New-Generation ASiR-V for Dose Reduction While Maintaining Image Quality in CT: A Phantom Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the need to reduce and optimize patient medical radiation exposure has prompted the introduction of novel reconstruction algorithms in computed tomography (CT). Against this backdrop, the present study aimed to assess whether reduced radiation dose CT images reconstructed with the new-generation adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) maintain the same image quality as that of routine image reconstruction. In addition, the optimization of image quality parameters for the ASiR-V algorithm (e.g., an optimal combination of blending percentage and noise index (NI)) was investigated. An abdominal reference phantom was imaged using the routine clinical protocol (fixed noise index of 18 and 40% ASiR reconstruction). Reduced radiation dose CT scans were performed with varying NI (22, 24, and 30) and using the ASiR-V reconstruction algorithm. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of image noise, contrast, and resolution were performed against NI and reconstruction blending percentages. Our results confirm the ability of the ASiR-V algorithm to provide images of high diagnostic quality while reducing the patient dose. All the parameters were improved in ASiR-V images as compared to ASiR. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses showed that the best agreement was obtained for the images reconstructed using ASiR-V with NI24 and a high percentage of blending (70–100%). This preliminary study results show that ASiR-V allows for a significant reduction in patient dose (about 40%) while maintaining a good overall image quality when appropriate NI (i.e., 24) is used.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Dose and Imaging · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Medical Physics and Expert System, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
Radiology Unit, IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
Medical Physics, ASL Roma 6, 00189 Rome, Italy
Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
Scientific Direction, IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. (2023, February 10). EC (2013) Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 Laying Down Basic Safety Standards for Protection against the Dangers Arising from Exposure to Ionising Radiation, and Repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/59/oj.
2. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2018). Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation, IAEA.
3. Effective Dose from Radiation Exposure in Medicine: Past, Present, and Future10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.020 ↗
4. Higher Patient Doses through X-Ray Imaging Procedures10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.017 ↗
5. Updated Estimates of Typical Effective Doses for Common CT Examinations in the UK Following the 2011 National Review10.1259/bjr.20150346 ↗
6. Radiation Dose Associated with Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427 ↗
7. Analysis of Patients Receiving ≥100 Msv during a Computed Tomography Intervention10.1007/s00330-020-07458-5 ↗
8. Patients Undergoing Recurrent CT Scans: Assessing the Magnitude10.1007/s00330-019-06523-y ↗
9. Multinational Data on Cumulative Radiation Exposure of Patients from Recurrent Radiological Procedures: Call for Action10.1007/s00330-019-06528-7 ↗
10. CT Scanning: Patterns of Use and Dose10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301 ↗
11. Computed Tomography—An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure10.1056/NEJMra072149 ↗
12. Cao, C.F., Ma, K.L., Shan, H., Liu, T.F., Zhao, S.Q., Wan, Y., Zhang, J., and Wang, H.Q. (2022). CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer, 22.10.1186/s12885-022-10310-2 ↗
13. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report Shows Substantial Medical Exposure Increase10.1148/radiol.2532090494 ↗
14. Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. Part II Phantom measurements
15. The effect of z over scanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations
16. Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: Successful implementation in neuroradiology section10.1148/radiol.2472071054 ↗
17. Iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominopelvic CT: Technical concepts and clinical implementation10.2214/AJR.14.13402 ↗
18. State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques10.1148/radiol.2015132766 ↗
19. Iterative model reconstruction: Simultaneously lowered computed tomography radiation dose and improved image quality
20. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: Dose reduction potential in the abdomen10.1097/RCT.0b013e31824e639e ↗
21. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality10.1148/radiol.14140676 ↗
22. Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: A qualitative and quantitative analysis10.2214/AJR.10.4573 ↗
23. Evaluation of Abdominal CT Image Quality Using a New Version of Vendor-Specific Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction10.1097/RCT.0000000000000472 ↗
24. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique10.1097/RLI.ob013e3181dzfeec ↗
25. Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: Physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments—A phantom approach
26. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential10.2214/AJR.17.19102 ↗
27. New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR-V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR10.1002/acm2.12253 ↗
28. Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in MDCT imaging: A clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR) part 2: The chest10.1055/s-0033-1335152 ↗
29. Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in abdominal MDCT imaging: A clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR)10.1055/s-0031-1282032 ↗
30. Quantitative analysis of the effect of iterative reconstruction using a phantom: Determining the appropriate blending percentage10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.253 ↗
31. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: Comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique10.1259/bjr.20150463 ↗
32. Reduced radiation dose with model-based iterative reconstruction versus standard dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT for diagnosis of acute renal colic10.1148/radiol.2015141287 ↗
33. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study10.2214/AJR.09.3855 ↗
34. Iterative reconstruction: How it works, how to apply it10.1007/s00247-014-3102-1 ↗
35. (2022, September 12). Available online: https://www.gehealthcare.co.uk/-/media/6862ed3b10424182924e03a49f4a46d7.pdf.
36. Abdominal CT: Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques10.1148/radiol.10092212 ↗
37. Initial Phantom Study Comparing Image Quality in Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction and New Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction V
38. Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction—V versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Impact on Dose Reduction and Image Quality in Body Computed Tomography10.1097/RCT.0000000000000677 ↗
39. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison with Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions10.1097/RCT.0000000000000666 ↗
40. CT texture analysis using the filtration-histogram method: What do the measurements mean?10.1102/1470-7330.2013.9045 ↗