The Impact of Digital Technology Use on Teaching Quality in University Physical Education: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Amid the ongoing digital transformation of higher education, increasing attention has been paid to the impact of digital technologies on teaching quality—particularly in physical education settings that require high levels of interaction and physical engagement. This study examined 1158 university students across China using a cross-sectional design, integrating interpretable machine learning models with structural equation modeling to systematically assess how the frequency of use of seven common digital technologies influences teaching quality in physical education classes. The study also investigated the mediating roles of perceived teacher support and academic self-efficacy. Nine machine learning models and logistic regression analyses were conducted to predict teaching quality, employing feature permutation importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to evaluate the relative contribution of each digital tool. Results identified multimedia courseware, e-textbooks, and question banks as the most influential predictors of teaching quality. The SHAP analysis further revealed that management software, educational websites, and multimedia materials had significant positive effects and exhibited synergistic interactions in improving teaching outcomes. Structural equation modeling showed that digital technology use had a significant direct positive effect on teaching quality (B = 0.347, p < 0.001). Moreover, perceived teacher support and academic self-efficacy not only served as independent mediators (95% CI = [0.146, 0.226], p < 0.001; 95% CI = [0.024, 0.063], p < 0.001) but also functioned as a chain mediating effect (95% CI = [0.036, 0.083], p < 0.001). This study is the first to integrate interpretable machine learning with structural modeling to elucidate the mechanisms through which digital technologies influence teaching quality in university-level physical education. The findings underscore the critical mediating roles of teacher support and student self-efficacy, providing both theoretical contributions and practical implications for enhancing digital pedagogy in higher education.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Physical Education and Pedagogy · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, China
Funding
Shandong Humanities and Social Sciences Project
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Evaluation of teacher professional learning workshops on the use of technology—A systematic review
2. Teaching in a Digital Age: How Educators Use Technology to Improve Student Learning10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856 ↗
3. Smart Colleges: Analyzing a 5G-Enabled Smart English Hybrid Teaching System10.1016/j.chb.2024.108275 ↗
4. VR-CPES: A Novel Cyber-Physical Education Systems for Interactive VR Services Based on a Mobile Platform
5. Kinshuk Virtual reality and gamification in education: A systematic review10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3 ↗
6. Optimization of physical education and training system based on machine learning and Internet of Things10.1007/s00521-021-06278-y ↗
7. Zhang, L., Gao, J., Zhao, L., Liu, Z., and Guan, A. (2025). Predicting College Student Engagement in Physical Education Classes Using Machine Learning and Structural Equation Modeling. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15073884 ↗
8. Data analysis of physical recovery and injury prevention in sports teaching based on wearable devices10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107589 ↗
9. Cai, X., Xian, Y., Liu, T., Zhou, Y., Chen, Q., and Cui, H. (2025). A study on factors influencing digital sports participation among Chinese secondary school students based on explainable machine learning. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-00769-x ↗
10. Pang, Y., Zhang, K., and Li, F. (2025). Explainable quality assessment of effective aligned skeletal representations for martial arts movements by multi-machine learning decisions. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-024-83475-4 ↗
11. Key Frame Detection in Badminton Swings and Its Application to Physical Education10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572105 ↗
12. The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model10.1080/0264041031000140374 ↗
13. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 ↗
14. Teacher support, academic engagement and learning anxiety in online foreign language learning10.1111/bjet.13430 ↗
15. Assessing the effects of student perceptions of instructional quality: A cross-subject within-student design10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102085 ↗
16. Relations between perceived teacher support and academic achievement: Positive emotions and learning engagement as mediators10.1007/s12144-022-03668-w ↗
17. Teacher agency and ICT affordances in classroom-based language assessment: The return to face-to-face classes after online teaching10.1016/j.system.2023.103218 ↗
18. Deng, Y., and Liu, H. (2025). To overcome test anxiety in on-line assessment: Unpacking the mediator roles of techno competencies, teacher support, self-efficacy, and autonomy. BMC Psychol., 13.10.1186/s40359-025-02545-y ↗
19. Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066 ↗
20. Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 ↗
21. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 ↗
22. The relationship between computer games and computer self-efficacy with academic engagement: The mediating role of students’ creativity10.1007/s10639-023-11757-x ↗
23. Relationships between middle school students’ digital literacy skills, computer programming self-efficacy, and computational thinking self-efficacy
24. Hori, R., and Fujii, M. (2021). Impact of Using ICT for Learning Purposes on Self-Efficacy and Persistence: Evidence from Pisa 2018. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116463 ↗
25. Do Achievement Goals Differently Orient Students’ Academic Engagement Through Learning Strategy and Academic Self-Efficacy and Vary by Grade10.2147/PRBM.S424593 ↗
26. Class-Related Emotions in Secondary Physical Education: A Control-Value Theory Approach10.1123/jtpe.2016-0131 ↗
27. Han, J., Geng, X., and Wang, Q. (2021). Sustainable Development of University EFL Learners’ Engagement, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy in Online Learning Environments: Chinese Experiences. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132111655 ↗
28. Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 ↗
29. Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006 ↗
30. Teacher support and learning engagement of EFL learners: The mediating role of self-efficacy and achievement goal orientation10.1007/s12144-022-04043-5 ↗
31. An, F., Yu, J., and Xi, L. (2022). Relationship between perceived teacher support and learning engagement among adolescents: Mediation role of technology acceptance and learning motivation. Front. Psychol., 13.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992464 ↗
32. Guo, Q., Samsudin, S., Yang, X., Gao, J., Ramlan, M.A., Abdullah, B., and Farizan, N.H. (2023). Relationship between Perceived Teacher Support and Student Engagement in Physical Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15076039 ↗
33. Chinese knot-like electrode design for advanced Li-S batteries10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.065 ↗
34. EFL teacher-student interaction, teacher immediacy, and Students’ academic engagement in the Chinese higher learning context10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104185 ↗
35. Miscalibration of self-efficacy and academic performance: Self-efficacy ≠ self-fulfilling prophecy10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.002 ↗
36. Connecting rural schools to quality education: Rural teachers’ use of digital educational resources10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.009 ↗
37. Measuring and changing teachers’ differential behavior as perceived by students and teachers10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.683 ↗
38. Ou, Y.D. (2005). A Study on the Relationship Between Teacher Expectations, Academic Self-Concept, Students’ Perception of Teacher Support Behaviors and Academic Performance. [Master’s Thesis, Guangxi Normal University].
39. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 ↗
40. Liang, Y.S. (2002). A Study on College Students’ Achievement Goals, Attribution Styles and Academic Self-Efficacy. [Master’s Thesis, Central China Normal University].
41. Teacher beliefs, classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroom learning environment: A multilevel analysis10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104501 ↗
42. Supporting students’ intrinsic motivation for online learning tasks: The effect of need-supportive task instructions on motivation, self-assessment, and task performance10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104663 ↗
43. Flipped learning in physical education: A scoping review10.1177/1356336X221120939 ↗
44. Development of a Cloud-based Network Teaching Platform10.3991/ijet.v13i04.8258 ↗
45. Rethinking the Traditional Textbook: A Case for Open Educational Resources (OER) and No-Cost Learning Materials10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.13 ↗
46. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0 ↗
47. Teaching Games for Understanding and Situated Learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model10.1123/jtpe.21.2.177 ↗
48. Teacher Effectiveness in Physical Education—Consensus?10.1080/02701367.2014.932656 ↗
49. Pan, X. (2022). Exploring the multidimensional relationships between educational situation perception, teacher support, online learning engagement, and academic self-efficacy in technology-based language learning. Front. Psychol., 13.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000069 ↗
50. Xu, B. (2024). Mediating role of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relationship between teacher support and academic achievement. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-75768-5 ↗
51. Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148 ↗
52. Linking web-based learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in MOOCs: The role of online academic hardiness10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100819 ↗