Effects of Petrophysical Parameters on Sedimentary Rock Strength Prediction: Implications of Machine Learning Approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Machine learning-guided predictive models are attractive in rock modeling for different scholars to obtain continuous profiles of rock compressive strength in rock engineering. The major objectives of the study are to assess the implications of machine learning (ML)-based connectionist models to obtain the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of rock, to perform parametric sensitivity analysis on petrophysical parameters, and to develop an improved correlation for UCS prediction. The least-squares support vector machine (LSSVM) is applied to develop data-driven models for the prediction of UCS. Additionally, the random forest (RF) algorithm is applied to verify the effectiveness of predictive models. A database containing well-logging data is processed and utilized to construct connectionist models to obtain UCS. For the efficacy of predictive models, statistical performance indicators such as the coefficient of determination (CC), average percentage relative error, and maximum average percentage error are utilized in the study. It is revealed that the RF- and LSSVM-based models for predicting UCS perform excellently with high precision. Considering the parametric sensitivity analysis in the predictive models for UCS, the formation compressional wave velocity and formation gamma-ray are the most strongly contributing predictor variables rather than other input variables such as the modulus of elasticity, acoustic shear wave velocity, and rock bulk density. The improved correlation for predicting UCS shows high precision, achieving a CC of 96% and root mean squared error of 0.54 MPa. This systematic research workflow is significant and can be utilized for connectionist robust model development and variable selections in the petroleum and mining fields, such as predicting reservoir properties, the drilling rate of penetration, sanding potentiality of hydrocarbon reservoir rocks, and for the practical implications of boring and geotechnical engineering projects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram 4349, Bangladesh
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Department of Process Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5, Canada
Funding
Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Predictive models and feature ranking in reservoir geomechanics: A critical review and research guidelines10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103493 ↗
2. Miller, R.P. (1965). Engineering Classification and Index Properties for Intact Rock. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois].
3. (2010). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens Under Varying States of Stress and Temperatures (Standard No. ASTM D 7012-07).
4. Practical estimates of rock mass strength10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X ↗
5. Machine Learning Approach to Model Rock Strength: Prediction and Variable Selection with Aid of Log Data10.1007/s00603-020-02184-2 ↗
6. Improved prediction of shear wave velocity for clastic sedimentary rocks using hybrid model with core data10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.06.014 ↗
7. Quantitative characterization of the brittleness of deep shales by integrating mineral content, elastic parameters, in situ stress conditions and logging analysis10.1007/s40789-023-00637-x ↗
8. Experimental Study on Rock Strength Parameters for Brittleness Index Evaluation: A Case Study of the Sitakunda Anticline Area, Bengal Basin
9. Raaen, A.M., Hovem, K.A., Joranson, H., and Fjaer, E. (1996, January 6–9). FORMEL: A step forward in strength logging. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/471916.10.2118/36533-MS ↗
10. Feasibility study of the stability of openhole multilaterals, Cook Inlet, Alaska10.2118/73192-PA ↗
11. Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003 ↗
12. Fjær, E., Holt, R.M., Raaen, A.M., Risnes, R., and Horsrud, P. (2008). Petroleum related rock mechanics (Vol. 53). Developments in Petroleum Science, Elsevier.
13. Mechanical property and thermal degradation mechanism of granite in thermal-mechanical coupled triaxial compression10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105270 ↗
14. Slope stability prediction based on a long short-term memory neural network: Comparisons with convolutional neural networks, support vector machines and random forest models10.1007/s40789-023-00579-4 ↗
15. Wu, W., Wang, T., Bai, J., Liu, J., Wang, X., Xu, H., and Feng, G. (2024). Failure characteristics and cooperative control strategies for gob-side entry driving near an advancing working face: A case study. Processes, 12.10.3390/pr12071398 ↗
16. A generalized early warning criterion for the landslide risk assessment: Deformation probability index (DPI)10.1007/s11440-023-02199-3 ↗
17. Non-monotonic effect of differential stress and temperature on mechanical property and rockburst proneness of granite under high-temperature true triaxial compression10.1007/s40948-024-00891-6 ↗
18. Laboratory Experiments and 3D DDA Numerical Simulations on Rockfall Movement Characteristics: G. Liu et al10.1007/s00603-025-04648-9 ↗
19. Model development for shear sonic velocity using petrophysical log data: Sensitivity analysis and statistical assessment10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103778 ↗
20. Estimation of formation strength index of aquifer from neural networks10.1016/j.cageo.2008.11.010 ↗
21. Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of serpentinites through physical, dynamic and mechanical properties using neural networks10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.10.001 ↗
22. Geomechanical parameter estimation from mechanical specific energy using artificial intelligence10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.054 ↗
23. Khan, N.M., Cao, K., Yuan, Q., Bin Mohd Hashim, M.H., Rehman, H., Hussain, S., Emad, M.Z., Ullah, B., Shah, K.S., and Khan, S. (2022). Application of machine learning and multivariate statistics to predict uniaxial compressive strength and static Young’s modulus using physical properties under different thermal conditions. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14169901 ↗
24. Jan, M.S., Hussain, S., e Zahra, R., Emad, M.Z., Khan, N.M., Rehman, Z.U., Cao, K., Alarifi, S.S., Raza, S., and Sherin, S. (2023). Appraisal of different artificial intelligence techniques for the prediction of marble strength. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15118835 ↗
25. Soft ground tunnel lithology classification using clustering-guided light gradient boosting machine10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.02.013 ↗
26. Input-parameter optimization using a SVR based ensemble model to predict landslide displacements in a reservoir area–A comparative study10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111107 ↗
27. Predicting uniaxial compressive strength from drilling variables aided by hybrid machine learning10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105546 ↗
28. A machine learning model to predict unconfined compressive strength of alkali-activated slag-based cemented paste backfill10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.009 ↗
29. Hybrid soft computing models for predicting unconfined compressive strength of lime stabilized soil using strength property of virgin cohesive soil10.1007/s10064-023-03537-1 ↗
30. Evaluating Productivity in Opencast Mines: A Machine Learning Analysis of Drill-Blast and Surface Miner Operations10.1007/s11053-024-10429-y ↗
31. Empirical relationship between strength and petrophysical properties for weakly cemented formations10.1016/j.petrol.2010.03.011 ↗
32. Application of neural network technique for prediction of uniaxial compressive strength using reservoir formation properties10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.033 ↗
33. Artificial neural networks and nonlinear regression techniques to assess the influence of slake durability cycles on the prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for carbonate rocks10.1002/nag.1066 ↗
34. Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of carbonate rocks using artificial neural networks10.1007/s12665-012-1783-z ↗
35. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rock samples using hybrid particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural networks10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.075 ↗
36. Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of soft rocks: A PSO-based ANN approach10.1007/s10064-014-0638-0 ↗
37. Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence models for prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of travertine rocks, case study: Azarshahr area, NW Iran10.1007/s40808-016-0132-8 ↗
38. A new predictive model for rock strength parameters utilizing GEP method10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.222 ↗
39. Tariq, Z., Elkatatny, S., Mahmoud, M., Ali, A.Z., and Abdulraheem, A. (2017, January 8–10). A new technique to develop rock strength correlation using artificial intelligence tools. Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/186062-MS ↗
40. Data driven model for sonic well log prediction10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.072 ↗
41. Prediction of strength parameters of sedimentary rocks using artificial neural networks and regression analysis10.1007/s12517-018-3929-0 ↗
42. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of rock based on lithology using stacking models10.1016/j.rockmb.2023.100081 ↗
43. Machine learning models for predicting unconfined compressive strength: A case study for Precambrian basement complex rocks from Ado-Ekiti, Southwestern Nigeria
44. Enhancing of uniaxial compressive strength of travertine rock prediction through machine learning and multivariate analysis10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101593 ↗
45. Uniaxial compressive strength prediction for rock material in deep mine using Boosting-Based machine learning methods and optimization algorithms
46. Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of different rocks using principal component analysis and deep neural network
47. Data-driven resilient model development and feature selection for rock compressive strength prediction using machine learning and transformer techniques10.1007/s12145-025-01803-2 ↗
48. A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks10.1186/s44147-024-00574-9 ↗
49. Log Data-Driven Prediction of Rock Strength Using Least-Square Support Vector Machine Approach: Case Study of a Gas Well Reservoir
50. Optimized Gradient Boosting Models for Adaptive Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Carbonate Rocks Using Drilling Data10.1021/acsomega.4c09603 ↗
51. Predicting rock mass strength from drilling data using synergistic unsupervised and supervised machine learning approaches10.1007/s12145-025-01837-6 ↗
52. Estimation of Uniaxial Strength of Rock: A Comparison between Bayesian-Optimized Machine Learning Models
53. Prediction of formation water resistivity from Rwa analysis of Titas gas field using wireline log data
54. Porosity assessment of gas reservoir using wireline log data: A case study of bokabil formation, Bangladesh10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.789 ↗
55. Tectonic framework and evolutionary history of the Bengal Basin in the Indian subcontinent
56. Geodynamic model and tectono-structural framework of the Bengal Basin and its surroundings10.1080/17445647.2020.1770136 ↗
57. Improved model development and feature ranking for rock permeability prediction by coupling petrophysical log data and ensemble machine learning techniques10.1007/s12145-024-01593-z ↗
58. Weighted least squares support vector machines: Robustness and sparse approximation10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00644-0 ↗
59. Coupled simulated annealing
60. A tutorial on support vector regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗