Council and the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering (ATC/CUREE) (2012). FEMA P-58, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: Methodology and Implementation, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
15. OpenSees (2023, March 19). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. Available online: https://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
16. OpenQuake (2023, March 19). Global Earthquake Model Foundation. Available online: https://www.globalquakemodel.org/openquake/.
17. OpenQuake: A modular open-source software for earthquake hazard and risk analysis10.1785/0220130087 ↗
18. Machine learning and structural health monitoring overview with emerging technology and high-dimensional data source highlights10.1177/14759217211036880 ↗
19. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A.D., and Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection through Deep Learning: State-of-the-Art Review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102778 ↗
20. Won, J., and Shin, J. (2021). Machine learning-based approach for seismic damage prediction method of building structures considering soil-structure interaction. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13084334 ↗
21. Seismic behavior & risk assessment of an existing bridge considering soil-structure interaction using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111800 ↗
22. A novel deep learning-based method for damage identification of smart building structures10.1177/1475921718804132 ↗
23. Seismic response prediction method for building structures using convolutional neural network
24. ADINA R&D Inc.: ADINA (2023, May 25). Version: 9.2.1. Available online: http://www.adina.com.
25. A simple soil–structure interaction model10.1016/S0307-904X(00)00006-8 ↗
26. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2013). FEMA: Hazus—MH 2.1: Technical Manual, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division.
27. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901 ↗
28. Rabiner, L.I., and Gold, B. (1975). Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall.
29. Kay, S. (1987). Spectral Estimation, Prentice-Hall, Inc.