Physics-Based Data Augmentation Enables Accurate Machine Learning Prediction of Melt Pool Geometry
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate melt pool geometry prediction is essential for ensuring quality and reliability in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF). However, small experimental datasets and limited physical interpretability often restrict the effectiveness of traditional machine learning (ML) models. This study proposes a hybrid framework that integrates an explicit thermal model with ML algorithms to improve prediction under sparse data conditions. The explicit model—calibrated for variable penetration depth and absorptivity—generates synthetic melt pool data, augmenting 36 experimental samples across conduction, transition, and keyhole regimes for 316 L stainless steel. Three ML methods—Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest, and XGBoost—are trained using fivefold cross-validation. The hybrid approach significantly improves prediction accuracy, especially in unstable transition regions (D/W ≈ 0.5–1.2), where morphological fluctuations hinder experimental sampling. The best-performing model (MLP) achieves R2 > 0.98, with notable reductions in MAE and RMSE. The results highlight the benefit of incorporating physically consistent, nonlinearly distributed synthetic data to enhance generalization and robustness. This physics-augmented learning strategy not only demonstrates scientific novelty by integrating mechanistic modeling into data-driven learning, but also provides a scalable solution for intelligent process optimization, in situ monitoring, and digital twin development in metal additive manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Funding
Hubei Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission and Manufacturing Engineering at Wuhan University of Science and Technology
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. (2015). Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Terminology (Standard No. ASTM52900-15).
2. Printability, microstructures, and mechanical properties of a novel Co-based superalloy fabricated via laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.jmst.2023.10.062 ↗
3. Assessing the compressive and tensile properties of TPMS-Gyroid and stochastic Ti64 lattice structures: A study on laser powder bed fusion manufacturing for biomedical implants10.1016/j.jsamd.2023.100663 ↗
4. Large sandwich sheets enabled by joining rolled sheets and additively manufactured core structures10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.034 ↗
5. Electrochemical behavior of alloy 22 processed by L-PBF10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140519 ↗
6. Effect of powder recycling on inclusion content in AISI 316L produced by L-PBF10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.017 ↗
7. Process planning of L-PBF of AISI 316L for improving surface quality and relating part integrity with microstructural characteristics10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125956 ↗
8. Exploring VHCF response in L-PBF AlSi7Mg alloy: Influence of T6 heat treatment on microstructural characteristics and defect distribution10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108471 ↗
9. Understanding melt pool characteristics in laser powder bed fusion: An overview of single- and multi-track melt pools for process optimization10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100137 ↗
10. Role of melt flow dynamics on track surface morphology in the L-PBF additive manufacturing process10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121602 ↗
11. On the lack of fusion porosity in L-PBF processes10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.008 ↗
12. The influence of novel beam shapes on melt pool shape and mechanical properties of L-PBF produced Al-alloy10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.12.007 ↗
13. Effect of laser power and scan speed on melt pool characteristics of commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti)10.1007/s11665-017-2768-6 ↗
14. Elucidating the effect of preheating temperature on melt pool morphology variation in Inconel 718 laser powder bed fusion via simulation and experiment
15. Single-track investigation of additively manufactured mold steel with larger layer thickness processing: Track morphology, melt pool characteristics and defects10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110378 ↗
16. Microstructure tailoring in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF): Strategies, challenges, and future outlooks10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172564 ↗
17. A Bézier curve fit to melt pool geometry for modeling additive manufacturing microstructures10.1016/j.cma.2023.116208 ↗
18. Melting pool simulation of 316L samples manufactured by selective laser melting method, comparison with experimental results10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107538 ↗
19. An adaptive smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) scheme for efficient melt pool simulations in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.camwa.2023.03.003 ↗
20. De Leon, E., Riensche, A., Bevans, B.D., and Billings, C. (2025). A review of modeling, simulation, and process qualification of additively manufactured metal components via the laser powder bed fusion method. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 9.10.3390/jmmp9010022 ↗
21. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives
22. Topology optimisation for design and additive manufacturing of functionally graded lattice structures using derivative-aware machine learning algorithms
23. Recent progress of sensing and machine learning technologies for process monitoring and defects detection in wire arc additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.060 ↗
24. A comprehensive study on the effects of surface post-processing on fatigue performance of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg: An augmented machine learning perspective on experimental observations
25. Mass finishing for additive manufacturing postprocessing: Tribological analysis, surface topology, image processing, predictive model, and processing recommendations10.1016/j.triboint.2024.110486 ↗
26. Towards a digital twin framework in additive manufacturing: Machine learning and Bayesian optimization for time series process optimization10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.04.023 ↗
27. Chemical composition based machine learning model to predict defect formation in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.mtla.2024.102041 ↗
28. Deep learning based porosity prediction for additively manufactured laser powder-bed fusion parts10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.130 ↗
29. MeltpoolNet: Melt pool characteristic prediction in metal additive manufacturing using machine learning
30. Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.095 ↗
31. Data-driven models for predictions of geometric characteristics of bead fabricated by selective laser melting10.1007/s10845-021-01845-5 ↗
32. Review of machine learning applications in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103676 ↗
33. Mundra, P., Debnath, D., and Garg, A. (2023). A Supervised Machine Learning Model for Regression to Predict Melt Pool Formation and Morphology in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Appl. Sci., 13.
34. Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: Towards a physics-informed data-driven paradigm10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.003 ↗
35. Mondal, S., Gwynn, D., Ray, A., and Basak, A. (2020). Investigation of Melt Pool Geometry Control in Additive Manufacturing Using Hybrid Modeling. Metals, 10.10.3390/met10050683 ↗
36. Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: Predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networks
37. Physics-informed deep learning of gas flow–melt pool multi-physical dynamics during powder bed fusion10.1016/j.cirp.2023.04.005 ↗
38. Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107614 ↗
39. Thermal field prediction for laser scanning paths in laser aided additive manufacturing by physics-based machine learning10.1016/j.cma.2019.112734 ↗
40. Calibration of laser penetration depth and absorptivity in finite element method based modeling of powder bed fusion melt pools10.1007/s12540-019-00599-3 ↗
41. Formation of scanning tracks during selective laser melting (SLM) of pure tungsten powder: Morphology, geometric features and forming mechanisms10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.11.003 ↗
42. Influence of processing parameters on the evolution of melt pool, porosity, and microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy parts fabricated by selective laser melting10.1007/s40964-017-0030-2 ↗
43. (2015). Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (Standard No. ASTM E8/E8M-15).
44. Keyhole fluctuation and pore formation mechanisms during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
45. Critical instability at moving keyhole tip generates porosity in laser melting10.1126/science.abd1587 ↗