journal article·2022-05-27Open access

A Critical Analysis of Agile and Lean Methodology to Fulfill the Project Management Gaps in Nonprofit Organizations (NPOs)

Fares AbuKhamis, Abdelhakim Abdelhadi

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 11

Abstract

This research examines the implications of lean and agile methodologies for solving project management gaps in nonprofit organizations (NPOs). The data were collected from project managers, executives, and supervisors through an online survey questionnaire. The value of Cronbach’s Alpha is below 0.8, indicating reliable, valid, and consistent results. This study also concludes that the primary cause of the incapability of the previously mentioned methodologies could be the lack of awareness from project respondents because only 40% and 36% knew about lean methodology and the agile approach, respectively, which could be a significant drawback. The findings of this study state that Agile and Lean methodology implantation in project management allows the recording of progress and teamwork performance periodically, which helps monitor projects that are going as per planned objectives or where remedial actions are required to be undertaken. Moreover, the agile technique should be employed in a project where the role of managers is crucial in this regard because sensitive issues, such as cost and efforts require constant monitoring and urgent attention. Based on the present study’s results, a hybrid strategy is necessary, combining Agile and Lean approaches to examine diverse business situations. Researchers and project experts need to add more factors to measure project gaps accurately and explain how Agile and Lean management work to change the success of a project.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quality and Supply Management · Management and Optimization Techniques · Digital Transformation in Industry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Prince Sultan University

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Gil-Vilda, F., Yagüe-Fabra, J.A., and Sunyer, A. (2021). From Lean Production to Lean 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review with a Historical Perspective. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110318 ↗
2. Glover, W.J., Poopunsri, T., and Hurley, R. (2014). Applying lean to non-profit organizations: A food bank case study. IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
3. Exploring the role of project management in product development of new technology-based firms10.1177/8756972819851939 ↗
4. A conceptual examination of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma models for managing waste in manufacturing SMEs10.1108/WJSTSD-10-2019-0073 ↗
5. Nahrkhalaji, S.S., Shafiee, S., Shafiee, M., and Hvam, L. (2018, January 16–19). Challenges of digital transformation: The case of the non-profit sector. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607762 ↗
6. Project management performance assessment in the non-profit sector
7. Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach10.12816/0040336 ↗
8. A case Study on Agile and Lean Project Management in Construction Industry10.9790/1684-1304013139 ↗
9. The Quality of IT Project Management: The Business Process and The Go Project Lean Aplication10.22219/jmb.v10i1.10808 ↗
10. Method for adaptation and implementation of agile project management methodology10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.055 ↗
11. Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology–reality or illusion?10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.105 ↗
12. Obradović, V., Todorović, M., and Bushuyev, S. (2018, January 11–14). Sustainability and agility in project management: Contradictory or complementary?. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), Lviv, Ukraine.10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526666 ↗
13. Lean six sigma project management–a stakeholder management perspective10.1108/TQM-09-2014-0070 ↗
14. Using lean manufacturing as service quality benchmark evaluation measure10.1108/IJLSS-02-2015-0003 ↗
15. Lean road transportation–a systematic method for the improvement of road transport operations10.1080/09537287.2016.1152405 ↗
16. Moya-Colorado, A., León-Bolaños, N., and Yagüe-Blanco, J.L. (2021). The Role of Donor Agencies in Promoting Standardized Project Management in the Spanish Development Non-Government Organizations. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031490 ↗
17. Cruz, A., Alves, A.C., and Tereso, A. (2020). Traditional, Agile and Lean Project Management—A Systematic Literature Review. J. Mod. Proj. Manag., 8.
18. Sutherland, A., Saltz, J., and Anderson, E. (2020, January 7–10). Introduction to the Minitrack on Agile and Lean: Organisations, Products and Development. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2020.758 ↗
19. Parsons, D., and MacCallum, K. (2019). Agile education, lean learning. Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3 ↗
20. Haidabrus, B., Grabis, J., and Protsenko, S. (2021). Agile project management based on data analysis for information management systems. Design, Simulation, Manufacturing: The Innovation Exchange, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-77719-7_18 ↗
21. The evolution of Project Management (PM): How Agile, Lean and Six Sigma change PM
22. Noteboom, C., Ofori, M., Sutra, K., and El-Gaydar, O. (2021, January 5). Agile project management: A systematic literature review of adoption drivers and critical success factors. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2021.813 ↗
23. Measuring the success of Lean and Agile projects: Are cost, time, scope and quality equally important?
24. Agile–Stage-Gate for Manufacturers: Changing the Way New Products Are Developed Integrating Agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380 ↗
25. The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review10.5539/jel.v6n1p102 ↗
26. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods
27. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research