Methodology for Feature Selection of Time Domain Vibration Signals for Assessing the Failure Severity Levels in Gearboxes
Source abstract
Abstract
Early failure detection in gear systems reduces unplanned downtime and associated maintenance costs in rotating machinery. Although numerous indicators can be extracted from vibration signals, selecting the most relevant ones remains challenging. This study proposes a methodology for selecting time-domain features to classify fault severity levels in spur gearboxes. Vibration signals are acquired using six accelerometers and processed to extract 64 statistical condition indicators (CIs). The most informative subset of CIs is identified and selected through a wrapper-based selection approach and artificial intelligence tools. The selected features are then evaluated based on the classification accuracy and the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) achieved using Random Forest (RF) and K-nearest neighbours (K-NN) models, with performance exceeding 98%. Additionally, the effect of sensor position and inclination on signal quality and classification performance is analysed using factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison tests. The results confirm the robustness of the selected CIs and the minimal influence of sensor placement variability, supporting the practical applicability of the proposed approach in industrial settings. The methodology offers a structured framework for selecting condition indicators in vibration signals, experimentally validated using multiple sensors and fault severity levels, and it is both automated and straightforward to implement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Statistics and Operational Research, and Quality, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Grupo de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnologías Industriales (GIDTEC), Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010102, Ecuador
Funding
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana and Universitat Politècnica de València
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. A novel dynamic predictive maintenance framework for gearboxes utilizing 341 nonlinear Wiener process10.1088/1361-6501/ad762e ↗
2. A systematic review on failure modes and proposed methodology to artificially seed faults for promoting PHM studies in laboratory environment for an industrial gearbox10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107076 ↗
3. Fault diagnosis in spur gears based on genetic algorithm and random forest10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.030 ↗
4. Selection of the level of vibration signal decomposition and mother wavelets to determine the level of failure severity in spur gearboxes10.1002/qre.3578 ↗
5. Sendlbeck, S., Fimpel, A., Siewerin, B., Otto, M., and Stahl, K. (2021). Condition monitoring of slow-speed gear wear using a transmission error-based approach with automated feature selection. Int. J. Progn. Health Manag., 12.10.36001/ijphm.2021.v12i2.3026 ↗
6. Seo, M.K., and Yun, W.Y. (2024). Gearbox Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis of Unlabeled Vibration Signals Using a Supervised Learning Classifier. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12020127 ↗
7. A review of gear fault diagnosis using various condition indicators10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.131 ↗
8. Fault severity detection of a worm gearbox based on several feature extraction methods through a developed condition monitoring system10.1007/s42452-020-04131-w ↗
9. Gearbox condition monitoring in wind turbines: A review10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.03.052 ↗
10. Feature ranking for multi-fault diagnosis of rotating machinery by using random forest and KNN
11. Gear fault intelligent diagnosis based on frequency-domain feature extraction10.1007/s42417-019-00089-1 ↗
12. A comparison of feature ranking techniques for fault diagnosis of ball bearing10.1007/s00500-015-1608-6 ↗
13. Analysis of statistical time-domain features effectiveness in identification of bearing faults from vibration signal10.1109/JSEN.2017.2727638 ↗
14. Gear crack level identification based on weighted K nearest neighbor classification algorithm10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.01.009 ↗
15. A Machine Learning-Based Wrapper Method for Feature Selection10.4018/IJDWM.352041 ↗
16. Feature selection for fault level diagnosis of planetary gearboxes10.1007/s11634-014-0168-4 ↗
17. Hybrid wrapper feature selection method based on genetic algorithm and extreme learning machine for intrusion detection10.1186/s40537-024-00887-9 ↗
18. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.J. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429246593 ↗
19. Raschka, S. (2018). Model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning. arXiv.
20. Combination of probability approach and support vector machine towards machine health prognostics10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.09.008 ↗
21. Intelligent fault diagnosis for tribo-mechanical systems by machine learning: Multi-feature extraction and ensemble voting methods10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112694 ↗
22. Guo, K., Wan, X., Liu, L., Gao, Z., and Yang, M. (2021). Fault diagnosis of intelligent production line based on digital twin and improved random forest. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167733 ↗
23. Optimal sensor placement for identifying multi-component failures in a wind turbine gearbox using integrated condition monitoring scheme10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108505 ↗
24. Optimization of sound sensor placement for condition monitoring of fixed-axis gearbox10.1080/23311916.2017.1345673 ↗
25. Data-Driven Approach for Fault Diagnosis of Harmonic Drives Using Wireless Acceleration Sensors and Machine Learning10.1007/s40684-025-00728-x ↗
26. An explainable unsupervised learning framework for scalable machine fault detection in Industry 4.010.1088/1361-6501/ace640 ↗
27. Rigas, S., Papachristou, M., Sotiropoulos, I., and Alexandridis, G. (2025). Explainable Fault Classification and Severity Diagnosis in Rotating Machinery Using Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks. Entropy, 27.10.3390/e27040403 ↗
28. Comparative analysis of support vector machine, random forest and k-nearest neighbor classifiers for predicting remaining usage life of roller bearings10.31449/inf.v48i7.5726 ↗
29. Fault Diagnosis in Chemical Reactors with Data-Driven Methods10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04042 ↗
30. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
31. The Distance-Weighted k-Nearest-Neighbor Rule10.1109/TSMC.1976.5408784 ↗
32. Hybrid k-Nearest Neighbor Classifier10.1109/TCYB.2015.2443857 ↗
33. Prasath, V., Alfeilat, H.A.A., Hassanat, A., Lasassmeh, O., Tarawneh, A.S., Alhasanat, M.B., and Salman, H.S.E. (2017). Distance and Similarity Measures Effect on the Performance of K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier—A Review. arXiv.
34. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2 ↗
35. R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
36. Feature extraction based on the Bhattacharyya distance10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00035-9 ↗
37. Rencher, A.C. (1998). Multivariate Statistical Inference and Applications, Wiley.
38. Feature selection and classification of mechanical fault of an induction motor using random forest classifier10.1016/j.pisc.2016.04.068 ↗