journal article·2025-09-16Open access

Role of Generative AI in AI-Based Digital Twins in Industry 5.0 and Evolution to Industry 6.0

Izabela Rojek, Dariusz Mikołajewski, Adrianna Piszcz, Olga Małolepsza, Mirosław Kozielski

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 18

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) plays a crucial role in improving AI-based digital twins (DTs), enabling more dynamic, adaptive, and accurate industrial simulations, essential as Industry 5.0/6.0 paradigms evolve and are implemented. In industry, genAI can simulate complex manufacturing processes or entire production lines, enabling companies to optimize operations, predict maintenance needs, reduce downtime, and develop more scenarios for correct operation (e.g., for faster transitions to new products or new materials) and address potential failures. GenAI also helps DTs continuously learn and evolve by generating new data and scenarios based on historical and current inputs. This capability ensures that DTs remain current and reflective of the real systems they represent, for both operational and training purposes (e.g., training operators for situations that rarely occur on a real production line).Furthermore, it facilitates the creation of synthetic data, which is important for training AI models when real-world data is scarce or expensive. This accelerates the development and improvement of DTs and increases the predictive accuracy, personalization, and operational efficiency of AI-based digital twins, making them more reliable and versatile tools in medicine and industry. However, in addition to strengths, it is also worth considering threats to prepare for risk mitigation. This article helps capture and maintain a balance between opportunities and threats in this area.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland

Funding

Kazimierz Wielki University

References (93)

Show source-provided references
1. Generative Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.jacr.2024.01.020 ↗
2. Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., and Dostatni, E. (2021). Digital Twins in Product Lifecycle for Sustainability in Manufacturing and Maintenance. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010031 ↗
3. Menaguale, O. (2023). Digital twin and cultural heritage—The future of society built on history and art. The Digital Twin, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-21343-4_34 ↗
4. Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., Dostatni, E., and Kopowski, J. (2023). Specificity of 3D Printing and AI-Based Optimization of Medical Devices Using the Example of a Group of Exoskeletons. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13021060 ↗
5. Modern approach to sustainable production in the context of Industry 4.0
6. Hawkinson, E. (2022). Automationin Education with Digital Twins: Trends and Issues. Int. J. Open Distance E-Learn., 8.10.58887/ijodel.v8i2.229 ↗
7. Digital twin: Data exploration, architecture, implementation and future10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26503 ↗
8. Meijer, C., Uh, H.W., and El Bouhaddani, S. (2023). Digital Twins in Healthcare: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities. J. Pers. Med., 13.10.20944/preprints202308.1261.v1 ↗
9. Gkontzis, A.F., Kotsiantis, S., Feretzakis, G., and Verykios, V.S. (2024). Enhancing Urban Resilience: Smart City Data Analyses, Forecasts, and Digital Twin Techniques at the Neighborhood Level. Future Internet, 16.10.20944/preprints202401.0967.v1 ↗
10. Avanzato, R., Beritelli, F., Lombardo, A., and Ricci, C. (2023). Heart DT: Monitoring and Preventing Cardiac Pathologies Using AI and IoT Sensors. Future Internet, 15.10.3390/fi15070223 ↗
11. Orlova, E.V. (2022). Design Technology and AI-Based Decision Making Model for Digital Twin Engineering. Future Internet, 14.10.3390/fi14090248 ↗
12. Generative AI in oncological imaging: Revolutionizing cancer detection and diagnosis10.18632/oncotarget.28640 ↗
13. Chandra, S., Prakash, P.K.S., Samanta, S., and Chilukuri, S. (2024). ClinicalGAN: Powering patient monitoring in clinical trials with patient digital twins. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-62567-1 ↗
14. Dynamic mirroring: Unveiling the role of digital twins, artificial intelligence and synthetic data for personalized medicine in laboratory medicine10.1515/cclm-2024-0517 ↗
15. Generative artificial intelligence empowers digital twins in drug discovery and clinical trials10.1080/17460441.2023.2273839 ↗
16. Is Academic Enhancement Possible by Means of Generative AI-Based Digital Twins?10.1080/15265161.2023.2249846 ↗
17. Is generative artificial intelligence the next step toward a personalized hemodialysis?
18. YOLO-Based Semantic Communication With Generative AI-Aided Resource Allocation for Digital Twins Construction10.1109/JIOT.2023.3317629 ↗
19. Sustainable Diffusion-based Incentive Mechanism for Generative AI-driven Digital Twins in Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems10.1109/TICPS.2024.3524483 ↗
20. A Review and Qualitative Meta-Analyss of Digital Human Modeling and Cyber-Physical-Systems in Ergonomics 4.010.1080/24725838.2021.1966130 ↗
21. Segovia, M., and Garcia-Alfaro, J. (2022). Design, Modeling and Implementation of Digital Twins. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22145396 ↗
22. Digital assembly technology based on augmented reality and digital twins: A review10.1016/j.vrih.2019.10.002 ↗
23. A Survey of Digital Twin for Industry 4.0: Benefits, Challenges and Opportunities10.1007/s42979-023-02363-2 ↗
24. Impact of AI-Driven Digital Twins in Industry 4.0: An Exploratory Analysis
25. Espina-Romero, L., Gutiérrez Hurtado, H., Ríos Parra, D., Vilchez Pirela, R.A., Talavera-Aguirre, R., and Ochoa-Díaz, A. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of AI in Manufacturing: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sci, 6.10.3390/sci6040060 ↗
26. Arruda, H.M., Bavaresco, R.S., Kunst, R., Bugs, E.F., Pesenti, G.C., and Barbosa, J.L.V. (2023). Data Science Methods and Tools for Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review and Taxonomy. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23115010 ↗
27. Gürses, A., Reddy, G., Masrur, S., Özdemir, Ö., Güvenç, I., Sichitiu, M.L., Sahin, A., Alkhateeb, A., and Dutta, R. (2024). Digital Twins for Supporting AI Research with Autonomous Vehicle Networks. arXiv.10.1109/MCOM.001.2400222 ↗
28. Visualisation of the digital twin data in manufacturing by using augmented reality10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.223 ↗
29. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179 ↗
30. Afzal, M., Li, R.Y.M., Shoaib, M., Ayyub, M.F., Tagliabue, L.C., Bilal, M., Ghafoor, H., and Manta, O. (2023). Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach. Sustainability, 15.10.20944/preprints202311.0244.v1 ↗
31. Li, S., Lin, X., Li, G., Chen, L., Liao, S., Wang, J., and Li, J. (2023, January 14–16). DPG-DT: Differentially Private Generative Digital Twin for Imbalanced Learning in Industrial IoT. Proceedings of the 2023 19th International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN), Nanjing, China.10.1109/MSN60784.2023.00049 ↗
32. Modern methods in the field of machine modeling and simulation as a research and practical issue related to Industry 4.0
33. An ontology-based shop-floor digital twin configuration approach10.1016/j.procir.2023.08.058 ↗
34. Dai, Y., Wang, S., Xiong, N.N., and Guo, W. (2020). A survey on knowledge graph embedding: Approaches, applications and benchmarks. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9050750 ↗
35. Generation of Asset Administration Shell with Large Language Model Agents: Towards Semantic Interoperability in Digital Twins in the Context of Industry 4.010.1109/ACCESS.2024.3415470 ↗
36. Amangeldy, B., Tasmurzayev, N., Imankulov, T., Baigarayeva, Z., Izmailov, N., Riza, T., Abdukarimov, A., Mukazhan, M., and Zhumagulov, B. (2025). AI-Powered Building Ecosystems: A Narrative Mapping Review on the Integration of Digital Twins and LLMs for Proactive Comfort, IEQ, andEnergy Management. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25175265 ↗
37. Zamini, M., Reza, H., and Rabiei, M. (2022). A review of knowledge graph completion. Information, 13.10.3390/info13080396 ↗
38. A survey of ai-generated content (aigc)
39. Artificial Intelligence in manufacturing: State of the art, perspectives, and future directions10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101 ↗
40. Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., Mroziński, A., and Macko, M. (2023). Machine Learning- and Artificial Intelligence-Derived Prediction for Home Smart Energy Systems with PV Installation and Battery Energy Storage. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16186613 ↗
41. Rojek, I., Mroziński, A., Kotlarz, P., Macko, M., and Mikołajewski, D. (2023). AI-Based Computational Model in Sustainable Transformation of Energy Markets. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16248059 ↗
42. Xu, M., Niyato, D., Chen, J., Zhang, H., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Mao, S., and Han, Z. (2023). Generative AI-empowered Simulation for Autonomous Driving in Vehicular Mixed Reality Metaverses. arXiv.10.1109/JSTSP.2023.3293650 ↗
43. Deep Generative Model and Its Applications for Effective Wireless Network Management: Tutorial and Case Study10.1109/MWC.009.2300165 ↗
44. Martini, B., Bellisario, D., and Coletti, P. (2024). Human-Centered and Sustainable Artificial Intelligence in Industry 5.0: Challenges and Perspectives. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135448 ↗
45. Hang, C.-N., Yu, P.-D., Morabito, R., and Tan, C.-W. (2024). Large Language Models Meet Next-Generation Networking Technologies: A Review. Future Internet, 16.10.3390/fi16100365 ↗
46. Scalise, P., Boeding, M., Hempel, M., Sharif, H., Delloiacovo, J., and Reed, J. (2024). A Systematic Survey on 5G and 6G Security Considerations, Challenges, Trends, and Research Areas. Future Internet, 16.10.3390/fi16030067 ↗
47. Musa, A.A., Hussaini, A., Qian, C., Guo, Y., and Yu, W. (2023). Open Radio Access Networks for Smart IoT Systems: State of Art and Future Directions. Future Internet, 15.10.3390/fi15120380 ↗
48. Hu, F., Wang, C., and Wu, X. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Facility Layout Design Paradigm. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105697 ↗
49. Classification of facility layout problems: A review study10.1007/s00170-017-0895-8 ↗
50. Gym-flp: A Python Package for Training Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Facility Layout Problems10.1007/s43069-024-00301-3 ↗
51. An evolutionary optimal green layout design for a production facility by simulated annealing algorithm10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.256 ↗
52. A framework for automated multiobjective factory layout planning using reinforcement learning10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.099 ↗
53. A bottom-up multi-objective optimisation approach to dynamic facility layout planning10.1080/00207543.2023.2168308 ↗
54. Semantic knowledge in generation of 3D layouts for decision-making10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104012 ↗
55. Conditional room layout generation based on graph neural networks10.1016/j.cag.2024.103971 ↗
56. Intelligent layout generation based on deep generative models: A comprehensive survey10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101940 ↗
57. Generative Shop floor Layout Design: Challenges and Proposed Modelling Approach10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.09.213 ↗
58. Knowledge graph and knowledge reasoning: A systematic review10.1016/j.jnlest.2022.100159 ↗
59. Różanowski, K., Piotrowski, Z., and Ciolek, M. (2013, January 1–5). Mobile Application for Driver’s Health Status Remote Monitoring. Proceedings of the 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Sardinia, Italy.10.1109/IWCMC.2013.6583819 ↗
60. Influence of cuff pressures of automatic sphygmomanometers on pulse oximetry measurements10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110329 ↗
61. Akter, N., Molnar, A., and Georgakopoulos, D. (2024). Toward Improving Human Training by Combining Wearable Full-Body IoT Sensors and Machine Learning. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24227351 ↗
62. Chen, X., Eder, M.A., Shihavuddin, A., and Zheng, D. (2021). A Human-Cyber-Physical System toward Intelligent Wind Turbine Operation and Maintenance. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020561 ↗
63. Design and control of system for elbow rehabilitation: Preliminary findings10.17219/acem/74556 ↗
64. Kawala-Janik, A., Podpora, M., Baranowski, J., Bauer, W., and Pelc, M. (2014, January 2–5). Innovative Approach in Analysis of EEG and EMG Signals—Comparision of the Two Novel Methods. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Miedzyzdroje, Poland.10.1109/MMAR.2014.6957459 ↗
65. Bickel, S., Goetz, S., and Wartzack, S. (2024). Symbol Detection in Mechanical Engineering Sketches: Experimental Study on Principle Sketches with Synthetic Data Generation and Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14146106 ↗
66. Overview and Comparison of Asset Information Model Standards10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3312286 ↗
67. Design of an improved layout for a steel processing facility using SLP and lean Manufacturing techniques10.1007/s12008-024-01828-9 ↗
68. Uncovering the behaviour of facility layout problem solutions in relation to factory design applications10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.306 ↗
69. Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., Kotlarz, P., Tyburek, K., Kopowski, J., and Dostatni, E. (2021). Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14247625 ↗
70. Artificial intelligence enabled smart design and manufacturing of advanced materials: The endless Frontier in AI+era10.1002/mgea.56 ↗
71. Rao, S., and Neethirajan, S. (2025). Computational Architectures for Precision Dairy Nutrition Digital Twins: A Technical Review and Implementation Framework. Sensors, 25.10.20944/preprints202506.2401.v1 ↗
72. Rojek, I., Kotlarz, P., Dorożyński, J., and Mikołajewski, D. (2024). Sixth-Generation (6G) Networks for Improved Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communication in Industry 4.0. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13101832 ↗
73. Zachariades, C., and Xavier, V. (2025). A Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Fault Diagnosis of Electric Machines. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25165128 ↗
74. Industry 5.0: The arising of a concept10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.312 ↗
75. Jin, J., Xu, H., and Leng, B. (2022). Adaptive Points Sampling for Implicit Field Reconstruction of Industrial Digital Twin. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22176630 ↗
76. Optimizing Cellular Manufacturing Facility Layout Design through Digital Twin Simulation: A Case Study
77. Martinez, E.M., Ponce, P., Macias, I., and Molina, A. (2021). Automation Pyramidas Constructor for a Complete Digital Twin, Case Study: A Didactic Manufacturing System. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21144656 ↗
78. Predictive compensation of thermal deformations of ball screws in cnc machines using neural networks
79. Ten industrial software towards smart manufacturing10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.01.012 ↗
80. Singh, R., Akram, S.V., Gehlot, A., Buddhi, D., Priyadarshi, N., and Twala, B. (2022). Energy System 4.0: Digitalization of the Energy Sector with Inclination towards Sustainability. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22176619 ↗
81. Damisa, U., Nwulu, N.I., and Siano, P. (2022). Towards Blockchain-Based Energy Trading: A Smart Contract Implementation of Energy Double Auction and Spinning Reserve Trading. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15114084 ↗
82. Huang, Z., Shen, Y., Li, J., Fey, M., and Brecher, C. (2021). A Survey on AI-Driven Digital Twins in Industry 4.0: Smart Manufacturing and Advanced Robotics. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21196340 ↗
83. A digital twin modeling method for production resources of shop floor10.1007/s00170-023-11903-2 ↗
84. Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., and Zurada, J.M. (2010). Hybrid Neural Networks as Prediction Models. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-13208-7 ↗
85. Han, X., Lin, Z., Clark, C., Vucetic, B., and Lomax, S. (2022). AI Based Digital Twin Model for Cattle Caring. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22197118 ↗
86. Shaposhnyk, O., Lai, K., Wolbring, G., Shmerko, V., and Yanushkevich, S. (2024). Next Generation Computing and Communication Hub for First Responders in Smart Cities. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24072366 ↗
87. Models for Better Environmental Intelligent Management within Water Supply Systems10.1007/s11269-014-0654-7 ↗
88. Choi, H., Yu, S., Lee, D., Noh, S.D., Ji, S., Kim, H., Yoon, H., Kwon, M., and Han, J. (2024). Optimization of the Factory Layout and Production Flow Using Production-Simulation-Based Reinforcement Learning. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12060390 ↗
89. Tasmurzayev, N., Amangeldy, B., Imanbek, B., Baigarayeva, Z., Imankulov, T., Dikhanbayeva, G., Amangeldi, I., and Sharipova, S. (2025). Digital Cardiovascular Twins, AI Agents, and Sensor Data: A Narrative Review from System Architecture to Proactive Heart Health. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25175272 ↗
90. Xie, R., Chen, M., Liu, W., Jian, H., and Shi, Y. (2021). Digital Twin Technologies for Turbo machinery in a Life Cycle Perspective: A Review. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13052495 ↗
91. Negri, V., Zanella, S., Mingotti, A., Tinarelli, R., Peretto, L., Barchi, F., and Acquaviva, A. (2024, January 18–20). Towars the DT of educational building: An AI-based distributed measurement system for the power forecasting. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 14th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS), Caserta, Italy.10.1109/AMPS62611.2024.10706690 ↗
92. Hevesli, M., Mohammed Seid, A., Erbad, A., and Abdallah, M.M. (2024, January 2–5). Energy efficient delay-aware design for MEC-enabled DT-assisted air-ground network. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Valencia, Spain.10.1109/PIMRC59610.2024.10817398 ↗
93. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗