Sustainable Packaging Design: Packaging Optimization and Material Reduction for Environmental Protection and Economic Benefits to Industry and Society
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper analyzes the concept of packaging redesign, with the primary objective of improving material utilization. It further examines the potential environmental and economic benefits that may result from effective packaging redesign for both industry and society. The research is based on a specific case study comparing two alternative bottle designs with identical capacity, focusing on shape, material usage, and space efficiency. A detailed numerical comparison highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each option. The analysis demonstrates that an optimized bottle design can lead to substantial material savings and waste reduction. For example, an 8% reduction in bottle weight could eliminate approximately 1.6 million tons of material annually, potentially translating into economic savings exceeding 3 billion U.S. dollars per year. The study underscores how strategic packaging redesign can yield significant benefits in terms of material efficiency and cost savings for companies. It also contributes to the field of Life Cycle Analysis by linking packaging design innovation to key environmental and economic outcomes, while ensuring that packaging continues to protect products and meet the needs of the end consumer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Supply Chain Management, International Hellenic University, 60100 Katerini, Greece
School of Mathematics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Department of People and Organisations, Faculty of Business and Law, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
References (95)
Show source-provided references
1. COVID–19 in transport industry: The case of Kazakhstan: Government measures and public reaction10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.148 ↗
2. Gulseven, O., Al Harmoodi, F., Al Falasi, M., and Alshomali, I. (2020). How the COVID-19 pandemic will affect the UN Sustainable Development Goals?. SSRN Electron. J., 3592933.10.2139/ssrn.3592933 ↗
3. COVID-19 pandemic as sustainability determinant of e-commerce in the creation of information society10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.501 ↗
4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2021, August 13). Climate Change Impacts, Available online: https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/climate/climate-change-impacts.
5. Alexander, L.V., Allen, S.K., Bindoff, N.L., Bréon, F.-M., Church, J.A., Cubasch, U., Emori, S., Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., and Gillett, N.P. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press.
6. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., and Gomis, M.I. (2021). Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
7. Global temperature evolution 1979–201010.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044022 ↗
8. Climate change: Challenging business, transforming politics10.1177/0007650311427659 ↗
9. Allen, M., Barros, V., and Broome, J. (2014). IPCC Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report—Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report, IPCC.
10. Global climate change and mental health10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.023 ↗
11. For whom the bell tolls: Climate change and income inequality10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113475 ↗
12. Pre- and post-production processes increasingly dominate greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems10.5194/essd-14-1795-2022 ↗
13. Identifying hot spots of security vulnerability associated with climate change in Africa10.1007/s10584-014-1142-z ↗
14. Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford University Press.
15. The impact of climate change on incomes and convergence in Africa10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104699 ↗
16. The economics of sustainability in the context of climate change: An overview10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.008 ↗
17. Vulnerability to climate change: Are innovative countries in a better position?10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101098 ↗
18. Financing climate policies through climate bonds—A three stage model and empirics10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.06.001 ↗
19. Impacts from climate change on organizations: A conceptual foundation10.1002/bse.679 ↗
20. A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: Empirical evidences from 133 countries10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.045 ↗
21. Decoupling China’s economic growth from carbon emissions: Empirical studies from 30 Chinese provinces (2001–2015)10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.384 ↗
22. Carbon emission evaluation model and carbon reduction strategies for newly urbanized areas10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.026 ↗
23. United Nations (2024, September 17). Paris Agreement. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.
24. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C10.1038/nature18307 ↗
25. The environmental effects of economic growth and globalization in Sub-Saharan Africa: A panel general method of moments approach10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.028 ↗
26. Offermann-van Heek, J., Arning, K., Linzenich, A., and Ziefle, M. (2018). Trust and distrust in carbon capture and utilization industry as relevant factors for the acceptance of carbon-based products. Front. Energy Res., 6.10.3389/fenrg.2018.00073 ↗
27. Georgakoudis, E.D. (2014). Packaging Operations Within the Greek Logistic Industry: Evaluating and Redesigning Paper Packaging in Compliance with Environmental Regulations. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Huddersfield].
28. Propensity to support sustainability initiatives: A cross-national model10.1007/s10551-011-0979-6 ↗
29. Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability
30. Knowledge and the climate change issue: An exploratory study of cluster and extra-cluster effects10.1007/s10551-013-1901-1 ↗
31. The influence of climate change on renewable energy systems designed to achieve zero energy buildings in the present: A case study in the Brazilian savannah10.1016/j.scs.2019.101843 ↗
32. Energy performance investigation of net plus energy town: Energy balance of the Jincheon Eco-Friendly Energy Town10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.113 ↗
33. The new 3Ps of sustainability marketing: The case of fashion10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.004 ↗
34. Bak, Ö. (2021). Packaging Design and Sustainability—The Case of Paper Packaging Supply Chain. Sustainable and Green Supply Chains and Logistics: Case Study Collection, Kogan Page.
35. The packaging redesign issue—Space exploitation and environmental benefits10.1108/MEQ-08-2021-0195 ↗
36. Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: A case study10.1016/0921-3449(96)01105-6 ↗
37. Economic cost recovery in the recycling of packaging waste: The case of Portugal10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.043 ↗
38. Fraser, D. (2022, March 07). The Effect of War on Food Prices. BBC News, Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-60644376.
39. Simchi-Levi, D., and Haren, P. (2025, March 19). How the War in Ukraine is Further Disrupting Global Supply Chains. Harvard Business Review, Available online: https://hbr.org/2022/03/how-the-war-in-ukraine-is-further-disrupting-global-supply-chains.
40. The raw material supply of the European Community: The importance of secondary raw materials10.1016/0301-4207(78)90045-4 ↗
41. How much does recycling reduce imports? Evidence from metallic raw materials10.1080/21606544.2018.1520650 ↗
42. Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in developed, emerging and Middle East and North Africa countries10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.126 ↗
43. Electricity consumption, CO2 emission, and economic growth in the Middle East10.1080/15567249.2012.658958 ↗
44. The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emissions on economic growth: Fresh evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equations models10.1016/j.scs.2014.05.004 ↗
45. Causality between income and emission: A country group-specific econometric analysis10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00280-4 ↗
46. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions?10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.011 ↗
47. The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 203010.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.001 ↗
48. What drives the carbon emission in the Chinese cities?—A case of pilot low carbon city of Beijing10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.333 ↗
49. Determining China’s CO2 emissions peak with a dynamic nonlinear artificial neural network approach and scenario analysis10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.058 ↗
50. Econometric modeling of CO2 emissions abatement: Comparing alternative approaches10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.001 ↗
51. An economic analysis of waste heat recovery and utilization in data centers considering environmental benefits10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.006 ↗
52. Considering infrastructure when calculating emissions for freight transportation10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.013 ↗
53. Industrial growth and emissions of CO2 in Ghana: The role of financial development and fossil fuel consumption10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.002 ↗
54. The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.269 ↗
55. Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes10.3763/cpol.2002.0236 ↗
56. What drives CO2 emissions from the transport sector? A linkage analysis10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.052 ↗
57. Minimizing losses in milk supply chain with sustainability: An example from an emerging economy10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.020 ↗
58. Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0 ↗
59. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?10.1006/jeem.2000.1132 ↗
60. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011 ↗
61. A review on European Union’s strategy for plastics in a circular economy and its impact on food safety10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125263 ↗
62. Food packaging—Roles, materials, and environmental issues10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x ↗
63. An overview of the problems posed by plastic products and the role of extended producer responsibility in Europe10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.256 ↗
64. Laville, S., and Taylor, M. (2017, June 28). A Million Bottles a Minute: World’s Plastic Binge “As Dangerous as Climate Change”. The Guardian. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/28/a-million-a-minute-worlds-plastic-bottle-binge-as-dangerous-as-climate-change.
65. Tap versus bottled water consumption: The influence of social norms, affect and image on consumer choice10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.090 ↗
66. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made10.1126/sciadv.1700782 ↗
67. Making citizen science count: Best practices and challenges of citizen science projects on plastics in aquatic environments10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.05.056 ↗
68. Plastic waste management, a matter for the “community”10.1111/1751-7915.13328 ↗
69. An arboreal docodont from the Jurassic and mammaliaform ecological diversification10.1126/science.1260879 ↗
70. Cózar, A., Sanz-Martín, M., Martí, E., González-Gordillo, J.I., Ubeda, B., Gálvez, J.Á., Irigoien, X., and Duarte, C.M. (2015). Plastic accumulation in the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0121762 ↗
71. Environmental impact of biodegradable food packaging when considering food waste10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.169 ↗
72. Plastic waste from recycling centres: Characterisation and evaluation of plastic recyclability10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.038 ↗
73. Plastic packaging goes sustainable: An analysis of consumer preferences for plastic water bottles10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.014 ↗
74. Calver, G. (2004). What Is Packaging Design?, RotoVision.
75. (2025, April 16). Sustainability|Meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary. Cambridge Dictionary, Available online: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sustainability.
76. Sustainable Packaging Coalition (2025, May 12). About Us—Sustainable Packaging Coalition. Available online: https://sustainablepackaging.org/about-us.
77. Packaging technology for home meal replacement: Innovations and future prospective10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108470 ↗
78. Packaging redesign—Benefits for the environment and the community10.1080/19397038.2018.1445789 ↗
79. Eco-efficient value creation: An alternative perspective on packaging and sustainability10.1002/pts.1978 ↗
80. Absolute versus relative environmental sustainability
81. Combining eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness for continuous loop beverage packaging systems: Lessons from the Carlsberg Circular Community10.1111/jiec.12554 ↗
82. Design assessment framework for food packaging integrating consumer preferences and environmental impact10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.027 ↗
83. Keller, J., Scagnetti, C., and Albrecht, S. (2022). The relevance of recyclability for the life cycle assessment of packaging based on design for life cycle. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14074076 ↗
84. Sustainable packaging design: A holistic methodology for packaging design10.1002/pts.887 ↗
85. Ecodesign approach for plastic minimization in shampoo bottles10.1002/pts.2760 ↗
86. Current trends in the German packaging industry10.17270/J.LOG.2022.688 ↗
87. Environmentally sustainable plastic food packaging: A holistic life cycle thinking approach for design decisions10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136680 ↗
88. Ranking eco-innovations to enable a sustainable circular economy with net-zero emissions10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05732 ↗
89. Analyzing the environmental sustainability of packaging for household appliances: A test case10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.106 ↗
90. Tiseo, I. (2023, September 12). PET Global Bottle Production 2021. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/723191/production-of-polyethylene-terephthalate-bottles-worldwide.
91. Patel, U. (2019, September 03). Aluminium vs. Plastic: Who’ll Win the Water Bottle War? Wood Mackenzie. Available online: https://www.woodmac.com/news/feature/aluminium-vs-plastic-who-will-win-the-water-bottle-war.
92. Plastics Information Europe (2023, May 04). Polymer Prices—Plastics Information Europe. PIE Web. Available online: https://pieweb.plasteurope.com/Default.aspx?pageid=199&docid=24983.
93. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, McKinsey Company, and World Economic Forum (2016, December 03). The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the Future of Plastics. Available online: https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/the-new-plastics-economy-rethinking-the-future-of-plastics.
94. Choice of environment-friendly food packagings through argumentation systems and preferences10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.07.006 ↗
95. European Environment Agency (2021, June 06). Special Report: The Polluter Pays Principle. Available online: https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR21_12/SR_polluter_pays_principle_EN.pdf.